Rocksolid Light

Welcome to RetroBBS

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

"The sixties were good to you, weren't they?" -- George Carlin


dovenet / HAM Radio / The K7RA Solar Update

SubjectAuthor
o The K7RA Solar UpdateARRL de WD1CKS

1
The K7RA Solar Update

<61FD1536.6894.dove-ham@wd1cks.org>

  copy mid

https://www.rocksolidbbs.com/dovenet/article-flat.php?id=449&group=DOVE-Net.HAM_Radio#449

  copy link   Newsgroups: DOVE-Net.HAM_Radio
From: arrl.de.wd1cks@VERT/WLARB (ARRL de WD1CKS)
To: QST
Subject: The K7RA Solar Update
Message-ID: <61FD1536.6894.dove-ham@wd1cks.org>
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2022 04:59:50 +0000
X-Comment-To: QST
Path: rocksolidbbs.com!not-for-mail
Organization: Whisky Lover's Amateur Radio BBS
Newsgroups: DOVE-Net.HAM_Radio
X-FTN-PID: Synchronet 3.19a-FreeBSD master/caed36004 May 16 2021 Clang 10.0.0
X-FTN-CHRS: CP437 2
WhenImported: 20220204041447-0800 41e0
WhenExported: 20220204045760-0800 41e0
ExportedFrom: VERT dove-ham 10052
WhenImported: 20220204115950Z 0000
WhenExported: 20220204121452Z 0000
ExportedFrom: WLARB dove-ham 6894
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=IBM437
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
 by: ARRL de WD1CKS - Fri, 4 Feb 2022 04:59 UTC

02/04/2022

Tad Cook, K7RA, Seattle, reports: Our sun was much more active over the past
week, with average daily sunspot number more than doubling from 39.6 in the
previous week to 81.3 in the current January 27 - February 2 reporting week.

Geomagnetic indicator average daily Planetary A index changed from 8.3 to 10.1,
while average middle latitude A index was unchanged at 6.4.

Predicted solar flux for the near term is 126, 130, and 125 on February 4 - 6;
120 on February 7 - 10; 128 on February 11 - 12; 125 on February 13 - 14; 120
on February 15 - 17; 128 on February 18 - 21; 125 on February 22 - 25; 128 on
February 26; 132 on February 27 - 28; 135 on March 1 - 3; 125 on March 4 - 7;
128 on March 8 - 11, and 125 on March 12 - 13.

Predicted planetary A index is 12, 20, 18, and 10 February 4 - 7; 5 on February
8 - 10; 8 on February 11; 5 on February 12 - 16; then 10, 12, 8, and 5 on
February 17 - 20; 10, 8, 5, and 8 on February 21 - 24; 12, 8, 5, and 8 on
February 25 - 28; 10, 5, and 5 on March 1 - 3; 20 and 12 on March 4 - 5; 5 on
March 6 - 8; then 12 and 8 on March 9 - 10; 5 on March 11 - 15, and 10, 12, and
8 on March 16 - 18.

This is the "Weekly Commentary on the Sun, the Magnetosphere, and the Earth's
Ionosphere, February 3, 2022" from F.K. Janda, OK1HH:

"The solar radio flux of 130 and the daily sunspot number up to 100 at the end
of January, compared to the equal heliographic length in past solar rotations,
showed the unreliability of 27-day quasi-periodicity as the guideline for
predictions. The M1 solar flare in AR2936 on January 29 was also a surprise
because of the magnetic configuration. On the contrary, it was no surprise that
the accompanied LDE, which triggered halo CME, was followed by an
intensification of the solar wind and an increase in Earth's geomagnetic field
activity. A major storm was expected on February 2, but it arrived a day later
and included major changes in the parameters of Earth's ionosphere in the form
of its positive phase, around 1200 UTC."

Here is an interesting new Solar Cycle 25 update[1], thanks to K9LA and K1HTV.

Via Spaceweather.com[2] comes this comment from Dr. Ron Turner of ANSER
Research Institute in Virginia, who thinks it may be too early to expect a
strong Solar Cycle 25.

This graph[3] shows why Turner is skeptical.

"Solar Cycle 25 is doing something interesting. It is mimicking old Solar Cycle
24 (SC24)," he said. "I took sunspot numbers from the early years of SC24 (the
red dashed line) and overlaid them on SC25 [and] they're an almost perfect
match."

This is significant because Solar Cycle 24 went on to become the weakest solar
cycle in a century. Its hot start did not lead to a strong maximum. Turner
isn't saying that Solar Cycle 25 will likewise be a dud. But, rather, "these
early sunspot numbers are not enough to guarantee a strong cycle."

David Moore shared this article[4] in Science Daily about a big solar event
more than 9,000 years ago that was discovered via ice core analysis.

Here's an update[5] from Space Weather Woman Tamitha Skov, WX6SWW.

Sunspot numbers for January 27 - February 2 were 85, 77, 74, 70, 100, 88, and
75, with a mean of 81.3. The 10.7-centimeter flux was 107.1, 113.4, 125.3,
129.6, 129.5, 128.6, and 128.2, with a mean of 123.1. Estimated planetary A
indices were 7, 8, 17, 10, 10, 7, and 12, with a mean of 10.1. Middle latitude
A index was 5, 5, 7, 7, 3, 10, and 8, with a mean of 6.4.

For more information concerning radio propagation, visit[6] the ARRL Technical
Information Service, read[7] "What the Numbers Mean...," and check this
propagation page[8] by Carl Luetzelschwab, K9LA.

A propagation bulletin archive[9] is available. For customizable propagation
charts, visit the VOACAP Online for Ham Radio[10] website.

Instructions[11] for starting or ending email distribution of ARRL bulletins
are on the ARRL website.

Share[12] your reports and observations.

[1] https://helioforecast.space/solarcycle
[2] http://www.spaceweather.com/
[3] https://www.spaceweather.com/images2022/03feb22/sunspotcounts.png
[4] https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2022/01/220126144204.htm
[5] https://youtu.be/QgJEkh1rNZg
[6] http://arrl.org/propagation-of-rf-signals
[7] http://arrl.org/the-sun-the-earth-the-ionosphere
[8] http://k9la.us/
[9] http://arrl.org/w1aw-bulletins-archive-propagation
[10] https://www.voacap.com/hf/
[11] http://arrl.org/bulletins
[12] mailto:k7ra@arrl.net

---
■ Synchronet ■ Whiskey Lover's Amateur Radio BBS

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.81
clearnet tor