Please help, since I am totaly stuck with the following. Any suggestion from the VO gurus would be appreciated!

So, having problem with "Kid Stack Size Limit Exceeded" I did a simple test.. I wrote a function Recursion_test() which I called recursively. The function gets called 664 times and then throws error "Kid Stack Size Limit Exceeded".
Given the fact that there are no additional objects instanciated and no additional variables initialized I expected the error would be corrected by assigning proper value to SetKidStackSize(), but this was not the case. It seems there is another limitation set in CAVO which I do not know how to remove.

This is the function:
FUNCTION Recursion_test(nLevel)
Default(@nLevel,1)
nLevel:=nLevel+1
Recursion_test(nLevel)
RETURN

And these are values when error occurs:
Memory(MEMORY_STACKKID) 678, SetKidStackSize(0) is set to 8192
Memory(MEMORY_REGISTERKID) 65, SetMaxRegisteredKids(0) is set to 10000
Memory(MEMORY_REGISTERAXIT) 222, SetMaxRegisteredAxitMethods(0) is set to 64000
MEMORY_STACK_SIZE 1069056, MEMORY_STACK_FREE 1035688
MEMORY_REGISTEREXIT_COUNT 3

As you can see none of the parameters is over the limit.

have you tried increasing the value of Project settings/Linker/Stack size?

I have tried but increasing the value of Project settings/Linker/Stack size does not help.

When error occurs there is still plenty of stack space available. MEMORY_STACK_FREE shows more than 1Mb, while used stack space is 33kb (MEMORY_STACK_SIZE minus MEMORY_STACK_FREE) and remains the same even if I increase stack size in project settings.

There must be a limit somewhere else. I just can not believe that VO allows only 664 levels of recursion.

Would you be kind enough to run the simple recursion function below and see what the limit in your VO installation is?

FUNCTION Recursion_test(nLevel)
Default(@nLevel,1)
nLevel:=nLevel+1
? "level of recursion "
?? nLevel
Recursion_test(nLevel)
RETURN

On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 2:31:38 PM UTC+2, Deckard42 wrote:
> have you tried increasing the value of Project settings/Linker/Stack size?

I see the same issue. I suggest your post your question to the forum at
https://www.xsharp.eu/forum

Robert may be able to shed some light on the stack kid size limits.

Jamal

On 7/19/2023 4:14 AM, Gorazd Petrovič wrote:
> Please help, since I am totaly stuck with the following. Any suggestion from the VO gurus would be appreciated!
>
> So, having problem with "Kid Stack Size Limit Exceeded" I did a simple test. I wrote a function Recursion_test() which I called recursively. The function gets called 664 times and then throws error "Kid Stack Size Limit Exceeded".
> Given the fact that there are no additional objects instanciated and no additional variables initialized I expected the error would be corrected by assigning proper value to SetKidStackSize(), but this was not the case. It seems there is another limitation set in CAVO which I do not know how to remove.
>
> This is the function:
> FUNCTION Recursion_test(nLevel)
> Default(@nLevel,1)
> nLevel:=nLevel+1
> Recursion_test(nLevel)
> RETURN
>
> And these are values when error occurs:
> Memory(MEMORY_STACKKID) 678, SetKidStackSize(0) is set to 8192
> Memory(MEMORY_REGISTERKID) 65, SetMaxRegisteredKids(0) is set to 10000
> Memory(MEMORY_REGISTERAXIT) 222, SetMaxRegisteredAxitMethods(0) is set to 64000
> MEMORY_STACK_SIZE 1069056, MEMORY_STACK_FREE 1035688
> MEMORY_REGISTEREXIT_COUNT 3
>
> As you can see none of the parameters is over the limit.
>

Jamal,
thanks for your effort. I will do as you suggested.
Gorazd
On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 8:30:26 PM UTC+2, Jamal wrote:
> I see the same issue. I suggest your post your question to the forum at
> https://www.xsharp.eu/forum
>
> Robert may be able to shed some light on the stack kid size limits.
>
> Jamal
> On 7/19/2023 4:14 AM, Gorazd Petrovič wrote:
> > Please help, since I am totaly stuck with the following. Any suggestion from the VO gurus would be appreciated!
> >
> > So, having problem with "Kid Stack Size Limit Exceeded" I did a simple test. I wrote a function Recursion_test() which I called recursively. The function gets called 664 times and then throws error "Kid Stack Size Limit Exceeded".
> > Given the fact that there are no additional objects instanciated and no additional variables initialized I expected the error would be corrected by assigning proper value to SetKidStackSize(), but this was not the case. It seems there is another limitation set in CAVO which I do not know how to remove.
> >
> > This is the function:
> > FUNCTION Recursion_test(nLevel)
> > Default(@nLevel,1)
> > nLevel:=nLevel+1
> > Recursion_test(nLevel)
> > RETURN
> >
> > And these are values when error occurs:
> > Memory(MEMORY_STACKKID) 678, SetKidStackSize(0) is set to 8192
> > Memory(MEMORY_REGISTERKID) 65, SetMaxRegisteredKids(0) is set to 10000
> > Memory(MEMORY_REGISTERAXIT) 222, SetMaxRegisteredAxitMethods(0) is set to 64000
> > MEMORY_STACK_SIZE 1069056, MEMORY_STACK_FREE 1035688
> > MEMORY_REGISTEREXIT_COUNT 3
> >
> > As you can see none of the parameters is over the limit.
> >

For all that are reading here: Robert has answered that this is not
possible to solve because the number of recursions is limited (is
limited also in X#, but the limit is a bit larger)

Wolfgang

Gorazd Petrovič wrote:

> Jamal,
> thanks for your effort. I will do as you suggested.
> Gorazd
> On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 8:30:26 PM UTC+2, Jamal wrote:
> > I see the same issue. I suggest your post your question to the
> > forum at https://www.xsharp.eu/forum
> >
> > Robert may be able to shed some light on the stack kid size limits.
> >
> > Jamal
> > On 7/19/2023 4:14 AM, Gorazd Petrovič wrote:
> > > Please help, since I am totaly stuck with the following. Any
> > > suggestion from the VO gurus would be appreciated!
> > >
> > > So, having problem with "Kid Stack Size Limit Exceeded" I did a
> > > simple test. I wrote a function Recursion_test() which I called
> > > recursively. The function gets called 664 times and then throws
> > > error "Kid Stack Size Limit Exceeded". Given the fact that there
> > > are no additional objects instanciated and no additional
> > > variables initialized I expected the error would be corrected by
> > > assigning proper value to SetKidStackSize(), but this was not the
> > > case. It seems there is another limitation set in CAVO which I do
> > > not know how to remove.
> > >
> > > This is the function:
> > > FUNCTION Recursion_test(nLevel)
> > > Default(@nLevel,1)
> > > nLevel:=nLevel+1
> > > Recursion_test(nLevel)
> > > RETURN
> > >
> > > And these are values when error occurs:
> > > Memory(MEMORY_STACKKID) 678, SetKidStackSize(0) is set to 8192
> > > Memory(MEMORY_REGISTERKID) 65, SetMaxRegisteredKids(0) is set to
> > > 10000 Memory(MEMORY_REGISTERAXIT) 222,
> > > SetMaxRegisteredAxitMethods(0) is set to 64000 MEMORY_STACK_SIZE
> > > 1069056, MEMORY_STACK_FREE 1035688 MEMORY_REGISTEREXIT_COUNT 3
> > >
> > > As you can see none of the parameters is over the limit.
> > >

--

Wolfgang, just for fun, I tested in X# and C# console app.

NET Framework 4.8 (x64 and x86), crashed at 15082

I tested the console in Net Core 7.0 and 8.0 Preview and it crashed at
23895. This result indicates that NET Core is really very efficient.

So, even the limit is much higher in .NET, no one should be doing this.

Gorazd, I suggest that you avoid recursive functions and instead use a
FOR Loop and handle your requirement in a separate function. VO just
cannot handle deep recursions!

