All you political wonks are almost always wrong.

Want to be right for a change? Add an obligatory
Linux paragraph to your posts.

Or don't. After all, who am I to question such
brilliant political discourse?

ObLinux:

man apropos

ObPolitics:

For cola? Maybe Stallman and Wayland bad...
not slobbering over some kind of fscking
Cheeto Benito mobster.

--
-v

On 2/10/2024 11:25 PM, vallor wrote:
> All you political wonks are almost always wrong.
>
> Want to be right for a change? Add an obligatory
> Linux paragraph to your posts.
>
> Or don't. After all, who am I to question such
> brilliant political discourse?
>
> ObLinux:
>
> man apropos
>
> ObPolitics:
>
> For cola? Maybe Stallman and Wayland bad...
> not slobbering over some kind of fscking
> Cheeto Benito mobster.

Bloaty,

Today was National Cream Cheese Brownie Day. Did you have a few?

On Sat, 10 Feb 2024 23:53:11 -0500, DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote in
<RoYxN.84699$GX69.77308@fx46.iad>:

> On 2/10/2024 11:25 PM, vallor wrote:
>> All you political wonks are almost always wrong.
>>
>> Want to be right for a change? Add an obligatory Linux paragraph to
>> your posts.
>>
>> Or don't. After all, who am I to question such brilliant political
>> discourse?
>>
>> ObLinux:
>>
>> man apropos
>>
>> ObPolitics:
>>
>> For cola? Maybe Stallman and Wayland bad...
>> not slobbering over some kind of fscking Cheeto Benito mobster.
>
>
> Bloaty,
>
> Today was National Cream Cheese Brownie Day. Did you have a few?

I had a Korean burrito made with "Impossible burger" "meat".

Is it your contention that you eat healthier than I do? Because
you don't.

You also forgot about the Linux. (Remember the group? It's
a group about Linux.)

ObLinux:

SC(1) General Commands Manual SC(1)

NAME
sc - spreadsheet calculator

SYNOPSIS
sc [-a] [-c] [-e] [-m] [-n] [-o] [-q] [-r] [-v] [-x]
[-C] [-R] [-P range[/address] | /address] [-W range]
[file...]

DESCRIPTION
The spreadsheet calculator sc is based on rectangular
tables much like a financial spreadsheet.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
(I once used sc to ask "what if" questions about how many Estes "E"
motors it would take to send 0.5kg from LEO to the Moon.)
--
-v

vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:

>All you political wonks are almost always wrong.

I talk about Linux a lot, and much more in an advocacy sense than you
ever do, but that doesn't mean I'll refrain from off-topic talk.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

vallor wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Feb 2024 23:53:11 -0500, DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote in
> <RoYxN.84699$GX69.77308@fx46.iad>:
>
>> On 2/10/2024 11:25 PM, vallor wrote:
>>> All you political wonks are almost always wrong.
>>>
>>> Want to be right for a change? Add an obligatory Linux paragraph to
>>> your posts.
>>>
>>> Or don't. After all, who am I to question such brilliant political
>>> discourse?
>>>
>>> ObLinux:
>>>
>>> man apropos
>>>
>>> ObPolitics:
>>>
>>> For cola? Maybe Stallman and Wayland bad...
>>> not slobbering over some kind of fscking Cheeto Benito mobster.
>>
>>
>> Bloaty,
>>
>> Today was National Cream Cheese Brownie Day. Did you have a few?
>
> I had a Korean burrito made with "Impossible burger" "meat".
>
> Is it your contention that you eat healthier than I do? Because
> you don't.
>
> You also forgot about the Linux. (Remember the group? It's
> a group about Linux.)
>
> ObLinux:
>
> SC(1) General Commands Manual SC(1)
>
> NAME
> sc - spreadsheet calculator
>
> SYNOPSIS
> sc [-a] [-c] [-e] [-m] [-n] [-o] [-q] [-r] [-v] [-x]
> [-C] [-R] [-P range[/address] | /address] [-W range]
> [file...]
>
> DESCRIPTION
> The spreadsheet calculator sc is based on rectangular
> tables much like a financial spreadsheet.
> _ _ _ _ _ _ _
> (I once used sc to ask "what if" questions about how many Estes "E"
> motors it would take to send 0.5kg from LEO to the Moon.)
>
it's easier to just click

On Sun, 11 Feb 2024 00:20:50 -0500, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in
<38mgsi5nc9uts0v785o6f4avjo3a1gfnlj@4ax.com>:

> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>
>>All you political wonks are almost always wrong.
>
>
> I talk about Linux a lot, and much more in an advocacy sense than you
> ever do,

I wouldn't know, I never see your posts except within very
narrow parameters -- and there, I've almost always regretted it.

