Hello,

More of my philosophy about Patents and Copyrights and Trademarks and more of my thoughts..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and as you notice that the difference between a Patent, Copyright, and Trademark is: A patent protects new inventions, processes, or scientific creations, a trademark protects brands, logos, and slogans, and a copyright protects original works of authorship, but as you notice that my abstraction below of from where comes dignity also makes you understand that the Mastery in my abstraction below also means that you have to have a good education , and having a good education makes you correctly think and act by protecting with Patents and Copyrights and Trademarks, and it also makes you make laws and enforce them in a country or in a global world, and notice also that mastery in my abstraction below also means the mastery over nature , so it also means that you have to be inventive and creative, so as you notice that i think my abstraction below of from where comes dignity is correct, so reread my thoughts of my philosophy below that i have thought and written quickly so that you notice my kind of dignity and so that you notice my kind of personality:

More of my philosophy of from where comes dignity and more of my thoughts...

I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, i will ask a philosophical question of:

From where comes dignity ?

I think that dignity comes not from big money or easy money, but dignity
comes from what we call in french: "La maîtrise" or what we call in english "The mastery", like of the mastery of science and/or technology , so i mean that dignity comes from you having to master the tools of adaptation that makes you successful, so it is why the having a good education is the so important thing that brings dignity, so it is why you are noticing that my way of talking to you is like the talking of a good educated man, and this shows my kind of dignity or this shows my kind of personality, since for me the most important thing is that i have to master the tools of adaptation so that to be successful, and of course you can invent the tools of adaptation and it is not in logical contradiction , since inventing the tools of adaptation is also the understanding of them and is like the mastery of them, like my way of inventing my thoughts of my philosophy and my inventing many proverbs that i am posting here etc.

More of my philosophy about is morality just an intellectual construct or not and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, so i have talked more about morality,
and i will ask the following philosophical question:

Is morality just an intellectual construct or not ?

I think that individual morality comes from the individual interest,
but being individual interest is not societal morality or general or global morality, so then societal morality comes from the societal interest, but here again notice that we can ask a philosophical question of:

What is the societal or general or global interest ?

I think that as i am explaining it in my thoughts of my philosophy,
that the essence of morality comes from the fact that we want to
adapt efficiently and to become more and more perfect so that to solve our problems and so that to be happy and so that to be greatly perfect or perfect, so it is the engine that creates morality, so then morality
is not just an intellectual construct, but it also comes from the empirical, so then i can ask a philosophical question of:

Is morality universal ?

So i invite you to read my following thoughts in the following
web link so that answers this philosophical question and that
talks more about morality:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/s8IZ5i5Udm0

And you can read the rest of my "interesting" philosophical thoughts in the following web links so that to understand my views on different subjects:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/vc32viYv1SY

And read also my other thoughts of my philosophy here:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/CmaowkjUJVY

More of my philosophy about the pragmatic meaning of human life and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, so i think that you can, like in absurdism of the philosopher Albert Camus, logically infer that human existence is absurd, but i don't think it is the good way of measuring, since i think that there is also the "pragmatic" way of measuring, since i think that noticing that humans die or a part of humans suffer or the like is not the thing that must make us think that human existence is absurd, since the "pragmatic" way of measuring the meaning of human life is to notice that we have really progressed in the today human life compared to the old human life and we are really progressing in an exponential way, and i think that it is what gives the meaning of human life, so i think what remains is that we have to minimize at best or avoid wars and we have to be the right safety in managing the exponential progress of our humanity, and speaking about the exponential progress of our humanity, here is what i have said about it:

More of my philosophy about the meaning of human life and more of my thoughts..

So I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests
and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i will ask a philosophical question of:

From where comes the meaning of human life ?

I think i am highly smart, and i say that you can by being relativism in
philosophy says that human life has no meaning, so relativism in philosophy in its essence has a problem, but i think that the smart way of constructing a meaning of human life, is also to be the pragmatic way by giving weights of importance to things, it is like "prioritizing" by giving weights of importance so that to be successful, i mean look at human life, it is much better than the old human life, so this way of looking at it permits to give a weight of importance , and also the other way is also to say that humanity is in fact progressing in an exponential way, so we are progressing so rapidly, and this way also of looking at it gives a great weight of importance and those two ways of looking at human life gives optimism, so i think it is the way to construct a meaning of human life, and this way of constructing a meaning of human life looks like my answer below about the can we be enlightned or not, so as you are noticing that the pragmatic way of my answer below proceeds by giving weights of importance so that also enforce the necessary "hierarchy" of humans so that to be the necessary order in society or in the world. And i also say that we have "just" already attained the knee of the exponential progress curve, this knee of the curve is the place where growth suddenly switches from a slower to an even faster exponential mode, so now the curve of exponential progress of our humanity has "just" already started to go exponentially even much faster, this is why i say that in about 10 years from now we will become so powerful because of it. And you have to look at the following video so that to understand this exponential progress of our humanity:

Exponential Progress: Can We Expect Mind-Blowing Changes In The Near Future

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfM5HXpfnJQ

And look in the following interesting article about how AI will create millions more Jobs than it Will destroy:

https://singularityhub.com/2019/01/01/ai-will-create-millions-more-jobs-than-it-will-destroy-heres-how/

So i think we have to be optimistic about this exponential progress of our humanity.

More of my philosophy about enlightenment and more of my thoughts..

So I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests
and i have scored above 115 IQ, and now i will invite you to look at
the following video of the indian philosophy that is making a big mistake:

The Bizarre Life Of An Enlightened Person

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SzmGkRF2ggU

So i am discovering in the above video patterns with my fluid intelligence that say to me that the above video of the indian philosophy is making a big mistake, since the above video of the indian philosophy is saying that you can not be enlightned, but it is "relativism" in philosophy that is not acceptable as morality, since also with this relativism we can also say that the smart humans among us are not smart humans, and this relativism brings an advantage of the being humbleness , but it also brings a disadvantage of being arrogance, so it is by logical analogy like the we can not say that you have to know how to use relativism like you have to know how to use a knife, since the normal distribution says that a not negligible percentage of humans are genetically violent, it is why i think that so that to be the right safety, we have to be the pragmatic way that also enforces the necessary "hierarchy" of humans so that to be the necessary order in society or in the world, so we have to for example say that the "highly smart" humans among us are the most important humans, since also they are like the most important engine that we have, since we can easily notice that without the highly smart humans, humanity becomes inferior like inferior animals, and it is why i have just said the following: