Chris wrote:
> Commander Kinsey <CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

<snip>

>> No, leaving someone to die costs nothing.
>
> Only a psychopath would suggest such a thing.
>

OR a troll. One thing is for certain, in either case if he does gets
this and gets really sick like all the other deniers he will have a
sudden change of opinion and also unsurprisingly not see the hypocrisy
in it.

--
Take care,

Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO
http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com

Jonathan N. Little <lws4art@gmail.com> wrote:
> Chris wrote:
>> Commander Kinsey <CK1@nospam.com> wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>>> No, leaving someone to die costs nothing.
>>
>> Only a psychopath would suggest such a thing.
>>
>
> OR a troll. One thing is for certain, in either case if he does gets
> this and gets really sick like all the other deniers he will have a
> sudden change of opinion and also unsurprisingly not see the hypocrisy
> in it.

Not all. Some still claimed it wasn't a big deal just before they went to
ICU and died.

Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> posted this:
>>
>> No, it's something that only a moron would not believe, for example,
>> "there is no god because we have never seen evidence of him" is common
>> sense.
>
> Nope. It's logical reasoning coupled with Occam's Razor. Any evidence
> supporting the presence of god is more easily explained without
> resorting to a magical being.

An assertion that God does not exist would be more of a declaration of
one's limited perspective and insight than it would be "common sense" or
"logical reasoning" - coupled with any deductive device...

It's like saying China doesn't exist because you've never actually seen it
- in spite of billions of others who have.

Is it "common sense" or "logical reasoning" to opine that blowing-up a
junkyard and it's susequent remnants over and over for millions, perhaps
billions, of years would result in a perfectly made, operational, and
sentient Cadillac? That we are the product of a series of random chaotic
events?

A rule of logic states that a negative cannot be proved, therefore to argue
that a thing/entity does not exist remains 'circle-logic' - which is one of
the primary fallacies, at best - because all it does is challenge the other
side to "prove" that the thing/entity that so obviously actually is
actually exists to the satisfaction of whoever says it/He does not exist...

The proof that God exists is, in fact, the argument that he does not exist.

When Jesus said "The poor will always be with [us]", he was not only
talking about money if you consider the context in which he made the
assertion. [Reference Matthew 26:6-13 with focus on Matthew 26:11;
similarly, Mark 14:3-9 with focus on Mark 14:7; then, for clarification,
Luke 7:36-50 and John 12:1-11]

See, the woman had great faith without "evidence", in a temporal sense, and
for that, Jesus forgave her sins and made her whole again.

That's right, we all know the story of Jesus raising the dead, as
exemplified by the story of Lazarus, but how many knew that the religious
'Deep State' government of those times actually plotted to kill Lazarus to
destroy the existence of evidence that Jesus had actually done this divine
miracle?

See, no matter what the "proof" is, there will always be those who would
destroy the evidence to support whatever alterior motives on which they
premise their perspectives? So, to actually "prove" God's existence would
result in making yourself a target for termination by the forces of evil.

Hope this helps.

--

I AM Bucky Breeder, (*(^;

And *NO*, that is *NOT* a Jedi Light Saber I have in my pocket!

But that doesn't necessarily mean I'm happy to see you either.

On Aug 10, 2021 at 4:33:32 AM MST, "Bucky Breeder" wrote
<XnsAD8242B92C436Ohmmmmmmm@85.12.62.254>:

> Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> posted this:
>>>
>>> No, it's something that only a moron would not believe, for example,
>>> "there is no god because we have never seen evidence of him" is common
>>> sense.
>>
>> Nope. It's logical reasoning coupled with Occam's Razor. Any evidence
>> supporting the presence of god is more easily explained without
>> resorting to a magical being.
>
> An assertion that God does not exist would be more of a declaration of
> one's limited perspective and insight than it would be "common sense" or
> "logical reasoning" - coupled with any deductive device...
>
> It's like saying China doesn't exist because you've never actually seen it
> - in spite of billions of others who have.

Nope. There is reason to believe China exists because of evidence.

There is no evidence to suggest a god exists.

> Is it "common sense" or "logical reasoning" to opine that blowing-up a
> junkyard and it's susequent remnants over and over for millions, perhaps
> billions, of years would result in a perfectly made, operational, and
> sentient Cadillac? That we are the product of a series of random chaotic
> events?
>
> A rule of logic states that a negative cannot be proved, therefore to argue
> that a thing/entity does not exist remains 'circle-logic' - which is one of
> the primary fallacies, at best - because all it does is challenge the other
> side to "prove" that the thing/entity that so obviously actually is
> actually exists to the satisfaction of whoever says it/He does not exist...
>
> The proof that God exists is, in fact, the argument that he does not exist.
>
> When Jesus said "The poor will always be with [us]", he was not only
> talking about money if you consider the context in which he made the
> assertion. [Reference Matthew 26:6-13 with focus on Matthew 26:11;
> similarly, Mark 14:3-9 with focus on Mark 14:7; then, for clarification,
> Luke 7:36-50 and John 12:1-11]
>
> See, the woman had great faith without "evidence", in a temporal sense, and
> for that, Jesus forgave her sins and made her whole again.
>
> That's right, we all know the story of Jesus raising the dead, as
> exemplified by the story of Lazarus, but how many knew that the religious
> 'Deep State' government of those times actually plotted to kill Lazarus to
> destroy the existence of evidence that Jesus had actually done this divine
> miracle?
>
> See, no matter what the "proof" is, there will always be those who would
> destroy the evidence to support whatever alterior motives on which they
> premise their perspectives? So, to actually "prove" God's existence would
> result in making yourself a target for termination by the forces of evil.
>
> Hope this helps.

You use the prime mover argument... which does not back the idea of a god. It
does suggest something even more complex... and offers no suggestion as to how
THAT was made. It does not offer an idea which is less complex or leads to
better understanding, predicting, or control of what we see around us.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

Chris wrote:
> Jonathan N. Little <lws4art@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Chris wrote:
>>> Commander Kinsey <CK1@nospam.com> wrote:
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>>>> No, leaving someone to die costs nothing.
>>>
>>> Only a psychopath would suggest such a thing.
>>>
>>
>> OR a troll. One thing is for certain, in either case if he does gets
>> this and gets really sick like all the other deniers he will have a
>> sudden change of opinion and also unsurprisingly not see the hypocrisy
>> in it.
>
> Not all. Some still claimed it wasn't a big deal just before they went to
> ICU and died.
>

True, stupidity does have no limits it seems for some, but reports are
many are having the "Come to Jesus" moment when dying.

BTW Q: What would Jesus do?
A: Get the f'in shot...

You know all that "love thy neighbor and all..."

--
Take care,

Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO
http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com

On Aug 10, 2021 at 6:34:25 AM MST, ""Jonathan N. Little"" wrote
<setv93$96e$1@dont-email.me>:

> Chris wrote:
>> Jonathan N. Little <lws4art@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Chris wrote:
>>>> Commander Kinsey <CK1@nospam.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> <snip>
>>>
>>>>> No, leaving someone to die costs nothing.
>>>>
>>>> Only a psychopath would suggest such a thing.
>>>>
>>>
>>> OR a troll. One thing is for certain, in either case if he does gets
>>> this and gets really sick like all the other deniers he will have a
>>> sudden change of opinion and also unsurprisingly not see the hypocrisy
>>> in it.
>>
>> Not all. Some still claimed it wasn't a big deal just before they went to
>> ICU and died.
>>
>
> True, stupidity does have no limits it seems for some, but reports are
> many are having the "Come to Jesus" moment when dying.
>
> BTW Q: What would Jesus do?
> A: Get the f'in shot...
>
> You know all that "love thy neighbor and all..."

What we are seeing is more and more on the right are starting to accept the
need... mostly when they see it impacting them. This is common among American
conservatives -- things do not matter until or unless it has a more direct
impact on them.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

Snit wrote:
> On Aug 10, 2021 at 6:34:25 AM MST, ""Jonathan N. Little"" wrote
> <setv93$96e$1@dont-email.me>:
>
>> Chris wrote:
>>> Jonathan N. Little <lws4art@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Chris wrote:
>>>>> Commander Kinsey <CK1@nospam.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> <snip>
>>>>
>>>>>> No, leaving someone to die costs nothing.
>>>>>
>>>>> Only a psychopath would suggest such a thing.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> OR a troll. One thing is for certain, in either case if he does gets
>>>> this and gets really sick like all the other deniers he will have a
>>>> sudden change of opinion and also unsurprisingly not see the hypocrisy
>>>> in it.
>>>
>>> Not all. Some still claimed it wasn't a big deal just before they went to
>>> ICU and died.
>>>
>>
>> True, stupidity does have no limits it seems for some, but reports are
>> many are having the "Come to Jesus" moment when dying.
>>
>> BTW Q: What would Jesus do?
>> A: Get the f'in shot...
>>
>> You know all that "love thy neighbor and all..."
>
> What we are seeing is more and more on the right are starting to accept the
> need... mostly when they see it impacting them. This is common among American
> conservatives -- things do not matter until or unless it has a more direct
> impact on them.
>

Funny the believe in a lot of crazy shit that they cannot see...

--
Take care,

Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO
http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com

On Sat, 07 Aug 2021 20:51:18 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Aug 7, 2021 at 11:03:28 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
> <op.07rof2q0mvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>
>> On Wed, 04 Aug 2021 19:30:50 +0100, Snit <Brock.McNuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Commander Kinsey <CK1@nospam.com> wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 02 Aug 2021 20:50:04 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Aug 2, 2021 at 11:37:19 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>>>> <op.07igohdqmvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, 01 Aug 2021 19:48:42 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Aug 1, 2021 at 11:20:01 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>>>>>> <op.07gk7ne7mvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, 30 Jul 2021 22:32:48 +0100, Carlos E. R. <robin_listas@es.invalid>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 30/07/2021 20.19, Commander Kinsey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 19:06:56 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 28, 2021 at 10:41:11 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>>>>>>>>>> <op.0684qxuumvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hell, the libertarian fantasy is being destroyed (again) right now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> People
>>>>>>>>>>>>> won't even wear a mask to help save their neighbor... and you think
>>>>>>>>>>>>> they will
>>>>>>>>>>>>> pay for things they are not forced to?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> My neighbour is free to wear one himself.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> But you will not wear one to protect him. That is my point.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I don't have to, as he has one on.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Wrong.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> His mask protects you, and your mask protects him.
>>>>>>>>> His mask does not protect him. Your mask does not protect you.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Unless you (and he) use a PPE.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The air coming out of my mouth is travelling faster than it is when it reaches
>>>>>>>> him, it's more likely to be stopped by his mask as it's going slower.
>>>>>>>> Everyone's masks protects themselves.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Your claims are contrary to the evidence on mask wearing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My claim is basic common sense, it's easier to stop a slow moving thing than a
>>>>>> fast moving thing.
>>>>>
>>>>> What you call "common sense" is your guess, and your guess is incorrect. You
>>>>> are not looking at evidence on spread but your own guesses as to what leads to
>>>>> the spread.
>>>>
>>>> I don't guess that things fall down instead of up. I don't guess that
>>>> faster moving air cools something quicker. I go by logic and experience.
>>>
>>> At least on this you reject evidence and make straw men.
>>
>> Considering how air moves is not straw.
>
> You are actively creating absurd claims about how a mask protects the wearer
> more than others, and using insane claims to try to back your nonsense. You
> ignore common sense and evidence.

Nothing absurd about it. Obviously if you blast something through a piece of fabric, it will get through more easily then if you blow gently.

On Sat, 07 Aug 2021 20:52:42 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Aug 7, 2021 at 11:03:00 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
> <op.07rofaiqmvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>
>>>>>> Or just stop making a mountain out of a molehill.
>>>>>
>>>>> As you do with mask wearing. Why do you do that?
>>>>
>>>> No, I'm refusing to make a mountain out of a molehill. I won't do
>>>> something to prevent something so trivial. Just as I don't build a
>>>> nuclear fallout shelter.
>>>
>>> Your excuses for denying evidence changes nothing. You still refuse to do
>>> the smallest thing to help stem a major pandemic.
>>
>> Something that kills many times less than the population growth is not major.
>
> The fact so many minimize the pandemic is why we will need more lock downs,
> mask mandates, and vaccine passports.
>
> Then the very ones forcing that on all of us will be the first to whine their
> rights are being infringed... they create problems and then whine when others
> work to solve them.

There is no problem to solve. A very small number ar dying, and everyone is free to hide away if they so wish.

>>>>>>> The current vaccines are still effective against the newer variants.
>>>>>>> https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)01358-1/fulltext
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Last year's AVG doesn't delete this year's computer viruses either.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It might. With heuristic scanning it can identify similar viruses.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That's why you update the software. Same with vaccines, if the dominant
>>>>>>> variants drift too far away from the vaccine's effectiveness then we get an
>>>>>>> "update" (booster). Simple and effective.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Expensive and unnecessary. We have an immune system, which you're compromising
>>>>>> by using a vaccine. How is it supposed to learn to be stronger?
>>>>>
>>>>> The fact we have an immune system is not in dispute.
>>>>
>>>> It would get stronger if it was required to be used. At this rate we
>>>> won't be able to fight off a common cold.
>>>
>>> Incorrect.
>>
>> Eskimos were killed by the common cold.
>
> Some.

At least they had an immune system from their own viruses.

On Sat, 07 Aug 2021 20:54:04 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Aug 7, 2021 at 11:02:11 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
> <op.07rodxvomvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>
>> On Wed, 04 Aug 2021 19:08:13 +0100, Snit <Brock.McNuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Commander Kinsey <CK1@nospam.com> wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 01 Aug 2021 19:55:36 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Aug 1, 2021 at 11:08:47 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>>>> <op.07gkoxhymvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, 30 Jul 2021 19:23:14 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Jul 30, 2021 at 11:12:11 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>>>>>> <op.07cvilr7mvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 18:59:32 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Jul 28, 2021 at 10:35:13 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>>>>>>>> <op.0684gzj1mvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.macrumors.com/guide/m1/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah like Intel and AMD are incapable of that.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> At least for now that is correct.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You are a religious nut, bowing to the god of Apple.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nope. I am an atheist... even in computers I say use what is best for you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Your logic has failed then, because Apple is never the best choice.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> If it is not for you then don't get one.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It's not for anyone. It's incompatible with most people. It costs more for the
>>>>>>>>>> same specs. You have a smaller base of programs and people to help you with
>>>>>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You say you do not like Macs but went out of your way to make a Hackintosh. :)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It wasn't out of my way, I was building a normal desktop PC, just out of
>>>>>>>> particular parts.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And just happened to make one that would work as a Hackintosh, and then got
>>>>>>> macOS and installed it. Hmmmm....
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I was told to. I was telling you it wasn't difficult.
>>>>>
>>>>> But you still went out of your way to do so... it was not an accident.
>>>>
>>>> What? I did nothing out of my way, it was no more difficult than
>>>> building any other computer.
>>>
>>> You had more specific needs and had to do more specific research.
>>
>> No, I always chose the best MB, CPU, GPU, etc for the computer, depending on
>> what the user wanted. In this case it was quite easy, I looked up a small list
>> of Mac OS compatible boards and picked the one with the best performance and
>> connections. Normally I'm choosing from the entire list, as Windows isn't
>> fussy and will run on anything, but Mac OS is a piece of shit and has limited
>> hardware compatibility.
>
> So why pick the macOS compatible ones if you do not like it?

Because the customer asked for a machine that could run MacOS.

> And why do so many people find so much value in Macs?

Not many really, it's a small niche OS.

> I say use what you like, but your view of Macs is simply not supported by the
> evidence.

The evidence shows most people like Windows. Which has the advantage of running on anything, not just very specific hardware.

>>>> Half of the computers I built were to specs provided by the customers.
>>>> I'd have a few standard ones I recommended, and people would say they
>>>> particularly wanted a certain MB, GPU, etc.
>>>>
>>>>> But you only managed to get one version of macOS running on it.
>>>>
>>>> I installed the latest, I saw no point in trying an older out of date
>>>> one, and I could hardly try one that wasn't out yet.
>>>
>>> My point stands. No evidence of other versions worked, just speculation
>>> they would.
>>
>> It's obvious. What I built was basically just a Mac.
>
> Nope. It was a hackintosh... and you make assumptions about how it would work
> with future OSs.

It was made with the same components Apple use. Only the case and PSU was different, and the OS cannot detect that. Things like the hard disk, Macs support any disk.

On Aug 10, 2021 at 11:11:59 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
<op.07w8t90rmvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
....
>>>
>>> No, I always chose the best MB, CPU, GPU, etc for the computer, depending on
>>> what the user wanted. In this case it was quite easy, I looked up a small list
>>> of Mac OS compatible boards and picked the one with the best performance and
>>> connections. Normally I'm choosing from the entire list, as Windows isn't
>>> fussy and will run on anything, but Mac OS is a piece of shit and has limited
>>> hardware compatibility.
>>
>> So why pick the macOS compatible ones if you do not like it?
>
> Because the customer asked for a machine that could run MacOS.

And it could run that version. OK.

>> And why do so many people find so much value in Macs?
>
> Not many really, it's a small niche OS.

Like other high end products, yes.

>> I say use what you like, but your view of Macs is simply not supported by the
>> evidence.
>
> The evidence shows most people like Windows. Which has the advantage of
> running on anything, not just very specific hardware.

The evidence is more people use Windows. Macs get higher satisfaction ratings
(which is not quite the same as your standard).
>
>>>>> Half of the computers I built were to specs provided by the customers.
>>>>> I'd have a few standard ones I recommended, and people would say they
>>>>> particularly wanted a certain MB, GPU, etc.
>>>>>
>>>>>> But you only managed to get one version of macOS running on it.
>>>>>
>>>>> I installed the latest, I saw no point in trying an older out of date
>>>>> one, and I could hardly try one that wasn't out yet.
>>>>
>>>> My point stands. No evidence of other versions worked, just speculation
>>>> they would.
>>>
>>> It's obvious. What I built was basically just a Mac.
>>
>> Nope. It was a hackintosh... and you make assumptions about how it would work
>> with future OSs.
>
> It was made with the same components Apple use. Only the case and PSU was
> different, and the OS cannot detect that. Things like the hard disk, Macs
> support any disk.

Again, you made assumptions it would be supported and Apple would not "kill"
it. The evidence shows it can be tricky to get those updates:

https://medium.com/macoclock/guide-how-to-update-your-hackintosh-macos-to-catalina-718f7b7b51ad

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Aug 10, 2021 at 11:09:50 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
<op.07w8qobpmvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:

> On Sat, 07 Aug 2021 20:52:42 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Aug 7, 2021 at 11:03:00 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>> <op.07rofaiqmvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>
>>>>>>> Or just stop making a mountain out of a molehill.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As you do with mask wearing. Why do you do that?
>>>>>
>>>>> No, I'm refusing to make a mountain out of a molehill. I won't do
>>>>> something to prevent something so trivial. Just as I don't build a
>>>>> nuclear fallout shelter.
>>>>
>>>> Your excuses for denying evidence changes nothing. You still refuse to do
>>>> the smallest thing to help stem a major pandemic.
>>>
>>> Something that kills many times less than the population growth is not major.
>>
>> The fact so many minimize the pandemic is why we will need more lock downs,
>> mask mandates, and vaccine passports.
>>
>> Then the very ones forcing that on all of us will be the first to whine their
>> rights are being infringed... they create problems and then whine when others
>> work to solve them.
>
> There is no problem to solve.

Denial does not make the problem go away.

> A very small number ar dying, and everyone is free to hide away if they so
> wish.
>
>>>>>>>> The current vaccines are still effective against the newer variants.
>>>>>>>> https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)01358-1/fulltext
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Last year's AVG doesn't delete this year's computer viruses either.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It might. With heuristic scanning it can identify similar viruses.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That's why you update the software. Same with vaccines, if the dominant
>>>>>>>> variants drift too far away from the vaccine's effectiveness then we get an
>>>>>>>> "update" (booster). Simple and effective.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Expensive and unnecessary. We have an immune system, which you're compromising
>>>>>>> by using a vaccine. How is it supposed to learn to be stronger?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The fact we have an immune system is not in dispute.
>>>>>
>>>>> It would get stronger if it was required to be used. At this rate we
>>>>> won't be able to fight off a common cold.
>>>>
>>>> Incorrect.
>>>
>>> Eskimos were killed by the common cold.
>>
>> Some.
>
> At least they had an immune system from their own viruses.

We have gone away from your black and white world view of "strength".

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Aug 10, 2021 at 11:08:34 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
<op.07w8okzsmvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:

> On Sat, 07 Aug 2021 20:51:18 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Aug 7, 2021 at 11:03:28 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>> <op.07rof2q0mvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>
>>> On Wed, 04 Aug 2021 19:30:50 +0100, Snit <Brock.McNuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Commander Kinsey <CK1@nospam.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 02 Aug 2021 20:50:04 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Aug 2, 2021 at 11:37:19 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>>>>> <op.07igohdqmvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sun, 01 Aug 2021 19:48:42 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Aug 1, 2021 at 11:20:01 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>>>>>>> <op.07gk7ne7mvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 30 Jul 2021 22:32:48 +0100, Carlos E. R. <robin_listas@es.invalid>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 30/07/2021 20.19, Commander Kinsey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 19:06:56 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 28, 2021 at 10:41:11 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>>>>>>>>>>> <op.0684qxuumvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hell, the libertarian fantasy is being destroyed (again) right now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> People
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> won't even wear a mask to help save their neighbor... and you think
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pay for things they are not forced to?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> My neighbour is free to wear one himself.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> But you will not wear one to protect him. That is my point.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I don't have to, as he has one on.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Wrong.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> His mask protects you, and your mask protects him.
>>>>>>>>>> His mask does not protect him. Your mask does not protect you.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Unless you (and he) use a PPE.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The air coming out of my mouth is travelling faster than it is when it reaches
>>>>>>>>> him, it's more likely to be stopped by his mask as it's going slower.
>>>>>>>>> Everyone's masks protects themselves.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Your claims are contrary to the evidence on mask wearing.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> My claim is basic common sense, it's easier to stop a slow moving thing than a
>>>>>>> fast moving thing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What you call "common sense" is your guess, and your guess is incorrect. You
>>>>>> are not looking at evidence on spread but your own guesses as to what leads to
>>>>>> the spread.
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't guess that things fall down instead of up. I don't guess that
>>>>> faster moving air cools something quicker. I go by logic and experience.
>>>>
>>>> At least on this you reject evidence and make straw men.
>>>
>>> Considering how air moves is not straw.
>>
>> You are actively creating absurd claims about how a mask protects the wearer
>> more than others, and using insane claims to try to back your nonsense. You
>> ignore common sense and evidence.
>
> Nothing absurd about it.

You speak of masks protecting the wearer more than others, which is contrary
to common sense and, more importantly, evidence.

Call your error what you wish.

> Obviously if you blast something through a piece of fabric, it will get
> through more easily then if you blow gently.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On 10/08/2021 12:33, Bucky Breeder wrote:
> Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> posted this:
>>>
>>> No, it's something that only a moron would not believe, for example,
>>> "there is no god because we have never seen evidence of him" is common
>>> sense.
>>
>> Nope. It's logical reasoning coupled with Occam's Razor. Any evidence
>> supporting the presence of god is more easily explained without
>> resorting to a magical being.
>
> An assertion that God does not exist would be more of a declaration of
> one's limited perspective and insight than it would be "common sense" or
> "logical reasoning" - coupled with any deductive device...

That's your opinion.

> It's like saying China doesn't exist because you've never actually seen it
> - in spite of billions of others who have.

The existence of China is easily demonstrable without needing to depend
on the opinion of others. Not so with a deity.

> Is it "common sense" or "logical reasoning" to opine that blowing-up a
> junkyard and it's susequent remnants over and over for millions, perhaps
> billions, of years would result in a perfectly made, operational, and
> sentient Cadillac? That we are the product of a series of random chaotic
> events?

Is it more logical or "common sense" to believe that a "sentient
Cadillac" (sic) - and a whole unreachable universe for it to exist in -
was created by an omnipotent magical being who came from nowhere for no
apparent good reason?

Science very clearly demonstrates how life and ultimately humans have
evolved to where we are now.

> A rule of logic states that a negative cannot be proved, therefore to argue
> that a thing/entity does not exist remains 'circle-logic' - which is one of
> the primary fallacies, at best - because all it does is challenge the other
> side to "prove" that the thing/entity that so obviously actually is
> actually exists to the satisfaction of whoever says it/He does not exist...

Demonstrable evidence is not something someone needs to be "believe", it
is clear and obvious.

> The proof that God exists is, in fact, the argument that he does not exist.

How meta-physical of you. All it shows is that she is a figment of
people's imagination.

The main point is does god need to exist? And clearly the answer is no.
Religions and churches work on the basis of a belief system where
proponents need to persuade others to "believe" in their dogma. So
whether a deity actually exists doesn't come into it and may even be
counterproductive. If it ever where shown to exist then no-one would
need to believe anymore and the system would potentially fall apart.

So arguing the existence or otherwise of him is unimportant. You can
choose to believe and I can choose not to which is absolutely fine on
both counts.

Am 11.08.21 um 13:14 schrieb Chris:
> On 10/08/2021 12:33, Bucky Breeder wrote:
>> An assertion that God does not exist would be more of a declaration of
>> one's limited perspective and insight than it would be "common sense" or
>> "logical reasoning" - coupled with any deductive device...
>
> That's your opinion.

That is not an opinion that is bigotry.

--
De gustibus non est disputandum

On Sat, 07 Aug 2021 20:54:29 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Aug 7, 2021 at 10:59:57 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
> <op.07rn97jimvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And even with you it protects the mouth and the nose but not the eyes. And
>>>>>> with the mouth and the nose air still comes in from poor fitting (common).
>>>>>> Even with a poor fit your droplets tend to not go NEARLY as far. This is why
>>>>>> it is best to have a mask AND social distance.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yup. It all adds up.
>>>>
>>>> To a bunch of worry warts. Do you fit five seatbelts to your car?
>>>
>>> Hence why libertarianism can=E2=80=99t work.
>>
>> You said hence but with no reason as to why you've linked the two.
>
> There is a common sense link.

I have no desire to wade through the conversation looking for a tenuous riddle link.

And an apostrophe has mutated above.

On Sat, 07 Aug 2021 20:54:53 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Aug 7, 2021 at 10:59:22 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
> <op.07rn88chmvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>
>> On Wed, 04 Aug 2021 19:08:11 +0100, Snit <Brock.McNuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Commander Kinsey <CK1@nospam.com> wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 01 Aug 2021 19:55:07 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Aug 1, 2021 at 11:08:59 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>>>> <op.07gko9u2mvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, 30 Jul 2021 19:23:55 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Jul 30, 2021 at 11:11:09 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>>>>>> <op.07cvgvncmvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I really don't give a *fuck*what you do, as you're only a lone cockroach
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in my book.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rene
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why be so cruel to cockroaches?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I kill all insects. They didn't ask to enter my property.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It was their ancestors property you stole.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> They don't have title deeds.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> They are very, very tiny.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I must have stood on it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You encRoached on their territory.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> FFS....
>>>>>
>>>>> Did it bug you?
>>>>
>>>> Regrettably you are too far away to punch.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Punch has too much sugar for my tastes anyway.
>>
>> sugar is raw food, nothing can have too much of it.
>
> As with computers, you eat as you wish and I will eat as I wish.

It's probably the alcohol that makes me fat.

On Sat, 07 Aug 2021 20:56:09 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Aug 7, 2021 at 10:59:06 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
> <op.07rn8s0omvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>
>> On Tue, 03 Aug 2021 23:49:24 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Aug 3, 2021 at 2:12:56 PM MST, "Chris" wrote <secbgo$r89$2@dont-email.me>:
>>>
>>>> Commander Kinsey <CK1@nospam.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 01 Aug 2021 19:54:58 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Aug 1, 2021 at 11:09:21 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>>>>> <op.07gkpvn9mvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, 30 Jul 2021 19:24:25 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Jul 30, 2021 at 11:10:56 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>>>>>>> <op.07cvgihkmvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> My emotion tells me you're all worrying about something insignificant.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Biggest cause of death in the world - Malaria.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2nd biggest - Kidney disease.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3rd biggest - Cancer.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4th biggest - Coronavirus - a bad flu.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> And that is with large work to reduce the harm of Covid. Imagine if we did
>>>>>>>>>>>> not. Already in the US, even with our precautions, it has reduced the average
>>>>>>>>>>>> life span by about 1 year. I assume it is about the same for the UK.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> That does not even count the 1 in 3 survivors with long term health effects.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> With a population of 7 billion, I don't give a fuck if half of them die, it
>>>>>>>>>>> would make the world more sensible.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> And that is why libertarianism cannot work.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It would solve your "climate" problem if there was only half of us.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It would help. Are you volunteering? Or do you only volunteer others?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The weakest will die, that is nature's way.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Define "weakest" as you use it there.
>>>>>
>>>>> Unable to handle a thing so small you can't see it without a microscope.
>>>>
>>>> Cyanide is even smaller. Anyone dying from that is pathetic!! /s
>>>
>>> How big is an idea? :)
>>
>> The size of a lightbulb:
>> https://youtu.be/BLRDCUWEdPc
>> I can't believe he did that.
>
> Why did he do that?

Could be:
1) Boredom
2) He's crazy
3) He thought he'd make money on Youtube
4) Someone dared him

On Sat, 07 Aug 2021 20:56:26 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Aug 7, 2021 at 10:56:31 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
> <op.07rn4howmvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>
>>>>>>>> It would solve your "climate" problem if there was only half of us.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It would help. Are you volunteering? Or do you only volunteer others?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The weakest will die, that is nature's way.
>>>>>
>>>>> Define "weakest" as you use it there.
>>>>
>>>> Unable to handle a thing so small you can't see it without a microscope.
>>>
>>> Cyanide is even smaller. Anyone dying from that is pathetic!! /s
>>
>> When everyone dies from the same thing it's not pathetic. When only some die,
>> they're pathetic.
>
> Hence why libertarian ideas cannot work.

Killing off a small number of people can work just fine.

On Sat, 07 Aug 2021 20:56:55 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Aug 7, 2021 at 10:55:30 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
> <op.07rn2sdemvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any wrapping annoys me. This post from you for example leaves the right half
>>>>>> of my monitor plain white. I think it originally came from retards that have
>>>>>> trouble following their eyes along longer lines.
>>>>>
>>>>> Either way avoids the hot mess coming from Gremlin, above.
>>>>
>>>> Almost everyone who wraps makes a mess after about 5 indentations. I've yet to
>>>> see a newsreader which wraps sensibly - that's never to wrap a single word (or
>>>> more importantly a URL), or any line which has been quoted, unless it cleverly
>>>> rewraps the whole paragraph by pushing one word all the way down several
>>>> lines.
>>>
>>> Entourage actually handed that well. Other than that it was mostly garbage.
>>
>> Well you returned it in the same mess I sent it.
>
> Others cannot fully correct the mess you create. Works with masks, too. :)

Actually, that code should be able to be returned to the correct symbol.

On Sat, 07 Aug 2021 20:57:43 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Aug 7, 2021 at 10:54:47 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
> <op.07rn1lt0mvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>
>> On Tue, 03 Aug 2021 21:44:47 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Aug 3, 2021 at 11:39:29 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>> <op.07kbf3ttmvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 01 Aug 2021 19:51:16 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Aug 1, 2021 at 11:15:01 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>>>> <op.07gkzbjomvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> OK? Does not break out the cause.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It shows they're diminishing. Anyway, once we've all had it, nobody else can
>>>>>>>> catch it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The same people can get new variants, potentially. But the idea is to reduce
>>>>>>> the harm below what it would be if all got it, with so many dying and 1/3 of
>>>>>>> the population having long term ill effects.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And removing any chance of evolution making us tougher against such things.
>>>>>
>>>>> What is the value in watching people needlessly suffer and die?
>>>>
>>>> To get them out of the gene pool and to stop them wasting our resources.
>>>
>>> So volunteer.
>>
>> I have done so by not wearing a mask or getting vaccinated. If I'm one of the
>> weak, I won't stay.
>
> And you might spread it to others...

Not if they're waring masks.

> even others who understand weak / strong
> is not as binary as you are pushing.

If you're inbetween, you get a bad cold for a few days, big deal.

>>>>>> You're sounding like you believe in god.
>>>>>
>>>>> One need not believe in a god to have morals... in fact such a belief, I
>>>>> think, can often get in the way (which is not to suggest religious people
>>>>> cannot be moral -- many are!)
>>>>
>>>> Morality is a belief almost as silly as god.
>>>
>>> No society can exist without some sense of morality.
>>
>> Bullshit. You'll have to explain this crazy idea.
>
> You stop at red lights to not kill others. And to save yourself.

No, I do it so I don't break my car.

