On Friday, December 2, 2005 at 3:02:59 PM UTC-2, Cyce wrote:
> Dear Sir,
>
> You find my range of values funny...
> I take it you don't believe it's possible, if this is the case could
> you please explain from your point of view why this is so.
>
> If your basis is the counting problem let me quash that silly, but true
> statement.
> The counting problem is true in that the number of finite states within
> a certain range is less than the number of infinite states.
> The counting problem, however falsely implies that a small number of
> states can't reproduce a larger number of states.
> I will use an example based on something not under the NDA, since I use
> other methods.
> 256^256 = 3.231700607131100730071487668867e+616 : 1-byte=>1-byte =>
> many bytes
> A simple example that demonstrates how two small values can combine to
> form a larger value. You may argue that it's only one state and this
> is true, however if you look at the range of the first and the range of
> the second byte there are 65,536 states. The counting argument is
> broken when you include cross referenced meaning, as in the above
> example, combined with recursive manipulation and disclude the infinite
> range.
> ie the truth is only as true as the next truth The difference between
> the earth being round and the earth being flat is not far apart
> mathematically and neither is true, the earth is neither round nor
> flat, but both and neither.
> If you have any other reason why my statements may be wrong I'd love to
> hear your thoughts on the matter so that I may verify them and the
> accuracy of my program,
> Cyce

Hello Cyce, are you still there? I did come across a limitless data compression system on my own. Are you willing to start a conversation?