Hello,

More of my philosophy about responsability and about happiness and more..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

I invite you to read the following article from a white supremacist and neo-nazi website called national vanguard:

https://nationalvanguard.org/2022/04/cosmotheism-in-savitri-devi-2/

And notice that it is saying the following about national socialism
of the white supremacism and neo-nazism:

"[National Socialism] aimed at stemming the physical and moral decay of modern, technically “advanced” humanity by forcing it — by forcing its racial élite, at least — to live in accordance with the ultimate purpose of Nature, which is not to make individuals “happy,” nor even to make, nations “happy,” but to evolve supermankind — living godhead — out of the existing master races, first of all, out of the pure Aryan. Happiness is a bourgeois conception, definitely. It is not our concern. We want animals to be happy — and inferior men, also, to the extent their happiness does not disturb the New Order. We believe higher mankind has better things to do. The Aryan world, remoulded by us after our final triumph, will no longer think in terms of happiness like the decadent world of today. It will think in terms of duty — like the early Vedic world, the early Christian world, the early Islamic world; like the world at the time of any great new beginning."

But i think i am really smart and i say that there is two weaknesses in
the above thoughts of neo-nazism, first weakness is that neo-nazism wants to be dictatorship so that to use the radical form, where we have to re-engineer the human condition by the centralized planning and large-scale social engineering as in old communist China or USSR(United Socialist Soviet Republic), but this way of doing has not worked correctly, and the second weakness is that the "duty" in the above thoughts of neo-nazism is idealized, but since the duty has to be dictated by the dictatorship of neo-nazism, so since it is not the democratic way, then the duty that is dictated by neo-nazism can not work correctly and it can become a big problem since it comes from the dictatorship of neo-nazism.

More of my philosophy about societal and individual identity and more of my thoughts..

I think i am smart, and i think that societal identity can not come
from the being rich or having big money, and i think that the societal identity is much more important than individual identity, since it is
the very basis for societal order, since the being diversity of this one
is rich and that one is not rich or is poor brings a kind of societal disorder and violence, since this kind of being unequal is not liked by people, so this is why i say that it is primordial to compensate it with a kind of being "decency" that maintain order in a society, and this kind of decency is, as i am saying it below, also the fact that we standardize with laws and rules so that to bring order.

More of my philosophy of what is the Western values and about the laws and more..

I have to clear something really important about laws, and here is what i will say:

Western countries have wanted to avoid the radical form, where we have to re-engineer the human condition by the centralized planning and large-scale social engineering as in old communist China or USSR(United Socialist Soviet Republic), since i think this way of doing has not worked so efficiently, so i think that western countries have given to there people human rights and freedom of expression or speech as Liberty, but i think they are not definitive rights, since i think that Western countries are proceeding by rational reforms into the society and then to undertake evidence-based assessments, so then they are also monitoring those western rights to see if they are working correctly or not, so if they are not working correctly , so they can change them, so then from my previous thoughts about nationalism and about the laws you
are also understanding the a kind of decency that brings order is so important for the society.

Read my previous thoughts so that to understand:

More of my philosophy about nationalism and about the laws and more..

I think i am smart, since i think that the laws that we enforce and
the kind of soft power that we softly enforce like by making them
rules that we explain is the constraints that makes the basis of americanism as a nationalism of USA, since speaking and writing english can become a law too if it is necessary, so you will say why not the culture ? but the culture is the expression of the diversity of the population, but the laws and the soft power as soft rules is what "standardize" and makes the the basis of the americanism of USA that i say is the nationalism of USA.

This is why i also just said the following:

More of my philosophy of is USA nationalism or patriotism..

I think that Donald Trump has not brought nationalism to USA, since i think that USA is a kind of nationalism that is not hard nationalism, since USA is a kind of americanism that is a kind of nationalism that is more softer than the one of president Putin, so what is the most important thing in americanism of USA ? i think it is the fact that it also comes from this USA americanism that maintain a kind of order by standardizing by being a mixture of laws that we enforce and by faith in God and a kind of soft power that brings a kind of decency that is an americanism that brings order, so i am saying it like this since
the most important part in americanism of USA is how to be an acceptable
society by being the right order.

More of my philosophy about president Putin and about the war in Ukraine..

I think i am smart, and i think that saying that president Putin is the only one responsable is not correct thinking, and what we have to do
is think more efficiently and to try to understand nationalism of president Putin, so we have to ask a question of is nationalism of president Putin too much dictatorial and too much extremist and why is it too much dictatorial and too much extremist, since we can easily notice that the kind of too much dictatorial and extremist nationalism of Putin is not the kind of nationalism of the nationalist Union for a Popular Movement that is centre-right political party in France, so then you are understanding that there is hard and archaic nationalism like in Algeria and Russia and Syria and of the one of Marine Le Pen , and there is more appropriate nationalism like nationalist Union for a Popular Movement that is centre-right political party in France, so then you are noticing where is the defect of nationalism of Putin, since i think that nationalism of Putin is partly an archaism that has to be improved by making it look like nationalist Union for a Popular Movement that is centre-right political party in France, but we have to
be careful since we have also to take into account the internal context
of what has happened in Russia that has created this kind of too much dictatorial and extremist nationalism of president Putin.

More of my philosophy about human diversity..

I think i am smart, and i think that one of the most important
thing in philosophy is to speak about what is the acceptable human diversity, so i think that what we are trying to do in the societies is that we are also standardizing by using laws, i mean the law doesn't accept all human diversities, and also we have to know that there is
soft power and hard power, and the hard power is the laws that we are
enforcing, and there is also soft power that we have to use so that
to be an acceptable society, this is why i say that having an acceptable
society is also knowing how to have smart and wise laws and how to be wisely and proactively a soft power that construct an acceptable society that doesn't degenerate into an unacceptable society. And it is
how i am doing it by also inventing many poems of Love and poems so
that to be in accordance with my following new proverb, so read them below:

I think i am really smart, and i am also an inventor of many proverbs,
and here is my just new proverb:

"We can easily hate our world, and look at the destruction that just happened quickly in Ukraine and you will notice it quickly, so hate becomes by logical analogy like an animal instinct that we have to control wisely, it is why we have to know how to be constructive so that to make our world more beautiful so that we become much less destructive because of hate."

More of my philosophy about my inventions and about my kind of personality...

I think i am really smart, and you have to understand my kind
of personality, since as you notice i am talking about my new software
projects, and as you notice that i am a inventor of many scalable
algorithms and algorithms, and i am also an inventor of many poems of Love and poems and here they are, read them carefully since my
poems of Love and poems look like me:

I want to share with you the following beautiful song with my poems of Love and poems..

I want to share with you the following beautiful song of Cesária Evora:

Amor Di Mundo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rCuJJwVwdJY&list=RDrCuJJwVwdJY&start_radio=1

And invite you to read all my following poems of Love and poems
that i have invented quickly:

Here is my new poem called: "I am walking this so beautiful desert"

I invite to listen to the following arabic music from Morocco
reading at the same time my poem below:

Music mandolin lamchaheb

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A8hnf2v4lmU