-=> Boraxman wrote to Dr. What <=-

Bo> Whatever definition of Socialism you have in mind, must be so broad
Bo> that it captures everything but your preferred 'ideal'. Which isn't
Bo> really a useful definition at all.

I see we have another miseducated person here. I suggest that you actually
read history - especially the areas of Italy, Germany and Russia just before
WWII.

Bo> OK, so everyone who has extolled the virtues of the Free Market, who

Ignoring the usual ignorant strawman people like you make: Take what I say to
an illogical extreme then claim I'm wrong because of that.

Bo> I didn't quote Marx. Show me which of Marx's quotes or words I used.
Bo> I'm not even a Marxist.

You did. But you not knowing you did shows your ignorance. Until you've
overcome that ignorance, it's not possible to discuss anything with you.

This is part of the problem with people like you: You "discuss" from a point
of "I'm right. Period." without entertaining the idea that you might be wrong.

So instead of listening, doing your own research, etc. and seeing for yourself,
you expect the person that you argue with to do all the research (and wasting
their time and energy) just for you to say "I don't agree."

.... Proofread carefully to see if you any words out!
___ MultiMail/Linux v0.52

--- Mystic BBS/QWK v1.12 A47 2021/12/25 (Windows/32)
* Origin: cold fusion - cfbbs.net - grand rapids, mi

Re: Re: Recession to Depressi
By: Dr. What to Boraxman on Tue Jul 19 2022 09:44 am

> I see we have another miseducated person here. I suggest that you actually
> read history - especially the areas of Italy, Germany and Russia just before
> WWII.
>

I'm familiar with that period of history.

> Ignoring the usual ignorant strawman people like you make: Take what I say
> to an illogical extreme then claim I'm wrong because of that.
> You did. But you not knowing you did shows your ignorance. Until you've
> overcome that ignorance, it's not possible to discuss anything with you.
>
> This is part of the problem with people like you: You "discuss" from a
> point of "I'm right. Period." without entertaining the idea that you might
> be wrong.

If I quoted Marx, you would then be able to provide the quote. All my replies are still here.

> So instead of listening, doing your own research, etc. and seeing for
> yourself, you expect the person that you argue with to do all the research
> (and wasting their time and energy) just for you to say "I don't agree."
>

You've done nothing but make vague accusations of Socialism because I dared to suggest that Capitalism wasn't all that peachy.

There isn't an argument here because you haven't made a point you've been able to substatiate yet.

---
■ Synchronet ■ MiND'S EYE BBS - Melb, Australia - mindseye.synchronetbbs.org