On Thu, 14 Mar 2024 20:39:59 -0500, Physfitfreak wrote:

> Do you know who needed Union support in this country. Physicists! You
> didn't have that, and therefore became a second world country.

Yeah, but we make movies about (dead, Communist) physicists.

On 3/14/2024 11:34 PM, rbowman wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Mar 2024 20:39:59 -0500, Physfitfreak wrote:
>
>> Do you know who needed Union support in this country. Physicists! You
>> didn't have that, and therefore became a second world country.
>
> Yeah, but we make movies about (dead, Communist) physicists.

Hahhahh :))

I saw it pirated when the HDcam version got available very soon after
its release. Hated it. One should never see a cam version of a movie.

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com

rbowman wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> On Thu, 14 Mar 2024 20:39:59 -0500, Physfitfreak wrote:
>
>> Do you know who needed Union support in this country. Physicists! You
>> didn't have that, and therefore became a second world country.
>
> Yeah, but we make movies about (dead, Communist) physicists.

And call "liberals" by the appellation of "Communist" :-D

ObLinux:

https://www.theregister.com/2000/07/31/ms_ballmer_linux_is_communism/

Steve Ballmer was the only person to raise the issue of Linux when he
wrapped up Microsoft's annual financial analysts meeting in Seattle,
although he put Sun and Oracle ahead in terms of being stronger
competitors. They of course are 'civilised' competitors - but the Linux
crowd, in the world of Prez Steve, are communists.

--
Work consists of whatever a body is obliged to do.
Play consists of whatever a body is not obliged to do.
-- Mark Twain

On Fri, 15 Mar 2024 00:51:54 -0500, Physfitfreak wrote:

> I saw it pirated when the HDcam version got available very soon after
> its release. Hated it. One should never see a cam version of a movie.

I'm not planning on seeing it in any format.

On Fri, 15 Mar 2024 07:05:16 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

> rbowman wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> On Thu, 14 Mar 2024 20:39:59 -0500, Physfitfreak wrote:
>>
>>> Do you know who needed Union support in this country. Physicists! You
>>> didn't have that, and therefore became a second world country.
>>
>> Yeah, but we make movies about (dead, Communist) physicists.
>
> And call "liberals" by the appellation of "Communist" :-D

While Oppenheimer may not have had a CPUSA card in his wallet he offered
financial support to it and its front groups.

https://www.commentary.org/articles/harvey-klehr/oppenheimer-was-a-
communist/

In some ways I respect old school CPUSA members for than 'liberals'. I
include 'classical liberals' in that too.

rbowman wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> On Fri, 15 Mar 2024 07:05:16 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
>> rbowman wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>
>>> On Thu, 14 Mar 2024 20:39:59 -0500, Physfitfreak wrote:
>>>
>>>> Do you know who needed Union support in this country. Physicists! You
>>>> didn't have that, and therefore became a second world country.
>>>
>>> Yeah, but we make movies about (dead, Communist) physicists.
>>
>> And call "liberals" by the appellation of "Communist" :-D
>
> While Oppenheimer may not have had a CPUSA card in his wallet he offered
> financial support to it and its front groups.
>
> https://www.commentary.org/articles/harvey-klehr/oppenheimer-was-a-communist/

Hop Sing! He name names! You blacklisted!

> In some ways I respect old school CPUSA members for than 'liberals'. I
> include 'classical liberals' in that too.

The terms 'liberal' and 'conservative' are grossly ill-defined these days.
Skunked, if I may say so.

Cue RonB to chastise me in some way. :-D

--
How apt the poor are to be proud.
-- William Shakespeare, "Twelfth-Night"

On 3/15/2024 11:19 AM, rbowman wrote:
> While Oppenheimer may not have had a CPUSA card in his wallet he offered
> financial support to it and its front groups.

Jews were still scared of you cro-magnons in 1930s. They knew what
nutjobs you'd been for centuries. Being Modern Human, they designed a
nice way to throw part of your people against the rest of you.

I don't blame them.

You cro-magnons harbor the Satan, not the Jews.

On Fri, 15 Mar 2024 14:45:34 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

> The terms 'liberal' and 'conservative' are grossly ill-defined these
> days.
> Skunked, if I may say so.

Three steps beyond skunked...

Le 12-03-2024, candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> a écrit :
>
> The trash system is already a safety net, you don't need to keep it
> saved.

I don't like trash systems. I don't need them and I hate when I can't
bypass them.