Jamal

On 7/26/2023 12:07 PM, Wolfgang Riedmann wrote:
> For all that are reading here: Robert has answered that this is not
> possible to solve because the number of recursions is limited (is
> limited also in X#, but the limit is a bit larger)
>

> Wolfgang
>
> Gorazd Petrovič wrote:
>
>> Jamal,
>> thanks for your effort. I will do as you suggested.
>> Gorazd
>> On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 8:30:26 PM UTC+2, Jamal wrote:
>>> I see the same issue. I suggest your post your question to the
>>> forum at https://www.xsharp.eu/forum
>>>
>>> Robert may be able to shed some light on the stack kid size limits.
>>>
>>> Jamal
>>> On 7/19/2023 4:14 AM, Gorazd Petrovič wrote:
>>>> Please help, since I am totaly stuck with the following. Any
>>>> suggestion from the VO gurus would be appreciated!
>>>>
>>>> So, having problem with "Kid Stack Size Limit Exceeded" I did a
>>>> simple test. I wrote a function Recursion_test() which I called
>>>> recursively. The function gets called 664 times and then throws
>>>> error "Kid Stack Size Limit Exceeded". Given the fact that there
>>>> are no additional objects instanciated and no additional
>>>> variables initialized I expected the error would be corrected by
>>>> assigning proper value to SetKidStackSize(), but this was not the
>>>> case. It seems there is another limitation set in CAVO which I do
>>>> not know how to remove.
>>>>
>>>> This is the function:
>>>> FUNCTION Recursion_test(nLevel)
>>>> Default(@nLevel,1)
>>>> nLevel:=nLevel+1
>>>> Recursion_test(nLevel)
>>>> RETURN
>>>>
>>>> And these are values when error occurs:
>>>> Memory(MEMORY_STACKKID) 678, SetKidStackSize(0) is set to 8192
>>>> Memory(MEMORY_REGISTERKID) 65, SetMaxRegisteredKids(0) is set to
>>>> 10000 Memory(MEMORY_REGISTERAXIT) 222,
>>>> SetMaxRegisteredAxitMethods(0) is set to 64000 MEMORY_STACK_SIZE
>>>> 1069056, MEMORY_STACK_FREE 1035688 MEMORY_REGISTEREXIT_COUNT 3
>>>>
>>>> As you can see none of the parameters is over the limit.
>>>>
>
>
>

Jamal,
The beauty of recursion is simplicity for solving problems when you do not know in advance how many iterations will be necessary to go through all levels of hierarchy of the given structure. I am afraid I do not know how to solve my problem with FOR or DO WHILE loop.
15.000 in .NET would definitely solve my problem. Maybe writting DLL in .NET would be the way to go? The problem is that going this way I would have to migrate pretty big chunk of my code from VO to .NET.
Gorazd
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 5:23:22 AM UTC+2, Jamal wrote:
> Wolfgang, just for fun, I tested in X# and C# console app.
>
> NET Framework 4.8 (x64 and x86), crashed at 15082
>
> I tested the console in Net Core 7.0 and 8.0 Preview and it crashed at
> 23895. This result indicates that NET Core is really very efficient.
>
>
> So, even the limit is much higher in .NET, no one should be doing this.
>
> Gorazd, I suggest that you avoid recursive functions and instead use a
> FOR Loop and handle your requirement in a separate function. VO just
> cannot handle deep recursions!
>
> Jamal
> On 7/26/2023 12:07 PM, Wolfgang Riedmann wrote:
> > For all that are reading here: Robert has answered that this is not
> > possible to solve because the number of recursions is limited (is
> > limited also in X#, but the limit is a bit larger)
> >
>
> > Wolfgang
> >
> > Gorazd Petrovič wrote:
> >
> >> Jamal,
> >> thanks for your effort. I will do as you suggested.
> >> Gorazd
> >> On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 8:30:26 PM UTC+2, Jamal wrote:
> >>> I see the same issue. I suggest your post your question to the
> >>> forum at https://www.xsharp.eu/forum
> >>>
> >>> Robert may be able to shed some light on the stack kid size limits.
> >>>
> >>> Jamal
> >>> On 7/19/2023 4:14 AM, Gorazd Petrovič wrote:
> >>>> Please help, since I am totaly stuck with the following. Any
> >>>> suggestion from the VO gurus would be appreciated!
> >>>>
> >>>> So, having problem with "Kid Stack Size Limit Exceeded" I did a
> >>>> simple test. I wrote a function Recursion_test() which I called
> >>>> recursively. The function gets called 664 times and then throws
> >>>> error "Kid Stack Size Limit Exceeded". Given the fact that there
> >>>> are no additional objects instanciated and no additional
> >>>> variables initialized I expected the error would be corrected by
> >>>> assigning proper value to SetKidStackSize(), but this was not the
> >>>> case. It seems there is another limitation set in CAVO which I do
> >>>> not know how to remove.
> >>>>
> >>>> This is the function:
> >>>> FUNCTION Recursion_test(nLevel)
> >>>> Default(@nLevel,1)
> >>>> nLevel:=nLevel+1
> >>>> Recursion_test(nLevel)
> >>>> RETURN
> >>>>
> >>>> And these are values when error occurs:
> >>>> Memory(MEMORY_STACKKID) 678, SetKidStackSize(0) is set to 8192
> >>>> Memory(MEMORY_REGISTERKID) 65, SetMaxRegisteredKids(0) is set to
> >>>> 10000 Memory(MEMORY_REGISTERAXIT) 222,
> >>>> SetMaxRegisteredAxitMethods(0) is set to 64000 MEMORY_STACK_SIZE
> >>>> 1069056, MEMORY_STACK_FREE 1035688 MEMORY_REGISTEREXIT_COUNT 3
> >>>>
> >>>> As you can see none of the parameters is over the limit.
> >>>>
> >
> >
> >

Gorazd,

Check the following as a guide.

https://www.refactoring.com/catalog/replaceRecursionWithIteration.html

Jamal

On 7/28/2023 6:55 AM, Gorazd Petrovič wrote:
> Jamal,
> The beauty of recursion is simplicity for solving problems when you do not know in advance how many iterations will be necessary to go through all levels of hierarchy of the given structure. I am afraid I do not know how to solve my problem with FOR or DO WHILE loop.
> 15.000 in .NET would definitely solve my problem. Maybe writting DLL in .NET would be the way to go? The problem is that going this way I would have to migrate pretty big chunk of my code from VO to .NET.
> Gorazd
> On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 5:23:22 AM UTC+2, Jamal wrote:
>> Wolfgang, just for fun, I tested in X# and C# console app.
>>
>> NET Framework 4.8 (x64 and x86), crashed at 15082
>>
>> I tested the console in Net Core 7.0 and 8.0 Preview and it crashed at
>> 23895. This result indicates that NET Core is really very efficient.
>>
>>
>> So, even the limit is much higher in .NET, no one should be doing this.
>>
>> Gorazd, I suggest that you avoid recursive functions and instead use a
>> FOR Loop and handle your requirement in a separate function. VO just
>> cannot handle deep recursions!
>>
>> Jamal
>> On 7/26/2023 12:07 PM, Wolfgang Riedmann wrote:
>>> For all that are reading here: Robert has answered that this is not
>>> possible to solve because the number of recursions is limited (is
>>> limited also in X#, but the limit is a bit larger)
>>>
>>
>>> Wolfgang
>>>
>>> Gorazd Petrovič wrote:
>>>
>>>> Jamal,
>>>> thanks for your effort. I will do as you suggested.
>>>> Gorazd
>>>> On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 8:30:26 PM UTC+2, Jamal wrote:
>>>>> I see the same issue. I suggest your post your question to the
>>>>> forum at https://www.xsharp.eu/forum
>>>>>
>>>>> Robert may be able to shed some light on the stack kid size limits.
>>>>>
>>>>> Jamal
>>>>> On 7/19/2023 4:14 AM, Gorazd Petrovič wrote:
>>>>>> Please help, since I am totaly stuck with the following. Any
>>>>>> suggestion from the VO gurus would be appreciated!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So, having problem with "Kid Stack Size Limit Exceeded" I did a
>>>>>> simple test. I wrote a function Recursion_test() which I called
>>>>>> recursively. The function gets called 664 times and then throws
>>>>>> error "Kid Stack Size Limit Exceeded". Given the fact that there
>>>>>> are no additional objects instanciated and no additional
>>>>>> variables initialized I expected the error would be corrected by
>>>>>> assigning proper value to SetKidStackSize(), but this was not the
>>>>>> case. It seems there is another limitation set in CAVO which I do
>>>>>> not know how to remove.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is the function:
>>>>>> FUNCTION Recursion_test(nLevel)
>>>>>> Default(@nLevel,1)
>>>>>> nLevel:=nLevel+1
>>>>>> Recursion_test(nLevel)
>>>>>> RETURN
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And these are values when error occurs:
>>>>>> Memory(MEMORY_STACKKID) 678, SetKidStackSize(0) is set to 8192
>>>>>> Memory(MEMORY_REGISTERKID) 65, SetMaxRegisteredKids(0) is set to
>>>>>> 10000 Memory(MEMORY_REGISTERAXIT) 222,
>>>>>> SetMaxRegisteredAxitMethods(0) is set to 64000 MEMORY_STACK_SIZE
>>>>>> 1069056, MEMORY_STACK_FREE 1035688 MEMORY_REGISTEREXIT_COUNT 3
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As you can see none of the parameters is over the limit.
>>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>

Jamal,
thanks for the information. I will give it a try.
Gorazd

Hi Gorazd,

it is really easy to move VO code to X# and use it as COM DLL in VO.

