Hello,

More of my philosophy about human life and more of my thoughts..

I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, i have just looked at the following video
about Jeff Bezos:

"I Got Rich When I Understood This" | Jeff Bezos

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7TWKKww-F30

I think that the most important thing in human life, is that human
life becomes interesting when it is lively and active, and i think
that when human life is lively and active, this lively and active becomes like a lever of positive energy that permits you to become
successful, so it is why i am talking about the good and dynamic economic system since it is also from where comes this lively and active human life.

More of my philosophy about quantity and about quality and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, i will ask a philosophical question of:

What's more about what is quantity and what is quality ?

So i think it is "relative", since I think that in an economic system you can produce in quantity and and it can become producing quality by contextualizing it , since for example the business depends on the context, since a product or service depends on the demand and on the context that can make it quality or quantity, so you can become rich by being not smart and/or not creative and by producing in quantity, and by becoming rich, by producing in quantity, you can attract talents and intelligence and become a high quality, so then quantity can become quality by the process of productivity, since you have to think capitalism as not a zero-sum game, and capitalism is not a zero-sum game since for example more wealth is always being produced and since we take natural resources and transform them into the goods that we want. We grow more food, weave cloth, build homes. We produce a larger supply of goods, and new goods which we never had before. Production increases the quantity of real, physical wealth.

And you can read more about my thoughts of my philosophy here:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/SLaXcX7HF4Y

More of my philosophy about relativism and more of my thoughts..

I will ask a philosophical question of:

What is relativism ?

So i think relativism comes from the fact that for example
even if we say, like absurdism of the philosopher Albert Camus, that human existence is absurd, the truth of saying it doesn't resist the fact that the exponential progress of humanity can rapidly make it false, since we can still discover technology or science that makes it false, so i think that relativism comes from this part of the "unknown" that makes us think with relativism. So for example saying that our universe is condemned is also a lack of relativism, since we can not know how our exponential progress will make us survive, since for example we have the law of conservation of mass, which in France is taught as Lavoisier's Law that says: "Nothing is lost, nothing is created, everything is transformed.", so our exponential progress
can make us be able to make transformation to the universe that make
us not condemned in our part of the universe even if the other
parts of the universe are condemned, But i also think that there is the "pragmatic" way of measuring and thinking as i am saying it below.

More of my philosophy of how to be positive and optimistic and more of my thoughts..

As you have just noticed, I have just posted my new following proverb:

"Human life is not a beautiful flower bouquet, so the way of doing is that you have to know how to use like the beautifulness of a beautiful flower as a "lever" of positive energy that permits you to be optimistic and positive, and this optimism and positive energy is the key to success and it gives you the will to live."

But my way of being positive and optimistic is the following, so read my
following thoughts of my philosophy so that to understand it:

More of my philosophy about the pragmatic meaning of human life and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, so i think that you can, like in absurdism of the philosopher Albert Camus, logically infer that human existence is absurd, but i don't think it is the good way of measuring, since i think that there is also the "pragmatic" way of measuring, since i think that noticing that humans die or a part of humans suffer or the like is not the thing that must make us think that human existence is absurd, since the "pragmatic" way of measuring the meaning of human life is to notice that we have really progressed in the today human life compared to the old human life and we are really progressing in an exponential way, and i think that it is what gives the meaning of human life, so i think what remains is that we have to minimize at best or avoid wars and we have to be the right safety in managing the exponential progress of our humanity, and speaking about the exponential progress of our humanity, here is what i have said about it:

More of my philosophy about the meaning of human life and more of my thoughts..

So I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests
and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i will ask a philosophical question of:

From where comes the meaning of human life ?

I think i am highly smart, and i say that you can by being relativism in
philosophy says that human life has no meaning, so relativism in philosophy in its essence has a problem, but i think that the smart way of constructing a meaning of human life, is also to be the pragmatic way by giving weights of importance to things, it is like "prioritizing" by giving weights of importance so that to be successful, i mean look at human life, it is much better than the old human life, so this way of looking at it permits to give a weight of importance , and also the other way is also to say that humanity is in fact progressing in an exponential way, so we are progressing so rapidly, and this way also of looking at it gives a great weight of importance and those two ways of looking at human life gives optimism, so i think it is the way to construct a meaning of human life, and this way of constructing a meaning of human life looks like my answer below about the can we be enlightned or not, so as you are noticing that the pragmatic way of my answer below proceeds by giving weights of importance so that also enforce the necessary "hierarchy" of humans so that to be the necessary order in society or in the world. And i also say that we have "just" already attained the knee of the exponential progress curve, this knee of the curve is the place where growth suddenly switches from a slower to an even faster exponential mode, so now the curve of exponential progress of our humanity has "just" already started to go exponentially even much faster, this is why i say that in about 10 years from now we will become so powerful because of it. And you have to look at the following video so that to understand this exponential progress of our humanity:

Exponential Progress: Can We Expect Mind-Blowing Changes In The Near Future

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfM5HXpfnJQ

And look in the following interesting article about how AI will create millions more Jobs than it Will destroy:

https://singularityhub.com/2019/01/01/ai-will-create-millions-more-jobs-than-it-will-destroy-heres-how/

So i think we have to be optimistic about this exponential progress of our humanity.

More of my philosophy about enlightenment and more of my thoughts..

So I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests
and i have scored above 115 IQ, and now i will invite you to look at
the following video of the indian philosophy that is making a big mistake:

The Bizarre Life Of An Enlightened Person

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SzmGkRF2ggU

So i am discovering in the above video patterns with my fluid intelligence that say to me that the above video of the indian philosophy is making a big mistake, since the above video of the indian philosophy is saying that you can not be enlightned, but it is "relativism" in philosophy that is not acceptable as morality, since also with this relativism we can also say that the smart humans among us are not smart humans, and this relativism brings an advantage of the being humbleness , but it also brings a disadvantage of being arrogance, so it is by logical analogy like the we can not say that you have to know how to use relativism like you have to know how to use a knife, since the normal distribution says that a not negligible percentage of humans are genetically violent, it is why i think that so that to be the right safety, we have to be the pragmatic way that also enforces the necessary "hierarchy" of humans so that to be the necessary order in society or in the world, so we have to for example say that the "highly smart" humans among us are the most important humans, since also they are like the most important engine that we have, since we can easily notice that without the highly smart humans, humanity becomes inferior like inferior animals.

And you can read my thoughts of my philosophy in the following web link:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/SLaXcX7HF4Y

Here is my new proverb..

I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests
and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and here is my new proverb: