Hello,

More of my philosophy about what is the important languages and
about diversity and more of my thoughts..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

I think i am highly smart, and i think that we have to know that
a kind of human diversity is necessary for survival, but what kind of human diversity is it ? so i will ask a philosophical question and i will answer it and you will notice what kind of human diversity
we need, so here is my philosophical question:

The education system in France and in other countries requires a
kind of conformism, so, is this kind of conformism a correct
way of doing ?

So i think i am highly smart, so i think that this kind of conformism
, such as in the education system of France and such countries, permits us to control our animal instincts in a kind of way, since those animal instincts can make us like a kind of fatalism that brings
too much dangerous violence and wars, such as the war in Ukraine, since
i think that the war in Ukraine was caused by the fact that like
in the education system of France, president Putin wants and wanted a kind of conformism that is the basis values of nationalism in Russia, so you have to be smart and notice that the war in Ukraine is a war between in the one side like conformism to values of nationalism, and it is looks like the conformism of the education system of France, and in the other side the too much liberty that has the tendency
to exhibit the animal instincts in a form of violence and culture of violence, so i think i can logically infer that a kind of diversity is necessary, and this kind of diversity has to be able to correctly control the animal instincts so that to be not this too much violence that makes us like fatalistic and that brings dangerous wars and too much violence, so i think that that for example gays can make sex and can marry, and shemales too, but they have not to be this kind of too much violence, so violence such as the ones that are genetically sadists or of the too much violent humans are problematic, so i can logically infer that we have not to make all of us smart, since it is against of the necessary diversity, but we have to speak a kind of language that learns the others to not be this too much violence that brings fatalism such as in Ukraine.

More of my philosophy about the the importance of randomness in
the genetic algorithm and in the evolutionary algorithms and more
of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and i will invite you to read my following
smart thoughts about evolutionary algorithms and artificial intelligence so that you notice how i am talking about the so important thing that we call "randomness":

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/joLVchvaCf0

So i think i am highly smart, and notice that i am saying in the above web link the following about evolutionary algorithms:

"I think that Modern trends in solving tough optimization problems tend
to use evolutionary algorithms and nature-inspired metaheuristic
algorithms, especially those based on swarm intelligence (SI), two major
characteristics of modern metaheuristic methods are nature-inspired, and
a balance between randomness and regularity."

So i think that in the genetic algorithm, there is a part that is hard coded, like selecting the best genes, and i think that it is what
we call regularity, since it is hard coded like that, but there is
a so important thing in that genetic algorithm that we call randomness,
and i think that it is the genetic mutations that happen with a
probability and that give a kind of diversity, so i think that this
genetic mutations are really important, since i can for example
say that if the best genes are the ones that use "reason", so then reason too can make the people that has the tendency to use reason do
a thing that is against there survival, like going to war when we
feel that there is too much risk, but this going to war can make
the members or people that use reason so that to attack the other enemy
be extinct in a war when they loose a war, and it is the basis of randomness in a genetic algorithm, since even when there is a war
between for example two Ant colonies, there are some members that do not make war and that can survive if other are extinct by making war, and i say it also comes from randomness of the genetics.

More of my philosophy about the other conditions of the genetic algorithm and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..
..
I think i am highly smart, and i think that the genetic algorithm
is interesting too, but i have to speak about one other most important thing about the genetic algorithm, so i will ask a philosophical question about it:

Since as i just said previously, read it below, that a good genetic algorithm has to efficiently balance between global(exploration) and local(exploitation) search , but how can you be sure that you have found a global optimum ?

I think i am smart, and i will say that it also depends on the kind of problem, so if for example we have a minimization problem, you can
rerun a number of times the genetic algorithm so that to select the best minimum among all the results and you can also give more time to
the exploration so that to find the a better result, also you have to know that the genetic algorithm can be more elitist in the crossover steps, but i think that this kind of Elitism can has the tendency to not efficiently higher the average best of the average members of the population, so then it depends on wich problem you want to use the genetic algorithm, also i think that the genetic algorithm is
a model that explains from where comes humans, since i also think
that the genetic mutations of humans, that happens with a probability, has also not only come from the inside body from the chromosomes and genes, but they also were the result of solar storms that, as has said NASA, that may have been key to life on Earth, read here so that to notice it:

https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2016/nasa-solar-storms-may-have-been-key-to-life-on-earth

Read my previous thoughts:

More of my philosophy about the genetic algorithm and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and as you have just noticed, i have just talked yesterday about the distributed intelligence and collective intelligence, and i invite you to read it in my below thoughts, and today i will invent more of my thoughts about the genetic algorithm, so i will ask the following philosophical question about the genetic algorithm:

Is the genetic algorithm a brute-force search and if it is
not, how is it different than the brute-force search ?

so i have just quickly took a look at some example of a minimization problem with a genetic algorithm, and i think that the genetic algorithm is not a brute-force search, since i think that when in a minimization
problem with a genetic algorithm you do a crossover, also called recombination, that is a genetic operator used to combine the genetic information of two parents to generate new offspring, the genetic algorithm has this tendency to also explore locally and we call it exploitation, and when the genetic algorithm does genetical mutations
with a level of probability, the genetic algorithm has this tendency to explore globally and we call it exploration, so i think a good genetic algorithm is the one that balance efficiently exploration and exploitation so that to avoid premature convergence, and
notice that when you explore locally and globally you can do it with
a bigger population that makes it search faster, so it is is why i think
the genetic algorithm has this kind of patterns that makes it a much better search than brute-force search. And so that to know more about this kind of artificial intelligence , i invite you to read my following thoughts in the following web link about evolutionary algorithms and artificial intelligence so that to understand more:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/joLVchvaCf0

More of my philosophy about fractals and about distributed intelligence and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and i have just looked at the model of fractals here:

https://iternal.us/what-is-a-fractal/

And i think by looking at them, i am discovering a pattern with my fluid intelligence, and it is that they look by logical analogy like a distributed intelligence and collective intelligence, since you can
consider the small steps(like the individual intelligence of the collective intelligence) that we repeat, of the model of fractals, like
the individual ants in an Ant colony, and when you look at the final
result of a good fractal you will think that it is so sophisticated,
but i think that from looking at the small steps and there small interactions you can understand that it is an impression and that it is not so sophisticated, and the so important question is how from an intelligence, that looks like a problem, can you makes it a distributed intelligence of small parts of intelligence that makes the interactions and give the result.

More of my philosophy of the model of intelligence of a Cyborg and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and i have just talked about the model of distributed intelligence or collective intelligence, read it below, and now i will talk about the model of intelligence of a Cyborg, so i think i am smart and i think that the model of intelligence of a Cyborg looks also by logical analogy like the model of distributed intelligence or collective intelligence, since i think that with internet and such tools we are becoming like Cyborgs, since i think that even the data in for example internet is also a distributed intelligence that we collect so that to be creativity or innovation that can become a high intelligence, so in the distributed intelligence model of for example an Ant colony, the Ants and there knowledge that causes there actions is the specialization of intelligence of the distributed intelligence, and notice how even Elon Musk is saying it that "We’re already a cyborg,", read here so that to notice it: