Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> Wrote in message:

> > make use of the convection cooling as well. This means the fan can be>>>> smaller and less noisy.>>> >>> Bollocks, the fan makes no detectable noise when spinning at minimum speed.>> >> It can run at lower speeds because of the making use of convection cooling.> > Once it's spinning, convection cannot occur. The air is moving faster than> convection.

>One force does not stop when another starts, and presumably the fan is not running all the time.<

Look up the definition for convection cooling. Once air begins to
circulate the convection aspect drops out. The fan doesn't run
all the time. It's like an electric fan on your car or truck. It
only comes on when the coolant temperature gets to the turn on
point. And it shuts back down when the coolant temperature drops
back down to the preset temperature. An additional electric fan
will go from slow if its being used at all to high if the AC is
in use - to assist in removing additional heat build up by a
harder working engine. That compressor isn't going to turn
itself.

--
Ask Snit how he pissed on his cat and his hallucination about the
eyeball. Heavy pharma abuse = a Snit
<https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews>

"Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> Wrote in message:

>Are you so bored with your life that you reply to me about someone else?

Yes. We are.

Some of us sadly live in a city where the elected officials have
enforced another mask mandate. Due to covid delta variant spread.
We're back to remote office work. We are beyond bored.

--
Ask Snit how he pissed on his cat and his hallucination about the
eyeball. Heavy pharma abuse = a Snit
<https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews>

On Jul 23, 2021 at 11:46:45 AM MST, "Rabid Roach" wrote
<r8EKI.30574$rr3.22336@fx34.iad>:

> On 2021-07-23 2:03 p.m., Snit wrote:
>> On Jul 23, 2021 at 8:45:02 AM MST, "Rabid Roach" wrote
>> <4uBKI.81720$Vv6.14245@fx45.iad>:
>>
>>> On 2021-07-23 8:47 a.m., pothead wrote:
>>>> On 2021-07-23, Rabid Roach <rabid@roa.ch> wrote:
>>>>> On 2021-07-22 11:44 p.m., AJL wrote:
>>>>>> Snit wrote:
>>>>>>> On Jul 22, 2021 at 8:48:29 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That's why you neanderthals still have guns.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Who is going to pay the government to stop people from having guns?
>>>>>>> You?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In a US city I lived in around 40 years ago the city council voted to
>>>>>> buy guns (all types) from the public and then destroyed them. They had
>>>>>> lots of takers. The program lasted for a couple of years as I recall. I
>>>>>> don't remember if it did any good at the time but currently the city has
>>>>>> the same gun problem as the rest in its size class (6M pop metro).
>>>>>
>>>>> Buying back guns from lawful owners simply means that when the thugs who
>>>>> got them illegally decide to commit crimes, nobody will be able to stop
>>>>> them. If your country gives you the right and the ability to defend
>>>>> yourself, why the heck would you sacrifice it?
>>>>
>>>> Gun control will never work.
>>>> How well did prohibition work out?
>>>
>>> It made a bunch of Italians who otherwise would have submitted to a
>>> lifetime of grunt work very wealthy and powerful.
>>>
>>>> And the problem with stricter gun laws is that it will be the first
>>>> step toward taking away the right of the citizens to legally own
>>>> firearms.
>>>>
>>>> This is the way the government works.
>>>> They take away your rights in incremental steps and before you know it,
>>>> that constitutional right no longer exists.
>>>
>>> The American Constitution, what I've long considered to be the greatest
>>> legal document ever written, has been ignored for so long that speaking
>>> about it has become pointless.
>>
>> It is not ignored -- it is used and referenced daily. I get how you right
>> wingers want to piss all over it as you toss out the very idea of a
>> representative government, and as you hate the founding principle of all
>> people being made equal (having equal rights), but those things matter to a
>> lot of us (liberals).
>
> Remind us which side wants to limit both the First and the Second
> Amendments.
>
>> That does not mean the document is perfect, nor the people who wrote it, nor
>> even that they all agreed.
>>
>>> I only hope that this takeover of the
>>> United States by China which is rapidly destroying the fabric of society
>>> will be reversed but I doubt that it will be. They have way too many
>>> allies in the country, especially in academia and the legacy media, that
>>> I don't foresee the country ever restoring itself to past greatness.
>>
>> It is not ignored -- it is used and referenced daily. I get how you right
>> wingers want to piss all over it as you toss out the very idea of a
>> representative government, and as you hate the founding principle of all
>> people being made equal (having equal rights), but those things matter to a
>> lot of us (liberals).

>> That does not mean the document is perfect, nor the people who wrote it, nor
>> even that they all agreed.

> Ignored.

Clearly not. You just have no reasoned response.

>> Why do you make such things up? Are you working on a fiction novel?
>>
>> What you are showing is what we see on the right: to push their views they
>> have to actively work against the very idea of an education. And they think
>> colleges and universities are liberal because of some grand scheme. Nope.
>> There are two factors which make them be generally liberal:
>>
>> 1) People from multiple walks of life go there. People of different races and
>> cultures and views. It is hard to go there and keep yourself in a
>> narrow-minded worldview, just as it is in diverse cities. You see others and
>> learn your ways are not the only ways, and not necessarily the best ways.
>>
>> 2) You look at evidence and reason and logic, you study science and engage in
>> fact checking.
>>
>> These two things are the opposite of what sustains the conservative movement,
>> so they hate education.

Nor any reasoned response to this.

