Message-ID:

Stellar rays prove fibbing never pays. Embezzlement is another matter.

devel / comp.protocols.dicom / question on largest and smallest pixel value

question on largest and smallest pixel value

<ee60aa6f-2e91-49ff-95d3-bfb55f63c049n@googlegroups.com>

https://www.rocksolidbbs.com/devel/article-flat.php?id=194&group=comp.protocols.dicom#194

copy link Newsgroups: comp.protocols.dicom

X-Received: by 2002:ad4:5489:: with SMTP id q9mr4097830qvy.14.1631125364350; Wed, 08 Sep 2021 11:22:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a37:2e81:: with SMTP id u123mr4849116qkh.156.1631125364155; Wed, 08 Sep 2021 11:22:44 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!news.uzoreto.com!tr3.eu1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.dicom
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2021 11:22:43 -0700 (PDT)
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=209.148.77.7; posting-account=-9i5ZwoAAAAUfKwljS77gKa-uayVaK1J
NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.148.77.7
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <ee60aa6f-2e91-49ff-95d3-bfb55f63c049n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: question on largest and smallest pixel value
From: stephen.istvan.fogarasi@gmail.com (fogarasi)
Injection-Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2021 18:22:44 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 0

by: fogarasi - Wed, 8 Sep 2021 18:22 UTC

Re: question on largest and smallest pixel value

<f14ee10e-c230-4dee-bbbd-85bef3e4d9c2n@googlegroups.com>

copy mid

https://www.rocksolidbbs.com/devel/article-flat.php?id=195&group=comp.protocols.dicom#195

copy link Newsgroups: comp.protocols.dicom

X-Received: by 2002:ae9:c007:: with SMTP id u7mr1359570qkk.271.1631169849159;
Wed, 08 Sep 2021 23:44:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:3e1:: with SMTP id cf1mr1360111qvb.43.1631169848954;
Wed, 08 Sep 2021 23:44:08 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.dicom
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2021 23:44:08 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <ee60aa6f-2e91-49ff-95d3-bfb55f63c049n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=147.161.9.81; posting-account=qM2gxgoAAACKZpyjHhvAMq6IZj-n6sFl
NNTP-Posting-Host: 147.161.9.81
References: <ee60aa6f-2e91-49ff-95d3-bfb55f63c049n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <f14ee10e-c230-4dee-bbbd-85bef3e4d9c2n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: question on largest and smallest pixel value
From: roni.zaharia@gmail.com (roniza)
Injection-Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2021 06:44:09 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 7

by: roniza - Thu, 9 Sep 2021 06:44 UTC

Yes.

ב-יום רביעי, 8 בספטמבר 2021 בשעה 21:22:45 UTC+3, fogarasi כתב/ה:
> A quick question on (0028,0106) and (0028,0107) smallest and largest pixel value. These values are definitely before application of rescale slope and intercept and any LUTs, correct ?

Subject	Author
question on largest and smallest pixel value	fogarasi
Re: question on largest and smallest pixel value	roniza