On Jul 28, 2021 at 10:44:18 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
<op.0684v4uymvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:

> On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 18:52:35 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Jul 27, 2021 at 10:42:32 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>> <op.066946wpmvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>
>>> On Mon, 26 Jul 2021 18:12:08 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Jul 26, 2021 at 6:46:18 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>>> <op.0644jgo5mvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 25 Jul 2021 19:58:20 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Jul 25, 2021 at 11:03:32 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>>>>> <op.063lr600mvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> They are very clear it has no fan. There is no lie. But if you don't want one
>>>>>>>>>> don't get one.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Might not technically be a lie, but it's still misrepresentation. Look at this
>>>>>>>>> powerful OR quiet machine....
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> To a large extent that is the choice you make. Another comparison I recently
>>>>>>>> watched:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://youtu.be/_wFmj1nMd-k
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The Air gets amazing reviews. And notice being "quiet" is one of the reasons
>>>>>>>> listed (as is price, power, video rendering, instant wake on open, no power
>>>>>>>> throttling on battery, excellent keyboard, excellent build, excellent monitor,
>>>>>>>> etc.) Only thing noted it is not good for: gaming (which is no surprise).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> For the fan comments: https://youtu.be/_wFmj1nMd-k?t=522
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You might not notice the fan noise... until you use a system which has no such
>>>>>>>> noise. I know for me I am bothered by fan noises. I appreciate the low sound
>>>>>>>> of Apple products.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> With zero fan noise you're in danger of hearing traffic noises outside.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sure. Still nice to have a quiet computer.
>>>>>
>>>>> It doesn't matter how quiet it is, something will annoy me, like the cooling
>>>>> fan on a Sky TV box, or a refridgerator in the next room. Your ears have
>>>>> automatic level control. But the most annoying thing is a change in noise.
>>>>
>>>> Might not matter to you... does to me and to others.
>>>
>>> I guess you have bad hearing.
>>
>> I have very sensitive hearing... but have a hard time "blocking out"
>> background noise. Comes with the dysautonomia I have.
>
> Then you should be like me. If you stop an annoying noise, you just end up
> hearing the next loudest one.

Distance also plays some role in it. I do not mind noises as much if they are
not as close.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Jul 28, 2021 at 10:43:50 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
<op.0684vcpamvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:

> On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 18:51:54 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Jul 27, 2021 at 10:42:59 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>> <op.06695xu0mvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>
>>> On Mon, 26 Jul 2021 18:12:23 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Jul 26, 2021 at 6:45:16 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>>> <op.0644hq2omvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 25 Jul 2021 19:57:57 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Jul 25, 2021 at 11:04:08 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>>>>> <op.063ls6u3mvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bollocks, the fan makes no detectable noise when spinning at minimum speed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It can run at lower speeds because of the making use of convection cooling.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Once it's spinning, convection cannot occur. The air is moving faster than
>>>>>>>>>>> convection.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> One force does not stop when another starts, and presumably the fan is not
>>>>>>>>>> running all the time.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Slow fans are not audible by humans.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> When needed they speed up... and I bet what you say is not audible often is.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Convection is not as good as a speeded up fan.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sure... but those made to work with convection have that as an advantage. As
>>>>>> you note, though, there are tradeoffs.
>>>>>
>>>>> If it's coming through the same hole, convection does nothing at all when the
>>>>> fan is running.
>>>>
>>>> How do you figure?
>>>
>>> Because the speed of the air forced by even a slow fan is an order of
>>> magnitude faster than convection.
>>
>> That would imply it does little, not nothing.
>
> I'd say negligible compared to a fan. It might be enough when the computer is
> idling, but if the fan runs at all, it's 10 times more cooling.
>
>> Would be interesting to see how much effect it really has. I suspect you get
>> much more with a vertical computer like an iMac than you do with a "flat"
>> computer like a laptop.
>
> Maybe, maybe not. If it's vertical, warm air from the bottom component is
> rising past the next component so it cools not so good.

I think it works by having the hottest components at the top. Not sure.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Jul 28, 2021 at 10:42:10 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
<op.0684sklomvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:

> On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 18:48:48 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Jul 27, 2021 at 10:30:21 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>> <op.0669kvbpmvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>
>>> On Mon, 26 Jul 2021 07:48:03 +0100, LegionX
>>> <MichaelAndAnneGlasser@griftersconjobsllc.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> HHI <HHI@imaginary.friend.com> Wrote in message:
>>>>
>>>>> On 7/25/21 11:24 PM, LegionX wrote:> Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> Wrote
>>>>> in message:> >> One would think... but Gremlin was posting saying there was
>>>>> an explosion but he had not heard from himself.<>Gremlin didn't post
>>>>> anything. We did. We again invite you to> support your socking accusation
>>>>> snit. We supported ours when we> called you out for socking up as Sigmond.>
>>>>>>> Gremlin is not the sharpest tool in the shed, no matter what name he
>>>>> posts under.<>On Gremlins *worst days* he can still mop the floor with you
>>>>> on> *any tech subject* with fuckin ease. Any of us can.> >Gremlin only
>>>>> posts under one handle
>>>>
>>>>> Shit. I forgot to mention Diesel.<> Snit. Diesel isn't a sock of Gremlins.
>>>>> It's an old handle he used
>>>> for the purposes of making things more difficult for the remailer
>>>> who revealed they had newbie level usenet search
>>>> skills.
>>>>
>>>> Would you like to try again girlyman?
>>>>
>>>>> You know what we mean you sock using asshole.<> We aren't mind readers. And
>>>>> even if one of us was - snits is far
>>>> too over self medicated on benzos and booze for us to read
>>>> his.
>>>
>>> Nobody fucking cares.
>>
>> Gremlin has forgotten how to wrap. Odd.
>
> You mean learned how to not wrap.

Or wrap properly.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Jul 28, 2021 at 10:41:53 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
<op.0684r3yqmvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:

> On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 18:48:12 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Jul 27, 2021 at 10:30:41 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>> <op.0669lf0emvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>
>>> On Sun, 25 Jul 2021 19:59:34 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Jul 25, 2021 at 11:01:33 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>>> <op.063lovo2mvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, 23 Jul 2021 20:22:10 +0100, Rabid Roach <rabid@roa.ch> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2021-07-23 2:56 p.m., LegionX wrote:
>>>>>>> "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> Wrote in message:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Are you so bored with your life that you reply to me about someone else?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes. We are.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Some of us sadly live in a city where the elected officials have
>>>>>>> enforced another mask mandate. Due to covid delta variant spread.
>>>>>>> We're back to remote office work. We are beyond bored.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The "delta variant" is basically one that was created by those who chose
>>>>>> to get "vaccinated" with a concoction that is likely to kill them. It is
>>>>>> more contagious but also less potent.
>>>>>
>>>>> Nobody is sticking any shit into my arm.
>>>>
>>>> Nor is anyone asking to.
>>>>
>>>> I hope they start demanding proof of vaccination once it gets full FDA
>>>> approval (which is likely coming soon).
>>>
>>> By which time it'll have been long gone anyway.
>>
>> Sadly a lot of people believe that fantasy.
>
> Go look at the deaths on worldometer.

OK? Does not break out the cause.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Jul 28, 2021 at 10:41:11 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
<op.0684qxuumvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:

> On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 18:44:03 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Jul 27, 2021 at 10:32:03 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>> <op.0669npfjmvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>
>>> On Sun, 25 Jul 2021 20:24:26 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Jul 25, 2021 at 10:58:30 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>>> <op.063ljs0rmvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, 24 Jul 2021 19:52:44 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Jul 24, 2021 at 10:36:50 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>>>>> <op.061pvodtmvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I guess the issue is that Microsoft lost the desire to develop Windows RT
>>>>>>>>>> (on Arm) due to the poor performance and unwillingness of third parties.
>>>>>>>>>> That in turn meant intel didn't really have a market for a desktop Arm CPU
>>>>>>>>>> so why would they bother?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Apple had the advantage of building both the OS and CPU together so that it
>>>>>>>>>> was a mature product when launched.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And they have millions of gullible users to pay through the nose for it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Say I disagreed -- it is those same people you trust to voluntarily pay for
>>>>>>>> services you think are important.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I don't want anyone to pay for anything they don't use themselves.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You don't use the fire department until you need it.
>>>>>
>>>>> You have home insurance. That would cover the fire department. But you could
>>>>> choose to risk it and have no insurance.
>>>>
>>>> Home insurance does not pay for the fire department, they pay for fire damage.
>>>> And they certainly do not pay to cover the 20+ fires burning within 20 miles
>>>> or so of me.
>>>
>>> They could if the government stopped doing so.
>>
>> Who would pay?
>
> The insurance, since you have a policy which includes fire.

My insurance does not cover forest fires 20 miles away from me. Does yours?

>> Hell, the libertarian fantasy is being destroyed (again) right now. People
>> won't even wear a mask to help save their neighbor... and you think they will
>> pay for things they are not forced to?
>
> My neighbour is free to wear one himself.

But you will not wear one to protect him. That is my point.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

Rabid Roach <rabid@roa.ch> wrote:
> On 2021-07-27 1:39 p.m., Commander Kinsey wrote:
>> On Mon, 26 Jul 2021 14:51:39 +0100, Rabid Roach <rabid@roa.ch> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2021-07-26 9:39 a.m., Commander Kinsey wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 25 Jul 2021 03:17:43 +0100, Rabid Roach <rabid@roa.ch> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2021-07-24 1:28 p.m., Commander Kinsey wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, 23 Jul 2021 13:31:07 +0100, Rabid Roach <rabid@roa.ch> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2021-07-22 11:44 p.m., AJL wrote:
>>>>>>>> Snit wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Jul 22, 2021 at 8:48:29 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> That's why you neanderthals still have guns.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Who is going to pay the government to stop people from having guns?
>>>>>>>>> You?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In a US city I lived in around 40 years ago the city council
>>>>>>>> voted to
>>>>>>>> buy guns (all types) from the public and then destroyed them.
>>>>>>>> They had
>>>>>>>> lots of takers. The program lasted for a couple of years as I
>>>>>>>> recall. I
>>>>>>>> don't remember if it did any good at the time but currently the
>>>>>>>> city has
>>>>>>>> the same gun problem as the rest in its size class (6M pop metro).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Buying back guns from lawful owners simply means that when the thugs
>>>>>>> who
>>>>>>> got them illegally decide to commit crimes, nobody will be able to
>>>>>>> stop
>>>>>>> them. If your country gives you the right and the ability to defend
>>>>>>> yourself, why the heck would you sacrifice it?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The idea is the thugs are less likely to be able to obtain one (eg. by
>>>>>> stealing it from a legal owner).
>>>>>
>>>>> It's interesting reasoning but it doesn't seem to be realistic.
>>>>> Besides,
>>>>> considering how tyrannical the governments of the world have already
>>>>> become with their reaction to the Kung Flu,
>>>>
>>>> Agreed on that.
>>>>
>>>>> I am not sure that as an
>>>>> American, I would be willing to make it even easier for them to
>>>>> bully me
>>>>> around than it already is.
>>>>
>>>> The UK manages without guns.
>>>
>>> Actual Brits, whose ancestors have been there for hundreds or thousands
>>> of years are Christian, well-behaved and believe in manners. I imagine
>>> that amongst them, guns are of no use. However, I wonder whether the New
>>> Brits have resorted to other means to kill people now that guns are not
>>> available...
>>>
>>> ... oh wait, what's this?
>>>
>>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ow-b1Cus1fg> "Birmingham knife crime
>>> overtakes London"
>>>
>>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=msTmT16-nRU> "London on track for
>>> highest number of teenage killings in a decade"
>>>
>>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j7pIO0F9y0U> "Knife crime on the rise
>>> in London"
>>>
>>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BJGyhuiW57M> "London's murder rate
>>> worse than New York?"
>>>
>>> You can take the knife out of the killer's hands but you can't take the
>>> killer out. Those wonderful, peaceful "New Brits" from Africa will
>>> always find a way. I wonder if the Old Brits would have enjoyed having a
>>> way of defending themselves against the adherents to the "religion of
>>> peace?"
>>
>> Knives are not as dangerous as guns, you could stop me killing you with
>> a knife.
>
> No, I can _try_. The fact that I am unarmed and that you have a knife
> gives you an advantage over me. If one of your attacks reaches its
> target, I am in pain or suffer a wound which will lead to weakness or
> death; if one of my attacks hits, you mostly feel temporary pain unless
> that hit is significant. People have been attacked by knives in places
> like London and there was a good number of victims before the attacker
> was finally stopped. If anything, the number of kills is almost as high
> as that of a man armed with a gun.

Maths isn't your strong point is it? The Borough Market attack by three men
armed with knives killed 8 people (2 with a van) and injured 48. That's
less than three murders per attacker.

A single gunman in Las Vegas killed 60 people and wounded 411. From 490
yards away.

Guns are, by design, significantly more lethal than knives. There is no
comparison.

On Jul 28, 2021 at 11:47:13 AM MST, "Chris" wrote
<sds8nh$isj$1@dont-email.me>:

>> No, I can _try_. The fact that I am unarmed and that you have a knife
>> gives you an advantage over me. If one of your attacks reaches its
>> target, I am in pain or suffer a wound which will lead to weakness or
>> death; if one of my attacks hits, you mostly feel temporary pain unless
>> that hit is significant. People have been attacked by knives in places
>> like London and there was a good number of victims before the attacker
>> was finally stopped. If anything, the number of kills is almost as high
>> as that of a man armed with a gun.
>
> Maths isn't your strong point is it? The Borough Market attack by three men
> armed with knives killed 8 people (2 with a van) and injured 48. That's
> less than three murders per attacker.
>
> A single gunman in Las Vegas killed 60 people and wounded 411. From 490
> yards away.
>
> Guns are, by design, significantly more lethal than knives. There is no
> comparison.