>
> <snip opinion I never asked for >
>
>>> I honestly think that three years is as long as the people need to
>>> resist this vaccine. By then, if the physicians stating that they are
>>> causing microscopic blood clots are correct and that the "inoculated"
>>> have condemned themselves to death within that time, then the government
>>> will have no choice but to admit it, give their typical insincere
>>> "sorry" to the surviving population and pretend that it wasn't part of
>>> their plan before the public storms their offices and hangs every last
>>> one of them.
>>
>> See: You are actively and willfully not just ignorant, but you embrace the
>> most absurd of ideas. Such nonsense is hard to maintain if you get an
>> education.
>
> I saved the link and people are free to either watch physicians who
> actually know what they're talking about
> <https://tv.gab.com/channel/r04ch/view/doctors-admit-that-vaccinated-will-die-60fadc7a8d0a91ce5a5a0499>
> or read your ignorance.

You prove my point: you seek out misinformation and actively work to stay
ignorant. You create false fears and insist they are real.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> Wrote in message:

>Just looked at read posts. Good grief Gremlin is desperate for attention.<

Have you seen a post from Gremlin more recent than his posts from
June? We haven't either. We invite you again to support your
accusation that we're a sock. How many more invites do you need
before you can support your statement?

Why are you continuing to duck when asked to support your claim
about Gremlin? As hard as you've worked to slime him - you should
be jumping at the chances we've given you to nail him to a cross
for socking. So why aren't you Snit?

>Has he ever lost it as badly as this?

There you go again Snit. Writing more trashy bullshit about
someone you claimed to want peace with who hasn't posted since
June. You aren't fooling anyone with this Snit.

When Gremlin returns to usenet and reads the posts you've been
writing since he's been gone - do you really think he's going to
assume you were serious about the peace? He hasn't interacted
with you in any way for over a month now. Do explain yourself
Snit.

You have to know by now you've trashed your reputation here right?
You called Apd a liar and then pranced around what you did. Great
job alienating yourself further idiot.

--
Ask Snit how he pissed on his cat and his hallucination about the
eyeball. Heavy pharma abuse = a Snit
<https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews>

On 2021-07-23 1:56 p.m., LegionX wrote:
> "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> Wrote in message:
>
>> Are you so bored with your life that you reply to me about someone else?
>
> Yes. We are.
>
> Some of us sadly live in a city where the elected officials have
> enforced another mask mandate. Due to covid delta variant spread.
> We're back to remote office work. We are beyond bored.
>

But your still alive and not in An ICU.

Rene

On 2021-07-23 2:56 p.m., LegionX wrote:
> "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> Wrote in message:
>
>> Are you so bored with your life that you reply to me about someone else?
>
> Yes. We are.
>
> Some of us sadly live in a city where the elected officials have
> enforced another mask mandate. Due to covid delta variant spread.
> We're back to remote office work. We are beyond bored.

The "delta variant" is basically one that was created by those who chose
to get "vaccinated" with a concoction that is likely to kill them. It is
more contagious but also less potent.

--
Rabid Roach
John 15:18

On 2021-07-23 3:02 p.m., Snit wrote:
> On Jul 23, 2021 at 11:46:45 AM MST, "Rabid Roach" wrote
> <r8EKI.30574$rr3.22336@fx34.iad>:
>
>> On 2021-07-23 2:03 p.m., Snit wrote:
>>> On Jul 23, 2021 at 8:45:02 AM MST, "Rabid Roach" wrote
>>> <4uBKI.81720$Vv6.14245@fx45.iad>:
>>>
>>>> On 2021-07-23 8:47 a.m., pothead wrote:
>>>>> On 2021-07-23, Rabid Roach <rabid@roa.ch> wrote:
>>>>>> On 2021-07-22 11:44 p.m., AJL wrote:
>>>>>>> Snit wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Jul 22, 2021 at 8:48:29 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That's why you neanderthals still have guns.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Who is going to pay the government to stop people from having guns?
>>>>>>>> You?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In a US city I lived in around 40 years ago the city council voted to
>>>>>>> buy guns (all types) from the public and then destroyed them. They had
>>>>>>> lots of takers. The program lasted for a couple of years as I recall. I
>>>>>>> don't remember if it did any good at the time but currently the city has
>>>>>>> the same gun problem as the rest in its size class (6M pop metro).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Buying back guns from lawful owners simply means that when the thugs who
>>>>>> got them illegally decide to commit crimes, nobody will be able to stop
>>>>>> them. If your country gives you the right and the ability to defend
>>>>>> yourself, why the heck would you sacrifice it?
>>>>>
>>>>> Gun control will never work.
>>>>> How well did prohibition work out?
>>>>
>>>> It made a bunch of Italians who otherwise would have submitted to a
>>>> lifetime of grunt work very wealthy and powerful.
>>>>
>>>>> And the problem with stricter gun laws is that it will be the first
>>>>> step toward taking away the right of the citizens to legally own
>>>>> firearms.
>>>>>
>>>>> This is the way the government works.
>>>>> They take away your rights in incremental steps and before you know it,
>>>>> that constitutional right no longer exists.
>>>>
>>>> The American Constitution, what I've long considered to be the greatest
>>>> legal document ever written, has been ignored for so long that speaking
>>>> about it has become pointless.
>>>
>>> It is not ignored -- it is used and referenced daily. I get how you right
>>> wingers want to piss all over it as you toss out the very idea of a
>>> representative government, and as you hate the founding principle of all
>>> people being made equal (having equal rights), but those things matter to a
>>> lot of us (liberals).
>>
>> Remind us which side wants to limit both the First and the Second
>> Amendments.
>>
>>> That does not mean the document is perfect, nor the people who wrote it, nor
>>> even that they all agreed.
>>>
>>>> I only hope that this takeover of the
>>>> United States by China which is rapidly destroying the fabric of society
>>>> will be reversed but I doubt that it will be. They have way too many
>>>> allies in the country, especially in academia and the legacy media, that
>>>> I don't foresee the country ever restoring itself to past greatness.
>>>
>>> It is not ignored -- it is used and referenced daily. I get how you right
>>> wingers want to piss all over it as you toss out the very idea of a
>>> representative government, and as you hate the founding principle of all
>>> people being made equal (having equal rights), but those things matter to a
>>> lot of us (liberals).
>
>>> That does not mean the document is perfect, nor the people who wrote it, nor
>>> even that they all agreed.
>
>> Ignored.
>
> Clearly not. You just have no reasoned response.

