Message-ID:

Fights between cats and dogs are prohibited by statute in Barber, North Carolina.

dovenet / Synchronet Discussion / Re: Zonegated netmail

Re: Zonegated netmail

<63CF0F13.45867.dove-syncdisc@bbs.leenooks.net>

https://www.rocksolidbbs.com/dovenet/article-flat.php?id=3&group=DOVE-Net.Synchronet_Discussion#3

copy link Newsgroups: DOVE-Net.Synchronet_Discussion

From: deon@VERT/ALTERANT (deon)
To: Wilfred van Velzen
Subject: Re: Zonegated netmail
Message-ID: <63CF0F13.45867.dove-syncdisc@bbs.leenooks.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2023 02:49:55 +1100
X-Comment-To: Wilfred van Velzen
Path: rocksolidbbs.com!not-for-mail
Organization: Alterant
Newsgroups: DOVE-Net.Synchronet_Discussion
In-Reply-To: <63CEF953.48867.sync@vert.synchro.net>
References: <63CEF953.48867.sync@vert.synchro.net>
X-FTN-PID: Synchronet 3.19c-Linux custom/fb4e4ce96 Oct 27 2022 GCC 10.2.1
X-FTN-MSGID: 45867.dove-syncdisc@12:1/2 2834f83e
X-FTN-REPLY: 2:280/464 63cef8de
X-FTN-CHRS: CP437 2
WhenImported: 20230123145112-0800 41e0
WhenExported: 20230123161816-0800 41e0
ExportedFrom: VERT sync 48870
WhenImported: 20230124094955+1100 9258
WhenExported: 20230124095112+1100 9258
ExportedFrom: ALTERANT dove-syncdisc 45867
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=IBM437
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

by: deon - Mon, 23 Jan 2023 15:49 UTC

Re: Re: Zonegated netmail
By: Wilfred van Velzen to deon on Mon Jan 23 2023 10:14 pm

> What is in the INTL kludge for that mail?

The INTL kludge is correct as it should be, ie:

INTL 3:633/509 2:292/854

So I'm using sbbsecho is being smart and opening the packet and realising that it can route to 3:633/509 directly and ignoring the address in the packet header?

....δεσ∩

---
■ Synchronet ■ AnsiTEX bringing back videotex but with ANSI

Re: Zonegated netmail

<63CF915C.48879.sync@vert.synchro.net>

copy mid

https://www.rocksolidbbs.com/dovenet/article-flat.php?id=12&group=DOVE-Net.Synchronet_Discussion#12

copy link Newsgroups: DOVE-Net.Synchronet_Discussion

From: wilfred.van.velzen@VERT (Wilfred van Velzen)
To: deon
Subject: Re: Zonegated netmail
Message-ID: <63CF915C.48879.sync@vert.synchro.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2023 01:35:16 +0100
X-Comment-To: deon
Path: rocksolidbbs.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: DOVE-Net.Synchronet_Discussion
In-Reply-To: <63CF0F13.45867.dove-syncdisc@bbs.leenooks.net>
References: <63CF0F13.45867.dove-syncdisc@bbs.leenooks.net>
X-FTN-AREA: SYNCHRONET
X-FTN-PID: GED+LNX 1.1.5-b20161221
X-FTN-TID: FMail-lnx64 2.1.5.2-B20230114
X-FTN-MSGID: 2:280/464 63cf8a50
X-FTN-REPLY: 45867.dove-syncdisc@12:1/2 2834f83e
X-FTN-CHRS: UTF-8 2
X-FTN-SEEN-BY: 103/705 124/5016 153/757 154/10 203/0 221/0 240/1120 5832 280/464
X-FTN-PATH: 280/464
X-FTN-Kludge: RFC-X-No-Archive: Yes
WhenImported: 20230124000548-0800 41e0
WhenExported: 20230124041815-0800 41e0
ExportedFrom: VERT sync 48879
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

by: Wilfred van Velzen - Tue, 24 Jan 2023 00:35 UTC

Hi deon,

On 2023-01-24 09:49:55, you wrote to me:

>> What is in the INTL kludge for that mail?

de> The INTL kludge is correct as it should be, ie:

de> INTL 3:633/509 2:292/854

de> So I'm using sbbsecho is being smart and opening the packet and realising
de> that it can route to 3:633/509 directly and ignoring the address in the
de> packet header?

I don't know, but it's probably something like that...

Bye, Wilfred.

--- FMail-lnx64 2.1.5.2-B20230114
* Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)
� Synchronet � Vertrauen � Home of Synchronet � [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net

Subject	Author
Zonegated netmail	deon
Zonegated netmail	Wilfred van Velzen