On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 21:10:27 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote:

> When it's a choice of the lesser of two evils I think it's morally right
> NOT to vote. (And it's ALWAYS a choice of the lesser of two evils now.)

That's been the case for presidential elections for my entire life. I get
a little more interested in Congressional elections, and pay attention to
state and local elections.

That is how it really should be.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subsidiarity_(Catholicism)

Yeah, more Catholic social doctrine. The Church used to come up with some
pretty good ideas although not recently. (again, almost all my life)

That battle was lost long ago. Biden issues the marching orders and
Turncoat Roberts backs him. Bush made as big a mistake with that one as
Eisenhower did with Earl Warren.

"Relf" <Usenet@Jeff-Relf.Me> wrote:

>Crump wrote: "Voting matters".
>
>Voting only matters to schizophrenic dictators, like Putin & Crump;
>in Russia, you "vote" under gun point.

I actually don't want executive authority. I don't think I have the
temperament for it, in large part because of my brain disorder/
substance abuse. I'm self-aware of it. But I should have the ability
to declare law valid and not. No one can replace me, on that.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

"Relf" <Usenet@Jeff-Relf.Me> wrote:

>You (Crump) replied ( to me ):
>> > Likely, I've exercised more than you ever have; I never voted.
>>
>> You would imagine that doesn't make you look dumb, Relf ?
>
>The more you vote, the dumber you are.

So if you help Trump win again, no biggie? That's pretty "dumb",
Relf.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

% <pursent100@gmail.com> wrote:

>>>> Voting matters.
>>>>
>>> do you really believe your vote means anything ,
>>> the people that run your country already know ,
>>> who the next president will be , they know years in advance ,
>>> the let you think you had a say but you don't ,
>>> it's already been figured out by leaders for the next 10 years ,
>>> votes mean nothing in fact it makes me laugh to think ,
>>> you believe they would let the people pick
>>
>> Evidence?
>>
>this isn't court

You still asserted something authoritatively, and stupidly, whether
you're under oath or not.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

RonB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> On 2024-01-23, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
>> RonB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>
>>> On 2024-01-22, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
>>>> RonB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2024-01-22, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
>>>>>> RabidPedagog wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2024-01-21 11:35, DFS wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 1/20/2024 5:43 PM, RonB wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Your vote means nothing with rigged voting machines.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> drool
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Does the conspiracy idiot gene run in the family?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Since it's a conspiracy, feel free to explain how both Trump was able to
>>>>>>> get more votes than the first time around yet lose.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Simple... Trump was loved by magahats, but he repulsed the majority of the
>>>>>> voters.
>>>>>
>>>>> Not the majority of voters — you mean the majority of those who "count" the
>>>>> votes.
>>>>
>>>> You mean like the Electoral College? Or are you echoing Stalin?
>>>
>>> No, I mean the corrupt Democrats in the big cities who are in charge of
>>> *massaging* the votes and changing who goes the Electoral College. Stay with
>>> me, this is not rocket science.
>>>
>>>>>>> Also, feel free to
>>>>>>> explain the sudden deposit of votes, all of which were for Biden, in the
>>>>>>> middle of the night after the votes stopped being counted for no reason
>>>>>>> whatsoever.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Long debunked.
>>>>>
>>>>> Not debunked at all. Judges refused to hear the lawsuits.
>>>>
>>>> Well, you generally have to present some evidence of the crime and your
>>>> standing related to it in order to get judges to spend their time on your
>>>> claims.
>>>
>>> Well generally you don't have corrupt, (mostly Democrat or RINO) judges who
>>> refuse to hear cases when thousands of affidavits are submitted attesting to
>>> foul play.
>>>
>>>>> Have you ever
>>>>> wondered why it takes the United States so long to count the votes (a month
>>>>> or more in some precincts) when every other country in the world can get it
>>>>> done on election night? It takes a lot longer to "massage" the votes than it
>>>>> does to count them.
>>>>
>>>> I tend to think the endless lawsuits, intimidation of poll workers, and demands
>>>> for triple recounts and multiple audits had something to do with it.
>>>
>>> Of course that's what you would "tend to think," because you "tend to think"
>>> that voting machines can't be rigged and those counting the ballots are
>>> not corrupt. What you "tend to think" does not jive with reality.
>>>
>>> In America we need to demand paper ballots and one day voting, except for
>>> absentee ballots. All absentee ballots should be counted BEFORE election
>>> day, as they come in. No drop boxes. Some kind of identification for every
>>> voter. Registration well before the day of the election. Some honesty in our
>>> election system.
>>>
>>>> "I need you to find 11768 votes..."
>>>
>>> Actually, you need to start by disallowing votes in precincts were more
>>> votes were counted than there were registered voters. That would be a good
>>> start.
>>
>> Sorry man, you've had almost 4 years to expose this stuff. You'd think the
>> Trump Republicans would have unearthed the "truth" by now.
>>
>> It just doesn't pass the smell test.
>
> Not when you hold your nose, ignore the burning sensation in your eyes and
> turn away from the rancid reality.

The rancid reality is that it was the Trump camp perpetrating "The Steal".

> If the crooked judges wouldn't hear the cases, what exactly do you suggest
> Trump could have done? These judges ignored the evidence of voter fraud and
> let the liars lie. The fix was in, and the judges were part of it.

:-D

Man, this sigmonster!

--
There's small choice in rotten apples.
-- William Shakespeare, "The Taming of the Shrew"

RabidPedagog wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> On 2024-01-23 14:21, Relf wrote:
>> You (Crump) replied ( to me ):
>>>> Likely, I've exercised more than you ever have; I never voted.
>>>
>>> You would imagine that doesn't make you look dumb, Relf ?
>>
>> The more you vote, the dumber you are.

Pathetic insult snipped.

--
Go to a movie tonight. Darkness becomes you.

Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
>RabidPedagog wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>> On 2024-01-23 14:21, Relf wrote:
>>> You (Crump) replied ( to me ):
>>>>> Likely, I've exercised more than you ever have; I never voted.
>>>>
>>>> You would imagine that doesn't make you look dumb, Relf ?
>>>
>>> The more you vote, the dumber you are.
>
>Pathetic insult snipped.

Why did he think your wife is trans, anyway? Did I miss something? My
GF is trans, but I think I remember you saying you have kids with your
wife.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

Joel wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
>>RabidPedagog wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>> On 2024-01-23 14:21, Relf wrote:
>>>> You (Crump) replied ( to me ):
>>>>>> Likely, I've exercised more than you ever have; I never voted.
>>>>>
>>>>> You would imagine that doesn't make you look dumb, Relf ?
>>>>
>>>> The more you vote, the dumber you are.
>>
>>Pathetic insult snipped.
>
> Why did he think your wife is trans, anyway? Did I miss something? My
> GF is trans, but I think I remember you saying you have kids with your
> wife.

Who knows? He's got a lemon in the head.

--
You will live to see your grandchildren.

On 2024-01-24, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 20:54:30 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote:
>
>> If she loses big in New Hampshire, she's already there. I don't think
>> she leads the polling (or is even close) in any the "Super Tuesday"
>> primaries. Don't be surprised, however, if they try to run as an
>> independent in the general election(without a chance to win, but she'd
>> probably pull enough of the Bush, Romney, McConnell, Cheney Republicans
>> away from Trump to give Biden the win).
>
> The latest news is she is down 11 but will fight on (with other peoples'
> money)
>
> New Hampshire is a little different. An unregistered voter can vote in
> either primary. You are registered to that party but can sign a list at
> the polling place to say you were only fooling and go back to undeclared.
>
> When I lived in NH I never bothered with primaries and stayed undeclared.
>
> In Montana you can't register with a party afaik. For primaries they give
> you two, sometimes three (Libertarian) ballots. Fill one out, turn the
> others in. Our primary is in June so it seldom matters but in 2008 whe it
> was a cliffhanger I went Democrat and voted for Obama in the primary.
> There's bad, and then there is really bad.
>
> It would be wonderful to get those lists and find out how many undeclared,
> left leaning people, voted for Haley and immediately reverted. Not holding
> my breath.
>
> In a way it's a good thing to see Democrats and never Trump RINOs waste
> their money on Haley. It supports the local economies with posters, room
> rentals for rallies, and so forth. Bleed the bastards try Nikki.

They interviewed quite a few Democrats who went "unaffiliated" to vote for
Haley and asked who they would vote for in the general election if Haley
won. All said Biden. For an idea of how many of the "temporarily
unaffiliated" voted for Haley, the exit polls showed that among Republican
registered voters, Trump had a 50 point lead over Haley. Also, it looks like
there is going to be close to 350,000 votes in the Republican primary, about
125,000 in the Democrat primary. I don't think New Hampshire is *that* much
skewed Republican (if at all).

