Message-ID:

"We don't have to protect the environment -- the Second Coming is at hand." -- James Watt

dovenet / Synchronet Discussion / Re: kermit protocol in sy

Re: kermit protocol in sy

<64DD32B2.50255.sync@vert.synchro.net>

https://www.rocksolidbbs.com/dovenet/article-flat.php?id=1328&group=DOVE-Net.Synchronet_Discussion#1328

copy link Newsgroups: DOVE-Net.Synchronet_Discussion

From: fusion@VERT/CFBBS (fusion)
To: paulie420
Subject: Re: kermit protocol in sy
Message-ID: <64DD32B2.50255.sync@vert.synchro.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 16:33:00 +0000
X-Comment-To: paulie420
Path: rocksolidbbs.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: DOVE-Net.Synchronet_Discussion
X-FTN-PID: Synchronet 3.20a-Linux master/99e8c77ca Jul 24 2023 GCC 12.2.0
X-FTN-MSGID: 50255.sync@1:103/705 29432d01
X-FTN-CHRS: ASCII 1
WhenImported: 20230816133354-0700 c1e0
WhenExported: 20230816141440-0700 c1e0
ExportedFrom: VERT sync 50255
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

by: fusion - Wed, 16 Aug 2023 16:33 UTC

On 16 Aug 2023, paulie420 said the following...
pa> I was able to get 600+ over kermit - about 4x the speeds I could get
pa> over other protocols... at any rate, I'd invite seeing kermit support,
pa> too. :P

is QW a mystic board? (specifically, using the internal zmodem) .. netrunner uses the same implementation and doesn't fare well according to the sexyz wiki page. maybe it just sucks.

reminds me of an article i read about DOS file sharing implementations from M$, IBM, etc.. after considerable effort tweaking,the results were kind of like "well, this would have been fast back then" .. even though the hardware is capable of 100x better.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A47 2021/12/25 (Windows/32)
* Origin: cold fusion - cfbbs.net - grand rapids, mi

Subject	Author
kermit protocol in sy	fusion