You can change newsgroups but you're still the despicable troll who was
chased out of comp.sys.mac.advocacy and universally ignored in
comp.os.linux.advocacy. I was willing to give your Marxist ass yet
another chance but I already regret it. Into the filter you go.

--
Rabid Roach
John 15:18

On 2021-07-23, Rabid Roach <rabid@roa.ch> wrote:
> On 2021-07-23 3:02 p.m., Snit wrote:
>> On Jul 23, 2021 at 11:46:45 AM MST, "Rabid Roach" wrote
>> <r8EKI.30574$rr3.22336@fx34.iad>:
>>
>>> On 2021-07-23 2:03 p.m., Snit wrote:
>>>> On Jul 23, 2021 at 8:45:02 AM MST, "Rabid Roach" wrote
>>>> <4uBKI.81720$Vv6.14245@fx45.iad>:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2021-07-23 8:47 a.m., pothead wrote:
>>>>>> On 2021-07-23, Rabid Roach <rabid@roa.ch> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2021-07-22 11:44 p.m., AJL wrote:
>>>>>>>> Snit wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Jul 22, 2021 at 8:48:29 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> That's why you neanderthals still have guns.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Who is going to pay the government to stop people from having guns?
>>>>>>>>> You?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In a US city I lived in around 40 years ago the city council voted to
>>>>>>>> buy guns (all types) from the public and then destroyed them. They had
>>>>>>>> lots of takers. The program lasted for a couple of years as I recall. I
>>>>>>>> don't remember if it did any good at the time but currently the city has
>>>>>>>> the same gun problem as the rest in its size class (6M pop metro).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Buying back guns from lawful owners simply means that when the thugs who
>>>>>>> got them illegally decide to commit crimes, nobody will be able to stop
>>>>>>> them. If your country gives you the right and the ability to defend
>>>>>>> yourself, why the heck would you sacrifice it?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Gun control will never work.
>>>>>> How well did prohibition work out?
>>>>>
>>>>> It made a bunch of Italians who otherwise would have submitted to a
>>>>> lifetime of grunt work very wealthy and powerful.
>>>>>
>>>>>> And the problem with stricter gun laws is that it will be the first
>>>>>> step toward taking away the right of the citizens to legally own
>>>>>> firearms.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is the way the government works.
>>>>>> They take away your rights in incremental steps and before you know it,
>>>>>> that constitutional right no longer exists.
>>>>>
>>>>> The American Constitution, what I've long considered to be the greatest
>>>>> legal document ever written, has been ignored for so long that speaking
>>>>> about it has become pointless.
>>>>
>>>> It is not ignored -- it is used and referenced daily. I get how you right
>>>> wingers want to piss all over it as you toss out the very idea of a
>>>> representative government, and as you hate the founding principle of all
>>>> people being made equal (having equal rights), but those things matter to a
>>>> lot of us (liberals).
>>>
>>> Remind us which side wants to limit both the First and the Second
>>> Amendments.
>>>
>>>> That does not mean the document is perfect, nor the people who wrote it, nor
>>>> even that they all agreed.
>>>>
>>>>> I only hope that this takeover of the
>>>>> United States by China which is rapidly destroying the fabric of society
>>>>> will be reversed but I doubt that it will be. They have way too many
>>>>> allies in the country, especially in academia and the legacy media, that
>>>>> I don't foresee the country ever restoring itself to past greatness.
>>>>
>>>> It is not ignored -- it is used and referenced daily. I get how you right
>>>> wingers want to piss all over it as you toss out the very idea of a
>>>> representative government, and as you hate the founding principle of all
>>>> people being made equal (having equal rights), but those things matter to a
>>>> lot of us (liberals).
>>
>>>> That does not mean the document is perfect, nor the people who wrote it, nor
>>>> even that they all agreed.
>>
>>> Ignored.
>>
>> Clearly not. You just have no reasoned response.
>
> You can change newsgroups but you're still the despicable troll who was
> chased out of comp.sys.mac.advocacy and universally ignored in
> comp.os.linux.advocacy. I was willing to give your Marxist ass yet
> another chance but I already regret it. Into the filter you go.

Don't waste your time with the super troll snit.

Here is what happens every time:

36- George Graves: "Jason. You have started an argument with
the Snit (AKA Michael Glasser), this should not be done. He
will drive you crazy with his twisted logic, his deep-rooted
need to be ALWAYS right at any cost. He will move goalposts,
set up strawmen, and bore you into submission with his endless
pedanticism. The only way to engage him is to hit and run. NEVER
engage him, it's a futile, empty procedure that will only anger
you and feed him. Take my advice and STAY AWAY!" 27 Oct 2004

--
pothead
Tommy Chong For President 2024
Lifetime Member of "The Prescott Parasite Eradication Team"
Ask snit how he pissed on his cat.
All about snit read below. Links courtesy of Ron:
https://web.archive.org/web/20181028000459/http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529043314/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529062255/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html

In article <DFEKI.28482$0Z7.24976@fx39.iad>, Rabid Roach <rabid@roa.ch>
wrote:

>
> The "delta variant" is basically one that was created by those who chose
> to get "vaccinated" with a concoction that is likely to kill them. It is
> more contagious but also less potent.

nonsense. not one word of that is even remotely correct.

