On Saturday, May 22, 2021 at 5:27:23 PM UTC-7, Amine Moulay Ramdane wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> Read again, i correct about here is my just new proverb about fluid intelligence and smartness..
>
> I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
>

No. You're a dumbass spammer.
> Here is my just new proverb:
>
> "Human smartness is finding a small number of tools that permit to
> to solve a great number of problems, so when you look carefully at what is human smartness you will notice that it is not about great quantity, it is about a small quantity of good quality that permits us to be so powerful. Being smart is not about quantity, it is much more about quality."
>
> So i think i am smart and i will explain my new proverb above:

I think you've only been told like 43 times that this isn't related to programming you stupid fucker.
>
> With pattern recognition of fluid intelligence we are finding
> patterns that are the tools, and we are understanding and applying those patterns that we are finding with fluid intelligence to
> other many other new problems, so then we are not finding the patterns again and again, so then we are not finding the tools that are those patterns again and again, so pattern recognition of fluid intelligence is a minimization process that permit to find a small number of tools that permits to solve great number of problems.
>
> More of my philosophy about human fluid intelligence and smartness..
>
> Human fluid intelligence involves being able to think and reason abstractly and solve problems, so it needs abstract thinking and pattern recognition, but we have to ask a philosophical question of:
>
> What is abstract thinking in human fluid intelligence ?
>
> So i will rapidly answer that abstract thinking is like
> when in software programming we construct a "class" (that leads to an object in runtime) and its attributes, it is like the way of constructing a "concept" and knowing about what is its characteristics,
> so abstract thinking is not finding a thing of a particular Huskie Dog and what is its characteristics, but it is finding the general concept of a Dog and its attributes or characteristics, so i think that
> good abstract thinking is much more powerful, so now i will ask a philosophical question of:
>
> What is the "relation" in human fluid intelligence between pattern recognition and abstract thinking ?
>
> I think that i have to define what is pattern recognition in human fluid intelligence, so i will say the following:
>
> Pattern recognition in human fluid intelligence is to recognize a particular way in which something is done, is organized, or happens, so i think that it is with this pattern recognition that we are able to incrementally understand and we are able to construct concepts etc. so this also permits to do abstract thinking in human fluid intelligence.
>
> So i will give my example of pattern recognition with my fluid
> intelligence that permits me to understand, here it is:
>
> So if you want to go fast from my country Morocco to another country called USA , how will you do it ? or what will you do ?
>
> It is like my IQ test..
>
> So if you answer that you need for example to use a fast airplane to go fast from Morocco to USA, your answer is a stupid answer, so you need the smart answer, so i will answer that the fast airplane too has to be "reliable" and your "health" has too to permit it and the "weather" has too to permit it, so now you are clearly noticing that you need to take into account many "factors" so that to go fast from Morocco to USA, so you are clearly noticing that being smart needs also a good plan
>
> So that to understand more, let us say that you are measuring a human IQ, so if it is high human IQ , this value is a measure that is relative to the other human IQs, so you will say that this high IQ is much better at adaptability than the other humans, but it is not correct measure, because even science and technology have constraints that constrain(or limit greatly) the expressiveness of human IQs, so then we can not say that a high human IQ is better at adaptability than the other humans..
>
> More philosophy about how to measure human IQ or human smartness..
>
> I think i am smart, and i will talk about how to measure human IQs or human smartness, first you have to know that you can measure relatively or absolutely, so if you measure the IQ of a human, you will give a value of IQ that is "relative" to the distribution of IQs of humans, so can we ask if it is the right way to measure human IQs? i think it is not, because there is a "very" important thing that is missing, and it is that you have to also measure IQ or smartness relatively to the "constraints" in our reality that constrain(or limit) human IQ or human smartness, and i think this will give a much more realistic measure of human IQs or human smartness, so if you are really smart you will start by searching what are those constraints in the reality that constrain human IQs or human smartness, because this way you will become really smart.
>
> Let me give an example about how to measure IQs or smartness..
>
> So if you are really smart you will give a smart example so that people can understand, so here it is:
>
> If i say: 2 + 2 = 4
>
> So you will notice that this equality is also constrained by constraints of reality, since for example you are noticing that it is not so mathematically expressive, so this not mathematically expressive is also constraining human IQ or human smartness, since if you understand and learn this mathematical equality, another person will quickly do the same, so the other person will adapt quickly to this level of smartness, so now you are noticing the smart idea, it is that even science and technology are constrained the same way, and this constraints on science and technology constrain or limit the expressiveness of high human IQs or high level of smartness so that other lower level human IQs or smartness can attain the level of adaptability of high human IQs, this is what is happening in our today world, and if you are smart you will notice that there is something else that is happening and it is that abstraction of complexity that reduce the complexity is making others not understanding the complexity behind the abstraction and this is not so efficient.
>
> Here is more about the constraints on science and technology:
>
> Is Science Going To End?
>
> Read more here:
>
> https://philosophynow.org/issues/68/Is_Science_Going_To_End
>
> And read also the following
>
> The Industrial Era Ended, and So Will the Digital Era
>
> Read more here:
>
> https://hbr.org/2018/07/the-industrial-era-ended-and-so-will-the-digital-era
>
> More political philosophy about what is smartness..
>
>
> I give you an example so that you understand:
>
> If i give the following three words:
>
> I, love, you.
>
> It is not the same as if i give the following five words:
>
> I, love, you, very, much
>
> So you are noticing that the five words permit a more sophisticated expressiveness, and notice that i am saying more sophisticated, since the five words bring more efficiency, and this bringing more efficiency is also what we call smartness, but notice that this smartness is brought by using the "tool" that is composed of the five words, so the tool that is our english language brings smartness, so then we have to be convinced by the fact that the tool like internet brings a much more efficiency and this much more efficiency brings much more smartness, so now you are noticing that smartness is not only genetical or cultural, but it is also the smartness of using the tool, and this is a very important thing, since the tool can be powerful and it can advance very much a human and can make a human really smart. So you have to understand that we are also in an Era of powerful tools such as internet that can advance very much a human and that can make a human really smart.
>
> And i invite you to read my thoughts of my philosophy here:
>
> https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/YZSYxV41-qI
>
> Also i invite you to read more of my thoughts of my philosophy here:
>
> https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/OjDTCDiawJw
>
> Also i invite you to read more of my thoughts of my philosophy here:
>
> https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ftf3lx5Rzxo
>

Get off welfare and get a job you loser.