As I have been looking for a better calculator than Windows offering for
a long time,Someone in these 3 newsgroups in the last couple weeks
mentioned 'Moffsoft calculator" I can't find that post but Thanks to
whoever mentioned it.

I downloaded both the Freeware and paid versions and studied the free
version and decided it looked real good \, so I installed the payware
version and worked with it for a couple hours and was thrilled to see
that it was what I really wanted including a printable tape

http://www.moffsoft.com/

So I immediately sent in the funds and purchased it, well worth the
price and then some.

Rene

On 7/19/2022 11:52 AM, Rene Lamontagne wrote:
> As I have been looking for a better calculator than Windows offering for
> a long time,Someone in these 3 newsgroups in the last couple weeks
> mentioned 'Moffsoft calculator" I can't  find that post but Thanks to
> whoever mentioned it.
>
> I downloaded both the Freeware and paid versions and studied the free
> version and decided it looked real good \, so I installed the payware
> version and worked with it for a couple hours and was thrilled to see
> that it was what I really wanted including a printable tape
>
> http://www.moffsoft.com/
>
> So I immediately sent in the funds and purchased it, well worth the
> price and then some.
>
> Rene

Probably "more" than what you really want, but here are two more
"computational" resources for your consideration.

https://www.wolframalpha.com/
https://www.sagemath.org/

On 2022-07-19 2:08 p.m., Bill wrote:
> On 7/19/2022 11:52 AM, Rene Lamontagne wrote:
>> As I have been looking for a better calculator than Windows offering
>> for a long time,Someone in these 3 newsgroups in the last couple weeks
>> mentioned 'Moffsoft calculator" I can't  find that post but Thanks to
>> whoever mentioned it.
>>
>> I downloaded both the Freeware and paid versions and studied the free
>> version and decided it looked real good \, so I installed the payware
>> version and worked with it for a couple hours and was thrilled to see
>> that it was what I really wanted including a printable tape
>>
>> http://www.moffsoft.com/
>>
>> So I immediately sent in the funds and purchased it, well worth the
>> price and then some.
>>
>> Rene
>
>
> Probably "more" than what you really want, but here are two more
> "computational" resources for your consideration.
>
> https://www.wolframalpha.com/
> https://www.sagemath.org/

Thanks Bill, both nice programs but more than I can use, MoffSoft
Calculator 2 is exactly what I was looking for.

Rene

Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> wrote in news:jjo29lFhbueU1
@mid.individual.net:

> As I have been looking for a better calculator than Windows offering
for
> a long time,Someone in these 3 newsgroups in the last couple weeks
> mentioned 'Moffsoft calculator" I can't find that post but Thanks to
> whoever mentioned it.
>
> I downloaded both the Freeware and paid versions and studied the free
> version and decided it looked real good \, so I installed the payware
> version and worked with it for a couple hours and was thrilled to see
> that it was what I really wanted including a printable tape
>
> http://www.moffsoft.com/
>
> So I immediately sent in the funds and purchased it, well worth the
> price and then some.
>
> Rene

Another possibility is the TI 84 graphing emulator & runs as a
"TI Smartview CE 84" or "Wabbitemu.exe" is a Z80 emulator to
run the TI-84 plus that is available & also there is a youtube
to show what to get/install the TI-84 plus on windows.

Haven't seen a financial version yet.

On Tue, 19 Jul 2022 14:30:58 -0500, Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca>
wrote:

>On 2022-07-19 2:08 p.m., Bill wrote:
>> On 7/19/2022 11:52 AM, Rene Lamontagne wrote:
>>> As I have been looking for a better calculator than Windows offering
>>> for a long time,Someone in these 3 newsgroups in the last couple weeks
>>> mentioned 'Moffsoft calculator" I can't  find that post but Thanks to
>>> whoever mentioned it.
>>>
>>> I downloaded both the Freeware and paid versions and studied the free
>>> version and decided it looked real good \, so I installed the payware
>>> version and worked with it for a couple hours and was thrilled to see
>>> that it was what I really wanted including a printable tape
>>>
>>> http://www.moffsoft.com/
>>>
>>> So I immediately sent in the funds and purchased it, well worth the
>>> price and then some.
>>>
>>> Rene
>>
>>
>> Probably "more" than what you really want, but here are two more
>> "computational" resources for your consideration.
>>
>> https://www.wolframalpha.com/
>> https://www.sagemath.org/
>
>Thanks Bill, both nice programs but more than I can use, MoffSoft
>Calculator 2 is exactly what I was looking for.

I use a calculator very seldom, but considering the price of the free
version and your recommendation, I just downloaded and installed it.

I'll see how I like it the next time I need to use a calculator (if I
remember that I have it <G>).

On Tue, 19 Jul 2022 12:54:10 -0700, Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com>
wrote:

>On Tue, 19 Jul 2022 14:30:58 -0500, Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca>
>wrote:
>
>>On 2022-07-19 2:08 p.m., Bill wrote:
>>> On 7/19/2022 11:52 AM, Rene Lamontagne wrote:
>>>> As I have been looking for a better calculator than Windows offering
>>>> for a long time,Someone in these 3 newsgroups in the last couple weeks
>>>> mentioned 'Moffsoft calculator" I can't  find that post but Thanks to
>>>> whoever mentioned it.
>>>>
>>>> I downloaded both the Freeware and paid versions and studied the free
>>>> version and decided it looked real good \, so I installed the payware
>>>> version and worked with it for a couple hours and was thrilled to see
>>>> that it was what I really wanted including a printable tape
>>>>
>>>> http://www.moffsoft.com/
>>>>
>>>> So I immediately sent in the funds and purchased it, well worth the
>>>> price and then some.
>>>>
>>>> Rene
>>>
>>>
>>> Probably "more" than what you really want, but here are two more
>>> "computational" resources for your consideration.
>>>
>>> https://www.wolframalpha.com/
>>> https://www.sagemath.org/
>>
>>Thanks Bill, both nice programs but more than I can use, MoffSoft
>>Calculator 2 is exactly what I was looking for.
>
>
>I use a calculator very seldom, but considering the price of the free
>version and your recommendation, I just downloaded and installed it.
>
>I'll see how I like it the next time I need to use a calculator (if I
>remember that I have it <G>).

I just added it to the Directory Opus Toolbar, called it Calc, and
removed the Microsoft Calc from there. So now that's the one I'll
always get, and won't have to try to remember it.

Ken Blake wrote:

>>I'll see how I like it the next time I need to use a calculator (if I
>>remember that I have it <G>).
>
> I just added it to the Directory Opus Toolbar, called it Calc, and
> removed the Microsoft Calc from there. So now that's the one I'll
> always get, and won't have to try to remember it.

Thanks for the thread on this new "free calc" option for Windows.
<http://www.moffsoft.com/>
<http://www.moffsoft.com/downloads.htm>
<http://www.moffsoft.com/download/MoffFreeCalcSetup.exe>
Name: MoffFreeCalcSetup.exe
Size: 782433 bytes (764 KiB)
SHA256: C9BCB825ADCEC93DAFD994A6ADA429AC386B0BF807C3F9509161CD17658C8DD5
TARGET = C:\app\editor\calc\fcalc\MoffFreeCalc.exe

Just in case people aren't aware of the RUN box shortcuts, if you type
"calc" into the RUN box, it brings up the default Windows calculator.
Win+R > Run (normally the RUN box is an icon in your taskbar)

If you want to point to a _different_ calculator, that's trivial.

For example, if you want a FreeCalc command called, oh, say, fcalc
[HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\App Paths]
fcalc.exe = C:\app\editor\calc\fcalc\MoffFreeCalc.exe

Voila! Now if you type "calc", you get the Microsoft Calculator, and if you
type "fcalc" instead, you get the free calc calculate downloaded above.
--
See also:
Winaero Old calculator for Windows 10
https://winaero.com/blog/classic-calculator-windows-10-creators/
https://winaero.com/blog/get-calculator-from-windows-8-and-windows-7-in-windows-10/

On 2022-07-19 3:04 p.m., Ken Blake wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Jul 2022 12:54:10 -0700, Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 19 Jul 2022 14:30:58 -0500, Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2022-07-19 2:08 p.m., Bill wrote:
>>>> On 7/19/2022 11:52 AM, Rene Lamontagne wrote:
>>>>> As I have been looking for a better calculator than Windows offering
>>>>> for a long time,Someone in these 3 newsgroups in the last couple weeks
>>>>> mentioned 'Moffsoft calculator" I can't  find that post but Thanks to
>>>>> whoever mentioned it.
>>>>>
>>>>> I downloaded both the Freeware and paid versions and studied the free
>>>>> version and decided it looked real good \, so I installed the payware
>>>>> version and worked with it for a couple hours and was thrilled to see
>>>>> that it was what I really wanted including a printable tape
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.moffsoft.com/
>>>>>
>>>>> So I immediately sent in the funds and purchased it, well worth the
>>>>> price and then some.
>>>>>
>>>>> Rene
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Probably "more" than what you really want, but here are two more
>>>> "computational" resources for your consideration.
>>>>
>>>> https://www.wolframalpha.com/
>>>> https://www.sagemath.org/
>>>
>>> Thanks Bill, both nice programs but more than I can use, MoffSoft
>>> Calculator 2 is exactly what I was looking for.
>>
>>
>> I use a calculator very seldom, but considering the price of the free
>> version and your recommendation, I just downloaded and installed it.
>>
>> I'll see how I like it the next time I need to use a calculator (if I
>> remember that I have it <G>).
>
>
>
> I just added it to the Directory Opus Toolbar, called it Calc, and
> removed the Microsoft Calc from there. So now that's the one I'll
> always get, and won't have to try to remember it.
>

Here is my easy to see doctored version..

https://i.postimg.cc/PNsy191x/image.png

Rene

On Sun, 24 Jul 2022 12:31:53 -0500, Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca>
wrote:

>On 2022-07-19 3:04 p.m., Ken Blake wrote:
>> On Tue, 19 Jul 2022 12:54:10 -0700, Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 19 Jul 2022 14:30:58 -0500, Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2022-07-19 2:08 p.m., Bill wrote:
>>>>> On 7/19/2022 11:52 AM, Rene Lamontagne wrote:
>>>>>> As I have been looking for a better calculator than Windows offering
>>>>>> for a long time,Someone in these 3 newsgroups in the last couple weeks
>>>>>> mentioned 'Moffsoft calculator" I can't  find that post but Thanks to
>>>>>> whoever mentioned it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I downloaded both the Freeware and paid versions and studied the free
>>>>>> version and decided it looked real good \, so I installed the payware
>>>>>> version and worked with it for a couple hours and was thrilled to see
>>>>>> that it was what I really wanted including a printable tape
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.moffsoft.com/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So I immediately sent in the funds and purchased it, well worth the
>>>>>> price and then some.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Rene
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Probably "more" than what you really want, but here are two more
>>>>> "computational" resources for your consideration.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.wolframalpha.com/
>>>>> https://www.sagemath.org/
>>>>
>>>> Thanks Bill, both nice programs but more than I can use, MoffSoft
>>>> Calculator 2 is exactly what I was looking for.
>>>
>>>
>>> I use a calculator very seldom, but considering the price of the free
>>> version and your recommendation, I just downloaded and installed it.
>>>
>>> I'll see how I like it the next time I need to use a calculator (if I
>>> remember that I have it <G>).
>>
>>
>>
>> I just added it to the Directory Opus Toolbar, called it Calc, and
>> removed the Microsoft Calc from there. So now that's the one I'll
>> always get, and won't have to try to remember it.
>>
>
>Here is my easy to see doctored version..
>
>https://i.postimg.cc/PNsy191x/image.png

Doctored in what way? What did you change?

I got the free version, not Calculator 2.

Can you tell me what there is about Calculator 2 that you like enough
to make it worth buying? If it's were $5-$10, I'd probably buy it
without thinking about it, but before I spend the $20, I'd like to be
sure its extra features are valuable to me.

I don't care much about the colors, but please tell me about the
toolbar icons, and what they do and what their value is.

On Sun, 24 Jul 2022 11:10:04 -0700, Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com>
wrote:

>On Sun, 24 Jul 2022 12:31:53 -0500, Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca>
>wrote:
>
>>On 2022-07-19 3:04 p.m., Ken Blake wrote:
>>> On Tue, 19 Jul 2022 12:54:10 -0700, Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 19 Jul 2022 14:30:58 -0500, Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2022-07-19 2:08 p.m., Bill wrote:
>>>>>> On 7/19/2022 11:52 AM, Rene Lamontagne wrote:
>>>>>>> As I have been looking for a better calculator than Windows offering
>>>>>>> for a long time,Someone in these 3 newsgroups in the last couple weeks
>>>>>>> mentioned 'Moffsoft calculator" I can't  find that post but Thanks to
>>>>>>> whoever mentioned it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I downloaded both the Freeware and paid versions and studied the free
>>>>>>> version and decided it looked real good \, so I installed the payware
>>>>>>> version and worked with it for a couple hours and was thrilled to see
>>>>>>> that it was what I really wanted including a printable tape
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.moffsoft.com/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So I immediately sent in the funds and purchased it, well worth the
>>>>>>> price and then some.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Rene
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Probably "more" than what you really want, but here are two more
>>>>>> "computational" resources for your consideration.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.wolframalpha.com/
>>>>>> https://www.sagemath.org/
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks Bill, both nice programs but more than I can use, MoffSoft
>>>>> Calculator 2 is exactly what I was looking for.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I use a calculator very seldom, but considering the price of the free
>>>> version and your recommendation, I just downloaded and installed it.
>>>>
>>>> I'll see how I like it the next time I need to use a calculator (if I
>>>> remember that I have it <G>).
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I just added it to the Directory Opus Toolbar, called it Calc, and
>>> removed the Microsoft Calc from there. So now that's the one I'll
>>> always get, and won't have to try to remember it.
>>>
>>
>>Here is my easy to see doctored version..
>>
>>https://i.postimg.cc/PNsy191x/image.png
>
>
>Doctored in what way? What did you change?
>
>I got the free version, not Calculator 2.
>
>Can you tell me what there is about Calculator 2 that you like enough
>to make it worth buying? If it's were $5-$10, I'd probably buy it
>without thinking about it, but before I spend the $20, I'd like to be
>sure its extra features are valuable to me.
>
>I don't care much about the colors, but please tell me about the
>toolbar icons, and what they do and what their value is.

Ignore that question. I just went to their web site and downloaded
Calculator 2 trial version. I liked the Financial Functions, Unit
Conversions, and Date/Time Calculator, so I decided to buy it.

I bought it through PayPal, which might have been a mistake, since I
didn't get a registration code to enter, and I can't find out how to
get it on their web site.

I just sent an e-mail message to support asking how to get it, but I
don't know long it will take to get an answer. Can you help?

On 2022-07-24 1:10 p.m., Ken Blake wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Jul 2022 12:31:53 -0500, Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca>
> wrote:
>
>> On 2022-07-19 3:04 p.m., Ken Blake wrote:
>>> On Tue, 19 Jul 2022 12:54:10 -0700, Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 19 Jul 2022 14:30:58 -0500, Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2022-07-19 2:08 p.m., Bill wrote:
>>>>>> On 7/19/2022 11:52 AM, Rene Lamontagne wrote:
>>>>>>> As I have been looking for a better calculator than Windows offering
>>>>>>> for a long time,Someone in these 3 newsgroups in the last couple weeks
>>>>>>> mentioned 'Moffsoft calculator" I can't  find that post but Thanks to
>>>>>>> whoever mentioned it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I downloaded both the Freeware and paid versions and studied the free
>>>>>>> version and decided it looked real good \, so I installed the payware
>>>>>>> version and worked with it for a couple hours and was thrilled to see
>>>>>>> that it was what I really wanted including a printable tape
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.moffsoft.com/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So I immediately sent in the funds and purchased it, well worth the
>>>>>>> price and then some.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Rene
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Probably "more" than what you really want, but here are two more
>>>>>> "computational" resources for your consideration.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.wolframalpha.com/
>>>>>> https://www.sagemath.org/
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks Bill, both nice programs but more than I can use, MoffSoft
>>>>> Calculator 2 is exactly what I was looking for.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I use a calculator very seldom, but considering the price of the free
>>>> version and your recommendation, I just downloaded and installed it.
>>>>
>>>> I'll see how I like it the next time I need to use a calculator (if I
>>>> remember that I have it <G>).
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I just added it to the Directory Opus Toolbar, called it Calc, and
>>> removed the Microsoft Calc from there. So now that's the one I'll
>>> always get, and won't have to try to remember it.
>>>
>>
>> Here is my easy to see doctored version..
>>
>> https://i.postimg.cc/PNsy191x/image.png
>
>
> Doctored in what way? What did you change?
>
> I got the free version, not Calculator 2.
>
> Can you tell me what there is about Calculator 2 that you like enough
> to make it worth buying? If it's were $5-$10, I'd probably buy it
> without thinking about it, but before I spend the $20, I'd like to be
> sure its extra features are valuable to me.
>
> I don't care much about the colors, but please tell me about the
> toolbar icons, and what they do and what their value is.
>

I use a calculator quite a lot, I do lots of conversions such as
temperature, length , weight, Metric to imperial and visa versa, so
these features are very important to me.

Financial functions
Unit conversions, all types
Date and time calculations
Product pricing
Saving any results to file
Printable tape of transactions to hardcopy

and a few other features. which make so versatile..

Color IS important to me, due to poor vision I find having various
colors for functions and buttons it so much easier for me to use.

