RetroBBS - comp.protocols.dicom

DICOMweb Adoption

<b7ef078c-3f5c-4651-9ea5-d089e3a4f7d5n@googlegroups.com>

https://www.rocksolidbbs.com/devel/article-flat.php?id=797&group=comp.protocols.dicom#797

copy link Newsgroups: comp.protocols.dicom

X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:24d:b0:762:5081:31a9 with SMTP id q13-20020a05620a024d00b00762508131a9mr31629qkn.0.1692195535743;
Wed, 16 Aug 2023 07:18:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a63:350f:0:b0:565:dcd0:cf24 with SMTP id
c15-20020a63350f000000b00565dcd0cf24mr422510pga.3.1692195535391; Wed, 16 Aug
2023 07:18:55 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.dicom
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 07:18:54 -0700 (PDT)
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2601:188:c403:7860:34c6:fdda:ee2:f1;
posting-account=83QsswoAAAAwsrNBsMIEzQfWYZQ9jr_J
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2601:188:c403:7860:34c6:fdda:ee2:f1
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <b7ef078c-3f5c-4651-9ea5-d089e3a4f7d5n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: DICOMweb Adoption
From: chris.burke@pathai.com (Chris Burke)
Injection-Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 14:18:55 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 1949

by: Chris Burke - Wed, 16 Aug 2023 14:18 UTC

Hi everyone,

I was curious if there is any data regarding the adoption rate of DICOMweb as opposed to DIMSE-based operations. Do most vendors support DICOMweb at this point? Are there preferences for one over the other? I'm particularly interested in the digital pathology area, but anywhere across the DICOM space would be interesting.

Thanks!

--- Chris

--
*Disclaimer: This email and any corresponding attachments may contain
confidential information. If you're not the intended recipient, any
copying, distribution, disclosure, or use of any information contained in
the email or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you believe to have
received this email in error, please email security@pathai.com
<mailto:security@pathai.com> immediately, then destroy the email and any
attachments without reading or saving.*

Re: DICOMweb Adoption

<1da4e325-e070-45ff-a2d5-bd01410bb3edn@googlegroups.com>

copy mid

https://www.rocksolidbbs.com/devel/article-flat.php?id=798&group=comp.protocols.dicom#798

copy link Newsgroups: comp.protocols.dicom

X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:91:b0:40f:e2a5:3100 with SMTP id o17-20020a05622a009100b0040fe2a53100mr43350qtw.6.1692283623867;
Thu, 17 Aug 2023 07:47:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:18a4:b0:686:6234:5537 with SMTP id
x36-20020a056a0018a400b0068662345537mr2627837pfh.1.1692283622975; Thu, 17 Aug
2023 07:47:02 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.goja.nl.eu.org!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.dicom
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 07:47:02 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <b7ef078c-3f5c-4651-9ea5-d089e3a4f7d5n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=173.72.134.3; posting-account=J-nNggkAAABAnjFwFaBfLdR5jOrjN8RB
NNTP-Posting-Host: 173.72.134.3
References: <b7ef078c-3f5c-4651-9ea5-d089e3a4f7d5n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <1da4e325-e070-45ff-a2d5-bd01410bb3edn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: DICOMweb Adoption
From: herman@otechimg.com (herman o.)
Injection-Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 14:47:03 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

by: herman o. - Thu, 17 Aug 2023 14:47 UTC

On Wednesday, August 16, 2023 at 9:18:57 AM UTC-5, Chris Burke wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I was curious if there is any data regarding the adoption rate of DICOMweb as opposed to DIMSE-based operations. Do most vendors support DICOMweb at this point? Are there preferences for one over the other? I'm particularly interested in the digital pathology area, but anywhere across the DICOM space would be interesting.
>
Hi Chris,

DICOMWeb is emerging as the go-to-standard for cloud connections. Especially with the many AI cloud based algorithms, this will become more and more popular. In addition, for any web acces such as the launch of viewers in an EMR or from mobile devices stand-alone, DICOMWeb is preferrable. I have not seen any modality to PACS and/or VNA connections using DICOMweb yet. So, for pathology, I would assume that most devices (scanners) will stick to DIMSE as well.

Herman O.

"Turn on, tune up, rock out." -- Billy Gibbons

devel / comp.protocols.dicom / DICOMweb Adoption

Subject	Author
DICOMweb Adoption	Chris Burke
Re: DICOMweb Adoption	herman o.