On Aug 11, 2021 at 8:55:29 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
<op.07yw6rzvmvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:

> On Sat, 07 Aug 2021 20:57:43 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Aug 7, 2021 at 10:54:47 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>> <op.07rn1lt0mvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>
>>> On Tue, 03 Aug 2021 21:44:47 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Aug 3, 2021 at 11:39:29 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>>> <op.07kbf3ttmvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 01 Aug 2021 19:51:16 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Aug 1, 2021 at 11:15:01 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>>>>> <op.07gkzbjomvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> OK? Does not break out the cause.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It shows they're diminishing. Anyway, once we've all had it, nobody else can
>>>>>>>>> catch it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The same people can get new variants, potentially. But the idea is to reduce
>>>>>>>> the harm below what it would be if all got it, with so many dying and 1/3 of
>>>>>>>> the population having long term ill effects.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And removing any chance of evolution making us tougher against such things.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What is the value in watching people needlessly suffer and die?
>>>>>
>>>>> To get them out of the gene pool and to stop them wasting our resources.
>>>>
>>>> So volunteer.
>>>
>>> I have done so by not wearing a mask or getting vaccinated. If I'm one of the
>>> weak, I won't stay.
>>
>> And you might spread it to others...
>
> Not if they're waring masks.

The chances are reduced. But you want to put your responsibility onto others
-- a fine description of libertarianism.

>
>> even others who understand weak / strong
>> is not as binary as you are pushing.
>
> If you're inbetween, you get a bad cold for a few days, big deal.

Again you ignore evidence.

>
>>>>>>> You're sounding like you believe in god.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> One need not believe in a god to have morals... in fact such a belief, I
>>>>>> think, can often get in the way (which is not to suggest religious people
>>>>>> cannot be moral -- many are!)
>>>>>
>>>>> Morality is a belief almost as silly as god.
>>>>
>>>> No society can exist without some sense of morality.
>>>
>>> Bullshit. You'll have to explain this crazy idea.
>>
>> You stop at red lights to not kill others. And to save yourself.
>
> No, I do it so I don't break my car.

How would your car break?

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Aug 11, 2021 at 8:54:34 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
<op.07yw48lxmvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:

> On Sat, 07 Aug 2021 20:56:55 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Aug 7, 2021 at 10:55:30 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>> <op.07rn2sdemvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Any wrapping annoys me. This post from you for example leaves the right half
>>>>>>> of my monitor plain white. I think it originally came from retards that have
>>>>>>> trouble following their eyes along longer lines.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Either way avoids the hot mess coming from Gremlin, above.
>>>>>
>>>>> Almost everyone who wraps makes a mess after about 5 indentations. I've yet to
>>>>> see a newsreader which wraps sensibly - that's never to wrap a single word (or
>>>>> more importantly a URL), or any line which has been quoted, unless it cleverly
>>>>> rewraps the whole paragraph by pushing one word all the way down several
>>>>> lines.
>>>>
>>>> Entourage actually handed that well. Other than that it was mostly garbage.
>>>
>>> Well you returned it in the same mess I sent it.
>>
>> Others cannot fully correct the mess you create. Works with masks, too. :)
>
> Actually, that code should be able to be returned to the correct symbol.

But it is not.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Aug 11, 2021 at 8:54:10 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
<op.07yw4ko6mvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:

> On Sat, 07 Aug 2021 20:56:26 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Aug 7, 2021 at 10:56:31 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>> <op.07rn4howmvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>
>>>>>>>>> It would solve your "climate" problem if there was only half of us.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It would help. Are you volunteering? Or do you only volunteer others?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The weakest will die, that is nature's way.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Define "weakest" as you use it there.
>>>>>
>>>>> Unable to handle a thing so small you can't see it without a microscope.
>>>>
>>>> Cyanide is even smaller. Anyone dying from that is pathetic!! /s
>>>
>>> When everyone dies from the same thing it's not pathetic. When only some die,
>>> they're pathetic.
>>
>> Hence why libertarian ideas cannot work.
>
> Killing off a small number of people can work just fine.

But the libertarians never volunteer.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Aug 11, 2021 at 8:52:57 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
<op.07yw2jdvmvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:

> On Sat, 07 Aug 2021 20:54:53 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Aug 7, 2021 at 10:59:22 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>> <op.07rn88chmvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>
>>> On Wed, 04 Aug 2021 19:08:11 +0100, Snit <Brock.McNuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Commander Kinsey <CK1@nospam.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 01 Aug 2021 19:55:07 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Aug 1, 2021 at 11:08:59 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>>>>> <op.07gko9u2mvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, 30 Jul 2021 19:23:55 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Jul 30, 2021 at 11:11:09 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>>>>>>> <op.07cvgvncmvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I really don't give a *fuck*what you do, as you're only a lone cockroach
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in my book.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rene
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why be so cruel to cockroaches?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I kill all insects. They didn't ask to enter my property.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It was their ancestors property you stole.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> They don't have title deeds.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> They are very, very tiny.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I must have stood on it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You encRoached on their territory.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> FFS....
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Did it bug you?
>>>>>
>>>>> Regrettably you are too far away to punch.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Punch has too much sugar for my tastes anyway.
>>>
>>> sugar is raw food, nothing can have too much of it.
>>
>> As with computers, you eat as you wish and I will eat as I wish.
>
> It's probably the alcohol that makes me fat.

Calories is a measure of heat. Drink your booze cold.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.