But paraphrasing Rev. Westley -- we don't have to think alike to
Linux alike.

> but that doesn't mean I'll refrain from off-topic talk.

You snipped the part out of my post where I said if you do,
maybe stick some Linux advocacy in an ObLinux paragraph
in your post.

Or not. Your choice, but think of the Linux famblees.

Consider: Such a paragraph included in these myriad
cross-posted monstrosities would send a message that
here, in cola, the topic is Linux Advocacy -- and that's
what they'll get if they show their face around here
anymore.

This could be the beginning of something big, Joel,
and you could be in on the ground floor.

--
-v

Le 11-02-2024, vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> a écrit :
> All you political wonks are almost always wrong.

Yes.

> Want to be right for a change? Add an obligatory
> Linux paragraph to your posts.

No.

> Or don't. After all, who am I to question such
> brilliant political discourse?

The purpose is not to question the political crap but to ignore it. If I
see a political message, I skip it. If I have to read it to find the
Linux related paragraph, I won't like it. I prefer having the political
garbage easy to ignore.

--
Si vous avez du temps à perdre :
https://scarpet42.gitlab.io

% wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> vallor wrote:
>> On Sat, 10 Feb 2024 23:53:11 -0500, DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote in
>> <RoYxN.84699$GX69.77308@fx46.iad>:
>>
>>> On 2/10/2024 11:25 PM, vallor wrote:
>>>> All you political wonks are almost always wrong.
>>>>
>>>> Want to be right for a change? Add an obligatory Linux paragraph to
>>>> your posts.
>>>>
>>>> Or don't. After all, who am I to question such brilliant political
>>>> discourse?
>>>>
>>>> ObLinux:
>>>>
>>>> man apropos
>>>>
>>>> ObPolitics:
>>>>
>>>> For cola? Maybe Stallman and Wayland bad...
>>>> not slobbering over some kind of fscking Cheeto Benito mobster.
>>>
>>> Bloaty,
>>>
>>> Today was National Cream Cheese Brownie Day. Did you have a few?
>>
>> I had a Korean burrito made with "Impossible burger" "meat".
>>
>> Is it your contention that you eat healthier than I do? Because
>> you don't.
>>
>> You also forgot about the Linux. (Remember the group? It's
>> a group about Linux.)
>>
>> ObLinux:
>>
>> SC(1) General Commands Manual SC(1)
>>
>> NAME
>> sc - spreadsheet calculator
>>
>> SYNOPSIS
>> sc [-a] [-c] [-e] [-m] [-n] [-o] [-q] [-r] [-v] [-x]
>> [-C] [-R] [-P range[/address] | /address] [-W range]
>> [file...]
>>
>> DESCRIPTION
>> The spreadsheet calculator sc is based on rectangular
>> tables much like a financial spreadsheet.
>> _ _ _ _ _ _ _
>> (I once used sc to ask "what if" questions about how many Estes "E"
>> motors it would take to send 0.5kg from LEO to the Moon.)
>>
> it's easier to just click

Nah. Either you "j" and "l" to the desired cell, or you lift your mouse hand
(wank hand?), move it to the mouse, move to the desired cell, click, then
move your hand back to the keyboard.

Now you are ready.

--
Try the Moo Shu Pork. It is especially good today.

vallor wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> Consider: Such a paragraph included in these myriad
> cross-posted monstrosities would send a message that
> here, in cola, the topic is Linux Advocacy -- and that's
> what they'll get if they show their face around here
> anymore.
>
> This could be the beginning of something big, Joel,
> and you could be in on the ground floor.

Certainly better than to grapple with a Russian firehose of falsehoods
accompanied with the written equivalent of a Gish gallop.

ObLinux:

$ aiksaurus gallop
=== traipse ==================
airing, amble, andante, ankle, barge, bundle, canter, caracole, clop,
constitutional, crawl, creep, dance, dead march, dogtrot, drub, flounce, foot,
footslog, footstep, forced march, fox trot, funeral march, gallop, hike,
hobble, hoof, hop, jaunt, jaywalk, jog, jog on, jog trot, jolt, leg, limp,
lope, lumber, lunge, lurch, march, mince, mush, pace, paddle, parade,
perambulate, plod, prance, promenade, rack, ramble, sashay, saunter, schlep,
scuff, scuffle, scuttle, shamble, sidle, slink, slither, slog, slouch, slow
motion, stagger, stomp, straddle, straggle, stride, stroll, strut, stump,
swagger, toddle, totter, traipse, tramp, trample, tread, troop, trot, trudge,
waddle, walk, wamble, wiggle, wobble

=== hop ======================
ax, bounce, canter, capriole, cavort, gallop, hightail, hop, hotfoot, hurdle,
jete, leap, leapfrog, lope, negotiate, pole vault, pounce, pounce upon,
prance, skip, sprint, start up, steeplechase, step lively, trot, vault

--
Abandon the search for Truth; settle for a good fantasy.

Le 11-02-2024, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> a écrit :
> % wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> it's easier to just click
>
> Nah. Either you "j" and "l" to the desired cell, or you lift your mouse hand
> (wank hand?), move it to the mouse, move to the desired cell, click, then
> move your hand back to the keyboard.
>
> Now you are ready.

Easier and faster are not the same.

--
Si vous avez du temps à perdre :
https://scarpet42.gitlab.io

vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:

>I never see your posts except within very
>narrow parameters -- and there, I've almost always regretted it.

Which is exactly why you can shut the fuck up and fuck off, asswipe.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

On 2/11/2024 12:12 AM, vallor wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Feb 2024 23:53:11 -0500, DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote in
> <RoYxN.84699$GX69.77308@fx46.iad>:
>
>> On 2/10/2024 11:25 PM, vallor wrote:
>>> All you political wonks are almost always wrong.
>>>
>>> Want to be right for a change? Add an obligatory Linux paragraph to
>>> your posts.
>>>
>>> Or don't. After all, who am I to question such brilliant political
>>> discourse?
>>>
>>> ObLinux:
>>>
>>> man apropos
>>>
>>> ObPolitics:
>>>
>>> For cola? Maybe Stallman and Wayland bad...
>>> not slobbering over some kind of fscking Cheeto Benito mobster.
>>
>>
>> Bloaty,
>>
>> Today was National Cream Cheese Brownie Day. Did you have a few?
>
> I had a Korean burrito made with "Impossible burger" "meat".

From a restaurant?

I eat veggie burgers every couple months (frozen mostly). Not my favorite.

> Is it your contention that you eat healthier than I do? Because
> you don't.

Probably not. What's your height and weight? I'm 6'1" and 215lbs.

> You also forgot about the Linux. (Remember the group? It's
> a group about Linux.)

You're right. Off-topic talk feels like a small violation. But I won't
stop doing it.

> ObLinux:
>
> SC(1) General Commands Manual SC(1)
>
> NAME
> sc - spreadsheet calculator
>
> SYNOPSIS
> sc [-a] [-c] [-e] [-m] [-n] [-o] [-q] [-r] [-v] [-x]
> [-C] [-R] [-P range[/address] | /address] [-W range]
> [file...]
>
> DESCRIPTION
> The spreadsheet calculator sc is based on rectangular
> tables much like a financial spreadsheet.
> _ _ _ _ _ _ _
> (I once used sc to ask "what if" questions about how many Estes "E"
> motors it would take to send 0.5kg from LEO to the Moon.)

owl (remember him?) was sexually obsessed with sc. It led to his mental
breakdown and incarceration.

On 2/11/2024 4:37 AM, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:

> If I
> see a political message, I skip it. If I have to read it to find the
> Linux related paragraph, I won't like it. I prefer having the political
> garbage easy to ignore.

Yes.

Joel wrote:
> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>
>> I never see your posts except within very
>> narrow parameters -- and there, I've almost always regretted it.
>
>
> Which is exactly why you can shut the fuck up and fuck off, asswipe.
>
you're such an angry little homo

On 2024-02-11, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
> vallor wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> Consider: Such a paragraph included in these myriad
>> cross-posted monstrosities would send a message that
>> here, in cola, the topic is Linux Advocacy -- and that's
>> what they'll get if they show their face around here
>> anymore.
>>
>> This could be the beginning of something big, Joel,
>> and you could be in on the ground floor.
>
> Certainly better than to grapple with a Russian firehose of falsehoods
> accompanied with the written equivalent of a Gish gallop.

Name one Russian falsehood spoken in the Putin interview. Much easier to
use knee-jerk character assassination than to state facts, isn't it?

I began to think you just put you brain in neutral and swallow whatever
bullshit the MSM feeds you. Facts are definitely NOT your forte. At least
not in the political realm.

> ObLinux:
>
> $ aiksaurus gallop
> === traipse ==================
> airing, amble, andante, ankle, barge, bundle, canter, caracole, clop,
> constitutional, crawl, creep, dance, dead march, dogtrot, drub, flounce, foot,
> footslog, footstep, forced march, fox trot, funeral march, gallop, hike,
> hobble, hoof, hop, jaunt, jaywalk, jog, jog on, jog trot, jolt, leg, limp,
> lope, lumber, lunge, lurch, march, mince, mush, pace, paddle, parade,
> perambulate, plod, prance, promenade, rack, ramble, sashay, saunter, schlep,
> scuff, scuffle, scuttle, shamble, sidle, slink, slither, slog, slouch, slow
> motion, stagger, stomp, straddle, straggle, stride, stroll, strut, stump,
> swagger, toddle, totter, traipse, tramp, trample, tread, troop, trot, trudge,
> waddle, walk, wamble, wiggle, wobble
>
> === hop ======================
> ax, bounce, canter, capriole, cavort, gallop, hightail, hop, hotfoot, hurdle,
> jete, leap, leapfrog, lope, negotiate, pole vault, pounce, pounce upon,
> prance, skip, sprint, start up, steeplechase, step lively, trot, vault
>
>

--
[Self-centered, Woke] "pride is a life of self-destructive fakery, an
entrapment to a false and self-created matrix of twisted unreality."
"It was pride that changed angels into devils..." — St. Augustine

On Sun, 11 Feb 2024 07:51:47 -0500, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in
<amghsitvp5me35p229g1vp1sk1lej41r5o@4ax.com>:

> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>
>>I never see your posts except within very narrow parameters -- and
>>there, I've almost always regretted it.
>
>
> Which is exactly why you can shut the fuck up and fuck off, asswipe.

Between this guy and DFS, cola has the "angsty teenager" market cornered.

My fault for even talking to them.

--
-v

vallor wrote:

>Between this guy and DFS, cola has the "angsty teenager" market cornered.
>
>My fault for even talking to them.

Especially DumFSck. As shitty and worthless a liar as has ever
haunted cola.

--
"I have to wonder why Linux users refuse to pay reasonable amounts for
software they claim is great? Is it a case of being cheap? Broke?
Greedy? All 3? There's no other way to explain it." - some dumb fsck

% <precent@yahoo.net> wrote:
>Joel wrote:
>> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>>
>>> I never see your posts except within very
>>> narrow parameters -- and there, I've almost always regretted it.
>>
>> Which is exactly why you can shut the fuck up and fuck off, asswipe.
>>
>you're such an angry little homo

Do something about it, then, bitch.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:

>>>I never see your posts except within very narrow parameters -- and
>>>there, I've almost always regretted it.
>>
>> Which is exactly why you can shut the fuck up and fuck off, asswipe.
>
>Between this guy and DFS, cola has the "angsty teenager" market cornered.
>
>My fault for even talking to them.

OK, faggot.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:

>"I have to wonder why Linux users refuse to pay reasonable amounts for
>software they claim is great? Is it a case of being cheap? Broke?
>Greedy? All 3? There's no other way to explain it." - some dumb fsck

I've donated to Mint multiple times including since my recent use on
the newer machine, and other FOSS projects.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

On 2024-02-11, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
> % <precent@yahoo.net> wrote:
>>Joel wrote:
>>> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I never see your posts except within very
>>>> narrow parameters -- and there, I've almost always regretted it.
>>>
>>> Which is exactly why you can shut the fuck up and fuck off, asswipe.
>>>
>>you're such an angry little homo
>
>
> Do something about it, then, bitch.

So are you a homo?
Asking for a friend.

--
pothead
Tommy Chong For President 2024.
Crazy Joe Biden Is A Demented Imbecile.
Impeach Joe Biden 2022.

Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> Le 11-02-2024, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> a écrit :
>> % wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>
>>> it's easier to just click
>>
>> Nah. Either you "j" and "l" to the desired cell, or you lift your mouse hand
>> (wank hand?), move it to the mouse, move to the desired cell, click, then
>> move your hand back to the keyboard.
>>
>> Now you are ready.
>
> Easier and faster are not the same.

Easier is faster.
Faster is easier.
Once you have learned the easier and faster.

--
You may my glories and my state dispose,
But not my griefs; still am I king of those.
-- William Shakespeare, "Richard II"

pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:

>So are you a homo?
>Asking for a friend.

I'm bisexual.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

On 2024-02-11, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>
>>So are you a homo?
>>Asking for a friend.
>
>
> I'm bisexual.
>

So that means you are half a homo.
Why?
Sounds unstable to my friend.

--
pothead
Tommy Chong For President 2024.
Crazy Joe Biden Is A Demented Imbecile.
Impeach Joe Biden 2022.

pothead wrote:
> On 2024-02-11, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>>
>>> So are you a homo?
>>> Asking for a friend.
>>
>>
>> I'm bisexual.
>>
>
> So that means you are half a homo.
> Why?
> Sounds unstable to my friend.
>
>
i thought only fags said homo