In article <r8EKI.30574$rr3.22336@fx34.iad>, Rabid Roach <rabid@roa.ch>
wrote:

> >> The American Constitution, what I've long considered to be the greatest
> >> legal document ever written, has been ignored for so long that speaking
> >> about it has become pointless.
> >
> > It is not ignored -- it is used and referenced daily. I get how you right
> > wingers want to piss all over it as you toss out the very idea of a
> > representative government, and as you hate the founding principle of all
> > people being made equal (having equal rights), but those things matter to a
> > lot of us (liberals).
>
> Remind us which side wants to limit both the First and the Second
> Amendments.

neither side does.

> I saved the link and people are free to either watch physicians who
> actually know what they're talking about
> <https://tv.gab.com/channel/r04ch/view/doctors-admit-that-vaccinated-will-die-60fadc7a8d0a91ce5a5a0499>
> or read your ignorance.

they don't know what they're talking about and neither do you.

there is a *huge* amount of evidence that shows their claim to not only
be false, but absurd.

On 2021-07-23 3:39 p.m., pothead wrote:
> On 2021-07-23, Rabid Roach <rabid@roa.ch> wrote:
>> On 2021-07-23 3:02 p.m., Snit wrote:
>>> On Jul 23, 2021 at 11:46:45 AM MST, "Rabid Roach" wrote
>>> <r8EKI.30574$rr3.22336@fx34.iad>:
>>>
>>>> On 2021-07-23 2:03 p.m., Snit wrote:
>>>>> On Jul 23, 2021 at 8:45:02 AM MST, "Rabid Roach" wrote
>>>>> <4uBKI.81720$Vv6.14245@fx45.iad>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2021-07-23 8:47 a.m., pothead wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2021-07-23, Rabid Roach <rabid@roa.ch> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2021-07-22 11:44 p.m., AJL wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Snit wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 22, 2021 at 8:48:29 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> That's why you neanderthals still have guns.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Who is going to pay the government to stop people from having guns?
>>>>>>>>>> You?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In a US city I lived in around 40 years ago the city council voted to
>>>>>>>>> buy guns (all types) from the public and then destroyed them. They had
>>>>>>>>> lots of takers. The program lasted for a couple of years as I recall. I
>>>>>>>>> don't remember if it did any good at the time but currently the city has
>>>>>>>>> the same gun problem as the rest in its size class (6M pop metro).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Buying back guns from lawful owners simply means that when the thugs who
>>>>>>>> got them illegally decide to commit crimes, nobody will be able to stop
>>>>>>>> them. If your country gives you the right and the ability to defend
>>>>>>>> yourself, why the heck would you sacrifice it?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Gun control will never work.
>>>>>>> How well did prohibition work out?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It made a bunch of Italians who otherwise would have submitted to a
>>>>>> lifetime of grunt work very wealthy and powerful.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And the problem with stricter gun laws is that it will be the first
>>>>>>> step toward taking away the right of the citizens to legally own
>>>>>>> firearms.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is the way the government works.
>>>>>>> They take away your rights in incremental steps and before you know it,
>>>>>>> that constitutional right no longer exists.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The American Constitution, what I've long considered to be the greatest
>>>>>> legal document ever written, has been ignored for so long that speaking
>>>>>> about it has become pointless.
>>>>>
>>>>> It is not ignored -- it is used and referenced daily. I get how you right
>>>>> wingers want to piss all over it as you toss out the very idea of a
>>>>> representative government, and as you hate the founding principle of all
>>>>> people being made equal (having equal rights), but those things matter to a
>>>>> lot of us (liberals).
>>>>
>>>> Remind us which side wants to limit both the First and the Second
>>>> Amendments.
>>>>
>>>>> That does not mean the document is perfect, nor the people who wrote it, nor
>>>>> even that they all agreed.
>>>>>
>>>>>> I only hope that this takeover of the
>>>>>> United States by China which is rapidly destroying the fabric of society
>>>>>> will be reversed but I doubt that it will be. They have way too many
>>>>>> allies in the country, especially in academia and the legacy media, that
>>>>>> I don't foresee the country ever restoring itself to past greatness.
>>>>>
>>>>> It is not ignored -- it is used and referenced daily. I get how you right
>>>>> wingers want to piss all over it as you toss out the very idea of a
>>>>> representative government, and as you hate the founding principle of all
>>>>> people being made equal (having equal rights), but those things matter to a
>>>>> lot of us (liberals).
>>>
>>>>> That does not mean the document is perfect, nor the people who wrote it, nor
>>>>> even that they all agreed.
>>>
>>>> Ignored.
>>>
>>> Clearly not. You just have no reasoned response.
>>
>> You can change newsgroups but you're still the despicable troll who was
>> chased out of comp.sys.mac.advocacy and universally ignored in
>> comp.os.linux.advocacy. I was willing to give your Marxist ass yet
>> another chance but I already regret it. Into the filter you go.
>
> Don't waste your time with the super troll snit.

I shouldn't, but I'm a Catholic and I easily forgive people who don't
deserve it.

