On Aug 1, 2021 at 11:09:21 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
<op.07gkpvn9mvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:

> On Fri, 30 Jul 2021 19:24:25 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Jul 30, 2021 at 11:10:56 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>> <op.07cvgihkmvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>
>>>>>>> My emotion tells me you're all worrying about something insignificant.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Biggest cause of death in the world - Malaria.
>>>>>>> 2nd biggest - Kidney disease.
>>>>>>> 3rd biggest - Cancer.
>>>>>>> 4th biggest - Coronavirus - a bad flu.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And that is with large work to reduce the harm of Covid. Imagine if we did
>>>>>> not. Already in the US, even with our precautions, it has reduced the average
>>>>>> life span by about 1 year. I assume it is about the same for the UK.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That does not even count the 1 in 3 survivors with long term health effects.
>>>>>
>>>>> With a population of 7 billion, I don't give a fuck if half of them die, it
>>>>> would make the world more sensible.
>>>>
>>>> And that is why libertarianism cannot work.
>>>
>>> It would solve your "climate" problem if there was only half of us.
>>
>> It would help. Are you volunteering? Or do you only volunteer others?
>
>
> The weakest will die, that is nature's way.

Define "weakest" as you use it there.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Aug 1, 2021 at 11:08:59 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
<op.07gko9u2mvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:

> On Fri, 30 Jul 2021 19:23:55 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Jul 30, 2021 at 11:11:09 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>> <op.07cvgvncmvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>
>>>>>>>>> I really don't give a *fuck*what you do, as you're only a lone cockroach
>>>>>>>>> in my book.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Rene
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Why be so cruel to cockroaches?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I kill all insects. They didn't ask to enter my property.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It was their ancestors property you stole.
>>>>>
>>>>> They don't have title deeds.
>>>>
>>>> They are very, very tiny.
>>>
>>> I must have stood on it.
>>
>> You encRoached on their territory.
>
> FFS....

Did it bug you?

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Aug 1, 2021 at 11:08:47 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
<op.07gkoxhymvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:

> On Fri, 30 Jul 2021 19:23:14 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Jul 30, 2021 at 11:12:11 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>> <op.07cvilr7mvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>
>>> On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 18:59:32 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Jul 28, 2021 at 10:35:13 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>>> <op.0684gzj1mvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.macrumors.com/guide/m1/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah like Intel and AMD are incapable of that.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> At least for now that is correct.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You are a religious nut, bowing to the god of Apple.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Nope. I am an atheist... even in computers I say use what is best for you.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Your logic has failed then, because Apple is never the best choice.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If it is not for you then don't get one.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's not for anyone. It's incompatible with most people. It costs more for the
>>>>> same specs. You have a smaller base of programs and people to help you with
>>>>> it.
>>>>
>>>> You say you do not like Macs but went out of your way to make a Hackintosh. :)
>>>
>>> It wasn't out of my way, I was building a normal desktop PC, just out of
>>> particular parts.
>>
>> And just happened to make one that would work as a Hackintosh, and then got
>> macOS and installed it. Hmmmm....
>
> I was told to. I was telling you it wasn't difficult.

But you still went out of your way to do so... it was not an accident. But you
only managed to get one version of macOS running on it.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

Chris wrote:
> Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Jul 31, 2021 at 10:50:45 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>> <op.07eo6vjymvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>
>>> On Fri, 30 Jul 2021 19:22:12 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Jul 30, 2021 at 11:13:39 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>>> <op.07cvk1c4mvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 19:01:25 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Jul 28, 2021 at 10:33:10 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>>>>> <op.0684dkasmvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, 26 Jul 2021 18:16:42 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Jul 26, 2021 at 6:39:23 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>>>>>>> <op.06437xjnmvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Buying back guns from lawful owners simply means that when the thugs who
>>>>>>>>>>>> got them illegally decide to commit crimes, nobody will be able to stop
>>>>>>>>>>>> them. If your country gives you the right and the ability to defend
>>>>>>>>>>>> yourself, why the heck would you sacrifice it?
>>>>>>>>>>> The idea is the thugs are less likely to be able to obtain one (eg. by
>>>>>>>>>>> stealing it from a legal owner).
>>>>>>>>>> It's interesting reasoning but it doesn't seem to be realistic. Besides,
>>>>>>>>>> considering how tyrannical the governments of the world have already
>>>>>>>>>> become with their reaction to the Kung Flu,
>>>>>>>>> Agreed on that.
>>>>>>>> They should be requiring vaccinations for more things. End the damned
>>>>>>>> pandemic.
>>>>>>> Forcing anyone to do anything is always wrong.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It's just a bad flu! Stop making a mountain out of a molehill!
>>>>>> It is not a flu, nor is it very similar to one other than how it spreads.
>>>>> It makes you feel like anything form "a bad cold" to "a horrid flu" from what
>>>>> people have said.
>>>> And it leaves 1/3 of those with it with lasting damage.
>>> I've not seen any evidence of this theory.
>> https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/monumental-acknowledgment-cdc-reports-long-term-covid-19-patients-n1234814
>>
>> Plenty more I can show... and we can go back to the original studies.
>>
>>>> And kills far more.
>>>> How many do you personally know who have died from it.
>>> I don't know anyone who died, yet I know many weak people who got through it.
>> You are lucky. I know several who have died.
>>
>> One of the things I find interesting with the conservative worldview is how
>> things often do not matter to those on the right until it has a more direct
>> impact on them. We are seeing this, some, with vaccinations. Fewer people are
>> spreading misinformation and more people are opting to be vaccinated.
>>
>>>>>> But the fact people will not even do very basic things to protect each other
>>>>>> from this pandemic is a great refutation of libertarianism. It simply does not
>>>>>> work in the real world.
>>>>> These things are unnecessary as the chances of you dying are minimal.
>>>> Already reduced the life expectancy in the US by one year.
>>> That's a very small amount.
>> Compared to?
>>
>>>> The chances of
>>>> dying going through a traffic light are very low -- so why should I be
>>>> required to stop at red light?
>>> You shouldn't, I don't. Especially "left on red", which is legal in the USA
>>> (although obviously yours is right).
>> Why stop at red lights at all? Why should I be forced to drive on the right?
>> It is arbitrary. You are not. What about my freedom? Can I not make the best
>> choices for myself?
>>
>> That is what you sound like with the vaccine.
>>
>>>>>>>>>> I am not sure that as an
>>>>>>>>>> American, I would be willing to make it even easier for them to bully me
>>>>>>>>>> around than it already is.
>>>>>>>>> The UK manages without guns.
>>>>>>>> They are "tyrannical" with that, eh?
>>>>>>> We don't think anything of it. Nobody here except madmen have a desire to own
>>>>>>> a gun. People do not feel threatened and want to defend themselves. Mainly
>>>>>>> because of the lack of criminals with guns.
>>>>>> But you want to control people and deny them their guns, eh?
>>>>> Libertarianism allows for a small amount of control - eg. locking up murderers.
>>>> Who pays?
>>> A very small income tax.
>> What if I do not want to pay?
>>>> And why jump to murderers? Only a very small percentage of guns are
>>>> used in murders.
>>> Because murder is about the only thing we should be stopping, along with
>>> burglary.
>> So I can have my 72 guns. OK.
>
> You can have one as long as you have a purpose for it. So a hunting rifle
> or a ahotgun. No handguns or semi-automatic rifles.
>
> You'll need a licence and complete background checks which take a few
> months to complete. You also need to be prepared for an annual police visit
> to check you're storing it correctly.
>

Here, you need the Hunter Safety course, before you can acquire
your first long gun. That teaches you how to carry a weapon at
a minimum. The weapon spends most of its time, pointed at the
ground, and not exactly pointed at your own feet either.

