RetroBBS - DOVE-Net.Synchronet_Programming - Add initial support for SFTP

Add initial support for SFTP

<65DD0C88.49078.syncprog@vert.synchro.net>

https://www.rocksolidbbs.com/dovenet/article-flat.php?id=3097&group=DOVE-Net.Synchronet_Programming#3097

copy link Newsgroups: DOVE-Net.Synchronet_Programming

From: deuc?@VERT (Deuc?)
To: GitLab note in main/sbbs
Subject: Add initial support for SFTP
Message-ID: <65DD0C88.49078.syncprog@vert.synchro.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 14:11:20 -0800
X-Comment-To: GitLab note in main/sbbs
Path: rocksolidbbs.com!not-for-mail
Organization: Vertrauen
Newsgroups: DOVE-Net.Synchronet_Programming
X-FTN-PID: Synchronet 3.20a-Linux master/3000ece51 Feb 24 2024 GCC 12.2.0
X-FTN-MSGID: 49078.syncprog@1:103/705 2a43023e
X-FTN-CHRS: CP437 2
WhenImported: 20240226141120-0800 41e0
WhenExported: 20240303164636-0800 41e0
ExportedFrom: VERT syncprog 49078
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=IBM437
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

by: Deuc? - Mon, 26 Feb 2024 22:11 UTC

https://gitlab.synchro.net/main/sbbs/-/merge_requests/415#note_4965

I'm using the sftp library (and newifc) to play with library interface concepts before I start hacking up ciolib (or start on a new ciolib replacement).

One of those things is planned to be "proper" C++ support instead of having C++ code call C functions... I'm generally becoming more and more of the opinion that extern "C" blocks in C++ code indicate bad choices, and am trying to work out what the alternative good choice looks like.

---
■ Synchronet ■ Vertrauen ■ Home of Synchronet ■ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net

Remember, even if you win the rat race -- you're still a rat.

dovenet / Synchronet Programming / Add initial support for SFTP