> Here is what happens every time:
>
> 36- George Graves: "Jason. You have started an argument with
> the Snit (AKA Michael Glasser), this should not be done. He
> will drive you crazy with his twisted logic, his deep-rooted
> need to be ALWAYS right at any cost. He will move goalposts,
> set up strawmen, and bore you into submission with his endless
> pedanticism. The only way to engage him is to hit and run. NEVER
> engage him, it's a futile, empty procedure that will only anger
> you and feed him. Take my advice and STAY AWAY!" 27 Oct 2004

--
Rabid Roach
John 15:18

On 2021-07-23 3:41 p.m., nospam wrote:
> In article <DFEKI.28482$0Z7.24976@fx39.iad>, Rabid Roach <rabid@roa.ch>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> The "delta variant" is basically one that was created by those who chose
>> to get "vaccinated" with a concoction that is likely to kill them. It is
>> more contagious but also less potent.
>
> nonsense. not one word of that is even remotely correct.

1)
<https://nypost.com/2021/07/08/dont-buy-the-hysteria-the-delta-variant-is-actually-less-dangerous/>

2)
<https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/world/why-is-the-delta-variant-so-much-more-contagious/ss-AAMrajt>

From abc.net.au at
<https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-07-02/delta-coronavirus-variant-symptoms-vaccines-spread/100255804>

"Is the Delta variant more deadly?
Because the variant is so new, research into it is in early days.

But Professor Turville said so far, mortality rates data looked promising.

"Looking at the 28-day follow up after infection, the death rate for the
original variants was 1.9 per cent mortality," he said.

"So far the Delta variant is showing 0.3 per cent mortality.

"That's super encouraging. The early signs look promising, but it is too
early to be definitive.""

As for the delta variant having been created by the vaccinated, notice
the numbers of _vaccinated_ infected versus unvaccinated.

--
Rabid Roach
John 15:18

On 2021-07-23 2:41 p.m., nospam wrote:
> In article <DFEKI.28482$0Z7.24976@fx39.iad>, Rabid Roach <rabid@roa.ch>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> The "delta variant" is basically one that was created by those who chose
>> to get "vaccinated" with a concoction that is likely to kill them. It is
>> more contagious but also less potent.
>
> nonsense. not one word of that is even remotely correct.
>

Rabid roach is spreading FUD and bullshit. and cowshit.

Rene

On 2021-07-23 3:41 p.m., nospam wrote:
> In article <r8EKI.30574$rr3.22336@fx34.iad>, Rabid Roach <rabid@roa.ch>
> wrote:
>
>>>> The American Constitution, what I've long considered to be the greatest
>>>> legal document ever written, has been ignored for so long that speaking
>>>> about it has become pointless.
>>>
>>> It is not ignored -- it is used and referenced daily. I get how you right
>>> wingers want to piss all over it as you toss out the very idea of a
>>> representative government, and as you hate the founding principle of all
>>> people being made equal (having equal rights), but those things matter to a
>>> lot of us (liberals).
>>
>> Remind us which side wants to limit both the First and the Second
>> Amendments.
>
> neither side does.

Lie. The left has made it clear that it wants the First to be limited or
eliminated and the Second to be repealed. You'd have to completely
ignore the media and the politicians speaking for the past few years to
even think that you could get away with such a false statement.

>> I saved the link and people are free to either watch physicians who
>> actually know what they're talking about
>> <https://tv.gab.com/channel/r04ch/view/doctors-admit-that-vaccinated-will-die-60fadc7a8d0a91ce5a5a0499>
>> or read your ignorance.
>
> they don't know what they're talking about and neither do you.

Yep. _Doctors_ know less about medicine and health than some guy on
Usenet who has consistently been wrong about just about everything to
Snit-like levels.

> there is a *huge* amount of evidence that shows their claim to not only
> be false, but absurd.

Uh huh.

--
Rabid Roach
John 15:18

In article <t9FKI.58543$h8.33309@fx47.iad>, Rabid Roach <rabid@roa.ch>
wrote:

> >> The "delta variant" is basically one that was created by those who chose
> >> to get "vaccinated" with a concoction that is likely to kill them. It is
> >> more contagious but also less potent.
> >
> > nonsense. not one word of that is even remotely correct.
>
> 1)
>
> <https://nypost.com/2021/07/08/dont-buy-the-hysteria-the-delta-variant-is-actu
> ally-less-dangerous/>

that's an opinion piece. it's not authored by a physician nor does it
reference any clinical studies.

also, the ny post is not a credible source. they used a reference to
shingles as a side effect of covid vaccines to try to make it look bad.

> 2)
>
> <https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/world/why-is-the-delta-variant-so-much-more-co
> ntagious/ss-AAMrajt>

they're correct that it's more contagious, which is a significant
problem.

> From abc.net.au at
>
> <https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-07-02/delta-coronavirus-variant-symptoms-vac
> cines-spread/100255804>
>
> "Is the Delta variant more deadly?
> Because the variant is so new, research into it is in early days.
>
> But Professor Turville said so far, mortality rates data looked promising.
>
> "Looking at the 28-day follow up after infection, the death rate for the
> original variants was 1.9 per cent mortality," he said.
>
> "So far the Delta variant is showing 0.3 per cent mortality.
>
> "That's super encouraging. The early signs look promising, but it is too
> early to be definitive.""

that's all speculation.

as he said 'it is too early to be definitive'. not exactly a good
reference.

more importantly, mortality is not the only negative outcome.

many people will be hospitalized, and while they eventually recover, it
can take weeks. some will have a milder case and recover at home, but
they'll still feel like shit and miss work.

roughly one-third of people will have long-term covid, with symptoms
continuing for weeks, if not months afterwards.

covid also affects the brain:
<https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.06.11.21258690v1>
...We used structural and functional brain scans from before and
after infection, to compare longitudinal brain changes between these
394 COVID-19 patients and 388 controls who were matched for age,
sex, ethnicity and interval between scans. We identified significant
effects of COVID-19 in the brain with a loss of grey matter in the
left parahippocampal gyrus, the left lateral orbitofrontal cortex and
the left insula.

and given that the delta variant is more contagious, one person can
easily bring it home to an entire family, any one of whom could get
*seriously* ill and die.

> As for the delta variant having been created by the vaccinated, notice
> the numbers of _vaccinated_ infected versus unvaccinated.

the delta variant appeared in *unvaccinated* people, as do other
variants (and not just covid either, but all viruses).

<https://www.webmd.com/vaccines/covid-19-vaccine/news/20210513/over-_99-
percent-hospitalized-2021-covid-patients-unvaccinated>
May 13, 2021 -- A new study found that more than 99% of patients
hospitalized with COVID-19 during the first four months of 2021
weren¹t fully vaccinated.

The Cleveland Clinic, which released the data on Tuesday, also found
that the mRNA vaccines created by Pfizer and Moderna were more than
96% effective in protecting against COVID-19 infection.

it's quite difficult for a virus to mutate in a host full of antibodies
fighting it off.

In article <2cFKI.58544$h8.12844@fx47.iad>, Rabid Roach <rabid@roa.ch>
wrote:

> >> Remind us which side wants to limit both the First and the Second
> >> Amendments.
> >
> > neither side does.
>
> Lie. The left has made it clear that it wants the First to be limited or
> eliminated and the Second to be repealed. You'd have to completely
> ignore the media and the politicians speaking for the past few years to
> even think that you could get away with such a false statement.

there's nothing false about it.

nobody is calling for the first or second amendments to be repealed.

also, the people with the most views/likes/retweets/etc. on facebook,
twitter and various other social media platforms are almost entirely on
the right.

not exactly an effective limit, is it?

> >> I saved the link and people are free to either watch physicians who
> >> actually know what they're talking about
> >>
> >> <https://tv.gab.com/channel/r04ch/view/doctors-admit-that-vaccinated-will-d
> >> ie-60fadc7a8d0a91ce5a5a0499>
> >> or read your ignorance.
> >
> > they don't know what they're talking about and neither do you.
>
> Yep. _Doctors_ know less about medicine and health than some guy on
> Usenet who has consistently been wrong about just about everything to
> Snit-like levels.

explain why only those doctors have the correct answers and why just
about every other doctor in the entire medical profession worldwide is
wrong, why countless clinical studies worldwide are wrong and why the
vaccines have proven to be extremely safe and effective.

claims that any of the covid vaccines will kill people in three years
is nutjob material. there is *zero* evidence of that, and significant
evidence to the contrary.

conspiracy theories are amusing, up until they're dangerous and end up
killing people.

On Jul 23, 2021 at 12:56:07 PM MST, "Rabid Roach" wrote
<t9FKI.58543$h8.33309@fx47.iad>:

> On 2021-07-23 3:41 p.m., nospam wrote:
>> In article <DFEKI.28482$0Z7.24976@fx39.iad>, Rabid Roach <rabid@roa.ch>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> The "delta variant" is basically one that was created by those who chose
>>> to get "vaccinated" with a concoction that is likely to kill them. It is
>>> more contagious but also less potent.
>>
>> nonsense. not one word of that is even remotely correct.
>
> 1)
> <https://nypost.com/2021/07/08/dont-buy-the-hysteria-the-delta-variant-is-actually-less-dangerous/>

It is not that the virus is less dangerous, it is that many people are smart
and educated enough to get vaccines.

You? Not so much.

>
> 2)
> <https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/world/why-is-the-delta-variant-so-much-more-contagious/ss-AAMrajt>
>
> From abc.net.au at
> <https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-07-02/delta-coronavirus-variant-symptoms-vaccines-spread/100255804>
>
> "Is the Delta variant more deadly?
> Because the variant is so new, research into it is in early days.
>
> But Professor Turville said so far, mortality rates data looked promising.
>
> "Looking at the 28-day follow up after infection, the death rate for the
> original variants was 1.9 per cent mortality," he said.
>
> "So far the Delta variant is showing 0.3 per cent mortality.
>
> "That's super encouraging. The early signs look promising, but it is too
> early to be definitive.""
>
> As for the delta variant having been created by the vaccinated, notice
> the numbers of _vaccinated_ infected versus unvaccinated.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On 23/07/2021 13.29, mechanic wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Jul 2021 10:20:08 -0400, Paul wrote:
>
>>> BTW, what is Masonite?
>>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Masonite
>>
>> or an alternative
>>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formica_%28plastic%29
>>
>> https://www.wikihow.com/Cut-Formica
>>
>> "Can you cut Formica with scissors?
>>
>> You can cut it with tin snips or special scissors
>> that are designed to cut laminate. Regular craft scissors
>> or kitchen shears likely won’t be strong enough."
>>
>> Formica would be thinner.
>>
>> Even a printed circuit board blank would
>> do in a pinch. You could buy some double-sided,
>> which has half ounce copper on either side. And
>> they come in various thicknesses. Such as 62.5
>> (1/16th of an inch).
>>
>> There's no lack of substrates.
>
> But you need some rigidity in the support platform. I don't think
> Formica would be rigid enough. PCB offcut would be.
>

Somewhere I saw a cushion sewed to a board, designed to hold a laptop on
your lap. Or a book.

--
Cheers,
Carlos E.R.