--
Si vous avez du temps à perdre :
https://scarpet42.gitlab.io

rbowman wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> On Fri, 15 Mar 2024 14:45:34 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
>> The terms 'liberal' and 'conservative' are grossly ill-defined these
>> days.
>> Skunked, if I may say so.
>
> Three steps beyond skunked...

In the old days, they'd call you a "Commie". These days, the call you a
"liberal".

Buncha communist pinko liberal Linux lovers around here! :-D

--
Q: How many IBM CPU's does it take to do a logical right shift?
A: 33. 1 to hold the bits and 32 to push the register.

Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> Le 12-03-2024, candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> a écrit :
>>
>> The trash system is already a safety net, you don't need to keep it
>> saved.
>
> I don't like trash systems. I don't need them and I hate when I can't
> bypass them.

Anything I want to be able to go back to if need, I just move it to ~/tmp.
Unless, of course, it is under git control.

--
It has long been an axiom of mine that the little things are infinitely
the most important.
-- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, "A Case of Identity"

Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

>Buncha communist pinko liberal Linux lovers around here! :-D

There are more conservative Linux lovers, it seems. Freedom lovers
are mostly on the right, collectivists and tyrants are mostly on the
left.

--
"There are loads of fat smelly basement dwellers with greasy hair and
pizza crumbed beards who use dumpster HW in the Linux community." -
"True Linux advocate" Hadron Quark

Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> wrote at 09:23 this Saturday (GMT):
> Le 12-03-2024, candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> a écrit :
>>
>> The trash system is already a safety net, you don't need to keep it
>> saved.
>
> I don't like trash systems. I don't need them and I hate when I can't
> bypass them.

I'm indifferent. It is nice to have sometimes.
--
user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom

On Sat, 16 Mar 2024 08:58:46 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

> In the old days, they'd call you a "Commie". These days, the call you a
> "liberal".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W8yhFJ8C6j0

chrisv wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
>>Buncha communist pinko liberal Linux lovers around here! :-D
>
> There are more conservative Linux lovers, it seems. Freedom lovers
> are mostly on the right, collectivists and tyrants are mostly on the
> left.

Overgeneralization. For example, some on the "right" want to curtail the
self-determination of women; one even thinks they should not be allowed to
vote. Or, businessmen should have freedom to do what they want regardless
of the effect on their employees or the environment.

Rather than "left" and "right", it seems to me to be more like "zealots"
and "pragmatists".

But we could argue for a long time about the details. And what "freedom" means.
We generally cannot do or say anything we want to without consequences.

--
You need more time; and you probably always will.

rbowman wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> On Sat, 16 Mar 2024 08:58:46 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
>> In the old days, they'd call you a "Commie". These days, the call you a
>> "liberal".
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W8yhFJ8C6j0

"If you ain't been called a red" - American Communist Song"

How about "If you ain't been called a green" (environmentalist)
How about "If you ain't been called a red" (Republican)
How about "If you ain't been called a blue" (Democrat)

--
Many a writer seems to think he is never profound except when he can't
understand his own meaning.
-- George D. Prentice

Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
> chrisv wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>
>>> Buncha communist pinko liberal Linux lovers around here! :-D
>>
>> There are more conservative Linux lovers, it seems. Freedom lovers
>> are mostly on the right, collectivists and tyrants are mostly on the
>> left.
>
> Overgeneralization. For example, some on the "right" want to curtail the
> self-determination of women; one even thinks they should not be allowed to
> vote. Or, businessmen should have freedom to do what they want regardless
> of the effect on their employees or the environment.
>
> Rather than "left" and "right", it seems to me to be more like "zealots"
> and "pragmatists".
>
> But we could argue for a long time about the details. And what "freedom" means.
> We generally cannot do or say anything we want to without consequences.
>
sure we can

% wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>> chrisv wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>
>>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>
>>>> Buncha communist pinko liberal Linux lovers around here! :-D
>>>
>>> There are more conservative Linux lovers, it seems. Freedom lovers
>>> are mostly on the right, collectivists and tyrants are mostly on the
>>> left.
>>
>> Overgeneralization. For example, some on the "right" want to curtail the
>> self-determination of women; one even thinks they should not be allowed to
>> vote. Or, businessmen should have freedom to do what they want regardless
>> of the effect on their employees or the environment.
>>
>> Rather than "left" and "right", it seems to me to be more like "zealots"
>> and "pragmatists".
>>
>> But we could argue for a long time about the details. And what "freedom" means.
>> We generally cannot do or say anything we want to without consequences.
>>
> sure we can

Try it and see! Make fun of Cheetoh Jesus in the midst of a bunch of
people toting American flags defaced by the face of EXPOTUS45.