Rene

On 2022-07-24 1:43 p.m., Ken Blake wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Jul 2022 11:10:04 -0700, Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 24 Jul 2022 12:31:53 -0500, Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2022-07-19 3:04 p.m., Ken Blake wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 19 Jul 2022 12:54:10 -0700, Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 19 Jul 2022 14:30:58 -0500, Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2022-07-19 2:08 p.m., Bill wrote:
>>>>>>> On 7/19/2022 11:52 AM, Rene Lamontagne wrote:
>>>>>>>> As I have been looking for a better calculator than Windows offering
>>>>>>>> for a long time,Someone in these 3 newsgroups in the last couple weeks
>>>>>>>> mentioned 'Moffsoft calculator" I can't  find that post but Thanks to
>>>>>>>> whoever mentioned it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I downloaded both the Freeware and paid versions and studied the free
>>>>>>>> version and decided it looked real good \, so I installed the payware
>>>>>>>> version and worked with it for a couple hours and was thrilled to see
>>>>>>>> that it was what I really wanted including a printable tape
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://www.moffsoft.com/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So I immediately sent in the funds and purchased it, well worth the
>>>>>>>> price and then some.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Rene
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Probably "more" than what you really want, but here are two more
>>>>>>> "computational" resources for your consideration.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://www.wolframalpha.com/
>>>>>>> https://www.sagemath.org/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks Bill, both nice programs but more than I can use, MoffSoft
>>>>>> Calculator 2 is exactly what I was looking for.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I use a calculator very seldom, but considering the price of the free
>>>>> version and your recommendation, I just downloaded and installed it.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll see how I like it the next time I need to use a calculator (if I
>>>>> remember that I have it <G>).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I just added it to the Directory Opus Toolbar, called it Calc, and
>>>> removed the Microsoft Calc from there. So now that's the one I'll
>>>> always get, and won't have to try to remember it.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Here is my easy to see doctored version..
>>>
>>> https://i.postimg.cc/PNsy191x/image.png
>>
>>
>> Doctored in what way? What did you change?
>>
>> I got the free version, not Calculator 2.
>>
>> Can you tell me what there is about Calculator 2 that you like enough
>> to make it worth buying? If it's were $5-$10, I'd probably buy it
>> without thinking about it, but before I spend the $20, I'd like to be
>> sure its extra features are valuable to me.
>>
>> I don't care much about the colors, but please tell me about the
>> toolbar icons, and what they do and what their value is.
>
> Ignore that question. I just went to their web site and downloaded
> Calculator 2 trial version. I liked the Financial Functions, Unit
> Conversions, and Date/Time Calculator, so I decided to buy it.
>
> I bought it through PayPal, which might have been a mistake, since I
> didn't get a registration code to enter, and I can't find out how to
> get it on their web site.
>
> I just sent an e-mail message to support asking how to get it, but I
> don't know long it will take to get an answer. Can you help?
>

Yes, I made the same mistake using PayPal and got no code so I went to
Moffoft support and sent an email to

sales@moffsoft.com and included my PayPal transaction number and
told them I did not receive a code.

I got an email back in about 36 hours with my registered name and code.

This is the second time PayPal has screwed me up.

Rene

On Sun, 24 Jul 2022 14:15:59 -0500, Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca>
wrote:

>On 2022-07-24 1:43 p.m., Ken Blake wrote:
>> On Sun, 24 Jul 2022 11:10:04 -0700, Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 24 Jul 2022 12:31:53 -0500, Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2022-07-19 3:04 p.m., Ken Blake wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 19 Jul 2022 12:54:10 -0700, Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, 19 Jul 2022 14:30:58 -0500, Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2022-07-19 2:08 p.m., Bill wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 7/19/2022 11:52 AM, Rene Lamontagne wrote:
>>>>>>>>> As I have been looking for a better calculator than Windows offering
>>>>>>>>> for a long time,Someone in these 3 newsgroups in the last couple weeks
>>>>>>>>> mentioned 'Moffsoft calculator" I can't  find that post but Thanks to
>>>>>>>>> whoever mentioned it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I downloaded both the Freeware and paid versions and studied the free
>>>>>>>>> version and decided it looked real good \, so I installed the payware
>>>>>>>>> version and worked with it for a couple hours and was thrilled to see
>>>>>>>>> that it was what I really wanted including a printable tape
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://www.moffsoft.com/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So I immediately sent in the funds and purchased it, well worth the
>>>>>>>>> price and then some.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Rene
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Probably "more" than what you really want, but here are two more
>>>>>>>> "computational" resources for your consideration.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://www.wolframalpha.com/
>>>>>>>> https://www.sagemath.org/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks Bill, both nice programs but more than I can use, MoffSoft
>>>>>>> Calculator 2 is exactly what I was looking for.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I use a calculator very seldom, but considering the price of the free
>>>>>> version and your recommendation, I just downloaded and installed it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'll see how I like it the next time I need to use a calculator (if I
>>>>>> remember that I have it <G>).
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I just added it to the Directory Opus Toolbar, called it Calc, and
>>>>> removed the Microsoft Calc from there. So now that's the one I'll
>>>>> always get, and won't have to try to remember it.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Here is my easy to see doctored version..
>>>>
>>>> https://i.postimg.cc/PNsy191x/image.png
>>>
>>>
>>> Doctored in what way? What did you change?
>>>
>>> I got the free version, not Calculator 2.
>>>
>>> Can you tell me what there is about Calculator 2 that you like enough
>>> to make it worth buying? If it's were $5-$10, I'd probably buy it
>>> without thinking about it, but before I spend the $20, I'd like to be
>>> sure its extra features are valuable to me.
>>>
>>> I don't care much about the colors, but please tell me about the
>>> toolbar icons, and what they do and what their value is.
>>
>> Ignore that question. I just went to their web site and downloaded
>> Calculator 2 trial version. I liked the Financial Functions, Unit
>> Conversions, and Date/Time Calculator, so I decided to buy it.
>>
>> I bought it through PayPal, which might have been a mistake, since I
>> didn't get a registration code to enter, and I can't find out how to
>> get it on their web site.
>>
>> I just sent an e-mail message to support asking how to get it, but I
>> don't know long it will take to get an answer. Can you help?
>>
>
>
>Yes, I made the same mistake using PayPal and got no code so I went to
>Moffoft support and sent an email to
>
> sales@moffsoft.com and included my PayPal transaction number and
>told them I did not receive a code.