I'm doing similar things all the time (mostly interfaces to web
services or databases).
If needed, I can point you to samples and/or documentation.

Wolfgang

Gorazd Petrovič wrote:

> Jamal,
> The beauty of recursion is simplicity for solving problems when you
> do not know in advance how many iterations will be necessary to go
> through all levels of hierarchy of the given structure. I am afraid I
> do not know how to solve my problem with FOR or DO WHILE loop.
> 15.000 in .NET would definitely solve my problem. Maybe writting DLL
> in .NET would be the way to go? The problem is that going this way I
> would have to migrate pretty big chunk of my code from VO to .NET.
> Gorazd On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 5:23:22 AM UTC+2, Jamal wrote:
> > Wolfgang, just for fun, I tested in X# and C# console app.
> >
> > NET Framework 4.8 (x64 and x86), crashed at 15082
> >
> > I tested the console in Net Core 7.0 and 8.0 Preview and it crashed
> > at 23895. This result indicates that NET Core is really very
> > efficient.
> >
> >
> > So, even the limit is much higher in .NET, no one should be doing
> > this.
> >
> > Gorazd, I suggest that you avoid recursive functions and instead
> > use a FOR Loop and handle your requirement in a separate function.
> > VO just cannot handle deep recursions!
> >
> > Jamal
> > On 7/26/2023 12:07 PM, Wolfgang Riedmann wrote:
> > > For all that are reading here: Robert has answered that this is
> > > not possible to solve because the number of recursions is limited
> > > (is limited also in X#, but the limit is a bit larger)
> > >
> >
> > > Wolfgang
> > >
> > > Gorazd Petrovič wrote:
> > >
> > >> Jamal,
> > >> thanks for your effort. I will do as you suggested.
> > >> Gorazd
> > >> On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 8:30:26 PM UTC+2, Jamal wrote:
> > >>> I see the same issue. I suggest your post your question to the
> > >>> forum at https://www.xsharp.eu/forum
> > >>>
> > >>> Robert may be able to shed some light on the stack kid size
> > limits. >>>
> > >>> Jamal
> > >>> On 7/19/2023 4:14 AM, Gorazd Petrovič wrote:
> > >>>> Please help, since I am totaly stuck with the following. Any
> > >>>> suggestion from the VO gurus would be appreciated!
> > >>>>
> > >>>> So, having problem with "Kid Stack Size Limit Exceeded" I did
> > a >>>> simple test. I wrote a function Recursion_test() which I
> > called >>>> recursively. The function gets called 664 times and
> > then throws >>>> error "Kid Stack Size Limit Exceeded". Given the
> > fact that there >>>> are no additional objects instanciated and no
> > additional >>>> variables initialized I expected the error would be
> > corrected by >>>> assigning proper value to SetKidStackSize(), but
> > this was not the >>>> case. It seems there is another limitation
> > set in CAVO which I do >>>> not know how to remove.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> This is the function:
> > >>>> FUNCTION Recursion_test(nLevel)
> > >>>> Default(@nLevel,1)
> > >>>> nLevel:=nLevel+1
> > >>>> Recursion_test(nLevel)
> > >>>> RETURN
> > >>>>
> > >>>> And these are values when error occurs:
> > >>>> Memory(MEMORY_STACKKID) 678, SetKidStackSize(0) is set to 8192
> > >>>> Memory(MEMORY_REGISTERKID) 65, SetMaxRegisteredKids(0) is set
> > to >>>> 10000 Memory(MEMORY_REGISTERAXIT) 222,
> > >>>> SetMaxRegisteredAxitMethods(0) is set to 64000
> > MEMORY_STACK_SIZE >>>> 1069056, MEMORY_STACK_FREE 1035688
> > MEMORY_REGISTEREXIT_COUNT 3 >>>>
> > >>>> As you can see none of the parameters is over the limit.
> > >>>>
> > >
> > >
> > >

--

Hi Wolfgang,
Thanks for suggestion. Similary I am using .NET.
Gorazd.
On Tuesday, August 1, 2023 at 10:41:46 AM UTC+2, Wolfgang Riedmann wrote:
> Hi Gorazd,
>
> it is really easy to move VO code to X# and use it as COM DLL in VO.
>
> I'm doing similar things all the time (mostly interfaces to web
> services or databases).
> If needed, I can point you to samples and/or documentation.
> Wolfgang
>
> Gorazd Petrovič wrote:
>
> > Jamal,
> > The beauty of recursion is simplicity for solving problems when you
> > do not know in advance how many iterations will be necessary to go
> > through all levels of hierarchy of the given structure. I am afraid I
> > do not know how to solve my problem with FOR or DO WHILE loop.
> > 15.000 in .NET would definitely solve my problem. Maybe writting DLL
> > in .NET would be the way to go? The problem is that going this way I
> > would have to migrate pretty big chunk of my code from VO to .NET.
> > Gorazd On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 5:23:22 AM UTC+2, Jamal wrote:
> > > Wolfgang, just for fun, I tested in X# and C# console app.
> > >
> > > NET Framework 4.8 (x64 and x86), crashed at 15082
> > >
> > > I tested the console in Net Core 7.0 and 8.0 Preview and it crashed
> > > at 23895. This result indicates that NET Core is really very
> > > efficient.
> > >
> > >
> > > So, even the limit is much higher in .NET, no one should be doing
> > > this.
> > >
> > > Gorazd, I suggest that you avoid recursive functions and instead
> > > use a FOR Loop and handle your requirement in a separate function.
> > > VO just cannot handle deep recursions!
> > >
> > > Jamal
> > > On 7/26/2023 12:07 PM, Wolfgang Riedmann wrote:
> > > > For all that are reading here: Robert has answered that this is
> > > > not possible to solve because the number of recursions is limited
> > > > (is limited also in X#, but the limit is a bit larger)
> > > >
> > >
> > > > Wolfgang
> > > >
> > > > Gorazd Petrovič wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Jamal,
> > > >> thanks for your effort. I will do as you suggested.
> > > >> Gorazd
> > > >> On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 8:30:26 PM UTC+2, Jamal wrote:
> > > >>> I see the same issue. I suggest your post your question to the
> > > >>> forum at https://www.xsharp.eu/forum
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Robert may be able to shed some light on the stack kid size
> > > limits. >>>
> > > >>> Jamal
> > > >>> On 7/19/2023 4:14 AM, Gorazd Petrovič wrote:
> > > >>>> Please help, since I am totaly stuck with the following. Any
> > > >>>> suggestion from the VO gurus would be appreciated!
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> So, having problem with "Kid Stack Size Limit Exceeded" I did
> > > a >>>> simple test. I wrote a function Recursion_test() which I
> > > called >>>> recursively. The function gets called 664 times and
> > > then throws >>>> error "Kid Stack Size Limit Exceeded". Given the
> > > fact that there >>>> are no additional objects instanciated and no
> > > additional >>>> variables initialized I expected the error would be
> > > corrected by >>>> assigning proper value to SetKidStackSize(), but
> > > this was not the >>>> case. It seems there is another limitation
> > > set in CAVO which I do >>>> not know how to remove.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> This is the function:
> > > >>>> FUNCTION Recursion_test(nLevel)
> > > >>>> Default(@nLevel,1)
> > > >>>> nLevel:=nLevel+1
> > > >>>> Recursion_test(nLevel)
> > > >>>> RETURN
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> And these are values when error occurs:
> > > >>>> Memory(MEMORY_STACKKID) 678, SetKidStackSize(0) is set to 8192
> > > >>>> Memory(MEMORY_REGISTERKID) 65, SetMaxRegisteredKids(0) is set
> > > to >>>> 10000 Memory(MEMORY_REGISTERAXIT) 222,
> > > >>>> SetMaxRegisteredAxitMethods(0) is set to 64000
> > > MEMORY_STACK_SIZE >>>> 1069056, MEMORY_STACK_FREE 1035688
> > > MEMORY_REGISTEREXIT_COUNT 3 >>>>
> > > >>>> As you can see none of the parameters is over the limit.
> > > >>>>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> --