This would be an example of how not to carry weapons. The reason you
don't carry weapons this way, is you could trip, and if the safety is
off, and the weapon has a hair trigger, you could shoot a member of
your "team" in front of you. In fact, I would think video of these
two, could easily be featured in just about any training course
one could imagine. Because of the mistakes they made. Even a person
who has played paintball, when they see video of these two, they'll
tell you the same things.

https://c.files.bbci.co.uk/13B30/production/_114088608_fb0cd11e-d463-45dc-becf-34aa6199d45f.jpg

Gun safety is not optional. My brother is a gun collector (of sorts).
Normally, he kept his guns in his room. But for some reason, he
committed not one, but a number of mistakes one day. He takes his 22 rifle
downstairs. He's sitting on the livingroom couch back home. There is
a live round in the 22. He's not really that stupid, so he was
probably cleaning or checking the movement or something. The round
wasn't in there for a nefarious purpose. He would not normally
be chambering rounds in the house. I don't know if the weapon has a safety.
Anyway, the couch is a wonderful place for a nap, so with loaded gun
and chambered round, he falls asleep on couch, rifle in hands.
Once asleep, the rifle falls out of his hands. Barrel (pointy end)
pointed towards his head. Rifle falls onto the carpet. Rifle discharges.
Barrel has moved away from his direction. Bullet embeds in livingroom wall.
But there could easily have been a different outcome. He could have
become a statistic that day.

I think you can safely say, the sound of the gun discharge,
was a wakeup call :-/

Paul

Commander Kinsey <CK1@nospam.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Jul 2021 22:32:48 +0100, Carlos E. R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
>
>> On 30/07/2021 20.19, Commander Kinsey wrote:
>>> On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 19:06:56 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Jul 28, 2021 at 10:41:11 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>>> <op.0684qxuumvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>
>>
>>>>>> Hell, the libertarian fantasy is being destroyed (again) right now.
>>>>>> People
>>>>>> won't even wear a mask to help save their neighbor... and you think
>>>>>> they will
>>>>>> pay for things they are not forced to?
>>>>>
>>>>> My neighbour is free to wear one himself.
>>>>
>>>> But you will not wear one to protect him. That is my point.
>>>
>>> I don't have to, as he has one on.
>>
>> Wrong.
>>
>> His mask protects you, and your mask protects him.
>> His mask does not protect him. Your mask does not protect you.
>>
>> Unless you (and he) use a PPE.
>
> The air coming out of my mouth is travelling faster than it is when it
> reaches him, it's more likely to be stopped by his mask as it's going
> slower. Everyone's masks protects themselves.

To a small degree. The main point is that your mask only protects one
person receiving the virus (you) whereas it stops you spreading it to
pretty much anyone you're in close contact with. It's a very uneven
equation in favour of protecting others.

On Aug 1, 2021 at 2:47:52 PM MST, "Chris" wrote <se74q8$aok$1@dont-email.me>:

> Commander Kinsey <CK1@nospam.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, 30 Jul 2021 22:32:48 +0100, Carlos E. R. <robin_listas@es.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 30/07/2021 20.19, Commander Kinsey wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 19:06:56 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Jul 28, 2021 at 10:41:11 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>>>> <op.0684qxuumvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>> Hell, the libertarian fantasy is being destroyed (again) right now.
>>>>>>> People
>>>>>>> won't even wear a mask to help save their neighbor... and you think
>>>>>>> they will
>>>>>>> pay for things they are not forced to?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My neighbour is free to wear one himself.
>>>>>
>>>>> But you will not wear one to protect him. That is my point.
>>>>
>>>> I don't have to, as he has one on.
>>>
>>> Wrong.
>>>
>>> His mask protects you, and your mask protects him.
>>> His mask does not protect him. Your mask does not protect you.
>>>
>>> Unless you (and he) use a PPE.
>>
>> The air coming out of my mouth is travelling faster than it is when it
>> reaches him, it's more likely to be stopped by his mask as it's going
>> slower. Everyone's masks protects themselves.
>
> To a small degree. The main point is that your mask only protects one
> person receiving the virus (you) whereas it stops you spreading it to
> pretty much anyone you're in close contact with. It's a very uneven
> equation in favour of protecting others.

And even with you it protects the mouth and the nose but not the eyes. And
with the mouth and the nose air still comes in from poor fitting (common).
Even with a poor fit your droplets tend to not go NEARLY as far. This is why
it is best to have a mask AND social distance.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Sat, 31 Jul 2021 20:00:50 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Jul 31, 2021 at 10:50:45 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
> <op.07eo6vjymvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>
>> On Fri, 30 Jul 2021 19:22:12 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Jul 30, 2021 at 11:13:39 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>> <op.07cvk1c4mvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 19:01:25 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Jul 28, 2021 at 10:33:10 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>>>> <op.0684dkasmvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, 26 Jul 2021 18:16:42 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Jul 26, 2021 at 6:39:23 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>>>>>> <op.06437xjnmvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Buying back guns from lawful owners simply means that when the thugs who
>>>>>>>>>>> got them illegally decide to commit crimes, nobody will be able to stop
>>>>>>>>>>> them. If your country gives you the right and the ability to defend
>>>>>>>>>>> yourself, why the heck would you sacrifice it?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The idea is the thugs are less likely to be able to obtain one (eg. by
>>>>>>>>>> stealing it from a legal owner).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It's interesting reasoning but it doesn't seem to be realistic. Besides,
>>>>>>>>> considering how tyrannical the governments of the world have already
>>>>>>>>> become with their reaction to the Kung Flu,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Agreed on that.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> They should be requiring vaccinations for more things. End the damned
>>>>>>> pandemic.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Forcing anyone to do anything is always wrong.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's just a bad flu! Stop making a mountain out of a molehill!
>>>>>
>>>>> It is not a flu, nor is it very similar to one other than how it spreads.
>>>>
>>>> It makes you feel like anything form "a bad cold" to "a horrid flu" from what
>>>> people have said.
>>>
>>> And it leaves 1/3 of those with it with lasting damage.
>>
>> I've not seen any evidence of this theory.
>
> https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/monumental-acknowledgment-cdc-reports-long-term-covid-19-patients-n1234814
>
> Plenty more I can show... and we can go back to the original studies.

Coronavirus hasn't been here long term yet. Those are medium term problems.

>>> And kills far more.
>>> How many do you personally know who have died from it.
>>
>> I don't know anyone who died, yet I know many weak people who got through it.
>
> You are lucky. I know several who have died.

You must hang around with weaker people.

> One of the things I find interesting with the conservative worldview is how
> things often do not matter to those on the right until it has a more direct
> impact on them. We are seeing this, some, with vaccinations. Fewer people are
> spreading misinformation and more people are opting to be vaccinated.

We believe direct impacts because the government and media lie. "First hand experience" is the only thing you should ever believe.

>>>>> But the fact people will not even do very basic things to protect each other
>>>>> from this pandemic is a great refutation of libertarianism. It simply does not
>>>>> work in the real world.
>>>>
>>>> These things are unnecessary as the chances of you dying are minimal.
>>>
>>> Already reduced the life expectancy in the US by one year.
>>
>> That's a very small amount.
>
> Compared to?

Your normal life expectancy.

>>> The chances of
>>> dying going through a traffic light are very low -- so why should I be
>>> required to stop at red light?
>>
>> You shouldn't, I don't. Especially "left on red", which is legal in the USA
>> (although obviously yours is right).
>
> Why stop at red lights at all? Why should I be forced to drive on the right?
> It is arbitrary. You are not. What about my freedom? Can I not make the best
> choices for myself?
>
> That is what you sound like with the vaccine.

I disobey any law I believe is wrong. Do you really stop at a red when the whole junction is empty?

Here's another way to go through a red safely - if the person in front goes through on green, you can go through as it turns to red, and so can hundreds behind you. The other direction won't just start driving into a continuous line of traffic.

>>>>>>>>> I am not sure that as an
>>>>>>>>> American, I would be willing to make it even easier for them to bully me
>>>>>>>>> around than it already is.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The UK manages without guns.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> They are "tyrannical" with that, eh?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We don't think anything of it. Nobody here except madmen have a desire to own
>>>>>> a gun. People do not feel threatened and want to defend themselves. Mainly
>>>>>> because of the lack of criminals with guns.
>>>>>
>>>>> But you want to control people and deny them their guns, eh?
>>>>
>>>> Libertarianism allows for a small amount of control - eg. locking up murderers.
>>>
>>> Who pays?
>>
>> A very small income tax.
>
> What if I do not want to pay?

It would be so small you wouldn't care.

>>> And why jump to murderers? Only a very small percentage of guns are
>>> used in murders.
>>
>> Because murder is about the only thing we should be stopping, along with
>> burglary.
>
> So I can have my 72 guns. OK.

As long as you don't kill people with them.

On Sun, 01 Aug 2021 20:26:35 +0100, Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> wrote:

> Chris wrote:
>> Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Jul 31, 2021 at 10:50:45 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>> <op.07eo6vjymvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 30 Jul 2021 19:22:12 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Jul 30, 2021 at 11:13:39 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>>>> <op.07cvk1c4mvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 19:01:25 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Jul 28, 2021 at 10:33:10 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>>>>>> <op.0684dkasmvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, 26 Jul 2021 18:16:42 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Jul 26, 2021 at 6:39:23 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>>>>>>>> <op.06437xjnmvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Buying back guns from lawful owners simply means that when the thugs who
>>>>>>>>>>>>> got them illegally decide to commit crimes, nobody will be able to stop
>>>>>>>>>>>>> them. If your country gives you the right and the ability to defend
>>>>>>>>>>>>> yourself, why the heck would you sacrifice it?
>>>>>>>>>>>> The idea is the thugs are less likely to be able to obtain one (eg. by
>>>>>>>>>>>> stealing it from a legal owner).
>>>>>>>>>>> It's interesting reasoning but it doesn't seem to be realistic. Besides,
>>>>>>>>>>> considering how tyrannical the governments of the world have already
>>>>>>>>>>> become with their reaction to the Kung Flu,
>>>>>>>>>> Agreed on that.
>>>>>>>>> They should be requiring vaccinations for more things. End the damned
>>>>>>>>> pandemic.
>>>>>>>> Forcing anyone to do anything is always wrong.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It's just a bad flu! Stop making a mountain out of a molehill!
>>>>>>> It is not a flu, nor is it very similar to one other than how it spreads.
>>>>>> It makes you feel like anything form "a bad cold" to "a horrid flu" from what
>>>>>> people have said.
>>>>> And it leaves 1/3 of those with it with lasting damage.
>>>> I've not seen any evidence of this theory.
>>> https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/monumental-acknowledgment-cdc-reports-long-term-covid-19-patients-n1234814
>>>
>>> Plenty more I can show... and we can go back to the original studies.
>>>
>>>>> And kills far more.
>>>>> How many do you personally know who have died from it.
>>>> I don't know anyone who died, yet I know many weak people who got through it.
>>> You are lucky. I know several who have died.
>>>
>>> One of the things I find interesting with the conservative worldview is how
>>> things often do not matter to those on the right until it has a more direct
>>> impact on them. We are seeing this, some, with vaccinations. Fewer people are
>>> spreading misinformation and more people are opting to be vaccinated.
>>>
>>>>>>> But the fact people will not even do very basic things to protect each other
>>>>>>> from this pandemic is a great refutation of libertarianism. It simply does not
>>>>>>> work in the real world.
>>>>>> These things are unnecessary as the chances of you dying are minimal.
>>>>> Already reduced the life expectancy in the US by one year.
>>>> That's a very small amount.
>>> Compared to?
>>>
>>>>> The chances of
>>>>> dying going through a traffic light are very low -- so why should I be
>>>>> required to stop at red light?
>>>> You shouldn't, I don't. Especially "left on red", which is legal in the USA
>>>> (although obviously yours is right).
>>> Why stop at red lights at all? Why should I be forced to drive on the right?
>>> It is arbitrary. You are not. What about my freedom? Can I not make the best
>>> choices for myself?
>>>
>>> That is what you sound like with the vaccine.
>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I am not sure that as an
>>>>>>>>>>> American, I would be willing to make it even easier for them to bully me
>>>>>>>>>>> around than it already is.
>>>>>>>>>> The UK manages without guns.
>>>>>>>>> They are "tyrannical" with that, eh?
>>>>>>>> We don't think anything of it. Nobody here except madmen have a desire to own
>>>>>>>> a gun. People do not feel threatened and want to defend themselves. Mainly
>>>>>>>> because of the lack of criminals with guns.
>>>>>>> But you want to control people and deny them their guns, eh?
>>>>>> Libertarianism allows for a small amount of control - eg. locking up murderers.
>>>>> Who pays?
>>>> A very small income tax.
>>> What if I do not want to pay?
>>>>> And why jump to murderers? Only a very small percentage of guns are
>>>>> used in murders.
>>>> Because murder is about the only thing we should be stopping, along with
>>>> burglary.
>>> So I can have my 72 guns. OK.
>>
>> You can have one as long as you have a purpose for it. So a hunting rifle
>> or a ahotgun. No handguns or semi-automatic rifles.
>>
>> You'll need a licence and complete background checks which take a few
>> months to complete. You also need to be prepared for an annual police visit
>> to check you're storing it correctly.
>>
>
> Here, you need the Hunter Safety course, before you can acquire
> your first long gun. That teaches you how to carry a weapon at
> a minimum. The weapon spends most of its time, pointed at the
> ground, and not exactly pointed at your own feet either.
>
> This would be an example of how not to carry weapons. The reason you
> don't carry weapons this way, is you could trip, and if the safety is
> off,

In the old days there was no safety. You just left the first barrel empty, so you had to pull the trigger twice.

On Sat, 31 Jul 2021 20:03:02 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Jul 31, 2021 at 10:47:09 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
> <op.07eo0vaomvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>
>> On Fri, 30 Jul 2021 19:19:02 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Jul 30, 2021 at 11:15:25 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>> <op.07cvnzs7mvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 19:02:53 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Jul 28, 2021 at 10:30:16 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>>>> <op.06838qlumvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, 26 Jul 2021 18:13:15 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Jul 26, 2021 at 6:44:15 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>>>>>> <op.0644f1rmmvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sun, 25 Jul 2021 19:56:15 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Jul 25, 2021 at 11:08:31 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>>>>>>>> <op.063l0hysmvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 24 Jul 2021 19:50:02 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 24, 2021 at 10:31:43 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>>>>>>>>>> <op.061pm5avmvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just remembered a poker game, in which we had to win the girls to get
>>>>>>>>>>>>> them to undress, in B/W CGA graphics - We had to coach our best poker
>>>>>>>>>>>>> player in our student residence to play it for us :-D
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Did you ever play Leisure Suit Larry? That was color EGA! We played it at
>>>>>>>>>>>> school.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It was a fun game... and you can STILL play it:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.retrogames.cz/play_493-DOS.php?language=EN
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I do not understand the desire to play outdated quality stuff. This is what I
>>>>>>>>>> play: https://youtu.be/IbnW213nRO8
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I am not much of a gamer... unless you count chess, but no real computer power
>>>>>>>>> needed for that. Even then I play about 1 game a day on average.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Fallout 4 is better than real life. In fact I regularly do something in real
>>>>>>>> life and think Fallout 4 would have made it easier to do that.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Glad you enjoy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Being able to insert some old tin cans and toothbrushes into a workshop and
>>>>>> having it create a fence is cool.
>>>>>
>>>>> Never played so do not get the reference.
>>>>
>>>> Part of the game is building settlements. If you've collected anything which
>>>> contains the things you need, eg. aluminium, gears, plastic, then you just
>>>> insert those into the "workshop" and ask it to produce the thing you want.
>>>
>>> Got it. Have seen similar... though can't even remember where.
>>
>> There are many building type games, but this one is good because of the
>> fighting in it too.
>
> If I had it in front of me I might try it, but don't really seek playing
> games. To each their own.

I decide if I want to try a game by watching it being played by others on Youtube.

On Sat, 31 Jul 2021 20:03:31 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Jul 31, 2021 at 10:45:15 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
> <op.07eoxpk7mvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>
>> On Fri, 30 Jul 2021 19:12:50 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Jul 30, 2021 at 11:06:52 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>> <op.07cu9qpjmvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, aren't *YOU* one of God's "special" little parasites?
>>>>>
>>>>> One thing seems for sure at this point: only the fucking brain-dead idiots,
>>>>> the poorest, the most ill-informed, and the most vulnerable among us will
>>>>> die from COVID-19 while the virus perpetuates itself because insolent
>>>>> assholes refuse to protect all of mankind by submitting to the simpliest of
>>>>> procedures and protocols...
>>>>>
>>>>> Reminds me of that poem, 'If', by Rudyard Kipling.
>>>>
>>>> You're confused, first you say only the ill-informed will die, then you say
>>>> we're endangering others.
>>>
>>> You increase your risk of infection and the risk you push onto others.
>>>
>>> It is like someone in a boat, saying they are only digging a hole in their own
>>> cabin so others should not try to control them. Or someone saying that the
>>> government should not tell them to drive on a specific side of the road.
>>>
>>> Selfish and short sighted and not seeing the overall impact they have... or
>>> not caring.
>>
>> You seem to have now forgotten what you wrote earlier:
>>
>> "only the fucking brain-dead idiots, the poorest, the most ill-informed, and
>> the most vulnerable among us will die from COVID-19"
>
> What message ID?

It's quoted above.

On Sat, 31 Jul 2021 20:03:56 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Jul 31, 2021 at 10:44:28 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
> <op.07eowepimvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>
>> On Fri, 30 Jul 2021 19:11:27 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Jul 30, 2021 at 11:07:22 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>> <op.07cvakjtmvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 18:53:44 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Jul 28, 2021 at 10:40:33 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>>>> <op.0684pvsxmvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 18:42:55 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Jul 27, 2021 at 10:33:50 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>>>>>> <op.0669qox3mvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Good luck finding an Apple M1 CPU and motherboard.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Even with Intel Macs it is not as easy as many seem to think. And if you did
>>>>>>>>>>> do it there was no reason to think the machine would be supported,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> There's no need to think: it is utterly unsupported.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I meant not even being able to run the never version of macOS. My wording was
>>>>>>>>> not clear though.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If you build it with parts that Apple use, the OS thinks it's an Apple and
>>>>>>>> will behave exactly the same way.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Not quite as easy as you try to make it sound:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://www.quora.com/How-reliable-is-a-64-bit-Hackintosh-as-a-main-computer
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But as a hobby project it sounds like fun.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I know it's easy because I've done a few of them.
>>>>>
>>>>> How many macOS versions did you use on it?
>>>>
>>>> I've explained this already. If it fools one, it'll fool them all.
>>>
>>> So how many did you use?
>>
>> One. Which is irrelevant.
>
> So it MIGHT have worked with others but that was not tested.

I see no reason it would stop working with future versions.

On Sat, 31 Jul 2021 20:05:31 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Jul 31, 2021 at 10:42:59 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
> <op.07eotxeemvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>
>> On Thu, 29 Jul 2021 19:25:02 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Jul 29, 2021 at 10:44:45 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>> <op.07azkvg7mvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 18:53:59 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Jul 27, 2021 at 10:42:13 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>>>> <op.06694nf0mvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, 26 Jul 2021 16:38:48 +0100, wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> LegionX <MichaelAndAnneGlasser@griftersconjobsllc.com> posted this:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> Wrote in message:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Are you so bored with your life that you reply to me about someone else?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yes. We are.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Some of us sadly live in a city where the elected officials have
>>>>>>>> enforced another mask mandate. Due to covid delta variant spread.
>>>>>>>> We're back to remote office work. We are beyond bored.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Here's where our government and especially our subservient news media are
>>>>>>> letting the general public down, over simplified:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "[My] People are destroyed for lack of knowledge." -- Hosea 4:6
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The COVID-19 "vaccinations" ONLY prevent the recipient[s] from getting
>>>>>>> seriously ill or dying from the virus. It DOES NOT prevent you from
>>>>>>> CONTRACTING the disease; CARRYING the virus; or, INFECTING OTHERS with the
>>>>>>> virus!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> These "vaccinations" DO NOT operate like insecticides and "kill the virus".
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> They merely train specific human RNA strains to resist the virus attaching
>>>>>>> to a specific protien which causes immune system reactions which are so
>>>>>>> severe that it makes people severely ill or kills them...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Don't forget that at the outset of this "pandemic" it was well publicized
>>>>>>> that ONE OF THE REASONS THIS VIRUS is so virulent is because an infected
>>>>>>> host (human) can carry and transmit the virus for ~2-weeks BEFORE showing
>>>>>>> any symptoms...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In other words, if you have the "vaccination[s]" - and are otherwise
>>>>>>> relatively healthy - and you contact the virus and IN FACT be "infected"
>>>>>>> but you simply will not get seriously ill or die from it... BUT you still
>>>>>>> CARRY THE VIRUS and CAN INFECT OTHER PEOPLE - WHO CAN IN TURN INFECT STILL
>>>>>>> MORE PEOPLE... AD INFINITUM - before the virus inside you dies because it
>>>>>>> cannot attach to the protien it needs to make you sick... IF you are
>>>>>>> otherwise relatively healthy...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Which is one of the reasons not to get vaccinated. You're actally more
>>>>>> dangerous as you don't realise you're infected and contact more people.
>>>>>
>>>>> No, you are not. The amount of misinformation is absurd.
>>>>
>>>> The misinformation is because nobody knows.
>>>
>>> There is always more to learn, but we now know a lot about COVID and the
>>> vaccines -- for example, we know they are very safe and effective.
>>
>> At stopping something that wasn't very dangerous anyway. And they're not that
>> effective actually. 80% at best, something like 25% with a new variant. Like
>> using last year's virus checker.
>
> Where are you getting your information?

The news.

> And do you stop at red lights? If so, why?

Only if it's busy and I can't b bothered looking at multiple streams of cars. If I can tell that I can get to where I want to go without hitting anything, and there are no cops about, I go.

>>>> Best to ignore "scientists" who all disagree with each other.
>>>
>>> Disagreement is a part of science... but then so is a growing consensus as we
>>> learn more.
>>
>> Until we've finished learning, we shouldn't believe any theories on the way.
>
> We never finish learning.

We finish certain things. Some of the laws of physics we're pretty certain on.

>> Look at the palava over which kind of fat is good for you.... if you had
>> listened to scientists a decade ago, you would be making yourself worse.
>>
>>>> I've heard a doctor (a surgeon) say the masks we wear are of no use
>>>> whatsoever. Unless we all used surgical masks, we might aswell not bother.
>>>
>>> That doctor is saying things against the evidence. I say go with the evidence.
>>
>> A surgeon knows how good masks are.
>>
>> And I wonder why they have surgical masks and don't just use the cheap Ebay
>> ones we all use?
>
> Has someone suggested all masks are equal?

Well the government isn't telling us to use certain ones.

On Sat, 31 Jul 2021 20:05:44 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Jul 31, 2021 at 10:40:47 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
> <op.07eop911mvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>
>> On Thu, 29 Jul 2021 19:23:28 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Jul 29, 2021 at 10:45:53 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>> <op.07azmrrymvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 18:58:46 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Jul 27, 2021 at 10:38:18 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>>>> <op.0669x4pymvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, 26 Jul 2021 06:54:29 +0100, LegionX
>>>>>> <MichaelAndAnneGlasser@griftersconjobsllc.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> Wrote in message:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> How the fuck can you need to ask someone if you're involved in an
>>>>>>>> explosion?<> Welcome to a flaw in snit logic. Gremlin didn't write the post
>>>>>>> snit is writing about. We did.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Snit has accused us of being a Gremlin sock - we've invited him to
>>>>>>> post the evidence supporting his accusation. To snit that meant
>>>>>>> he would just continue to repeat it. In snits mind. Thats what
>>>>>>> evidence means.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Snit didn't accuse us of this until we busted him socking up as
>>>>>>> Sigmond and provided actual evidence to help us prove our
>>>>>>> accusation. We caught him using the same IP address posting as
>>>>>>> Sigmond as he did with Snit. He didn't even deny he made both
>>>>>>> posts until we specifically pointed out the fact we found the
>>>>>>> posts shared the same ip in plain sight in the headers. Once we
>>>>>>> grilled him good and tore both of his explanations for this so
>>>>>>> called ip forgery (hah yep on usenet with known servers that
>>>>>>> werent compromised) he started accusing us of being a sock of
>>>>>>> Gremlins.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We know enough about you to know that like snit you dont earn an
>>>>>>> income. You're also mooch and like snit very well known as a
>>>>>>> troll. But you're different in the sense your not a harmful troll
>>>>>>> whos out to fuck people over. You just do it for kicks. We get
>>>>>>> that. Snit on the other hand is a real life dangerous
>>>>>>> narcisist.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Wouldn't it be obvious?<> It should be. But this is snits story so the
>>>>>>>> gaping holes in his
>>>>>>> "logic" are the reason he wrote what he did. Gremlin hasn't
>>>>>>> posted since June of this year. Snit has spent the time to
>>>>>>> continue badmouthing him every chance he gets. He really is that
>>>>>>> *jealous* of Gremlin.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Get a life.
>>>>>
>>>>> I wonder if LegionX is Gremlin trying to pretend he has a flood bot similar to
>>>>> Carroll's.
>>>>
>>>> I stopped caring a long time ago. Maybe we should find them/it a hobby?
>>>
>>> Anger is his hobby these days.
>>
>> I wonder if we could harness the energy of angry people?
>
> We can try.

I think doing so might anger them more, and you could get a runaway explosion.

On Sat, 31 Jul 2021 20:06:20 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Jul 31, 2021 at 10:40:22 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
> <op.07eopkv8mvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>
>> On Thu, 29 Jul 2021 19:23:06 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Jul 29, 2021 at 10:47:31 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>> <op.07azpht8mvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 20:16:18 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Jul 27, 2021 at 11:57:30 AM MST, "Rabid Roach" wrote
>>>>> <uGYLI.42794$0Z7.19653@fx39.iad>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2021-07-27 1:30 p.m., Commander Kinsey wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sun, 25 Jul 2021 19:59:34 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Jul 25, 2021 at 11:01:33 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>>>>>>> <op.063lovo2mvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 23 Jul 2021 20:22:10 +0100, Rabid Roach <rabid@roa.ch> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 2021-07-23 2:56 p.m., LegionX wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> Wrote in message:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you so bored with your life that you reply to me about someone
>>>>>>>>>>>> else?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Yes. We are.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Some of us sadly live in a city where the elected officials have
>>>>>>>>>>> enforced another mask mandate. Due to covid delta variant spread.
>>>>>>>>>>> We're back to remote office work. We are beyond bored.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The "delta variant" is basically one that was created by those who
>>>>>>>>>> chose
>>>>>>>>>> to get "vaccinated" with a concoction that is likely to kill them.
>>>>>>>>>> It is
>>>>>>>>>> more contagious but also less potent.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Nobody is sticking any shit into my arm.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Nor is anyone asking to.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I hope they start demanding proof of vaccination once it gets full FDA
>>>>>>>> approval (which is likely coming soon).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> By which time it'll have been long gone anyway.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm _shocked_ that Marxist Snit is demanding tyranny.
>>>>>
>>>>> I did no such thing, nor am I a Marxist. But, hey, you got my online handle
>>>>> right. Good for you!
>>>>
>>>> Tyranny is "government by a ruler or small group of people who have unlimited
>>>> power over the people" - which is exactly what "demanding proof of
>>>> vaccination" is.
>>>
>>> How? Every society has safety standards. Do you not want your wait staff to
>>> have washed their hands after they use the restroom? Is that "tyranny" in your
>>> mind?
>>
>> Yes it's tyranny. You should decide your own safety.
>
> Back to no more stopping at red lights nor having the government tell me which
> side of the road to drive on.
>
>> Either cook your own food or go somewhere you know to be clean.
>
> How do you know?

Reviews.