And the easier it is to get guns the more common suicide and homicide are.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

In article <T7WLI.18008$W56.11962@fx08.iad>, Rabid Roach <rabid@roa.ch>
wrote:

>
> >>
> >> Did they ban Trump because he asked them to censor people he didn't like?
> >
> > they banned trump because he violated their terms of service. it's
> > really quite simple.
>
> Which is not at all what Parler did, just like I said. He wasn't even a
> member there when they _allegedly_ prevented him from coming in because
> they weren't willing to play ball with his requests.

that doesn't matter.

parler is a private service and gets to decide how to run it and who
gets to use it, just as every other service does.

<https://i.etsystatic.com/11019183/r/il/c6721b/1920811285/il_794xN.19208
11285_9n4a.jpg>

> They want us to
> believe that they're all about free speech when they're banning people
> for speaking freely

that's not what they're doing.

they're banning people for violating their terms of service, including
posting false, misleading and outright dangerous content, especially
when it can result in injuries or death.

people can speak freely all they want.

what they can't do is force another company to do things it doesn't
want to do.

what you want is the very opposite of freedom.

>
> >> Right now, you're basically lying but that's something habitual with
> >> you. In Parler's case, Trump was _allegedly_ asking them to limit free
> >> speech in his favour in exchange for his presence. Apparently, it
> >> extended to them censoring anyone who was critical of Jews which would
> >> explain why Gab wasn't even considered. In the case of Twitter, Facebook
> >> and Youtube, they censored _his_ free speech because they didn't like
> >> what he was saying regardless of whether it was true or not.
> >
> > nobody censored trump's free speech.
>
> Lie. The social media platforms coordinated to ban him simultaneously.

nonsense. nobody coordinated anyone to do anything.

actions have consequences. it's that simple.

On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 18:53:59 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Jul 27, 2021 at 10:42:13 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
> <op.06694nf0mvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>
>> On Mon, 26 Jul 2021 16:38:48 +0100, wrote:
>>
>>> LegionX <MichaelAndAnneGlasser@griftersconjobsllc.com> posted this:
>>>
>>>> "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> Wrote in message:
>>>>
>>>>> Are you so bored with your life that you reply to me about someone else?
>>>>
>>>> Yes. We are.
>>>>
>>>> Some of us sadly live in a city where the elected officials have
>>>> enforced another mask mandate. Due to covid delta variant spread.
>>>> We're back to remote office work. We are beyond bored.
>>>
>>>
>>> Here's where our government and especially our subservient news media are
>>> letting the general public down, over simplified:
>>>
>>> "[My] People are destroyed for lack of knowledge." -- Hosea 4:6
>>>
>>> The COVID-19 "vaccinations" ONLY prevent the recipient[s] from getting
>>> seriously ill or dying from the virus. It DOES NOT prevent you from
>>> CONTRACTING the disease; CARRYING the virus; or, INFECTING OTHERS with the
>>> virus!
>>>
>>> These "vaccinations" DO NOT operate like insecticides and "kill the virus".
>>>
>>> They merely train specific human RNA strains to resist the virus attaching
>>> to a specific protien which causes immune system reactions which are so
>>> severe that it makes people severely ill or kills them...
>>>
>>> Don't forget that at the outset of this "pandemic" it was well publicized
>>> that ONE OF THE REASONS THIS VIRUS is so virulent is because an infected
>>> host (human) can carry and transmit the virus for ~2-weeks BEFORE showing
>>> any symptoms...
>>>
>>> In other words, if you have the "vaccination[s]" - and are otherwise
>>> relatively healthy - and you contact the virus and IN FACT be "infected"
>>> but you simply will not get seriously ill or die from it... BUT you still
>>> CARRY THE VIRUS and CAN INFECT OTHER PEOPLE - WHO CAN IN TURN INFECT STILL
>>> MORE PEOPLE... AD INFINITUM - before the virus inside you dies because it
>>> cannot attach to the protien it needs to make you sick... IF you are
>>> otherwise relatively healthy...
>>
>> Which is one of the reasons not to get vaccinated. You're actally more
>> dangerous as you don't realise you're infected and contact more people.
>
> No, you are not. The amount of misinformation is absurd.

The misinformation is because nobody knows. Best to ignore "scientists" who all disagree with each other. I've heard a doctor (a surgeon) say the masks we wear are of no use whatsoever. Unless we all used surgical masks, we might aswell not bother.

On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 18:58:46 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Jul 27, 2021 at 10:38:18 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
> <op.0669x4pymvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>
>> On Mon, 26 Jul 2021 06:54:29 +0100, LegionX
>> <MichaelAndAnneGlasser@griftersconjobsllc.com> wrote:
>>
>>> "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> Wrote in message:
>>>
>>>> How the fuck can you need to ask someone if you're involved in an
>>>> explosion?<> Welcome to a flaw in snit logic. Gremlin didn't write the post
>>> snit is writing about. We did.
>>>
>>> Snit has accused us of being a Gremlin sock - we've invited him to
>>> post the evidence supporting his accusation. To snit that meant
>>> he would just continue to repeat it. In snits mind. Thats what
>>> evidence means.
>>>
>>> Snit didn't accuse us of this until we busted him socking up as
>>> Sigmond and provided actual evidence to help us prove our
>>> accusation. We caught him using the same IP address posting as
>>> Sigmond as he did with Snit. He didn't even deny he made both
>>> posts until we specifically pointed out the fact we found the
>>> posts shared the same ip in plain sight in the headers. Once we
>>> grilled him good and tore both of his explanations for this so
>>> called ip forgery (hah yep on usenet with known servers that
>>> werent compromised) he started accusing us of being a sock of
>>> Gremlins.
>>>
>>> We know enough about you to know that like snit you dont earn an
>>> income. You're also mooch and like snit very well known as a
>>> troll. But you're different in the sense your not a harmful troll
>>> whos out to fuck people over. You just do it for kicks. We get
>>> that. Snit on the other hand is a real life dangerous
>>> narcisist.
>>>
>>>> Wouldn't it be obvious?<> It should be. But this is snits story so the
>>>> gaping holes in his
>>> "logic" are the reason he wrote what he did. Gremlin hasn't
>>> posted since June of this year. Snit has spent the time to
>>> continue badmouthing him every chance he gets. He really is that
>>> *jealous* of Gremlin.
>>
>> Get a life.
>
> I wonder if LegionX is Gremlin trying to pretend he has a flood bot similar to
> Carroll's.

I stopped caring a long time ago. Maybe we should find them/it a hobby?