I had sent my message to support@moffsoft.com It probably doesn't make
any difference, but since sales@moffsoft.com worked for you, I just
sent them a copy too.

>I got an email back in about 36 hours with my registered name and code.

Very glad to hear that. I guess I just need to be patient (patience
was never one of my strong points) and wait for a reply from one of
the two addresses.

>This is the second time PayPal has screwed me up.

I don't think it's really PayPal screwing up. It's Moffsoft not making
it work properly with PayPal, and telling their customers that they
can use PayPal when they shouldn't. But as long as it gets fixed
relatively quickly, it doesn't matter very much.

I suppose it's possible that even if we hadn't written to Moffsoft, we
would have gotten the registration info from them in a day or two.
Maybe it just takes a little while for PayPal to send the payment info
to them, so they can then send the registration info to their
customer. But if that's case, it should say that on the Moffsoft web
site.

On Sun, 24 Jul 2022 12:39:05 -0700, Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com>
wrote:

>I suppose it's possible that even if we hadn't written to Moffsoft, we
>would have gotten the registration info from them in a day or two.
>Maybe it just takes a little while for PayPal to send the payment info
>to them, so they can then send the registration info to their
>customer. But if that's case, it should say that on the Moffsoft web
>site.

Or maybe I didn't get an immediate e-mail message with the
registration info from Moffsoft because today is Sunday, and I'll get
it tomorrow.

On 2022-07-24 2:44 p.m., Ken Blake wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Jul 2022 12:39:05 -0700, Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I suppose it's possible that even if we hadn't written to Moffsoft, we
>> would have gotten the registration info from them in a day or two.
>> Maybe it just takes a little while for PayPal to send the payment info
>> to them, so they can then send the registration info to their
>> customer. But if that's case, it should say that on the Moffsoft web
>> site.
>
> Or maybe I didn't get an immediate e-mail message with the
> registration info from Moffsoft because today is Sunday, and I'll get
> it tomorrow.

Yeah, my order was on Saturday and Sunday. also which didn't help.

Rene

>

On Sun, 24 Jul 2022 12:31:53 -0500, Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca>
wrote:

>Here is my easy to see doctored version..
>https://i.postimg.cc/PNsy191x/image.png

No comment on the calculator, but looking at your desktop and I love
seeing that somebody has almost as many drives as me. I mean, why
limit yourself to just C:\ when there are so many letters in the
alphabet? ;-)

On 2022-07-25 10:17 a.m., Spalls Hurgenson wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Jul 2022 12:31:53 -0500, Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca>
> wrote:
>
>> Here is my easy to see doctored version..
>> https://i.postimg.cc/PNsy191x/image.png
>
> No comment on the calculator, but looking at your desktop and I love
> seeing that somebody has almost as many drives as me. I mean, why
> limit yourself to just C:\ when there are so many letters in the
> alphabet? ;-)

Yes, each drive has one specific purpose and it makes it so easy to find
anything because I know where thy are, I rarely use file explorer.

Rene

>
>
>
>

On Mon, 25 Jul 2022 10:47:56 -0500, Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca>
wrote:

>On 2022-07-25 10:17 a.m., Spalls Hurgenson wrote:
>> On Sun, 24 Jul 2022 12:31:53 -0500, Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Here is my easy to see doctored version..
>>> https://i.postimg.cc/PNsy191x/image.png
>>
>> No comment on the calculator, but looking at your desktop and I love
>> seeing that somebody has almost as many drives as me. I mean, why
>> limit yourself to just C:\ when there are so many letters in the
>> alphabet? ;-)
>
>Yes, each drive has one specific purpose ...