As for Haley staying in the race... I would imagine her funding will dry up
after this loss and she might reconsider. She spent, I think, $40 million in
an attempt to win New Hampshire. She'll win 8 or 9 delegates, so about $5
million per delegate. Trump spent about half that — so not cheap at $1.7
million a delegate either (he'll win 12 or 13 delegates).

--
"Evil preaches tolerance until it is dominant, then it tries to silence good."
-- Archbishop Charles J. Chaput

On 2024-01-24, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
> RonB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> On 2024-01-23, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
>>> RonB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>>
>>>> On 2024-01-22, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
>>>>> RonB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2024-01-22, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
>>>>>>> RabidPedagog wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2024-01-21 11:35, DFS wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 1/20/2024 5:43 PM, RonB wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Your vote means nothing with rigged voting machines.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> drool
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Does the conspiracy idiot gene run in the family?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Since it's a conspiracy, feel free to explain how both Trump was able to
>>>>>>>> get more votes than the first time around yet lose.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Simple... Trump was loved by magahats, but he repulsed the majority of the
>>>>>>> voters.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not the majority of voters — you mean the majority of those who "count" the
>>>>>> votes.
>>>>>
>>>>> You mean like the Electoral College? Or are you echoing Stalin?
>>>>
>>>> No, I mean the corrupt Democrats in the big cities who are in charge of
>>>> *massaging* the votes and changing who goes the Electoral College. Stay with
>>>> me, this is not rocket science.
>>>>
>>>>>>>> Also, feel free to
>>>>>>>> explain the sudden deposit of votes, all of which were for Biden, in the
>>>>>>>> middle of the night after the votes stopped being counted for no reason
>>>>>>>> whatsoever.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Long debunked.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not debunked at all. Judges refused to hear the lawsuits.
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, you generally have to present some evidence of the crime and your
>>>>> standing related to it in order to get judges to spend their time on your
>>>>> claims.
>>>>
>>>> Well generally you don't have corrupt, (mostly Democrat or RINO) judges who
>>>> refuse to hear cases when thousands of affidavits are submitted attesting to
>>>> foul play.
>>>>
>>>>>> Have you ever
>>>>>> wondered why it takes the United States so long to count the votes (a month
>>>>>> or more in some precincts) when every other country in the world can get it
>>>>>> done on election night? It takes a lot longer to "massage" the votes than it
>>>>>> does to count them.
>>>>>
>>>>> I tend to think the endless lawsuits, intimidation of poll workers, and demands
>>>>> for triple recounts and multiple audits had something to do with it.
>>>>
>>>> Of course that's what you would "tend to think," because you "tend to think"
>>>> that voting machines can't be rigged and those counting the ballots are
>>>> not corrupt. What you "tend to think" does not jive with reality.
>>>>
>>>> In America we need to demand paper ballots and one day voting, except for
>>>> absentee ballots. All absentee ballots should be counted BEFORE election
>>>> day, as they come in. No drop boxes. Some kind of identification for every
>>>> voter. Registration well before the day of the election. Some honesty in our
>>>> election system.
>>>>
>>>>> "I need you to find 11768 votes..."
>>>>
>>>> Actually, you need to start by disallowing votes in precincts were more
>>>> votes were counted than there were registered voters. That would be a good
>>>> start.
>>>
>>> Sorry man, you've had almost 4 years to expose this stuff. You'd think the
>>> Trump Republicans would have unearthed the "truth" by now.
>>>
>>> It just doesn't pass the smell test.
>>
>> Not when you hold your nose, ignore the burning sensation in your eyes and
>> turn away from the rancid reality.
>
> The rancid reality is that it was the Trump camp perpetrating "The Steal".

No, that's the delusional "reality."

>> If the crooked judges wouldn't hear the cases, what exactly do you suggest
>> Trump could have done? These judges ignored the evidence of voter fraud and
>> let the liars lie. The fix was in, and the judges were part of it.
>
> :-D
>
> Man, this sigmonster!
>

--
"Evil preaches tolerance until it is dominant, then it tries to silence good."
-- Archbishop Charles J. Chaput

On 2024-01-24, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 21:10:27 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote:
>
>> When it's a choice of the lesser of two evils I think it's morally right
>> NOT to vote. (And it's ALWAYS a choice of the lesser of two evils now.)
>
> That's been the case for presidential elections for my entire life. I get
> a little more interested in Congressional elections, and pay attention to
> state and local elections.
>
> That is how it really should be.
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subsidiarity_(Catholicism)
>
> Yeah, more Catholic social doctrine. The Church used to come up with some
> pretty good ideas although not recently. (again, almost all my life)
>
> That battle was lost long ago. Biden issues the marching orders and
> Turncoat Roberts backs him. Bush made as big a mistake with that one as
> Eisenhower did with Earl Warren.

