Hey.
What are You doin9 ?
Sucking Your own dick ?


**********************************
☏: 372 53900660

Amine Moulay Ramdane kirjutas Laupäev, 28. mai 2022 kl 16:57:03 UTC+2:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> More of my philosophy about the exponential progress and about capitalism and more of my thoughts..
>
> I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
> invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
>
>
> I think i am highly smart, and of course i have to talk more about why i am optimistic about capitalism, and here is why , read the following thoughts about the Ramez Naam’s new book so that to understand:
>
>
> The Limits of the Earth, Part 1: Problems
>
> "In my own new book, The Infinite Resource: The Power of Ideas on a Finite Planet, I challenge this view. The problem isn’t economic growth, per se. Nor is the problem that our natural resources are too small. While finite, the natural resources the planet supplies are vast and far larger than humanity needs in order to continue to thrive and grow prosperity for centuries to come. The problem, rather, is the types of resources we access, and the manner and efficiency with which we use them.
>
> And the ultimate solution to those problems is innovation – innovation in the science and technology that we use to tap into physical resources, and innovation in the economic system that steers our consumption.
>
> The situation we’re in isn’t a looming wall that we’re doomed to crash into. It’s a race – a race between depletion and pollution of natural resources on one side, and our pace of innovation on the other."
>
> Read more here:
>
> https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/the-limits-of-the-earth-part-1-problems/
>
> And i also say that we have "just" already attained the knee
> of the exponential progress curve, this knee of the curve is the place
> where growth suddenly switches from a slower to an even faster
> exponential mode, so now the curve of exponential progress of our
> humanity has "just" already started to go exponentially even much
> faster, this is why i say that in about 10 years from now we will become so powerful because of it. And you have to look at the following video so that to understand this exponential progress of our humanity:
>
> Exponential Progress: Can We Expect Mind-Blowing Changes In The Near Future
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfM5HXpfnJQ
>
>
> And you can read my thoughts about artificial intelligence and productivity and about China and its artificial intelligence and computer chips in the following web link:
>
> https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/UOt_4qTgN8M
>
> And you can read my following thoughts about Nanotechnology and about
> Exponential Progress in the following web link:
>
> https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/mjE_2AG1TKQ
>
>
> More of my philosophy about the american dream and more of my thoughts..
>
> The American dream was initially conceived by Thomas Jefferson as each citizen’s right to the pursuit of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, this american dream is not about guaranteed outcomes, of course, but the pursuit of opportunities, so notice carefully
> that i have just spoken more and more about those kind of opportunities
> that we have to have and that makes the american dream, like for example
> my talking in my below thoughts about Progressive Capitalism of Joseph E. Stiglitz, since Joseph E. Stiglitz is saying in his videos below that he has advised the democratic party about his reforms of his progressive capitalism, so read my below thoughts carefully so that to understand:
>
>
> And I have just looked at many videos on youtube of Joseph Stiglitz and
> i have just understood him well, but i have just quickly found the following interesting video of him that explains well the reforms that we need so that to be progressive capitalism, and he is saying in this video that he has advised the democratic party about his reforms of his
> progressive capitalism and i think that he is a democrat, so i
> invite you to look at his following interesting video so that
> to understand:
>
> Joseph Stiglitz on People, Power, and Profit | Munich Security Conference 2020
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sym4UZOjhJc
>
>
> And more precision about more of my philosophy about progressive capitalism..
>
> I invite you again to look at the following interesting video of Joseph E.. Stiglitz that speaks about some thoughts of his interesting book “People, Power, and Profits: Progressive Capitalism for an Age of Discontent.”:
>
> Joseph Stiglitz on People, Power, and Profits: Progressive Capitalism for an Age of Discontent
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jLJksgMIDdI
>
>
> And read his following interesting article in The New York Times so that
> to understand:
>
> Joseph E. Stiglitz is a university professor at Columbia, the 2001 recipient of the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economics, a former chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers, a former chief economist of the World Bank and the author, most recently, of “People, Power, and Profits: Progressive Capitalism for an Age of Discontent.”, and i invite you to read his following interesting article in The New York Times:
>
> Progressive capitalism is not an oxymoron
>
> Read more here:
>
> https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/19/opinion/sunday/progressive-capitalism.html
>
> More of my philosophy about my kind of personality and more of my thoughts..
>
> I think i am highly smart, but i will ask a philosophical question of:
>
>
> How can i explain my kind of personality ?
>
> I think i am like an inventor or creator, since if you look at my below thoughts you will notice that what i like most is inventing thoughts and
> inventing algorithms and inventing a philosophy and inventing poems of Love and poems and inventing proverbs, so as you have just noticed it is
> what i am doing in front of you, so my way of doing is mostly
> about being creative and inventive that permits me to adapt
> efficiently, so look for example how i have quickly invented my following algorithms here as a logical proof of what i am saying to you:
>
> Scalable reference counting with efficient support for weak references
>
> https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-reference-counting-with-efficient-support-for-weak-references
>
> New variants of Scalable RWLocks
>
> https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/new-variants-of-scalable-rwlocks
>
> Scalable lock that is FIFO fair and starvation-free
>
> https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-mlock
>
> And i have also invented many other algorithms too..
>
>
> And look at my following thoughts so that you notice that
> it is the same pattern, i mean that i am the being inventive and creative:
>
> More of my philosophy about my kind of methodology of learning and more of my thoughts..
>
> I think i am highly smart, and i will explain to you my kind of way of learning much more clearly:
>
> I don't learn like you are learning, since i have to understand
> the architectural ideas more clearly, by inventing them and/or understanding them much more clearly, and after that, i think that
> this gives a form to a high level of intelligence that permits me to understand rapidly and efficiently, so i give you an example, so i have invented many architectural ideas that have given form to my philosophy as a high level intelligence , and this has allowed me to make you understand more the weaknesses of the philosophies of other philosophers, so i am doing it this way for genetic algorithms(read my thoughts about it below) etc., so i give you an example, so read my following thoughts in the following web link that i have rapidly invented, and you will notice how i am doing it by reading them carefully and by noticing my kind of personality, so here is a part of my philosophy about self-confidence and about how to be the positive energy and how to be hope so that you notice how my philosophy is smart:
>
> https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/RNxOWBpkHkM
>
>
> And look here in my following tutorial about Petri Nets how i have invented a methodology as also architectural ideas that permit to rapidly model parallel applications from the logical operators IF and THEN and OR and AND into a Petri Net model, so look at it carefully in my tutorial here , since i think it is interesting too:
>
> https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/how-to-analyse-parallel-applications-with-petri-nets
>
> More of my philosophy about the the importance of randomness in
> the genetic algorithm and in the evolutionary algorithms and more
> of my thoughts..
>
> I think i am highly smart, and i will invite you to read my following
> smart thoughts about evolutionary algorithms and artificial intelligence so that you notice how i am talking about the so important thing that we call "randomness":
>
> https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/joLVchvaCf0
>
>
> So i think i am highly smart, and notice that i am saying in the above web link the following about evolutionary algorithms:
>
> "I think that Modern trends in solving tough optimization problems tend
> to use evolutionary algorithms and nature-inspired metaheuristic
> algorithms, especially those based on swarm intelligence (SI), two major
> characteristics of modern metaheuristic methods are nature-inspired, and
> a balance between randomness and regularity."
>
> So i think that in the genetic algorithm, there is a part that is hard coded, like selecting the best genes, and i think that it is what
> we call regularity, since it is hard coded like that, but there is
> a so important thing in the genetic algorithm that we call randomness,
> and i think that it is the genetic mutations that happen with a
> probability and that give a kind of diversity, so i think that this
> genetic mutations are really important, since i can for example
> say that if the best genes are the ones that use "reason", so then reason too can make the people that has the tendency to use reason do
> a thing that is against there survival, like going to war when we
> feel that there is too much risk, but this going to war can make
> the members or people that use reason so that to attack the other enemy
> be extinct in a war when they loose a war, and it is the basis of randomness in a genetic algorithm, since even when there is a war
> between for example two Ant colonies, there are some members that do not make war and that can survive if other are extinct by making war, and i say it also comes from randomness of the genetics.
>
> More of my philosophy about the other conditions of the genetic algorithm and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..
> .
> I think i am highly smart, and i think that the genetic algorithm
> is interesting too, but i have to speak about one other most important thing about the genetic algorithm, so i will ask a philosophical question about it:
>
> Since as i just said previously, read it below, that a good genetic algorithm has to efficiently balance between global(exploration) and local(exploitation) search , but how can you be sure that you have found a global optimum ?
>
> I think i am smart, and i will say that it also depends on the kind of problem, so if for example we have a minimization problem, you can
> rerun a number of times the genetic algorithm so that to select the best minimum among all the results and you can also give more time to
> the exploration so that to find the a better result, also you have to know that the genetic algorithm can be more elitist in the crossover steps, but i think that this kind of Elitism can has the tendency to not efficiently higher the average best of the average members of the population, so then it depends on wich problem you want to use the genetic algorithm, also i think that the genetic algorithm is
> a model that explains from where comes humans, since i also think
> that the genetic mutations of humans, that happens with a probability, has also not only come from the inside body from the chromosomes and genes, but they also were the result of solar storms that, as has said NASA, that may have been key to life on Earth, read here so that to notice it:
>
> https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2016/nasa-solar-storms-may-have-been-key-to-life-on-earth
>
> Read my previous thoughts:
>
> More of my philosophy about the genetic algorithm and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..
>
> I think i am highly smart, and as you have just noticed, i have just talked yesterday about the distributed intelligence and collective intelligence, and i invite you to read it in my below thoughts, and today i will invent more of my thoughts about the genetic algorithm, so i will ask the following philosophical question about the genetic algorithm:
>
> Is the genetic algorithm a brute-force search and if it is
> not, how is it different than the brute-force search ?
