Rocksolid Light

Welcome to RetroBBS

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

We can defeat gravity. The problem is the paperwork involved.


computers / comp.sys.ibm.ps2.hardware / Re: IBM XGA-2 vs CL-GD5426 and others

SubjectAuthor
* IBM XGA-2 vs CL-GD5426 and othersJonathan Carron
`* Re: IBM XGA-2 vs CL-GD5426 and othersChristian Holzapfel
 `- Re: IBM XGA-2 vs CL-GD5426 and othersJonathan Carron

1
IBM XGA-2 vs CL-GD5426 and others

<09b8883c-d52f-4da0-afd7-916a5ecd9295n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.rocksolidbbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=4432&group=comp.sys.ibm.ps2.hardware#4432

  copy link   Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.ps2.hardware
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:17ab:b0:783:3765:7860 with SMTP id ay43-20020a05620a17ab00b0078337657860mr16098qkb.1.1704932998002;
Wed, 10 Jan 2024 16:29:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:2a71:b0:3bd:27c7:605b with SMTP id
fu17-20020a0568082a7100b003bd27c7605bmr2900oib.7.1704932997641; Wed, 10 Jan
2024 16:29:57 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.ps2.hardware
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 16:29:57 -0800 (PST)
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=104.158.36.35; posting-account=I9w2UgoAAABuOtFGjjGYd2bGNgC8ZwGv
NNTP-Posting-Host: 104.158.36.35
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <09b8883c-d52f-4da0-afd7-916a5ecd9295n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: IBM XGA-2 vs CL-GD5426 and others
From: jcarron2@gmail.com (Jonathan Carron)
Injection-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 00:29:57 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 1938
 by: Jonathan Carron - Thu, 11 Jan 2024 00:29 UTC

Hi,

Wondering if there is any knowledge out there, I have a Reply80 board in my model 80, with the boring Cirrus Logic 5426. Would there be any improvement in dropping in a XGA-2 card in terms of video performance (speed) ? I realize that both are 1mb cards, ( perhaps the 5426 can maybe be increase to 2mb by soldering on sockets/installing chips for higher resolutions, read something about drivers not supporting this though).

Anyways other than filling in the model 80 with an additional card to cover the missing slot cover, drawing a few more watts, and things looking cooler with the side panel off, would the XGA-2 card perform faster at VGA resolution tasks, eg a game, or Win/OS2 gui performance (not that I'd be able to notice any of it) ?

Maybe I should just try the landmark benchmark and see how many CPS each can do?

TIA,
Jonathan

Re: IBM XGA-2 vs CL-GD5426 and others

<5e8d47fc-6677-4234-81ab-93e659205f90n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.rocksolidbbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=4452&group=comp.sys.ibm.ps2.hardware#4452

  copy link   Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.ps2.hardware
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:4513:b0:783:3a73:b974 with SMTP id t19-20020a05620a451300b007833a73b974mr10315qkp.7.1704993301220;
Thu, 11 Jan 2024 09:15:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:3496:b0:6dc:4f6:4ea6 with SMTP id
c22-20020a056830349600b006dc04f64ea6mr2630otu.1.1704993301027; Thu, 11 Jan
2024 09:15:01 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!nntp.comgw.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.ps2.hardware
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 09:15:00 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <09b8883c-d52f-4da0-afd7-916a5ecd9295n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=31.18.86.150; posting-account=FPBAAwoAAAAHSuAFWDSUBrkdVBQ0jD3u
NNTP-Posting-Host: 31.18.86.150
References: <09b8883c-d52f-4da0-afd7-916a5ecd9295n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <5e8d47fc-6677-4234-81ab-93e659205f90n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: IBM XGA-2 vs CL-GD5426 and others
From: google@holzapfel.biz (Christian Holzapfel)
Injection-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 17:15:01 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Bytes: 1340
 by: Christian Holzapfel - Thu, 11 Jan 2024 17:15 UTC

Generally the XGA-2 deliver superior 2D performance compared to the "1MB Short SVGA". Accelerated drivers are available for Windows 95 and 98, but also under 3.1 or OS/2 it will be noticeably faster.

Re: IBM XGA-2 vs CL-GD5426 and others

<71b6656d-bc65-49b0-a78d-103878590159n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.rocksolidbbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=4460&group=comp.sys.ibm.ps2.hardware#4460

  copy link   Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.ps2.hardware
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:5096:b0:680:cd41:352 with SMTP id kk22-20020a056214509600b00680cd410352mr5680qvb.7.1705021979592;
Thu, 11 Jan 2024 17:12:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:4488:b0:6dd:e657:7c1e with SMTP id
r8-20020a056830448800b006dde6577c1emr48020otv.5.1705021979390; Thu, 11 Jan
2024 17:12:59 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!border-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.ps2.hardware
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 17:12:59 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <5e8d47fc-6677-4234-81ab-93e659205f90n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=104.158.36.35; posting-account=I9w2UgoAAABuOtFGjjGYd2bGNgC8ZwGv
NNTP-Posting-Host: 104.158.36.35
References: <09b8883c-d52f-4da0-afd7-916a5ecd9295n@googlegroups.com> <5e8d47fc-6677-4234-81ab-93e659205f90n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <71b6656d-bc65-49b0-a78d-103878590159n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: IBM XGA-2 vs CL-GD5426 and others
From: jcarron2@gmail.com (Jonathan Carron)
Injection-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 01:12:59 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 5
 by: Jonathan Carron - Fri, 12 Jan 2024 01:12 UTC

On Thursday 11 January 2024 at 12:15:01 UTC-5, Christian Holzapfel wrote:
> Generally the XGA-2 deliver superior 2D performance compared to the "1MB Short SVGA". Accelerated drivers are available for Windows 95 and 98, but also under 3.1 or OS/2 it will be noticeably faster.

thanks for the input! Will see if I get some time to fiddle with it and maybe do some comparisons...

Jonathan

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.8
clearnet tor