On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 20:16:18 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Jul 27, 2021 at 11:57:30 AM MST, "Rabid Roach" wrote
> <uGYLI.42794$0Z7.19653@fx39.iad>:
>
>> On 2021-07-27 1:30 p.m., Commander Kinsey wrote:
>>> On Sun, 25 Jul 2021 19:59:34 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Jul 25, 2021 at 11:01:33 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>>> <op.063lovo2mvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, 23 Jul 2021 20:22:10 +0100, Rabid Roach <rabid@roa.ch> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2021-07-23 2:56 p.m., LegionX wrote:
>>>>>>> "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> Wrote in message:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Are you so bored with your life that you reply to me about someone
>>>>>>>> else?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes. We are.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Some of us sadly live in a city where the elected officials have
>>>>>>> enforced another mask mandate. Due to covid delta variant spread.
>>>>>>> We're back to remote office work. We are beyond bored.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The "delta variant" is basically one that was created by those who
>>>>>> chose
>>>>>> to get "vaccinated" with a concoction that is likely to kill them.
>>>>>> It is
>>>>>> more contagious but also less potent.
>>>>>
>>>>> Nobody is sticking any shit into my arm.
>>>>
>>>> Nor is anyone asking to.
>>>>
>>>> I hope they start demanding proof of vaccination once it gets full FDA
>>>> approval (which is likely coming soon).
>>>
>>> By which time it'll have been long gone anyway.
>>
>> I'm _shocked_ that Marxist Snit is demanding tyranny.
>
> I did no such thing, nor am I a Marxist. But, hey, you got my online handle
> right. Good for you!

Tyranny is "government by a ruler or small group of people who have unlimited power over the people" - which is exactly what "demanding proof of vaccination" is.

On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 20:00:48 +0100, Rabid Roach <rabid@roa.ch> wrote:

> On 2021-07-27 1:39 p.m., Commander Kinsey wrote:
>> On Mon, 26 Jul 2021 14:51:39 +0100, Rabid Roach <rabid@roa.ch> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2021-07-26 9:39 a.m., Commander Kinsey wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 25 Jul 2021 03:17:43 +0100, Rabid Roach <rabid@roa.ch> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2021-07-24 1:28 p.m., Commander Kinsey wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, 23 Jul 2021 13:31:07 +0100, Rabid Roach <rabid@roa.ch> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2021-07-22 11:44 p.m., AJL wrote:
>>>>>>>> Snit wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Jul 22, 2021 at 8:48:29 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> That's why you neanderthals still have guns.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Who is going to pay the government to stop people from having guns?
>>>>>>>>> You?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In a US city I lived in around 40 years ago the city council
>>>>>>>> voted to
>>>>>>>> buy guns (all types) from the public and then destroyed them.
>>>>>>>> They had
>>>>>>>> lots of takers. The program lasted for a couple of years as I
>>>>>>>> recall. I
>>>>>>>> don't remember if it did any good at the time but currently the
>>>>>>>> city has
>>>>>>>> the same gun problem as the rest in its size class (6M pop metro).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Buying back guns from lawful owners simply means that when the thugs
>>>>>>> who
>>>>>>> got them illegally decide to commit crimes, nobody will be able to
>>>>>>> stop
>>>>>>> them. If your country gives you the right and the ability to defend
>>>>>>> yourself, why the heck would you sacrifice it?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The idea is the thugs are less likely to be able to obtain one (eg. by
>>>>>> stealing it from a legal owner).
>>>>>
>>>>> It's interesting reasoning but it doesn't seem to be realistic.
>>>>> Besides,
>>>>> considering how tyrannical the governments of the world have already
>>>>> become with their reaction to the Kung Flu,
>>>>
>>>> Agreed on that.
>>>>
>>>>> I am not sure that as an
>>>>> American, I would be willing to make it even easier for them to
>>>>> bully me
>>>>> around than it already is.
>>>>
>>>> The UK manages without guns.
>>>
>>> Actual Brits, whose ancestors have been there for hundreds or thousands
>>> of years are Christian, well-behaved and believe in manners. I imagine
>>> that amongst them, guns are of no use. However, I wonder whether the New
>>> Brits have resorted to other means to kill people now that guns are not
>>> available...
>>>
>>> ... oh wait, what's this?
>>>
>>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ow-b1Cus1fg> "Birmingham knife crime
>>> overtakes London"
>>>
>>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=msTmT16-nRU> "London on track for
>>> highest number of teenage killings in a decade"
>>>
>>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j7pIO0F9y0U> "Knife crime on the rise
>>> in London"
>>>
>>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BJGyhuiW57M> "London's murder rate
>>> worse than New York?"
>>>
>>> You can take the knife out of the killer's hands but you can't take the
>>> killer out. Those wonderful, peaceful "New Brits" from Africa will
>>> always find a way. I wonder if the Old Brits would have enjoyed having a
>>> way of defending themselves against the adherents to the "religion of
>>> peace?"
>>
>> Knives are not as dangerous as guns, you could stop me killing you with
>> a knife.
>
> No, I can _try_. The fact that I am unarmed and that you have a knife
> gives you an advantage over me.

I was knifed (failed attempt) a long time ago. I grabbed his wrist and squeezed, then attempted to break his arm. He dropped the knife and ran away.

The problem with attacking you with a knife is I cannot defend my arm. And the arm is needed to control the knife.

On Jul 29, 2021 at 10:47:31 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
<op.07azpht8mvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:

> On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 20:16:18 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Jul 27, 2021 at 11:57:30 AM MST, "Rabid Roach" wrote
>> <uGYLI.42794$0Z7.19653@fx39.iad>:
>>
>>> On 2021-07-27 1:30 p.m., Commander Kinsey wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 25 Jul 2021 19:59:34 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Jul 25, 2021 at 11:01:33 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>>>> <op.063lovo2mvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, 23 Jul 2021 20:22:10 +0100, Rabid Roach <rabid@roa.ch> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2021-07-23 2:56 p.m., LegionX wrote:
>>>>>>>> "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> Wrote in message:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Are you so bored with your life that you reply to me about someone
>>>>>>>>> else?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yes. We are.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Some of us sadly live in a city where the elected officials have
>>>>>>>> enforced another mask mandate. Due to covid delta variant spread.
>>>>>>>> We're back to remote office work. We are beyond bored.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The "delta variant" is basically one that was created by those who
>>>>>>> chose
>>>>>>> to get "vaccinated" with a concoction that is likely to kill them.
>>>>>>> It is
>>>>>>> more contagious but also less potent.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nobody is sticking any shit into my arm.
>>>>>
>>>>> Nor is anyone asking to.
>>>>>
>>>>> I hope they start demanding proof of vaccination once it gets full FDA
>>>>> approval (which is likely coming soon).
>>>>
>>>> By which time it'll have been long gone anyway.
>>>
>>> I'm _shocked_ that Marxist Snit is demanding tyranny.
>>
>> I did no such thing, nor am I a Marxist. But, hey, you got my online handle
>> right. Good for you!
>
> Tyranny is "government by a ruler or small group of people who have unlimited
> power over the people" - which is exactly what "demanding proof of
> vaccination" is.

How? Every society has safety standards. Do you not want your wait staff to
have washed their hands after they use the restroom? Is that "tyranny" in your
mind?

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Jul 29, 2021 at 10:45:53 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
<op.07azmrrymvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:

> On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 18:58:46 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Jul 27, 2021 at 10:38:18 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>> <op.0669x4pymvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>
>>> On Mon, 26 Jul 2021 06:54:29 +0100, LegionX
>>> <MichaelAndAnneGlasser@griftersconjobsllc.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> Wrote in message:
>>>>
>>>>> How the fuck can you need to ask someone if you're involved in an
>>>>> explosion?<> Welcome to a flaw in snit logic. Gremlin didn't write the post
>>>> snit is writing about. We did.
>>>>
>>>> Snit has accused us of being a Gremlin sock - we've invited him to
>>>> post the evidence supporting his accusation. To snit that meant
>>>> he would just continue to repeat it. In snits mind. Thats what
>>>> evidence means.
>>>>
>>>> Snit didn't accuse us of this until we busted him socking up as
>>>> Sigmond and provided actual evidence to help us prove our
>>>> accusation. We caught him using the same IP address posting as
>>>> Sigmond as he did with Snit. He didn't even deny he made both
>>>> posts until we specifically pointed out the fact we found the
>>>> posts shared the same ip in plain sight in the headers. Once we
>>>> grilled him good and tore both of his explanations for this so
>>>> called ip forgery (hah yep on usenet with known servers that
>>>> werent compromised) he started accusing us of being a sock of
>>>> Gremlins.
>>>>
>>>> We know enough about you to know that like snit you dont earn an
>>>> income. You're also mooch and like snit very well known as a
>>>> troll. But you're different in the sense your not a harmful troll
>>>> whos out to fuck people over. You just do it for kicks. We get
>>>> that. Snit on the other hand is a real life dangerous
>>>> narcisist.
>>>>
>>>>> Wouldn't it be obvious?<> It should be. But this is snits story so the
>>>>> gaping holes in his
>>>> "logic" are the reason he wrote what he did. Gremlin hasn't
>>>> posted since June of this year. Snit has spent the time to
>>>> continue badmouthing him every chance he gets. He really is that
>>>> *jealous* of Gremlin.
>>>
>>> Get a life.
>>
>> I wonder if LegionX is Gremlin trying to pretend he has a flood bot similar to
>> Carroll's.
>
> I stopped caring a long time ago. Maybe we should find them/it a hobby?

Anger is his hobby these days.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Jul 29, 2021 at 10:44:45 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
<op.07azkvg7mvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:

> On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 18:53:59 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Jul 27, 2021 at 10:42:13 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>> <op.06694nf0mvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>
>>> On Mon, 26 Jul 2021 16:38:48 +0100, wrote:
>>>
>>>> LegionX <MichaelAndAnneGlasser@griftersconjobsllc.com> posted this:
>>>>
>>>>> "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> Wrote in message:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Are you so bored with your life that you reply to me about someone else?
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes. We are.
>>>>>
>>>>> Some of us sadly live in a city where the elected officials have
>>>>> enforced another mask mandate. Due to covid delta variant spread.
>>>>> We're back to remote office work. We are beyond bored.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Here's where our government and especially our subservient news media are
>>>> letting the general public down, over simplified:
>>>>
>>>> "[My] People are destroyed for lack of knowledge." -- Hosea 4:6
>>>>
>>>> The COVID-19 "vaccinations" ONLY prevent the recipient[s] from getting
>>>> seriously ill or dying from the virus. It DOES NOT prevent you from
>>>> CONTRACTING the disease; CARRYING the virus; or, INFECTING OTHERS with the
>>>> virus!
>>>>
>>>> These "vaccinations" DO NOT operate like insecticides and "kill the virus".
>>>>
>>>> They merely train specific human RNA strains to resist the virus attaching
>>>> to a specific protien which causes immune system reactions which are so
>>>> severe that it makes people severely ill or kills them...
>>>>
>>>> Don't forget that at the outset of this "pandemic" it was well publicized
>>>> that ONE OF THE REASONS THIS VIRUS is so virulent is because an infected
>>>> host (human) can carry and transmit the virus for ~2-weeks BEFORE showing
>>>> any symptoms...
>>>>
>>>> In other words, if you have the "vaccination[s]" - and are otherwise
>>>> relatively healthy - and you contact the virus and IN FACT be "infected"
>>>> but you simply will not get seriously ill or die from it... BUT you still
>>>> CARRY THE VIRUS and CAN INFECT OTHER PEOPLE - WHO CAN IN TURN INFECT STILL
>>>> MORE PEOPLE... AD INFINITUM - before the virus inside you dies because it
>>>> cannot attach to the protien it needs to make you sick... IF you are
>>>> otherwise relatively healthy...
>>>
>>> Which is one of the reasons not to get vaccinated. You're actally more
>>> dangerous as you don't realise you're infected and contact more people.
>>
>> No, you are not. The amount of misinformation is absurd.
>
> The misinformation is because nobody knows.

There is always more to learn, but we now know a lot about COVID and the
vaccines -- for example, we know they are very safe and effective.

> Best to ignore "scientists" who all disagree with each other.

Disagreement is a part of science... but then so is a growing consensus as we
learn more.

> I've heard a doctor (a surgeon) say the masks we wear are of no use
> whatsoever. Unless we all used surgical masks, we might aswell not bother.

That doctor is saying things against the evidence. I say go with the evidence.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

Commander Kinsey <CK1@nospam.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 18:53:59 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Jul 27, 2021 at 10:42:13 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>> <op.06694nf0mvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>
>>> On Mon, 26 Jul 2021 16:38:48 +0100, wrote:
>>>
>>>> LegionX <MichaelAndAnneGlasser@griftersconjobsllc.com> posted this:
>>>>
>>>>> "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> Wrote in message:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Are you so bored with your life that you reply to me about someone else?
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes. We are.
>>>>>
>>>>> Some of us sadly live in a city where the elected officials have
>>>>> enforced another mask mandate. Due to covid delta variant spread.
>>>>> We're back to remote office work. We are beyond bored.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Here's where our government and especially our subservient news media are
>>>> letting the general public down, over simplified:
>>>>
>>>> "[My] People are destroyed for lack of knowledge." -- Hosea 4:6
>>>>
>>>> The COVID-19 "vaccinations" ONLY prevent the recipient[s] from getting
>>>> seriously ill or dying from the virus. It DOES NOT prevent you from
>>>> CONTRACTING the disease; CARRYING the virus; or, INFECTING OTHERS with the
>>>> virus!
>>>>
>>>> These "vaccinations" DO NOT operate like insecticides and "kill the virus".
>>>>
>>>> They merely train specific human RNA strains to resist the virus attaching
>>>> to a specific protien which causes immune system reactions which are so
>>>> severe that it makes people severely ill or kills them...
>>>>
>>>> Don't forget that at the outset of this "pandemic" it was well publicized
>>>> that ONE OF THE REASONS THIS VIRUS is so virulent is because an infected
>>>> host (human) can carry and transmit the virus for ~2-weeks BEFORE showing
>>>> any symptoms...
>>>>
>>>> In other words, if you have the "vaccination[s]" - and are otherwise
>>>> relatively healthy - and you contact the virus and IN FACT be "infected"
>>>> but you simply will not get seriously ill or die from it... BUT you still
>>>> CARRY THE VIRUS and CAN INFECT OTHER PEOPLE - WHO CAN IN TURN INFECT STILL
>>>> MORE PEOPLE... AD INFINITUM - before the virus inside you dies because it
>>>> cannot attach to the protien it needs to make you sick... IF you are
>>>> otherwise relatively healthy...
>>>
>>> Which is one of the reasons not to get vaccinated. You're actally more
>>> dangerous as you don't realise you're infected and contact more people.
>>
>> No, you are not. The amount of misinformation is absurd.
>
> The misinformation is because nobody knows.

Wrong as usual. The vaccines reduce transmission by 80% after the first
dose and 90% after both.
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7013e3.htm

> Best to ignore "scientists" who all disagree with each other. I've heard
> a doctor (a surgeon) say the masks we wear are of no use whatsoever.
> Unless we all used surgical masks, we might aswell not bother.

So you prefer anecdotes, I see.

On Jul 29, 2021 at 12:34:55 PM MST, "Chris" wrote
<sduvsv$p9j$1@dont-email.me>:

>>>> Which is one of the reasons not to get vaccinated. You're actally more
>>>> dangerous as you don't realise you're infected and contact more people.
>>>
>>> No, you are not. The amount of misinformation is absurd.
>>
>> The misinformation is because nobody knows.
>
> Wrong as usual. The vaccines reduce transmission by 80% after the first
> dose and 90% after both.
> https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7013e3.htm
>
>> Best to ignore "scientists" who all disagree with each other. I've heard
>> a doctor (a surgeon) say the masks we wear are of no use whatsoever.
>> Unless we all used surgical masks, we might aswell not bother.
>
> So you prefer anecdotes, I see.

Right: the plural of anecdote is not data.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 20:02:07 +0100, Rabid Roach <rabid@roa.ch> wrote:

> On 2021-07-27 1:40 p.m., Commander Kinsey wrote:
>> On Mon, 26 Jul 2021 14:54:26 +0100, Rabid Roach <rabid@roa.ch> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2021-07-26 9:40 a.m., Commander Kinsey wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 25 Jul 2021 03:19:16 +0100, Rabid Roach <rabid@roa.ch> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2021-07-24 1:29 p.m., Commander Kinsey wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, 23 Jul 2021 13:47:45 +0100, pothead <pothead@snakebite.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2021-07-23, Rabid Roach <rabid@roa.ch> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2021-07-22 11:44 p.m., AJL wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Snit wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 22, 2021 at 8:48:29 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> That's why you neanderthals still have guns.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Who is going to pay the government to stop people from having
>>>>>>>>>> guns?
>>>>>>>>>> You?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In a US city I lived in around 40 years ago the city council
>>>>>>>>> voted to
>>>>>>>>> buy guns (all types) from the public and then destroyed them. They
>>>>>>>>> had
>>>>>>>>> lots of takers. The program lasted for a couple of years as I
>>>>>>>>> recall. I
>>>>>>>>> don't remember if it did any good at the time but currently the
>>>>>>>>> city
>>>>>>>>> has
>>>>>>>>> the same gun problem as the rest in its size class (6M pop metro).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Buying back guns from lawful owners simply means that when the
>>>>>>>> thugs who
>>>>>>>> got them illegally decide to commit crimes, nobody will be able to
>>>>>>>> stop
>>>>>>>> them. If your country gives you the right and the ability to defend
>>>>>>>> yourself, why the heck would you sacrifice it?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Gun control will never work.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It works in the UK.
>>>>>
>>>>> That's right: there are no stabbings, people getting run over by vans
>>>>> driven by those devout to the "religion of peace" or explosions in the
>>>>> UK anymore. It's been at least a few days.
>>>>>
>>>>> When was gun control implemented again?
>>>>
>>>> Why would you expect a lack of guns to help with those? It helps with
>>>> the most easy way to kill someone. I can't knife you from a distance.
>>>
>>> That's not what I was saying. I was suggesting that even if you make
>>> guns more difficult to obtain, the killers remain.
>>
>> But would find it more difficult to kill.
>
> Wars were waged for millennia with both sides using little more than
> what are today considered to be knives. We didn't somehow become immune
> to stab wounds over that amount of time.

I could shoot 20 people in a few minutes, I doubt I could stab that many.

>>> If the United Kingdom
>>> were concerned about keeping their streets safe, they wouldn't let in
>>> those very well-mannered and peaceful migrants from Africa who worship a
>>> murderous pedophile who wrote a book demanding that anyone who doesn't
>>> have the same ideology must die. If discarding that trash is of no
>>> interest to them, giving the real Brits a fighting chance againt these
>>> barbarians wouldn't be such a bad idea.
>>
>> I agree on the immigrunts.
>
> I like that name, immigrunts.

Slightly changing a word often makes more sense. Like plandemic.

On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 15:19:49 +0100, wrote:

> Commander Kinsey <CK1@nospam.com> posted this:
>
>> On Mon, 26 Jul 2021 16:38:48 +0100, wrote:
>>
>>> LegionX <MichaelAndAnneGlasser@griftersconjobsllc.com> posted this:
>>>
>>>> "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> Wrote in message:
>>>>
>>>>> Are you so bored with your life that you reply to me about someone
>>>>> else?
>>>>
>>>> Yes. We are.
>>>>
>>>> Some of us sadly live in a city where the elected officials have
>>>> enforced another mask mandate. Due to covid delta variant spread.
>>>> We're back to remote office work. We are beyond bored.
>>>
>>>
>>> Here's where our government and especially our subservient news media
>>> are letting the general public down, over simplified:
>>>
>>> "[My] People are destroyed for lack of knowledge." -- Hosea
>>> 4:6
>>>
>>> The COVID-19 "vaccinations" ONLY prevent the recipient[s] from getting
>>> seriously ill or dying from the virus. It DOES NOT prevent you from
>>> CONTRACTING the disease; CARRYING the virus; or, INFECTING OTHERS with
>>> the virus!
>>>
>>> These "vaccinations" DO NOT operate like insecticides and "kill the
>>> virus".
>>>
>>> They merely train specific human RNA strains to resist the virus
>>> attaching to a specific protien which causes immune system reactions
>>> which are so severe that it makes people severely ill or kills them...
>>>
>>> Don't forget that at the outset of this "pandemic" it was well
>>> publicized that ONE OF THE REASONS THIS VIRUS is so virulent is because
>>> an infected host (human) can carry and transmit the virus for ~2-weeks
>>> BEFORE showing any symptoms...
>>>
>>> In other words, if you have the "vaccination[s]" - and are otherwise
>>> relatively healthy - and you contact the virus and IN FACT be
>>> "infected" but you simply will not get seriously ill or die from it...
>>> BUT you still CARRY THE VIRUS and CAN INFECT OTHER PEOPLE - WHO CAN IN
>>> TURN INFECT STILL MORE PEOPLE... AD INFINITUM - before the virus
>>> inside you dies because it cannot attach to the protien it needs to
>>> make you sick... IF you are otherwise relatively healthy...
>
>
>>
>> Which is one of the reasons not to get vaccinated. You're actally more
>> dangerous as you don't realise you're infected and contact more people.
>>
>
> D'UH! #WHOOSH Somebody explain it to him...
>
>
>>> This is WHY wearing of masks IS NOT an issue of personal freedom... It
>>> is a matter of LOGICAL STRATEGY to defeat the virus' spreading - and
>>> mutating - until sufficient population are "vaccinated" to
>>> constructively defeat this incantation of this virus.
>
>
>>
>> I will wear what I want to wear and nobody will tell me otherwise. Stop
>> fussing over a bad flu that kills less than malaria, kidney disease, and
>> cancer.
>
>
> Well, aren't *YOU* one of God's "special" little parasites?
>
> One thing seems for sure at this point: only the fucking brain-dead idiots,
> the poorest, the most ill-informed, and the most vulnerable among us will
> die from COVID-19 while the virus perpetuates itself because insolent
> assholes refuse to protect all of mankind by submitting to the simpliest of
> procedures and protocols...
>
> Reminds me of that poem, 'If', by Rudyard Kipling.

You're confused, first you say only the ill-informed will die, then you say we're endangering others.

On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 18:53:44 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Jul 28, 2021 at 10:40:33 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
> <op.0684pvsxmvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>
>> On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 18:42:55 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Jul 27, 2021 at 10:33:50 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>> <op.0669qox3mvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>>
>>>>>>>> Good luck finding an Apple M1 CPU and motherboard.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Even with Intel Macs it is not as easy as many seem to think. And if you did
>>>>>>> do it there was no reason to think the machine would be supported,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There's no need to think: it is utterly unsupported.
>>>>>
>>>>> I meant not even being able to run the never version of macOS. My wording was
>>>>> not clear though.
>>>>
>>>> If you build it with parts that Apple use, the OS thinks it's an Apple and
>>>> will behave exactly the same way.
>>>
>>> Not quite as easy as you try to make it sound:
>>>
>>> https://www.quora.com/How-reliable-is-a-64-bit-Hackintosh-as-a-main-computer
>>>
>>> But as a hobby project it sounds like fun.
>>
>> I know it's easy because I've done a few of them.
>
> How many macOS versions did you use on it?

I've explained this already. If it fools one, it'll fool them all.

On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 18:57:21 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Jul 28, 2021 at 10:40:11 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
> <op.0684o9yomvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>
>> ...
>>>>>
>>>>> Even with Intel Macs it is not as easy as many seem to think.
>>>>
>>>> It was fucking easy. Mainly just the motherboard needs to be the same, in my
>>>> case it was Foxconn boards.
>>>
>>> Motherboard and GPU and other components. And even then you might be one macOS
>>> update away from not being able to use it (with the update).
>>
>> Ok, maybe the GPU. But everything else is pretty standard.
>>
>> And I disagree on the update. If any combination is ok with version X, it will
>> be ok with version X+1, otherwise Apple would be killing off genuine Apples
>> too.
>
> I have heard horror stories of folks who have one only to have Apple change
> things and make them no longer work (with the new upgrade). Even have this on
> minor updates.
>
> Not sure how common it is though... I have never made one.
>
>>
>>>>> And if you did
>>>>> do it there was no reason to think the machine would be supported, and if you
>>>>> ran into issues no way to get support from Apple, and Apple offers excellent
>>>>> support.
>>>>
>>>> Who asks for support from Apple/Microsoft? We use Google.
>>>
>>> I run into issue where Google has no answers.
>>
>> In which case nobody will.
>
> Worked recently with Apple on some odd issues a neighbor was having. In the
> end, I admit, they were not of much help... ended up doing a backup, wiping
> the drive, and starting from scratch. Never had to do that before. They were
> having very weird permissions issues... things would be allowed sometimes
> until they gave permission, then they were not allowed at all. Tried a new
> user. Re-installed the OS. Created another new user. No dice.
>
> Wiped the drive and brought their data back... and all was good. Very odd.

Computers are getting too complicated and too random. They used to be simple and would do the same thing under the same circumstances. The only good thing about that is if one crashes, you can do exactly the same thing and it probably won't the next time.

>>>>>>> Not only do you get the hardware about half the price, but you don't have
>>>>>>> to pay for the OS.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> macOS has been free for the best part of a decade.
>>>>>
>>>>> You pay for it with the hardware... he is talking about pirating.
>>>>
>>>> I'm a very naughty boy.
>>>
>>> You are.
>>
>> Spank me.
>
> Can I take videos as I do it?

Only if you have a Sony steadycam.

On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 18:57:55 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Jul 28, 2021 at 10:37:55 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
> <op.0684lhcymvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>
>> On Mon, 26 Jul 2021 21:12:13 +0100, Carlos E. R. <robin_listas@es.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 26/07/2021 15.45, Commander Kinsey wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 25 Jul 2021 19:57:57 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Jul 25, 2021 at 11:04:08 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>>>> <op.063ls6u3mvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Bollocks, the fan makes no detectable noise when spinning at
>>>>>>>>>>>> minimum speed.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It can run at lower speeds because of the making use of
>>>>>>>>>>> convection cooling.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Once it's spinning, convection cannot occur. The air is moving
>>>>>>>>>> faster than
>>>>>>>>>> convection.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> One force does not stop when another starts, and presumably the
>>>>>>>>> fan is not
>>>>>>>>> running all the time.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Slow fans are not audible by humans.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> When needed they speed up... and I bet what you say is not audible
>>>>>>> often is.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Convection is not as good as a speeded up fan.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sure... but those made to work with convection have that as an
>>>>> advantage. As
>>>>> you note, though, there are tradeoffs.
>>>>
>>>> If it's coming through the same hole, convection does nothing at all
>>>> when the fan is running.
>>>
>>> Not fully correct :-)
>>>
>>> The heat inside a chip goes to its surface by convection, and travels
>>> the heatsink via convection, where it passes to the air flow.
>>
>> No, conduction not convection in a solid. Convection would need the metal to
>> move.
>
> Get it hot enough and it will!

I don't believe that would be within the design specs of the silicon.

On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 18:58:27 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Jul 28, 2021 at 10:36:32 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
> <op.0684i6c5mvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>
>> On Mon, 26 Jul 2021 18:22:27 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Jul 26, 2021 at 6:35:36 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>> <op.06431mnxmvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, 24 Jul 2021 03:52:44 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Jul 23, 2021 at 7:20:40 PM MST, "Rabid Roach" wrote
>>>>> <YNKKI.17476$W56.2707@fx08.iad>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2021-07-23 7:45 p.m., Rene Lamontagne wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2021-07-23 5:28 p.m., Rabid Roach wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2021-07-23 3:58 p.m., Rene Lamontagne wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 2021-07-23 2:41 p.m., nospam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> In article <DFEKI.28482$0Z7.24976@fx39.iad>, Rabid Roach <rabid@roa.ch>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The "delta variant" is basically one that was created by those who
>>>>>>>>>>> chose
>>>>>>>>>>> to get "vaccinated" with a concoction that is likely to kill them.
>>>>>>>>>>> It is
>>>>>>>>>>> more contagious but also less potent.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> nonsense. not one word of that is even remotely correct.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Rabid roach is spreading FUD and bullshit. and cowshit.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I believe in your freedom to believe what the legacy media tells you
>>>>>>>> on Friday, even if it is contradicted by what they tell you on
>>>>>>>> Saturday. Enjoy your sleep.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> My podiatrist Passed away in the HSC ICU from COVID-19 y
>>>>>>> three weeks ago! Do you think that's my imagination?
>>>>>>> Do you see any smileys here?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You Dumb Cockroach.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My condolences, but none of what you are saying is confirming that the
>>>>>> delta variant is more dangerous
>>>>>
>>>>> It is more contagious.
>>>>>
>>>>>> or that the vaccine works.
>>>>>
>>>>> Massi evidence shows it does. Heck, well over 90% of those in hospitals are
>>>>> not fully vaccinated.
>>>>>
>>>>>> You're simply
>>>>>> telling me a story which is supposed to stimulate emotion in me and get
>>>>>> me to back down. I am neither moved nor willing to back down on my
>>>>>> statement.
>>>>>
>>>>> Logic, fact checking, scientific studies are more than emotion. Please stop
>>>>> spreading lies.
>>>>
>>>> My emotion tells me you're all worrying about something insignificant.
>>>>
>>>> Biggest cause of death in the world - Malaria.
>>>> 2nd biggest - Kidney disease.
>>>> 3rd biggest - Cancer.
>>>> 4th biggest - Coronavirus - a bad flu.
>>>
>>> And that is with large work to reduce the harm of Covid. Imagine if we did
>>> not. Already in the US, even with our precautions, it has reduced the average
>>> life span by about 1 year. I assume it is about the same for the UK.
>>>
>>> That does not even count the 1 in 3 survivors with long term health effects.
>>
>> With a population of 7 billion, I don't give a fuck if half of them die, it
>> would make the world more sensible.
>
> And that is why libertarianism cannot work.

It would solve your "climate" problem if there was only half of us.

On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 18:58:41 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Jul 28, 2021 at 10:35:59 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
> <op.0684h9zqmvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>
>> On Mon, 26 Jul 2021 18:21:04 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Jul 26, 2021 at 6:36:03 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>> <op.06432d2nmvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, 24 Jul 2021 03:53:58 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Jul 23, 2021 at 7:48:44 PM MST, "Rene Lamontagne" wrote
>>>>> <im1dcbF2g80U1@mid.individual.net>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2021-07-23 9:20 p.m., Rabid Roach wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2021-07-23 7:45 p.m., Rene Lamontagne wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2021-07-23 5:28 p.m., Rabid Roach wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 2021-07-23 3:58 p.m., Rene Lamontagne wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 2021-07-23 2:41 p.m., nospam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> In article <DFEKI.28482$0Z7.24976@fx39.iad>, Rabid Roach
>>>>>>>>>>> <rabid@roa.ch>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The "delta variant" is basically one that was created by those who
>>>>>>>>>>>> chose
>>>>>>>>>>>> to get "vaccinated" with a concoction that is likely to kill them.
>>>>>>>>>>>> It is
>>>>>>>>>>>> more contagious but also less potent.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> nonsense. not one word of that is even remotely correct.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Rabid roach is spreading FUD and bullshit. and cowshit.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I believe in your freedom to believe what the legacy media tells you
>>>>>>>>> on Friday, even if it is contradicted by what they tell you on
>>>>>>>>> Saturday. Enjoy your sleep.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> My podiatrist Passed away in the HSC ICU from COVID-19 y
>>>>>>>> three weeks ago! Do you think that's my imagination?
>>>>>>>> Do you see any smileys here?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You Dumb Cockroach.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> My condolences, but none of what you are saying is confirming that the
>>>>>>> delta variant is more dangerous or that the vaccine works. You're simply
>>>>>>> telling me a story which is supposed to stimulate emotion in me and get
>>>>>>> me to back down. I am neither moved nor willing to back down on my
>>>>>>> statement.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I really don't give a *fuck*what you do, as you're only a lone cockroach
>>>>>> in my book.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Rene
>>>>>
>>>>> Why be so cruel to cockroaches?
>>>>
>>>> I kill all insects. They didn't ask to enter my property.
>>>
>>> It was their ancestors property you stole.
>>
>> They don't have title deeds.
>
> They are very, very tiny.

I must have stood on it.

On Jul 30, 2021 at 11:07:22 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
<op.07cvakjtmvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:

> On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 18:53:44 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Jul 28, 2021 at 10:40:33 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>> <op.0684pvsxmvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>
>>> On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 18:42:55 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Jul 27, 2021 at 10:33:50 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>>> <op.0669qox3mvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Good luck finding an Apple M1 CPU and motherboard.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Even with Intel Macs it is not as easy as many seem to think. And if you did
>>>>>>>> do it there was no reason to think the machine would be supported,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There's no need to think: it is utterly unsupported.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I meant not even being able to run the never version of macOS. My wording was
>>>>>> not clear though.
>>>>>
>>>>> If you build it with parts that Apple use, the OS thinks it's an Apple and
>>>>> will behave exactly the same way.
>>>>
>>>> Not quite as easy as you try to make it sound:
>>>>
>>>> https://www.quora.com/How-reliable-is-a-64-bit-Hackintosh-as-a-main-computer
>>>>
>>>> But as a hobby project it sounds like fun.
>>>
>>> I know it's easy because I've done a few of them.
>>
>> How many macOS versions did you use on it?
>
> I've explained this already. If it fools one, it'll fool them all.

So how many did you use?

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.