>
> so i have just quickly took a look at some example of a minimization problem with a genetic algorithm, and i think that the genetic algorithm is not a brute-force search, since i think that when in a minimization
> problem with a genetic algorithm you do a crossover, also called recombination, that is a genetic operator used to combine the genetic information of two parents to generate new offspring, the genetic algorithm has this tendency to also explore locally and we call it exploitation, and when the genetic algorithm does genetical mutations
> with a level of probability, the genetic algorithm has this tendency to explore globally and we call it exploration, so i think a good genetic algorithm is the one that balance efficiently exploration and exploitation so that to avoid premature convergence, and
> notice that when you explore locally and globally you can do it with
> a bigger population that makes it search faster, so it is is why i think
> the genetic algorithm has this kind of patterns that makes it a much better search than brute-force search. And so that to know more about this kind of artificial intelligence , i invite you to read my following thoughts in the following web link about evolutionary algorithms and artificial intelligence so that to understand more:
>
> https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/joLVchvaCf0
>
>
> More of my philosophy about the analytic queueing-circuit analyzer PDQ and more of my thoughts..
>
> I think i am highly smart, since i have also passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, so as you have just noticed i have just talked about timesharing and coroutines in the following link:
>
> https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/tN_O-AgkGjY
>
> And i have just talked about Markov chains in mathematics and about Petri Nets here:
>
> https://groups.google.com/g/soc.culture.quebec/c/LPE4zR-BqHY
>
> Now i will talk about my PDQ for Delphi and Freepascal:
>
> This is a port by Amine Moulay Ramdane of PDQ version 6.2.0 to Delphi
> on Windows and to Freepascal on both Windows and Linux, i have also provided you with two demos, one queuing MM1 demo, and another Jackson network demo. Also i have provided you with my HTML tutorial on how to solve analytically the Jackson network problem provided to you as a PDQ demo.
>
> PDQ is an analytic queueing-circuit analyzer made freely available under MIT/X11 license from: http://www.perfdynamics.com/Tools/PDQ.html
>
> You can download it from my website here:
>
> https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/pdq-for-delphi-and-freepascal
>
> And here is an example in Delphi and Freepascal of the Jackson network demo that i have included inside the zip file(and you can look
> at my mathematical modeling of it here in my website: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/jackson-network-problem):
>
> ---
>
> program test_network;
>
>
> uses pdq64,LinSys;
>
>
> type router1 = array of pansichar;
> servTime1 = array of double;
> visitRatios1 = array of double;
> serviceDemands1 = array of double;
> var
>
> A, b, x : TMatrix;
> arrivRate:double;
> work:pansichar;
> router:router1;
> servTime:servTime1;
> visitRatios:visitRatios1;
> serviceDemands:serviceDemands1;
> i:integer;
>
> begin
>
> setlength(router,3);
> setlength(servTime,3);
> setlength(visitRatios,3);
> setlength(serviceDemands,3);
>
>
> arrivRate := 0.50;
> work:='Traffic';
>
> router[0]:='Router1';
> router[1]:='Router2';
> router[2]:='Router3';
>
> servTime[0]:=1.0;
> servTime[1]:=2.0;
> servTime[2]:=1.0;
>
> A := TMatrix.Create (3,3);
> b := TMatrix.Create (3,1);
> x := TMatrix.Create (3,1);
>
> A[1,1] := 1.0; A[1,2] := 0.0; A[1,3] := -0.2;
> A[2,1] := -0.5; A[2,2] := 1.0; A[2,3] := 0.0;
> A[3,1] := -0.5; A[3,2] := -0.8; A[3,3] := 1.0;
>
> b[1,1] := 0.5; b[2,1] := 0.0; b[3,1] := 0.0;
>
> LinSys.gauss(A, b, x);
>
> visitRatios[0]:=x[1,1]/arrivRate;
> visitRatios[1]:=x[2,1]/arrivRate;
> visitRatios[2]:=x[3,1]/arrivRate;
>
> serviceDemands[0]:=visitRatios[0]*servTime[0];
> serviceDemands[1]:=visitRatios[1]*servTime[1];
> serviceDemands[2]:=visitRatios[2]*servTime[2];
>
> pdq64.PDQ_Init('Delphi Network in PDQ');
>
> pdq64.PDQ_CreateOpen(work,arrivRate);
>
> pdq64.PDQ_SetWUnit('Msgs');
> pdq64.PDQ_SetTUnit('Time');
>
>
> for i:=0 to 2
> do
> begin
> pdq64.PDQ_CreateNode(router[i],pdq64.CEN,pdq64.FCFS);
> pdq64.PDQ_SetDemand(router[i],work,serviceDemands[i]);
> end;
>
> pdq64.PDQ_Solve(pdq64.CANON);
> pdq64.PDQ_Report();
>
> setlength(router,0);
> setlength(servTime,0);
> setlength(visitRatios,0);
> setlength(serviceDemands,0);
>
> A.free;
> b.free;
> x.free;
>
>
> end.
>
> ---
>
>
>
> And i invite you to read more of my thoughts of my philosophy here:
>
> https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/sw5EarahFo8
>
>
>
>
> Thank you,
> Amine Moulay Ramdane.