Rocksolid Light

Welcome to RetroBBS

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

God made the integers; all else is the work of Man. -- Kronecker


devel / comp.lang.cobol / Re: Unit test frameworks for GnuCOBOL

SubjectAuthor
* Unit test frameworks for GnuCOBOLBruce Axtens
`* Re: Unit test frameworks for GnuCOBOLdocdwarf
 `* Re: Unit test frameworks for GnuCOBOLOleg Kunitsyn
  `* Re: Unit test frameworks for GnuCOBOLbugmagnet
   `* Re: Unit test frameworks for GnuCOBOLJustin Hill
    `- Re: Unit test frameworks for GnuCOBOLpete dashwood

1
Unit test frameworks for GnuCOBOL

<sbf6fb$pih$1@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://www.rocksolidbbs.com/devel/article-flat.php?id=151&group=comp.lang.cobol#151

  copy link   Newsgroups: comp.lang.cobol
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: bruce.axtens@gmail.com (Bruce Axtens)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.cobol
Subject: Unit test frameworks for GnuCOBOL
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2021 21:16:25 +0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 8
Message-ID: <sbf6fb$pih$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2021 13:16:29 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="055d2fa53b9d095cccd84b36da75e670";
logging-data="26193"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19okin12UnoSjFBxSRLeSgH"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
Firefox/60.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.7.1
Cancel-Lock: sha1:+eTpN0hFlNk5ycUgvNQz2h3J8yE=
X-Mozilla-News-Host: snews://news.eternal-september.org:563
 by: Bruce Axtens - Tue, 29 Jun 2021 13:16 UTC

Has anyone used any of the following unit test frameworks for COBOL?
1. https://github.com/OlegKunitsyn/gcblunit
2. https://sites.google.com/site/cobolunit/
3. https://github.com/neopragma/cobol-unit-test/wiki

Opinions?

Bruce

Re: Unit test frameworks for GnuCOBOL

<sbfi2k$ddu$1@reader1.panix.com>

  copy mid

https://www.rocksolidbbs.com/devel/article-flat.php?id=152&group=comp.lang.cobol#152

  copy link   Newsgroups: comp.lang.cobol
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!panix!.POSTED.panix1.panix.com!not-for-mail
From: docdwarf@panix.com
Newsgroups: comp.lang.cobol
Subject: Re: Unit test frameworks for GnuCOBOL
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2021 16:34:28 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: Public Access Networks Corp.
Message-ID: <sbfi2k$ddu$1@reader1.panix.com>
References: <sbf6fb$pih$1@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2021 16:34:28 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader1.panix.com; posting-host="panix1.panix.com:166.84.1.1";
logging-data="13758"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com"
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
 by: docdwarf@panix.com - Tue, 29 Jun 2021 16:34 UTC

In article <sbf6fb$pih$1@dont-email.me>,
Bruce Axtens <bruce.axtens@gmail.com> wrote:
>Has anyone used any of the following unit test frameworks for COBOL?
>1. https://github.com/OlegKunitsyn/gcblunit
>2. https://sites.google.com/site/cobolunit/
>3. https://github.com/neopragma/cobol-unit-test/wiki
>
>Opinions?

1. Everybody's got one.
2. They all stink.
3. Nobody wants to look at the other guy's.

.... or so I was taught.

DD

Re: Unit test frameworks for GnuCOBOL

<eb6208fe-1a4f-4212-a80f-8af62342d315n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.rocksolidbbs.com/devel/article-flat.php?id=154&group=comp.lang.cobol#154

  copy link   Newsgroups: comp.lang.cobol
X-Received: by 2002:a37:96c2:: with SMTP id y185mr29954631qkd.6.1625041660807;
Wed, 30 Jun 2021 01:27:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:e803:: with SMTP id k3mr42321727ybd.268.1625041660668;
Wed, 30 Jun 2021 01:27:40 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.cobol
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 01:27:40 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <sbfi2k$ddu$1@reader1.panix.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=92.76.18.31; posting-account=43eTzQoAAABX8w_AhhVw5GBf3_-XOhKq
NNTP-Posting-Host: 92.76.18.31
References: <sbf6fb$pih$1@dont-email.me> <sbfi2k$ddu$1@reader1.panix.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <eb6208fe-1a4f-4212-a80f-8af62342d315n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Unit test frameworks for GnuCOBOL
From: olegs.kunicins@gmail.com (Oleg Kunitsyn)
Injection-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 08:27:40 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
 by: Oleg Kunitsyn - Wed, 30 Jun 2021 08:27 UTC

On Tuesday, June 29, 2021 at 6:34:29 PM UTC+2, docd...@panix.com wrote:
> In article <sbf6fb$pih$1...@dont-email.me>,
> Bruce Axtens <bruce....@gmail.com> wrote:
> >Has anyone used any of the following unit test frameworks for COBOL?
> >1. https://github.com/OlegKunitsyn/gcblunit
> >2. https://sites.google.com/site/cobolunit/
> >3. https://github.com/neopragma/cobol-unit-test/wiki
> >
> >Opinions?
> 1. Everybody's got one.
> 2. They all stink.
> 3. Nobody wants to look at the other guy's.
>
> ... or so I was taught.
>
> DD
Regading GCBLUnit
- https://medium.com/swlh/modern-cobol-package-tutorial-96d57bc7e23a
- https://medium.com/swlh/modern-cobol-microservice-tutorial-7d7d738f0b00