If you're talking about physical drives, OK, that's the way they are.
But if you're talking about multiple partitions, I think it's a bad
choice for almost everyone. What frequently happens when people
organize with partitions instead of folders is that they miscalculate
how much room they need on each such partition, and then when they run
out of room on the partition where a file logically belongs, while
still having lots of space left on another one, they simply store the
file in the "wrong" partition. Paradoxically, therefore, that kind of
partition structure results in less organization rather than more..

> ...and it makes it so easy to find
>anything because I know where thy are,

I also know where everything is. If it's part of Windows or an
installed programs, it's on C:. If it's data, it's on D. C and D are
on separate drives because it makes it a little easier to just backup
everything on D:.

If I can't remember where something is, I use Search Everything, which
finds it almost instantly.

I should mention that I also have two other installed physical drives,
D: and E:. There are both used for backup. As I've said here many
times, I think backup should not be to an internal drive, but they
are not my primary backups. They are simply extra copies of backup and
are installed and used for backup, simply because there were laying
around and I had no other use for them.

>I rarely use file explorer.

I never use file explorer. I use Directory Opus, which I think is much
better.

On 7/19/22 11:52, this is what Rene Lamontagne wrote:
> As I have been looking for a better calculator than Windows offering for a long time,Someone in these 3 newsgroups in
> the last couple weeks mentioned 'Moffsoft calculator" I can't  find that post but Thanks to whoever mentioned it.
>
> I downloaded both the Freeware and paid versions and studied the free version and decided it looked real good \, so I
> installed the payware version and worked with it for a couple hours and was thrilled to see that it was what I really
> wanted including a printable tape
>
> http://www.moffsoft.com/
>
> So I immediately sent in the funds and purchased it, well worth the price and then some.
>
> Rene
I know this isn't the calculator you are using (or hope not) but it's just ironic this turned up on my email today.
https://www.howtogeek.com/820691/phishing-attacks-are-now-using-the-windows-calculator/

Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> posted this
via news:jk5e05FmkboU1@mid.individual.net:

> https://i.postimg.cc/PNsy191x/image.png

Naturally, it's the gay rainbow colors...

--

I AM Bucky Breeder, (*(^;

And *NO*, that is *NOT* a Jedi Light Saber I have in my pocket!

But that doesn't necessarily mean I'm happy to see you either.

On Mon, 25 Jul 2022 09:06:56 -0700, Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com>
wrote:

>On Mon, 25 Jul 2022 10:47:56 -0500, Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca>
>wrote:
>
>>On 2022-07-25 10:17 a.m., Spalls Hurgenson wrote:
>>> On Sun, 24 Jul 2022 12:31:53 -0500, Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Here is my easy to see doctored version..
>>>> https://i.postimg.cc/PNsy191x/image.png
>>>
>>> No comment on the calculator, but looking at your desktop and I love
>>> seeing that somebody has almost as many drives as me. I mean, why
>>> limit yourself to just C:\ when there are so many letters in the
>>> alphabet? ;-)
>>
>>Yes, each drive has one specific purpose ...
>
>
>If you're talking about physical drives, OK, that's the way they are.
>But if you're talking about multiple partitions, I think it's a bad
>choice for almost everyone. What frequently happens when people
>organize with partitions instead of folders is that they miscalculate
>how much room they need on each such partition, and then when they run
>out of room on the partition where a file logically belongs, while
>still having lots of space left on another one, they simply store the
>file in the "wrong" partition. Paradoxically, therefore, that kind of
>partition structure results in less organization rather than more..
>
Admin tools makes it pretty easy to change partition size on the fly
without losing anything. (W/7)

>> ...and it makes it so easy to find
>>anything because I know where thy are,
>
>I also know where everything is. If it's part of Windows or an
>installed programs, it's on C:. If it's data, it's on D. C and D are
>on separate drives because it makes it a little easier to just backup
>everything on D:.
>
>If I can't remember where something is, I use Search Everything, which
>finds it almost instantly.
>
>
>I should mention that I also have two other installed physical drives,
>D: and E:. There are both used for backup. As I've said here many
>times, I think backup should not be to an internal drive, but they
>are not my primary backups. They are simply extra copies of backup and
>are installed and used for backup, simply because there were laying
>around and I had no other use for them.
>
I agree. My C: is the smallest drive on my system and it gets imaged
every day.

