RetroBBS - alt.html - Re: IPv6 vs XHTML specification.

IPv6 vs XHTML specification.

<t5lujl$dg6$1@txtcon.i2p>

https://www.rocksolidbbs.com/devel/article-flat.php?id=577&group=alt.html#577

Path: i2pn2.org!rocksolid2!txtcon.i2p!.POSTED.127.163.152.53!not-for-mail
From: invalid@invalid.invalid (Miner)
Newsgroups: alt.html
Subject: IPv6 vs XHTML specification.
Date: Fri, 13 May 2022 15:48:07 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: TxtCon.I2P
Message-ID: <t5lujl$dg6$1@txtcon.i2p>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 13 May 2022 15:48:07 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: txtcon.i2p; posting-account="miner"; posting-host="127.163.152.53";
logging-data="13830"; mail-complaints-to="txtcon@i2pmail.org"

by: Miner - Fri, 13 May 2022 15:48 UTC

Re: IPv6 vs XHTML specification.

<slrnt7t9tk.icg.g.kreme@zephyrus.lan>

copy mid

https://www.rocksolidbbs.com/devel/article-flat.php?id=579&group=alt.html#579

copy link Newsgroups: alt.html

Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!kreme.dont-email.me!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: g.kreme@kreme.dont-email.me (Lewis)
Newsgroups: alt.html
Subject: Re: IPv6 vs XHTML specification.
Date: Fri, 13 May 2022 18:47:16 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: Miskatonic U
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <slrnt7t9tk.icg.g.kreme@zephyrus.lan>
References: <t5lujl$dg6$1@txtcon.i2p>
Reply-To: g.kreme@gmail.don-t-email-me.com
Injection-Date: Fri, 13 May 2022 18:47:16 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: kreme.dont-email.me; posting-host="4dfd53aaf09c22fd80602f16fa36143a";
logging-data="9758"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18lo2vzYwhlQLe7rj89CpDs"
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Darwin)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Py4JAR8veqEES8bhNS5vMcJdluQ=
X-Face: )^b5"R:T7U>9~:PEn3YkzMfW*[b1qKeU.fP9C8~8HpU9}lA&6`bH1z
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
Mail-Copies-To: nobody

by: Lewis - Fri, 13 May 2022 18:47 UTC

In message <t5lujl$dg6$1@txtcon.i2p> Miner <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> How to make hyperlink to IPv6 address without violation of XHTML
> specification?

You will have to be way more detailed in what your issue is.

Also, why the fuck XHTML? that was an experiment that utterly failed,
which is why we have a much more sensible and clean HTML5.

--
'And I suppose you know what sound is made by one hand clapping, do
you?' said the holy man nastily. YES. CL. THE OTHER HAND MAKES
THE AP.

Re: IPv6 vs XHTML specification.

<4skhqoswqp2r$.4a08ixtem7nc$.dlg@40tude.net>

copy mid

https://www.rocksolidbbs.com/devel/article-flat.php?id=581&group=alt.html#581

copy link Newsgroups: alt.html

Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: jj4public@gmail.com (JJ)
Newsgroups: alt.html
Subject: Re: IPv6 vs XHTML specification.
Date: Sat, 14 May 2022 06:58:08 +0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <4skhqoswqp2r$.4a08ixtem7nc$.dlg@40tude.net>
References: <t5lujl$dg6$1@txtcon.i2p>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="06f37f5751712a86d005e5ac6acb495b";
logging-data="20352"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18+DU5L/LwYuQu2r/34STiI9GXfzxZxXj8="
User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.84
Cancel-Lock: sha1:FqGg3muvIADkCy7lQb6KkZtzj4c=
X-Bitcoin: 1LcqwCQBQmhcWfWsVEAeyLchkAY8ZfuMnS
X-Face: \*\`0(1j~VfYC>ebz[&O.]=,Nm\oRM{of,liRO#7Eqi4|!]!(Gs=Akgh{J)605>C9Air?pa d{sSZ09u+A7f<^paR"/NH_#<mE1S"hde\c6PZLUB[t/s5-+Iu5DSc?P0+4%,Hl

by: JJ - Fri, 13 May 2022 23:58 UTC

On Fri, 13 May 2022 15:48:07 -0000 (UTC), Miner wrote:
> How to make hyperlink to IPv6 address without violation of XHTML
> specification?

Make sure the IPv6 address is wrapped using square brackets. e.g.

https://[::1]/

And AFAIK you'll have to use Transitional XHTML, instead of Strict.

Re: IPv6 vs XHTML specification.

<t5np7j$ite$1@txtcon.i2p>

copy mid

https://www.rocksolidbbs.com/devel/article-flat.php?id=582&group=alt.html#582

copy link Newsgroups: alt.html

Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!rocksolid2!txtcon.i2p!.POSTED.127.163.152.53!not-for-mail
From: invalid@invalid.invalid (Miner)
Newsgroups: alt.html
Subject: Re: IPv6 vs XHTML specification.
Date: Sat, 14 May 2022 08:28:37 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: TxtCon.I2P
Message-ID: <t5np7j$ite$1@txtcon.i2p>
References: <t5lujl$dg6$1@txtcon.i2p> <4skhqoswqp2r$.4a08ixtem7nc$.dlg@40tude.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 14 May 2022 08:28:37 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: txtcon.i2p; posting-account="miner"; posting-host="127.163.152.53";
logging-data="19374"; mail-complaints-to="txtcon@i2pmail.org"

by: Miner - Sat, 14 May 2022 08:28 UTC

JJ wrote:

> On Fri, 13 May 2022 15:48:07 -0000 (UTC), Miner wrote:
> > How to make hyperlink to IPv6 address without violation of XHTML
> > specification?
>
> Make sure the IPv6 address is wrapped using square brackets. e.g.
>
> https://[::1]/
>
> And AFAIK you'll have to use Transitional XHTML, instead of Strict.

I have use "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN".

On line '<a
href="http://[218:e61f:301a:8985:d364:9076:5680:2771]">IPv6</a>'
Tidy 5.7.45 complain: "line 39 column 82 - Warning: <a> illegal
characters found in URI".

--
Miner

Re: IPv6 vs XHTML specification.

<t5nq84$jhn$1@txtcon.i2p>

copy mid

https://www.rocksolidbbs.com/devel/article-flat.php?id=583&group=alt.html#583

copy link Newsgroups: alt.html

Path: i2pn2.org!rocksolid2!txtcon.i2p!.POSTED.127.163.152.53!not-for-mail
From: invalid@invalid.invalid (Miner)
Newsgroups: alt.html
Subject: Re: IPv6 vs XHTML specification.
Date: Sat, 14 May 2022 08:45:57 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: TxtCon.I2P
Message-ID: <t5nq84$jhn$1@txtcon.i2p>
References: <t5lujl$dg6$1@txtcon.i2p> <slrnt7t9tk.icg.g.kreme@zephyrus.lan>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 14 May 2022 08:45:57 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: txtcon.i2p; posting-account="miner"; posting-host="127.163.152.53";
logging-data="20023"; mail-complaints-to="txtcon@i2pmail.org"

by: Miner - Sat, 14 May 2022 08:45 UTC

Lewis wrote:

> In message <t5lujl$dg6$1@txtcon.i2p> Miner <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> > How to make hyperlink to IPv6 address without violation of
> > XHTML specification?
>
> You will have to be way more detailed in what your issue is.

Tidy complain on hyperlink: http://[::1]/

> Also, why the fuck XHTML? that was an experiment that utterly
> failed, which is why we have a much more sensible and clean
> HTML5.

XHTML satisfy all my needs, except this one rudiment.

--
Miner

Re: IPv6 vs XHTML specification.

<1kzl9d1gkwxcb.103wtqa0hgfam.dlg@40tude.net>

copy mid

https://www.rocksolidbbs.com/devel/article-flat.php?id=586&group=alt.html#586

copy link Newsgroups: alt.html

Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: jj4public@gmail.com (JJ)
Newsgroups: alt.html
Subject: Re: IPv6 vs XHTML specification.
Date: Sun, 15 May 2022 09:20:45 +0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <1kzl9d1gkwxcb.103wtqa0hgfam.dlg@40tude.net>
References: <t5lujl$dg6$1@txtcon.i2p> <4skhqoswqp2r$.4a08ixtem7nc$.dlg@40tude.net> <t5np7j$ite$1@txtcon.i2p>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="aa56d6997939bdf7f6516589b8f03ab1";
logging-data="13566"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/9GYWzl3uJ/Ea7bHkF5B9ZxtTBlPVdtE0="
User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.84
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Muk+StkpzNQOI+GOIysXP8G9zN8=
X-Bitcoin: 1LcqwCQBQmhcWfWsVEAeyLchkAY8ZfuMnS
X-Face: \*\`0(1j~VfYC>ebz[&O.]=,Nm\oRM{of,liRO#7Eqi4|!]!(Gs=Akgh{J)605>C9Air?pa d{sSZ09u+A7f<^paR"/NH_#<mE1S"hde\c6PZLUB[t/s5-+Iu5DSc?P0+4%,Hl

by: JJ - Sun, 15 May 2022 02:20 UTC

On Sat, 14 May 2022 08:28:37 -0000 (UTC), Miner wrote:
>
> I have use "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN".
>
> On line '<a
> href="http://[218:e61f:301a:8985:d364:9076:5680:2771]">IPv6</a>'
> Tidy 5.7.45 complain: "line 39 column 82 - Warning: <a> illegal
> characters found in URI".

Use W3C's Validator. Don't use third party software/library.

Re: IPv6 vs XHTML specification.

<slrnt83tdn.2bc7.g.kreme@zephyrus.local>

copy mid

https://www.rocksolidbbs.com/devel/article-flat.php?id=591&group=alt.html#591

copy link Newsgroups: alt.html

Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!kreme.dont-email.me!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: g.kreme@kreme.dont-email.me (Lewis)
Newsgroups: alt.html
Subject: Re: IPv6 vs XHTML specification.
Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 06:56:56 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: Miskatonic U
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <slrnt83tdn.2bc7.g.kreme@zephyrus.local>
References: <t5lujl$dg6$1@txtcon.i2p> <slrnt7t9tk.icg.g.kreme@zephyrus.lan>
<t5nq84$jhn$1@txtcon.i2p>
Reply-To: g.kreme@gmail.don-t-email-me.com
Injection-Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 06:56:56 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: kreme.dont-email.me; posting-host="db97336a054d0450984f989c62b49605";
logging-data="7605"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/NZKYZYGhqRptGa2c5iwvV"
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Darwin)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:xTAyxpeJSumRrPedUWDCGq0MKKY=
X-Face: )^b5"R:T7U>9~:PEn3YkzMfW*[b1qKeU.fP9C8~8HpU9}lA&6`bH1z
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
Mail-Copies-To: nobody

by: Lewis - Mon, 16 May 2022 06:56 UTC

In message <t5nq84$jhn$1@txtcon.i2p> Miner <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> Lewis wrote:

>> In message <t5lujl$dg6$1@txtcon.i2p> Miner <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>> > How to make hyperlink to IPv6 address without violation of
>> > XHTML specification?
>>
>> You will have to be way more detailed in what your issue is.

> Tidy complain on hyperlink: http://[::1]/

Tidy complaining is not an indication of violating XHTML spec.

This is the validation check <https://validator.w3.org/nu/>

>> Also, why the fuck XHTML? that was an experiment that utterly
>> failed, which is why we have a much more sensible and clean
>> HTML5.

> XHTML satisfy all my needs, except this one rudiment.

Again, there is no reasons to use XHTML and good reasons not to, but
you be you. You *will* have problems because XHTML has been pretty much
abandoned.

--
Lobotomy means never having to say you're sorry -- or anything else.

IOT trap -- core dumped

devel / alt.html / Re: IPv6 vs XHTML specification.

Subject	Author
IPv6 vs XHTML specification.	Miner
Re: IPv6 vs XHTML specification.	Lewis
Re: IPv6 vs XHTML specification.	Miner
Re: IPv6 vs XHTML specification.	Lewis
Re: IPv6 vs XHTML specification.	JJ
Re: IPv6 vs XHTML specification.	Miner
Re: IPv6 vs XHTML specification.	JJ