Re: Unit test frameworks for GnuCOBOL

<sbllg6$ef6$1@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://www.rocksolidbbs.com/devel/article-flat.php?id=155&group=comp.lang.cobol#155

  copy link   Newsgroups: comp.lang.cobol
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "bugmagnet@outlook.com" (bugmagnet)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.cobol
Subject: Re: Unit test frameworks for GnuCOBOL
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2021 00:09:42 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <sbllg6$ef6$1@dont-email.me>
References: <sbf6fb$pih$1@dont-email.me> <sbfi2k$ddu$1@reader1.panix.com>
<eb6208fe-1a4f-4212-a80f-8af62342d315n@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2021 00:09:42 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="508fdfc26dba06e6fbf1337bf084b9e3";
logging-data="14822"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/z4ixn1zT9hEZOPIEBvApZ"
User-Agent: PhoNews/3.6.0 (Android/10)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:HFoeGRcyuscNSUrWq/XAi8J6fxQ=
In-Reply-To: <eb6208fe-1a4f-4212-a80f-8af62342d315n@googlegroups.com>
 by: bugmagnet - Fri, 2 Jul 2021 00:09 UTC

On 30/6/21 4:27 pm, Oleg Kunitsyn wrote:

>Regading GCBLUnit
>- https://medium.com/swlh/modern-cobol-package-tutorial-96d57bc7e23a
>- https://medium.com/swlh/modern-cobol-microservice-tutorial-7d7d738f0b00

Thank you, sir. A COBOL track on exercism.io now looks considerably more
likely

Re: Unit test frameworks for GnuCOBOL

<fa510187-2b84-4b62-acd5-1eb90fd38a09n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.rocksolidbbs.com/devel/article-flat.php?id=156&group=comp.lang.cobol#156

  copy link   Newsgroups: comp.lang.cobol
X-Received: by 2002:a37:9c89:: with SMTP id f131mr3545640qke.433.1625198909819;
Thu, 01 Jul 2021 21:08:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:e803:: with SMTP id k3mr3966529ybd.268.1625198909473;
Thu, 01 Jul 2021 21:08:29 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.cobol
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2021 21:08:29 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <sbllg6$ef6$1@dont-email.me>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2600:100f:b03a:2125:b1a4:a353:5ad3:1ff0;
posting-account=WXK3uAoAAACjOxDmo4r9ylncNe-RFcVg
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2600:100f:b03a:2125:b1a4:a353:5ad3:1ff0
References: <sbf6fb$pih$1@dont-email.me> <sbfi2k$ddu$1@reader1.panix.com>
<eb6208fe-1a4f-4212-a80f-8af62342d315n@googlegroups.com> <sbllg6$ef6$1@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <fa510187-2b84-4b62-acd5-1eb90fd38a09n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Unit test frameworks for GnuCOBOL
From: jrhill85@gmail.com (Justin Hill)
Injection-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2021 04:08:29 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
 by: Justin Hill - Fri, 2 Jul 2021 04:08 UTC

Wow... Even COBOL has a package manager in 2021! What a time to be alive.

Re: Unit test frameworks for GnuCOBOL

<il2bl9Fs5ibU2@mid.individual.net>

  copy mid

https://www.rocksolidbbs.com/devel/article-flat.php?id=163&group=comp.lang.cobol#163

  copy link   Newsgroups: comp.lang.cobol
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: dashwood@enternet.co.nz (pete dashwood)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.cobol
Subject: Re: Unit test frameworks for GnuCOBOL
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 20:09:13 +1200
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <il2bl9Fs5ibU2@mid.individual.net>
References: <sbf6fb$pih$1@dont-email.me> <sbfi2k$ddu$1@reader1.panix.com>
<eb6208fe-1a4f-4212-a80f-8af62342d315n@googlegroups.com>
<sbllg6$ef6$1@dont-email.me>
<fa510187-2b84-4b62-acd5-1eb90fd38a09n@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net ZIdjAaB6QXiOy9Ogf3npEwgBsY0y024ZhpOT1lMv44TxqoZ0+b
Cancel-Lock: sha1:u65ZUImw6hmpaSjEOb81TSdLuww=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/78.11.0
In-Reply-To: <fa510187-2b84-4b62-acd5-1eb90fd38a09n@googlegroups.com>
Content-Language: en-US
 by: pete dashwood - Mon, 12 Jul 2021 08:09 UTC

On 2/07/2021 16:08, Justin Hill wrote:
> Wow... Even COBOL has a package manager in 2021! What a time to be alive.
>
Thanks Justin.
Your post made me smile.
I spent 3 hours today on GitHub trying to clone a MS repo for the new
WinUI 3 library, and learning what it is as I did it...
I am no wiser...
But I am certainly better informed. :-)

Pete.

--
I used to write *COBOL*; now I can do *anything*...

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.8
clearnet tor