On 2022-07-25 11:49 a.m., gfretwell@aol.com wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jul 2022 09:06:56 -0700, Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 25 Jul 2022 10:47:56 -0500, Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2022-07-25 10:17 a.m., Spalls Hurgenson wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 24 Jul 2022 12:31:53 -0500, Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Here is my easy to see doctored version..
>>>>> https://i.postimg.cc/PNsy191x/image.png
>>>>
>>>> No comment on the calculator, but looking at your desktop and I love
>>>> seeing that somebody has almost as many drives as me. I mean, why
>>>> limit yourself to just C:\ when there are so many letters in the
>>>> alphabet? ;-)
>>>
>>> Yes, each drive has one specific purpose ...
>>
>>
>> If you're talking about physical drives, OK, that's the way they are.
>> But if you're talking about multiple partitions, I think it's a bad
>> choice for almost everyone. What frequently happens when people
>> organize with partitions instead of folders is that they miscalculate
>> how much room they need on each such partition, and then when they run
>> out of room on the partition where a file logically belongs, while
>> still having lots of space left on another one, they simply store the
>> file in the "wrong" partition. Paradoxically, therefore, that kind of
>> partition structure results in less organization rather than more..
>>
> Admin tools makes it pretty easy to change partition size on the fly
> without losing anything. (W/7)
>
>
>>> ...and it makes it so easy to find
>>> anything because I know where thy are,
>>
>> I also know where everything is. If it's part of Windows or an
>> installed programs, it's on C:. If it's data, it's on D. C and D are
>> on separate drives because it makes it a little easier to just backup
>> everything on D:.
>>
>> If I can't remember where something is, I use Search Everything, which
>> finds it almost instantly.
>>
>>
>> I should mention that I also have two other installed physical drives,
>> D: and E:. There are both used for backup. As I've said here many
>> times, I think backup should not be to an internal drive, but they
>> are not my primary backups. They are simply extra copies of backup and
>> are installed and used for backup, simply because there were laying
>> around and I had no other use for them.
>>
> I agree. My C: is the smallest drive on my system and it gets imaged
> every day.
>

Likewise, and to another external disconnected drive weekly.

Rene

On 2022-07-25 11:19 a.m., Big Al wrote:
> On 7/19/22 11:52, this is what Rene Lamontagne wrote:
>> As I have been looking for a better calculator than Windows offering
>> for a long time,Someone in these 3 newsgroups in the last couple weeks
>> mentioned 'Moffsoft calculator" I can't  find that post but Thanks to
>> whoever mentioned it.
>>
>> I downloaded both the Freeware and paid versions and studied the free
>> version and decided it looked real good \, so I installed the payware
>> version and worked with it for a couple hours and was thrilled to see
>> that it was what I really wanted including a printable tape
>>
>> http://www.moffsoft.com/
>>
>> So I immediately sent in the funds and purchased it, well worth the
>> price and then some.
>>
>> Rene
> I know this isn't the calculator you are using (or hope not) but it's
> just ironic this turned up on my email today.
> https://www.howtogeek.com/820691/phishing-attacks-are-now-using-the-windows-calculator/
>

No more Windows calculator, I am now using Moffsoft calculator 2
exclusively.

Rene

On Mon, 25 Jul 2022 11:17:06 -0400, Spalls Hurgenson
<spallshurgenson@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Sun, 24 Jul 2022 12:31:53 -0500, Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca>
>wrote:
>
>>Here is my easy to see doctored version..
>>https://i.postimg.cc/PNsy191x/image.png
>
>No comment on the calculator, but looking at your desktop and I love
>seeing that somebody has almost as many drives as me. I mean, why
>limit yourself to just C:\ when there are so many letters in the
>alphabet? ;-)

Instead of a bunch of individual drives (volumes), each with its own
letter, I pool my drives and use a single letter. At the moment, I'm
doing an upgrade that will increase the size of my drive pool from 36TB
to 66TB, all under a single volume known as D:.

36: 12+12+4+4+4
66: 12+12+14+14+14

On Tue, 19 Jul 2022 22:54:05 +0100, in alt.comp.os.windows-10, Andy
Burnelli wrote:

>See also:
>Winaero Old calculator for Windows 10
>https://winaero.com/blog/classic-calculator-windows-10-creators/
>https://winaero.com/blog/get-calculator-from-windows-8-and-windows-7-in-windows-10/

The old Win 7 calculator is now subject to malware droppers. dll sideload
vuln.

https://www.howtogeek.com/820691/phishing-attacks-are-now-using-the-windows-calculator/

Best to leave it be.

--
Zag

No one ever said on their deathbed, 'Gee, I wish I had
spent more time alone with my computer.' ~Dan(i) Bunten