On Sun, 01 Aug 2021 09:16:01 +0100, Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote:

> Commander Kinsey <CK1@nospam.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, 29 Jul 2021 20:34:55 +0100, Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Commander Kinsey <CK1@nospam.com> wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 18:53:59 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Jul 27, 2021 at 10:42:13 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>>>> <op.06694nf0mvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, 26 Jul 2021 16:38:48 +0100, wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> LegionX <MichaelAndAnneGlasser@griftersconjobsllc.com> posted this:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> Wrote in message:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Are you so bored with your life that you reply to me about someone else?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yes. We are.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Some of us sadly live in a city where the elected officials have
>>>>>>>> enforced another mask mandate. Due to covid delta variant spread.
>>>>>>>> We're back to remote office work. We are beyond bored.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Here's where our government and especially our subservient news media are
>>>>>>> letting the general public down, over simplified:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "[My] People are destroyed for lack of knowledge." -- Hosea 4:6
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The COVID-19 "vaccinations" ONLY prevent the recipient[s] from getting
>>>>>>> seriously ill or dying from the virus. It DOES NOT prevent you from
>>>>>>> CONTRACTING the disease; CARRYING the virus; or, INFECTING OTHERS with the
>>>>>>> virus!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> These "vaccinations" DO NOT operate like insecticides and "kill the virus".
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> They merely train specific human RNA strains to resist the virus attaching
>>>>>>> to a specific protien which causes immune system reactions which are so
>>>>>>> severe that it makes people severely ill or kills them...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Don't forget that at the outset of this "pandemic" it was well publicized
>>>>>>> that ONE OF THE REASONS THIS VIRUS is so virulent is because an infected
>>>>>>> host (human) can carry and transmit the virus for ~2-weeks BEFORE showing
>>>>>>> any symptoms...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In other words, if you have the "vaccination[s]" - and are otherwise
>>>>>>> relatively healthy - and you contact the virus and IN FACT be "infected"
>>>>>>> but you simply will not get seriously ill or die from it... BUT you still
>>>>>>> CARRY THE VIRUS and CAN INFECT OTHER PEOPLE - WHO CAN IN TURN INFECT STILL
>>>>>>> MORE PEOPLE... AD INFINITUM - before the virus inside you dies because it
>>>>>>> cannot attach to the protien it needs to make you sick... IF you are
>>>>>>> otherwise relatively healthy...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Which is one of the reasons not to get vaccinated. You're actally more
>>>>>> dangerous as you don't realise you're infected and contact more people.
>>>>>
>>>>> No, you are not. The amount of misinformation is absurd.
>>>>
>>>> The misinformation is because nobody knows.
>>>
>>> Wrong as usual. The vaccines reduce transmission by 80% after the first
>>> dose and 90% after both.
>>> https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7013e3.htm
>>
>> Until you get a variant.
>
> Possibly. Which is why have to do everything to stop spreading the virus
> and giving it the chance for new variants to arise.

Or just stop making a mountain out of a molehill.

> The current vaccines are still effective against the newer variants.
> https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)01358-1/fulltext
>
>> Last year's AVG doesn't delete this year's computer viruses either.
>
> It might. With heuristic scanning it can identify similar viruses.
>
> That's why you update the software. Same with vaccines, if the dominant
> variants drift too far away from the vaccine's effectiveness then we get an
> "update" (booster). Simple and effective.

Expensive and unnecessary. We have an immune system, which you're compromising by using a vaccine. How is it supposed to learn to be stronger?

On Sun, 01 Aug 2021 19:48:22 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Aug 1, 2021 at 11:20:35 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
> <op.07gk8lcvmvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>
>>>>>>> With the early Apple IIe systems you had to pop a chip out and turn it around
>>>>>>> to go from supporting a modem to a printer... which was stupid. They later did
>>>>>>> fix that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To upgrade the RAM on my ZX Spectrum required a soldering iron!
>>>>>
>>>>> Try it on a new M1!
>>>>
>>>> I have a soldering iron with the extra fine tip, will that do?
>>>
>>> One way to find out.
>>
>> Have you ever picked up the wrong end?
>
> Nope. And only rarely the right one.

This is similar and hilarious:
https://youtu.be/-myu4I6kJIs

On Sun, 01 Aug 2021 19:48:42 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Aug 1, 2021 at 11:20:01 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
> <op.07gk7ne7mvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>
>> On Fri, 30 Jul 2021 22:32:48 +0100, Carlos E. R. <robin_listas@es.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 30/07/2021 20.19, Commander Kinsey wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 19:06:56 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Jul 28, 2021 at 10:41:11 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>>>> <op.0684qxuumvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>> Hell, the libertarian fantasy is being destroyed (again) right now.
>>>>>>> People
>>>>>>> won't even wear a mask to help save their neighbor... and you think
>>>>>>> they will
>>>>>>> pay for things they are not forced to?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My neighbour is free to wear one himself.
>>>>>
>>>>> But you will not wear one to protect him. That is my point.
>>>>
>>>> I don't have to, as he has one on.
>>>
>>> Wrong.
>>>
>>> His mask protects you, and your mask protects him.
>>> His mask does not protect him. Your mask does not protect you.
>>>
>>> Unless you (and he) use a PPE.
>>
>> The air coming out of my mouth is travelling faster than it is when it reaches
>> him, it's more likely to be stopped by his mask as it's going slower.
>> Everyone's masks protects themselves.
>
> Your claims are contrary to the evidence on mask wearing.

My claim is basic common sense, it's easier to stop a slow moving thing than a fast moving thing.

On Sun, 01 Aug 2021 19:49:03 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Aug 1, 2021 at 11:17:42 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
> <op.07gk3sqtmvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>
>>>>>>> I have very sensitive hearing... but have a hard time "blocking out"
>>>>>>> background noise. Comes with the dysautonomia I have.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Then you should be like me. If you stop an annoying noise, you just end up
>>>>>> hearing the next loudest one.
>>>>>
>>>>> Distance also plays some role in it. I do not mind noises as much if they are
>>>>> not as close.
>>>>
>>>> Annoyance = volume/distance.
>>>
>>> To some extent, yes.
>>
>> To what extent isn't it?
>
> To the extent that it is, but in reverse.

What? Louder volume is more annoying. More distance is less annoying.

On Aug 2, 2021 at 11:37:46 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
<op.07igo8crmvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:

> On Sun, 01 Aug 2021 19:49:03 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Aug 1, 2021 at 11:17:42 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>> <op.07gk3sqtmvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>
>>>>>>>> I have very sensitive hearing... but have a hard time "blocking out"
>>>>>>>> background noise. Comes with the dysautonomia I have.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Then you should be like me. If you stop an annoying noise, you just end up
>>>>>>> hearing the next loudest one.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Distance also plays some role in it. I do not mind noises as much if they are
>>>>>> not as close.
>>>>>
>>>>> Annoyance = volume/distance.
>>>>
>>>> To some extent, yes.
>>>
>>> To what extent isn't it?
>>
>> To the extent that it is, but in reverse.
>
> What? Louder volume is more annoying. More distance is less annoying.

I was just being silly... there are other factors than distance. Tone,
repetition, etc. Try listening to Baby Shark softly.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Aug 2, 2021 at 11:37:19 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
<op.07igohdqmvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:

> On Sun, 01 Aug 2021 19:48:42 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Aug 1, 2021 at 11:20:01 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>> <op.07gk7ne7mvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>
>>> On Fri, 30 Jul 2021 22:32:48 +0100, Carlos E. R. <robin_listas@es.invalid>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 30/07/2021 20.19, Commander Kinsey wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 19:06:56 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Jul 28, 2021 at 10:41:11 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>>>>> <op.0684qxuumvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hell, the libertarian fantasy is being destroyed (again) right now.
>>>>>>>> People
>>>>>>>> won't even wear a mask to help save their neighbor... and you think
>>>>>>>> they will
>>>>>>>> pay for things they are not forced to?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> My neighbour is free to wear one himself.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But you will not wear one to protect him. That is my point.
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't have to, as he has one on.
>>>>
>>>> Wrong.
>>>>
>>>> His mask protects you, and your mask protects him.
>>>> His mask does not protect him. Your mask does not protect you.
>>>>
>>>> Unless you (and he) use a PPE.
>>>
>>> The air coming out of my mouth is travelling faster than it is when it reaches
>>> him, it's more likely to be stopped by his mask as it's going slower.
>>> Everyone's masks protects themselves.
>>
>> Your claims are contrary to the evidence on mask wearing.
>
> My claim is basic common sense, it's easier to stop a slow moving thing than a
> fast moving thing.