Trump was either really stupid with a lot of his picks (especially for his
cabinet and two of his Supreme Court picks) or he chose exactly who he
wanted to choose under the guise of being "a poor judge of character." I
tend to think the latter. Trump says what his electorate wants to hear and
does (for the most part) what the Swamp creatures tell him to do.

--
"Evil preaches tolerance until it is dominant, then it tries to silence good."
-- Archbishop Charles J. Chaput

On 1/23/2024 4:56 PM, RabidPedagog wrote:

> And here I thought Chris Ahlstrom was dumb because he spent most of his
> ideas being violently penetrated by his wife's "girl cock."

LMFAO!

Creepy was always down for a pegging.

DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>On 1/23/2024 4:56 PM, RabidPedagog wrote:
>
>> And here I thought Chris Ahlstrom was dumb because he spent most of his
>> ideas being violently penetrated by his wife's "girl cock."
>
>LMFAO!
>
>
>Creepy was always down for a pegging.

Pegging is with a sex toy, not a gock. I have had the experience of
being pegged by a cis woman, but that's fundamentally different from a
trans woman buttfucking me. It didn't feel the same as when I've
gotten fucked by men.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

On 2024-01-24 12:38 p.m., DFS wrote:
> On 1/23/2024 4:56 PM, RabidPedagog wrote:
>
>> And here I thought Chris Ahlstrom was dumb because he spent most of
>> his ideas being violently penetrated by his wife's "girl cock."
>
>
> LMFAO!
>
>
> Creepy was always down for a pegging.

Ugh, I hate when I accidentally write the wrong word. I meant days, not
ideas.

--
RabidPedagog
Catholic paleoconservative
Linux Mint patron

On 2024-01-24 15:10, Relf wrote:
> If Trump wins it's because CNN & Crump can't stop feeding the troll.

Or because people are tired are choosing between eating and paying their
rent while third-world parasites get everything including health care at
Americans' expense.

--
RabidPedagog
Catholic paleoconservative

On Saturday, January 20, 2024 at 6:59:01 AM UTC-5, RonB wrote:
> On 2024-01-19, RabidPedagog <ra...@pedag.og> wrote:
> > On 2024-01-19 10:35 a.m., RonB wrote:
> >> ...
> >> But our economy was in a hell of a lot better condition off under Trump than
> >> under whoever pulls the senile puppet's strings now.

Trump's first three years (just before CoVid) were objectively equal or worse to
Obama's last three years immediately prior to Trump.

<https://www.businessinsider.com/charts-contrasting-trump-economy-obama-bush-administrations-republicans-democrats-2020-10>
> > Democrats could argue that his actions set the economy up for the
> > difficulties being faced right now, especially with inflation. After
> > all, he locked the country and caused supply chain issues. However, he'd
> > just blame the ones who recommended the action to him.
>
> There's a lot more than the lockdowns, though I think I think those came
> with Biden, not Trump.

The lockdowns were in 2020; Trump was POTUS then, not Biden.

Likewise, we do know that the CoVid stimulus spending was the cause of
inflation, as it was a "damned if you do & damned if you don't" choice between
a crashed economy & recession in the immediate term, versus inflation later..
The vast majority of that spending ... all of the PPP, all of the Airlines money
were also under Trump in 2020, as well as 2 of the 3 checks sent to individuals:
(the third check sent out by Biden in Spring 2021). The sum of all of this was
a shade north of $5T, of which just $931B were the Stimulus checks: if we KISS
those into assumed equal portions for the three rounds of checks, then Biden's
was ~$300B, so the spending distribution was roughly $4.7T = 94% Trump

> There's also the completely uncontrolled illegal
> alien issue (with all the special privileges they get)

They're following the law, namely the Refugee Act of 1980 which says that the USA
obligated ourselves to accept and adjudicate refugees from other countries; see:

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Refugee_Act>

The Republican Party has been systematically underfunding the immigration court
system, resulting in a huge backlog, so those refugee arrivals get to stay here for
several years while waiting for their legally-entitled day in court ("Law & Order!" party).
Statistically, most of the time they lose (like 95%), and are then subject to deportation,
but good luck now finding them.