--
You will be advanced socially, without any special effort on your part.

Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
> % wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>> chrisv wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>>
>>>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Buncha communist pinko liberal Linux lovers around here! :-D
>>>>
>>>> There are more conservative Linux lovers, it seems. Freedom lovers
>>>> are mostly on the right, collectivists and tyrants are mostly on the
>>>> left.
>>>
>>> Overgeneralization. For example, some on the "right" want to curtail the
>>> self-determination of women; one even thinks they should not be allowed to
>>> vote. Or, businessmen should have freedom to do what they want regardless
>>> of the effect on their employees or the environment.
>>>
>>> Rather than "left" and "right", it seems to me to be more like "zealots"
>>> and "pragmatists".
>>>
>>> But we could argue for a long time about the details. And what "freedom" means.
>>> We generally cannot do or say anything we want to without consequences.
>>>
>> sure we can
>
> Try it and see! Make fun of Cheetoh Jesus in the midst of a bunch of
> people toting American flags defaced by the face of EXPOTUS45.
>
>
its usually the lesser intelligent person , that comments
on the more intelligent person's , lack of intelligents
and we all think what we do has major significants

Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

>Try it and see! Make fun of Cheetoh Jesus in the midst of a bunch of
>people toting American flags defaced by the face of EXPOTUS45.

Hell, just waving the American flag causes some leftist weirdos to
feel "unsafe". They should just get the fsck out, IMO. We've got
leftists fresh off the boat from utter shitholes who have the audacity
to criticize our way of doing things. Inclusion? They'll slaughter
each other for being the wrong kind of Muslim!

chrisv wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
>>Try it and see! Make fun of Cheetoh Jesus in the midst of a bunch of
>>people toting American flags defaced by the face of EXPOTUS45.
>
> Hell, just waving the American flag causes some leftist weirdos to
> feel "unsafe". They should just get the fsck out, IMO. We've got
> leftists fresh off the boat from utter shitholes who have the audacity
> to criticize our way of doing things. Inclusion? They'll slaughter
> each other for being the wrong kind of Muslim!

"Buh wuddaboud ...?"

--
You prefer the company of the opposite sex, but are well liked by your own.

On 3/17/2024 8:45 AM, chrisv wrote:
> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
>> Try it and see! Make fun of Cheetoh Jesus in the midst of a bunch of
>> people toting American flags defaced by the face of EXPOTUS45.
>
> Hell, just waving the American flag causes some leftist weirdos to
> feel "unsafe". They should just get the fsck out, IMO. We've got
> leftists fresh off the boat from utter shitholes who have the audacity
> to criticize our way of doing things. Inclusion? They'll slaughter
> each other for being the wrong kind of Muslim!
>

Very dumb.

Even my dick doesn't feel like reasoning with you.

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com

Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

> chrisv wrote:
>>
>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>
>>>Try it and see! Make fun of Cheetoh Jesus in the midst of a bunch of
>>>people toting American flags defaced by the face of EXPOTUS45.
>>
>> Hell, just waving the American flag causes some leftist weirdos to
>> feel "unsafe". They should just get the fsck out, IMO. We've got
>> leftists fresh off the boat from utter shitholes who have the audacity
>> to criticize our way of doing things. Inclusion? They'll slaughter
>> each other for being the wrong kind of Muslim!
>
>"Buh wuddaboud ...?"

Nope. My point was much stronger than yours. As usual.

Cue :-D "comeback".

chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
>>>>Try it and see! Make fun of Cheetoh Jesus in the midst of a bunch of
>>>>people toting American flags defaced by the face of EXPOTUS45.
>>>
>>> Hell, just waving the American flag causes some leftist weirdos to
>>> feel "unsafe". They should just get the fsck out, IMO. We've got
>>> leftists fresh off the boat from utter shitholes who have the audacity
>>> to criticize our way of doing things. Inclusion? They'll slaughter
>>> each other for being the wrong kind of Muslim!
>>
>>"Buh wuddaboud ...?"
>
>Nope. My point was much stronger than yours. As usual.
>
>Cue :-D "comeback".

If only you were arguing for the right thing. If you don't believe in
me or don't know I exist, it'd take revolution. Trump is the dictator
for people weak enough to fall prey, but Psalm 46:10 and whatnot.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.