What you call "common sense" is your guess, and your guess is incorrect. You
are not looking at evidence on spread but your own guesses as to what leads to
the spread.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Aug 2, 2021 at 11:36:55 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
<op.07igntykmvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:

> On Sun, 01 Aug 2021 19:48:22 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Aug 1, 2021 at 11:20:35 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>> <op.07gk8lcvmvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>
>>>>>>>> With the early Apple IIe systems you had to pop a chip out and turn it around
>>>>>>>> to go from supporting a modem to a printer... which was stupid. They later did
>>>>>>>> fix that.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To upgrade the RAM on my ZX Spectrum required a soldering iron!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Try it on a new M1!
>>>>>
>>>>> I have a soldering iron with the extra fine tip, will that do?
>>>>
>>>> One way to find out.
>>>
>>> Have you ever picked up the wrong end?
>>
>> Nope. And only rarely the right one.
>
> This is similar and hilarious:
> https://youtu.be/-myu4I6kJIs

OUCH!

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Aug 2, 2021 at 11:34:54 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
<op.07igkguhmvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:

> On Sun, 01 Aug 2021 09:16:01 +0100, Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Commander Kinsey <CK1@nospam.com> wrote:
>>> On Thu, 29 Jul 2021 20:34:55 +0100, Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Commander Kinsey <CK1@nospam.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 18:53:59 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Jul 27, 2021 at 10:42:13 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>>>>> <op.06694nf0mvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, 26 Jul 2021 16:38:48 +0100, wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> LegionX <MichaelAndAnneGlasser@griftersconjobsllc.com> posted this:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> Wrote in message:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Are you so bored with your life that you reply to me about someone else?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yes. We are.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Some of us sadly live in a city where the elected officials have
>>>>>>>>> enforced another mask mandate. Due to covid delta variant spread.
>>>>>>>>> We're back to remote office work. We are beyond bored.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Here's where our government and especially our subservient news media are
>>>>>>>> letting the general public down, over simplified:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "[My] People are destroyed for lack of knowledge." -- Hosea 4:6
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The COVID-19 "vaccinations" ONLY prevent the recipient[s] from getting
>>>>>>>> seriously ill or dying from the virus. It DOES NOT prevent you from
>>>>>>>> CONTRACTING the disease; CARRYING the virus; or, INFECTING OTHERS with the
>>>>>>>> virus!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> These "vaccinations" DO NOT operate like insecticides and "kill the virus".
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> They merely train specific human RNA strains to resist the virus attaching
>>>>>>>> to a specific protien which causes immune system reactions which are so
>>>>>>>> severe that it makes people severely ill or kills them...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Don't forget that at the outset of this "pandemic" it was well publicized
>>>>>>>> that ONE OF THE REASONS THIS VIRUS is so virulent is because an infected
>>>>>>>> host (human) can carry and transmit the virus for ~2-weeks BEFORE showing
>>>>>>>> any symptoms...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In other words, if you have the "vaccination[s]" - and are otherwise
>>>>>>>> relatively healthy - and you contact the virus and IN FACT be "infected"
>>>>>>>> but you simply will not get seriously ill or die from it... BUT you still
>>>>>>>> CARRY THE VIRUS and CAN INFECT OTHER PEOPLE - WHO CAN IN TURN INFECT STILL
>>>>>>>> MORE PEOPLE... AD INFINITUM - before the virus inside you dies because it
>>>>>>>> cannot attach to the protien it needs to make you sick... IF you are
>>>>>>>> otherwise relatively healthy...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Which is one of the reasons not to get vaccinated. You're actally more
>>>>>>> dangerous as you don't realise you're infected and contact more people.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No, you are not. The amount of misinformation is absurd.
>>>>>
>>>>> The misinformation is because nobody knows.
>>>>
>>>> Wrong as usual. The vaccines reduce transmission by 80% after the first
>>>> dose and 90% after both.
>>>> https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7013e3.htm
>>>
>>> Until you get a variant.
>>
>> Possibly. Which is why have to do everything to stop spreading the virus
>> and giving it the chance for new variants to arise.
>
> Or just stop making a mountain out of a molehill.

As you do with mask wearing. Why do you do that?

>
>> The current vaccines are still effective against the newer variants.
>> https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)01358-1/fulltext
>>
>>> Last year's AVG doesn't delete this year's computer viruses either.
>>
>> It might. With heuristic scanning it can identify similar viruses.
>>
>> That's why you update the software. Same with vaccines, if the dominant
>> variants drift too far away from the vaccine's effectiveness then we get an
>> "update" (booster). Simple and effective.
>
> Expensive and unnecessary. We have an immune system, which you're compromising
> by using a vaccine. How is it supposed to learn to be stronger?

The fact we have an immune system is not in dispute.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Aug 2, 2021 at 11:34:00 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
<op.07igiycjmvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:

> On Sat, 31 Jul 2021 20:06:20 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Jul 31, 2021 at 10:40:22 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>> <op.07eopkv8mvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>
>>> On Thu, 29 Jul 2021 19:23:06 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Jul 29, 2021 at 10:47:31 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>>> <op.07azpht8mvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 20:16:18 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Jul 27, 2021 at 11:57:30 AM MST, "Rabid Roach" wrote
>>>>>> <uGYLI.42794$0Z7.19653@fx39.iad>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2021-07-27 1:30 p.m., Commander Kinsey wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sun, 25 Jul 2021 19:59:34 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Jul 25, 2021 at 11:01:33 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>>>>>>>> <op.063lovo2mvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 23 Jul 2021 20:22:10 +0100, Rabid Roach <rabid@roa.ch> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2021-07-23 2:56 p.m., LegionX wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> Wrote in message:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you so bored with your life that you reply to me about someone
>>>>>>>>>>>>> else?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes. We are.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Some of us sadly live in a city where the elected officials have
>>>>>>>>>>>> enforced another mask mandate. Due to covid delta variant spread.
>>>>>>>>>>>> We're back to remote office work. We are beyond bored.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The "delta variant" is basically one that was created by those who
>>>>>>>>>>> chose
>>>>>>>>>>> to get "vaccinated" with a concoction that is likely to kill them.
>>>>>>>>>>> It is
>>>>>>>>>>> more contagious but also less potent.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Nobody is sticking any shit into my arm.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Nor is anyone asking to.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I hope they start demanding proof of vaccination once it gets full FDA
>>>>>>>>> approval (which is likely coming soon).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> By which time it'll have been long gone anyway.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm _shocked_ that Marxist Snit is demanding tyranny.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I did no such thing, nor am I a Marxist. But, hey, you got my online handle
>>>>>> right. Good for you!
>>>>>
>>>>> Tyranny is "government by a ruler or small group of people who have unlimited
>>>>> power over the people" - which is exactly what "demanding proof of
>>>>> vaccination" is.
>>>>
>>>> How? Every society has safety standards. Do you not want your wait staff to
>>>> have washed their hands after they use the restroom? Is that "tyranny" in your
>>>> mind?
>>>
>>> Yes it's tyranny. You should decide your own safety.
>>
>> Back to no more stopping at red lights nor having the government tell me which
>> side of the road to drive on.
>>
>>> Either cook your own food or go somewhere you know to be clean.
>>
>> How do you know?
>
> Reviews.