> and there's the shutting down of oil pipelines and exploration.

One pipeline was cancelled, which was the Keystone XL extension. That Canadian tar sands
oil was already flowing - - shipped in other pipes & rail tanker cars. As such, had the pipeline
been built, it wouldn't have really changed oil production, but just increased corporate profits.
FYI, the reason it was cancelled was because Trump violated US laws to give them their go-ahead.
Also note that the tar oil sands are a very heavy 'sludge' grade which is used as bunker fuel on
cargo ships: it has no impact on the price at the pumps for American gas/diesel consumer prices.

> There's also the billion$ going to Ukraine.

The majority of which is US military equipment being sent, not big old bundles of cash.
And even what 'cash' there is, the total includes loans ... not a simple giveaway.

<https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/how-much-aid-the-u-s-has-sent-to-ukraine-in-6-charts>

And to put it all into perspective, the total 'cash' has been just less than $30B, which is 25x smaller
than what the Trump administration gave away in just the PPP "loan" program, which we are now
finding that tons of that $800B in giveaways can't now be audited to find and determine if it wasn't
fraudulent to begin with...but it appears that at least 10% ($80B) was fraudulent:

<https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/biggest-fraud-generation-looting-covid-relief-program-known-ppp-n1279664>

FYI, all of the above is easily fact-checked via open literature official & reputable media sources,
which of course excludes the crap sites which RonB reads and parrots propaganda from.

-hh

"Relf" <Usenet@Jeff-Relf.Me> wrote:

>If Trump wins it's because CNN & Crump can't stop feeding the troll.

Psalm 46:10 mother fucker.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 15:58:52 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote:

> I don't think New Hampshire is *that* much
> skewed Republican (if at all).

It was at one point.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meldrim_Thomson_Jr.

Thomson was the golden age. Galen, a Democrat followed him, and then back
to Sununu, a Republican. (nit the current Sununu, that is his son). It was
back and forth but the state was changing in part due to an influx from
Massachusetts. I bailed in '88.

On 1/23/2024 6:05 PM, Relf wrote:

> How much does he Microsoft charge to avoid its "updates", 300 $ ?

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/answers/questions/1351413/how-do-you-turn-off-windows-10-updates-which-are-r

Supposedly.

One respondent said it didn't work.

Also
$ gpedit
Local Computer Policy
Computer Configuration
Administrative Templates
Windows Components
Windows Update

Under Windows Update are 4 sections containing a wide variety of
confusing settings.

Probably some combination of them will disable updates permanently.

I don't blame any OS maker for making some updates mandatory.

On 2024-01-24, RabidPedagog <rabid@pedag.og> wrote:
> On 2024-01-24 15:10, Relf wrote:
>> If Trump wins it's because CNN & Crump can't stop feeding the troll.
>
> Or because people are tired are choosing between eating and paying their
> rent while third-world parasites get everything including health care at
> Americans' expense.

Not only that but I just saw the news that they don't have to provide
identification to fly on airlines in the United States. Or to get a bank
account. A new privileged class. Illegal aliens and crapheads like Gore and
the rest of WEF hypocrites are the same in this respect.

--
"Evil preaches tolerance until it is dominant, then it tries to silence good."
-- Archbishop Charles J. Chaput

On 2024-01-25, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 15:58:52 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote:
>
>> I don't think New Hampshire is *that* much
>> skewed Republican (if at all).
>
> It was at one point.
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meldrim_Thomson_Jr.
>
> Thomson was the golden age. Galen, a Democrat followed him, and then back
> to Sununu, a Republican. (nit the current Sununu, that is his son). It was
> back and forth but the state was changing in part due to an influx from
> Massachusetts. I bailed in '88.

Not that long ago Idaho was flip-flopping between Democrat and Republican,
but not recently. I don't think it mattered to Idahoans, so long as the
candidate was Mormon.

Back in the 90s I heard the story of someone who wrote to Cecil Andrus
complaining that jobs were listed in Idaho Falls for "former LDS
missionaries — wasn't that discrimination?" The governor's response was
supposedly, "You do know I'm LDS, right?" The Mormons still have their
religious education classrooms right across from the Public schools in a lot
places. The kids walk across the street and take their Mormon training
classes during school hours.

With all the Californians, Oregonians and Washingtonians moving to Idaho, to
escape the insanity of Seattle, Portland, San Francisco and L.A., I'm
guessing the Mormon influence will slowly wane. Probably already is waning.
The mayor of Boise was born in Boston, I think. She's already survived one
recall election. Even threatened to sue the city of Meridian because
Meridian didn't force mask wearing during Covid. I think she was a little
confused about what city she was the mayor of.

--
"Evil preaches tolerance until it is dominant, then it tries to silence good."
-- Archbishop Charles J. Chaput

On Thu, 25 Jan 2024 18:33:31 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote:

> With all the Californians, Oregonians and Washingtonians moving to
> Idaho, to escape the insanity of Seattle, Portland, San Francisco and
> L.A., I'm guessing the Mormon influence will slowly wane. Probably
> already is waning.

The influx has leavened Salt Lake and environs. People don't think of
southern ID as Mormon but they control a lot. The panhandle is a different
story. Butler is gone but there still are a lot of Identity leaning
people.

On 2024-01-26, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Jan 2024 18:33:31 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote:
>
>> With all the Californians, Oregonians and Washingtonians moving to
>> Idaho, to escape the insanity of Seattle, Portland, San Francisco and
>> L.A., I'm guessing the Mormon influence will slowly wane. Probably
>> already is waning.
>
> The influx has leavened Salt Lake and environs. People don't think of
> southern ID as Mormon but they control a lot. The panhandle is a different
> story. Butler is gone but there still are a lot of Identity leaning
> people.

Especially southeast Idaho. Idaho Falls was (maybe still is) the most Mormon
city in the country. In the 90s I worked at a Radio Shack there for a short
while. One time the manager of my Radio Shack was actually in the aisle of
the mall arguing with someone about a computer sale. (Teachers would buy
computers at our store to try them out, then (after a month) bring them back
because they could get an a discount buying through their school discount
via some catalog. This was happening quite a lot, hurting our sales. We
would supply and training, then they would return the computer.) Anyhow
these two were actually yelling at each other, in public, saying "I'll tell
the bishop on you." "No, I'll tell the bishop on YOU." These were grown men,
in their 30s or 40s. Just unbelievable.

--
"Evil preaches tolerance until it is dominant, then it tries to silence good."
-- Archbishop Charles J. Chaput

On 2024-01-26, RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2024-01-26, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, 25 Jan 2024 18:33:31 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote:
>>
>>> With all the Californians, Oregonians and Washingtonians moving to
>>> Idaho, to escape the insanity of Seattle, Portland, San Francisco and
>>> L.A., I'm guessing the Mormon influence will slowly wane. Probably
>>> already is waning.
>>
>> The influx has leavened Salt Lake and environs. People don't think of
>> southern ID as Mormon but they control a lot. The panhandle is a different
>> story. Butler is gone but there still are a lot of Identity leaning
>> people.
>
> Especially southeast Idaho. Idaho Falls was (maybe still is) the most Mormon
> city in the country. In the 90s I worked at a Radio Shack there for a short
> while. One time the manager of my Radio Shack was actually in the aisle of
> the mall arguing with someone about a computer sale. (Teachers would buy
> computers at our store to try them out, then (after a month) bring them back
> because they could get an a discount buying through their school discount
> via some catalog. This was happening quite a lot, hurting our sales. We
> would supply and training, then they would return the computer.) Anyhow
> these two were actually yelling at each other, in public, saying "I'll tell
> the bishop on you." "No, I'll tell the bishop on YOU." These were grown men,
> in their 30s or 40s. Just unbelievable.

Good grief. Sorry about the mangled sentences there. I tried to edit "on the
fly" and it didn't work out very well. Hopefully the gist got through.

--
"Evil preaches tolerance until it is dominant, then it tries to silence good."
-- Archbishop Charles J. Chaput

On 1/24/2024 12:41 PM, Joel wrote:
> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>> On 1/23/2024 4:56 PM, RabidPedagog wrote:
>>
>>> And here I thought Chris Ahlstrom was dumb because he spent most of his
>>> ideas being violently penetrated by his wife's "girl cock."
>>
>> LMFAO!
>>
>>
>> Creepy was always down for a pegging.
>
>
> Pegging is with a sex toy, not a gock. I have had the experience of
> being pegged by a cis woman, but that's fundamentally different from a
> trans woman buttfucking me. It didn't feel the same as when I've
> gotten fucked by men.

Where do you even find degenerate people willing to participate in those
perversions?

Did you pay a hooker for the pegging?