On 23/07/2021 13.13, Mayayana wrote:
> "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote
>
> | > Of course it is a compromise -- the world is full of them. With the
> Macbook
> | > Air it is designed to be lightweight and have a long battery life, and
> while
> | > it fits a lot of needs it is not a gaming machine. But it absolutely
> does have
> | > a GPU.
> |
> | I intentionally buy all my laptops with that kind of graphics. I prefer
> | long battery life over graphic power.
> |
> | And not only my own laptops, but those I buy for other people - unless
> | when I find out when questioning them on their usage that they are game
> | players or some other usage that demands powerful graphics.
> |
>
> That's a good point that I don't think most people
> are even aware of. For many years now, integrated
> graphics has been plenty of power to run a large monitor
> with 32-bit color. In that sense, separate graphics cards
> are outdated technology. Only a small minority of people
> are trying to run games where 100 soldiers, or 100 naked
> beauties with realistic, flowing hair, need to be displayed
> and refreshed at top speed while your avatar kills them or
> fucks them, respectively.

Another advantage: less weight. Kilograms, I mean. Comes from smaller
battery, smaller fan, smaller cooling ducts...

I may need instead cpu power and more RAM to run calc sheets or
multipage+images in word processors.

>
> It's the difference between a car and a sports car. One
> is for transportation. The other is for fun or sport. You
> could drive the sports car for transportation, but it's expensive
> and your bag of groceries might not even fit in the trunk.
> Your kids won't fit in the seats. The only thing it's really
> good for is driving very fast and announcing to others that
> you have a lot of money. Very, very few people drive sports
> cars. And it's the same with computers. A computer is for
> doing work. A gaming machine is for fun. Who uses
> them? Computer geeks who never grew up and some teenage
> boys, mostly. But they do account for many of the advances
> in computer technology, thanks to the fact that teenage boys
> (and geeky office workers who can't get a date) want their
> fantasy naked girls to be as realistic as possible.

I just remembered a poker game, in which we had to win the girls to get
them to undress, in B/W CGA graphics - We had to coach our best poker
player in our student residence to play it for us :-D

--
Cheers,
Carlos E.R.

On Jul 23, 2021 at 12:23:27 PM MST, "Rabid Roach" wrote
<RGEKI.28483$0Z7.21398@fx39.iad>:

> On 2021-07-23 3:02 p.m., Snit wrote:
>> On Jul 23, 2021 at 11:46:45 AM MST, "Rabid Roach" wrote
>> <r8EKI.30574$rr3.22336@fx34.iad>:
>>
>>> On 2021-07-23 2:03 p.m., Snit wrote:
>>>> On Jul 23, 2021 at 8:45:02 AM MST, "Rabid Roach" wrote
>>>> <4uBKI.81720$Vv6.14245@fx45.iad>:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2021-07-23 8:47 a.m., pothead wrote:
>>>>>> On 2021-07-23, Rabid Roach <rabid@roa.ch> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2021-07-22 11:44 p.m., AJL wrote:
>>>>>>>> Snit wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Jul 22, 2021 at 8:48:29 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> That's why you neanderthals still have guns.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Who is going to pay the government to stop people from having guns?
>>>>>>>>> You?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In a US city I lived in around 40 years ago the city council voted to
>>>>>>>> buy guns (all types) from the public and then destroyed them. They had
>>>>>>>> lots of takers. The program lasted for a couple of years as I recall. I
>>>>>>>> don't remember if it did any good at the time but currently the city has
>>>>>>>> the same gun problem as the rest in its size class (6M pop metro).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Buying back guns from lawful owners simply means that when the thugs who
>>>>>>> got them illegally decide to commit crimes, nobody will be able to stop
>>>>>>> them. If your country gives you the right and the ability to defend
>>>>>>> yourself, why the heck would you sacrifice it?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Gun control will never work.
>>>>>> How well did prohibition work out?
>>>>>
>>>>> It made a bunch of Italians who otherwise would have submitted to a
>>>>> lifetime of grunt work very wealthy and powerful.
>>>>>
>>>>>> And the problem with stricter gun laws is that it will be the first
>>>>>> step toward taking away the right of the citizens to legally own
>>>>>> firearms.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is the way the government works.
>>>>>> They take away your rights in incremental steps and before you know it,
>>>>>> that constitutional right no longer exists.
>>>>>
>>>>> The American Constitution, what I've long considered to be the greatest
>>>>> legal document ever written, has been ignored for so long that speaking
>>>>> about it has become pointless.
>>>>
>>>> It is not ignored -- it is used and referenced daily. I get how you right
>>>> wingers want to piss all over it as you toss out the very idea of a
>>>> representative government, and as you hate the founding principle of all
>>>> people being made equal (having equal rights), but those things matter to a
>>>> lot of us (liberals).
>>>
>>> Remind us which side wants to limit both the First and the Second
>>> Amendments.
>>>
>>>> That does not mean the document is perfect, nor the people who wrote it, nor
>>>> even that they all agreed.
>>>>
>>>>> I only hope that this takeover of the
>>>>> United States by China which is rapidly destroying the fabric of society
>>>>> will be reversed but I doubt that it will be. They have way too many
>>>>> allies in the country, especially in academia and the legacy media, that
>>>>> I don't foresee the country ever restoring itself to past greatness.
>>>>
>>>> It is not ignored -- it is used and referenced daily. I get how you right
>>>> wingers want to piss all over it as you toss out the very idea of a
>>>> representative government, and as you hate the founding principle of all
>>>> people being made equal (having equal rights), but those things matter to a
>>>> lot of us (liberals).
>>
>>>> That does not mean the document is perfect, nor the people who wrote it, nor
>>>> even that they all agreed.
>>
>>> Ignored.
>>
>> Clearly not. You just have no reasoned response.