I find most for restaurants to not fit my tastes. I am in meat-n-potatoes
country, and I am more adventurous than that.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Aug 2, 2021 at 11:33:44 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
<op.07igiiddmvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:

> On Sat, 31 Jul 2021 20:05:44 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Jul 31, 2021 at 10:40:47 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>> <op.07eop911mvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>
>>> On Thu, 29 Jul 2021 19:23:28 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Jul 29, 2021 at 10:45:53 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>>> <op.07azmrrymvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 18:58:46 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Jul 27, 2021 at 10:38:18 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>>>>> <op.0669x4pymvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, 26 Jul 2021 06:54:29 +0100, LegionX
>>>>>>> <MichaelAndAnneGlasser@griftersconjobsllc.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> Wrote in message:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> How the fuck can you need to ask someone if you're involved in an
>>>>>>>>> explosion?<> Welcome to a flaw in snit logic. Gremlin didn't write the post
>>>>>>>> snit is writing about. We did.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Snit has accused us of being a Gremlin sock - we've invited him to
>>>>>>>> post the evidence supporting his accusation. To snit that meant
>>>>>>>> he would just continue to repeat it. In snits mind. Thats what
>>>>>>>> evidence means.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Snit didn't accuse us of this until we busted him socking up as
>>>>>>>> Sigmond and provided actual evidence to help us prove our
>>>>>>>> accusation. We caught him using the same IP address posting as
>>>>>>>> Sigmond as he did with Snit. He didn't even deny he made both
>>>>>>>> posts until we specifically pointed out the fact we found the
>>>>>>>> posts shared the same ip in plain sight in the headers. Once we
>>>>>>>> grilled him good and tore both of his explanations for this so
>>>>>>>> called ip forgery (hah yep on usenet with known servers that
>>>>>>>> werent compromised) he started accusing us of being a sock of
>>>>>>>> Gremlins.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We know enough about you to know that like snit you dont earn an
>>>>>>>> income. You're also mooch and like snit very well known as a
>>>>>>>> troll. But you're different in the sense your not a harmful troll
>>>>>>>> whos out to fuck people over. You just do it for kicks. We get
>>>>>>>> that. Snit on the other hand is a real life dangerous
>>>>>>>> narcisist.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Wouldn't it be obvious?<> It should be. But this is snits story so the
>>>>>>>>> gaping holes in his
>>>>>>>> "logic" are the reason he wrote what he did. Gremlin hasn't
>>>>>>>> posted since June of this year. Snit has spent the time to
>>>>>>>> continue badmouthing him every chance he gets. He really is that
>>>>>>>> *jealous* of Gremlin.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Get a life.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I wonder if LegionX is Gremlin trying to pretend he has a flood bot similar to
>>>>>> Carroll's.
>>>>>
>>>>> I stopped caring a long time ago. Maybe we should find them/it a hobby?
>>>>
>>>> Anger is his hobby these days.
>>>
>>> I wonder if we could harness the energy of angry people?
>>
>> We can try.
>
> I think doing so might anger them more, and you could get a runaway explosion.

I do think there is that risk.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Aug 2, 2021 at 11:33:15 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
<op.07ighpk2mvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:

> On Sat, 31 Jul 2021 20:05:31 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Jul 31, 2021 at 10:42:59 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>> <op.07eotxeemvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>
>>> On Thu, 29 Jul 2021 19:25:02 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Jul 29, 2021 at 10:44:45 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>>> <op.07azkvg7mvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 18:53:59 +0100, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Jul 27, 2021 at 10:42:13 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
>>>>>> <op.06694nf0mvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, 26 Jul 2021 16:38:48 +0100, wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> LegionX <MichaelAndAnneGlasser@griftersconjobsllc.com> posted this:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> Wrote in message:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Are you so bored with your life that you reply to me about someone else?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yes. We are.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Some of us sadly live in a city where the elected officials have
>>>>>>>>> enforced another mask mandate. Due to covid delta variant spread.
>>>>>>>>> We're back to remote office work. We are beyond bored.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Here's where our government and especially our subservient news media are
>>>>>>>> letting the general public down, over simplified:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "[My] People are destroyed for lack of knowledge." -- Hosea 4:6
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The COVID-19 "vaccinations" ONLY prevent the recipient[s] from getting
>>>>>>>> seriously ill or dying from the virus. It DOES NOT prevent you from
>>>>>>>> CONTRACTING the disease; CARRYING the virus; or, INFECTING OTHERS with the
>>>>>>>> virus!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> These "vaccinations" DO NOT operate like insecticides and "kill the virus".
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> They merely train specific human RNA strains to resist the virus attaching
>>>>>>>> to a specific protien which causes immune system reactions which are so
>>>>>>>> severe that it makes people severely ill or kills them...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Don't forget that at the outset of this "pandemic" it was well publicized
>>>>>>>> that ONE OF THE REASONS THIS VIRUS is so virulent is because an infected
>>>>>>>> host (human) can carry and transmit the virus for ~2-weeks BEFORE showing
>>>>>>>> any symptoms...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In other words, if you have the "vaccination[s]" - and are otherwise
>>>>>>>> relatively healthy - and you contact the virus and IN FACT be "infected"
>>>>>>>> but you simply will not get seriously ill or die from it... BUT you still
>>>>>>>> CARRY THE VIRUS and CAN INFECT OTHER PEOPLE - WHO CAN IN TURN INFECT STILL
>>>>>>>> MORE PEOPLE... AD INFINITUM - before the virus inside you dies because it
>>>>>>>> cannot attach to the protien it needs to make you sick... IF you are
>>>>>>>> otherwise relatively healthy...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Which is one of the reasons not to get vaccinated. You're actally more
>>>>>>> dangerous as you don't realise you're infected and contact more people.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No, you are not. The amount of misinformation is absurd.
>>>>>
>>>>> The misinformation is because nobody knows.
>>>>
>>>> There is always more to learn, but we now know a lot about COVID and the
>>>> vaccines -- for example, we know they are very safe and effective.
>>>
>>> At stopping something that wasn't very dangerous anyway. And they're not that
>>> effective actually. 80% at best, something like 25% with a new variant. Like
>>> using last year's virus checker.
>>
>> Where are you getting your information?
>
> The news.

Have specific articles or clips? How about research papers?

>
>> And do you stop at red lights? If so, why?
>
> Only if it's busy and I can't b bothered looking at multiple streams of cars.
> If I can tell that I can get to where I want to go without hitting anything,
> and there are no cops about, I go.

Why stop when there are cars? They can stop for you just as easily.

>
>>>>> Best to ignore "scientists" who all disagree with each other.
>>>>
>>>> Disagreement is a part of science... but then so is a growing consensus as we
>>>> learn more.
>>>
>>> Until we've finished learning, we shouldn't believe any theories on the way.
>>
>> We never finish learning.
>
> We finish certain things. Some of the laws of physics we're pretty certain on.

You mean the "laws" that Einstein proved were wrong? :)

>
>>> Look at the palava over which kind of fat is good for you.... if you had
>>> listened to scientists a decade ago, you would be making yourself worse.
>>>
>>>>> I've heard a doctor (a surgeon) say the masks we wear are of no use
>>>>> whatsoever. Unless we all used surgical masks, we might aswell not bother.
>>>>
>>>> That doctor is saying things against the evidence. I say go with the evidence.
>>>
>>> A surgeon knows how good masks are.
>>>
>>> And I wonder why they have surgical masks and don't just use the cheap Ebay
>>> ones we all use?
>>
>> Has someone suggested all masks are equal?
>
> Well the government isn't telling us to use certain ones.

They make suggestions... but you did not answer the question.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.