Instead of actually trying to give a reasoned response you lash out in anger.
Keep in mind that anger is at yourself and your own failure to be able to
defend your conspiracy theory crap. It is not at me and I do not take it
personally.

>
> You can change newsgroups but you're still the despicable troll who was
> chased out of comp.sys.mac.advocacy and universally ignored in
> comp.os.linux.advocacy. I was willing to give your Marxist ass yet
> another chance but I already regret it. Into the filter you go.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Jul 23, 2021 at 12:06:24 PM MST, "Rene Lamontagne" wrote
<im0i9gFrohmU1@mid.individual.net>:

> On 2021-07-23 1:56 p.m., LegionX wrote:
>> "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> Wrote in message:
>>
>>> Are you so bored with your life that you reply to me about someone else?
>>
>> Yes. We are.
>>
>> Some of us sadly live in a city where the elected officials have
>> enforced another mask mandate. Due to covid delta variant spread.
>> We're back to remote office work. We are beyond bored.
>>
>
> But your still alive and not in An ICU.
>
> Rene

He also survived an explosion he posted about the other day where he said he
needed updates to see if he was even involved.

Gremlin is not the sharpest tool in the shed, no matter what name he posts
under.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> Wrote in message:

> someone else?>> >> Yes. We are.>> >> Some of us sadly live in a city where the elected officials have>> enforced another mask mandate. Due to covid delta variant spread.>> We're back to remote office work. We are beyond bored.>> > > But your still alive and n

>He also survived an explosion<

In the same way as you did - by not having been anywhere near it.

>he posted about the other day<

No Snit. He did not. We did. He hasn't posted here since June.

>where he said he needed updates to see if he was even involved.<

What? That doesn't even make sense Snit. Even for you.

>Gremlin is not the sharpest tool in the shed, no matter what name he
posts under.<

We invite you again to support your sock accusation. Why can't you
do so? We had no trouble proving that you were socking as
Sigmond. Other posters came forward with more names of socks
you've been busted using. Nobody else has shown gross reading
comprehension issues by trying to claim we're Gremlin.

How do you explain all of this? And why are you still prancing
around the fact you called Apd a liar when he also wrote that the
floodbot has seeded search engines with derogatory comments you
wrote about Steve Carroll and Gremlin.

Go ahead Snit - continue to stick your fingers in your ears.
Everyone knows what you are. :)

--
Ask Snit how he pissed on his cat and his hallucination about the
eyeball. Heavy pharma abuse = a Snit
<https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews>

In article <sdfe59$7vj$1@dont-email.me>,
MichaelAndAnneGlasser@griftersconjobsllc.com says...
>
> Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> Wrote in message:
>
> > someone else?>> >> Yes. We are.>> >> Some of us sadly live in a city where the elected officials have>> enforced another mask mandate. Due to covid delta variant spread.>> We're back to remote office work. We are beyond bored.>> > > But your still alive and n
>
> >He also survived an explosion<
>
> In the same way as you did - by not having been anywhere near it.
>
> >he posted about the other day<
>
> No Snit. He did not. We did. He hasn't posted here since June.
>
> >where he said he needed updates to see if he was even involved.<
>
> What? That doesn't even make sense Snit. Even for you.
>
> >Gremlin is not the sharpest tool in the shed, no matter what name he
> posts under.<
>
> We invite you again to support your sock accusation. Why can't you
> do so? We had no trouble proving that you were socking as
> Sigmond. Other posters came forward with more names of socks
> you've been busted using. Nobody else has shown gross reading
> comprehension issues by trying to claim we're Gremlin.
>
> How do you explain all of this? And why are you still prancing
> around the fact you called Apd a liar when he also wrote that the
> floodbot has seeded search engines with derogatory comments you
> wrote about Steve Carroll and Gremlin.
>
> Go ahead Snit - continue to stick your fingers in your ears.
> Everyone knows what you are. :)

Well I'm not sure *everyone* knows what snit really is. Snit has
admitted he censors his families Internet access and keeps a close
watch on email his wife and kids receive.

So maybe it's time a snail mail campaign is started so that snit's
wife, neighbors, local schools and so forth can see what snit does
with his life, ie:trolling, doxxing and sponging off the U.S tax
payers.

If enough letters were mailed, it would be impossible for snit to
intercept them all and if just the facts were stated, like links to
the various snit lists as well as snit admitting he carries a teddy
bear around and so forth it might actually work as an intervention
for snit and get him to realize he needs medical help.

Of course a billboard located on the main highway leading into his
town would also suffice but letters mailed could be just as
effective.

On Jul 23, 2021 at 3:22:50 PM MST, "Simon LaPeen" wrote
<MPG.3b650b339a1b68a798983b@nntp.aioe.org>:

> Snit has
> admitted he censors his families Internet access and keeps a close
> watch on email his wife and kids receive.

Steve Carroll <sciho7$tmg$8@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
-----
Quote it or it didn't happen.
-----

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On 2021-07-23 3:58 p.m., Rene Lamontagne wrote:
> On 2021-07-23 2:41 p.m., nospam wrote:
>> In article <DFEKI.28482$0Z7.24976@fx39.iad>, Rabid Roach <rabid@roa.ch>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> The "delta variant" is basically one that was created by those who chose
>>> to get "vaccinated" with a concoction that is likely to kill them. It is
>>> more contagious but also less potent.
>>
>> nonsense. not one word of that is even remotely correct.
>>
>
> Rabid roach is spreading FUD and bullshit. and cowshit.

I believe in your freedom to believe what the legacy media tells you on
Friday, even if it is contradicted by what they tell you on Saturday.
Enjoy your sleep.

--
Rabid Roach
John 15:18