Rocksolid Light

Welcome to RetroBBS

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

Noncombatant: A dead Quaker. -- Ambrose Bierce


computers / alt.os.linux.ubuntu / Ubuntu Cinnamon vs Linux Mint Debian Edition

SubjectAuthor
* Ubuntu Cinnamon vs Linux Mint Debian EditionYrrah
`- Re: Ubuntu Cinnamon vs Linux Mint Debian EditionMike Easter

1
Ubuntu Cinnamon vs Linux Mint Debian Edition

<bkncji5dctu4qmadr7jdis1a6h0d3d2j78@net.com>

  copy mid

https://www.rocksolidbbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=3568&group=alt.os.linux.ubuntu#3568

  copy link   Newsgroups: alt.os.linux.mint alt.os.linux.ubuntu
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!peer02.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer02.ams4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx01.ams4.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Yrrah-aolm@aolm.invalid (Yrrah)
Newsgroups: alt.os.linux.mint,alt.os.linux.ubuntu
Subject: Ubuntu Cinnamon vs Linux Mint Debian Edition
Sender: Yrrah <Yrrah-aolm@aolm.invalid>
Organization: Subversion International
Message-ID: <bkncji5dctu4qmadr7jdis1a6h0d3d2j78@net.com>
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 26
X-Complaints-To: http://support.highwinds-media.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 11:57:57 UTC
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 13:57:57 +0200
X-Received-Bytes: 1958
 by: Yrrah - Mon, 23 Oct 2023 11:57 UTC

x-posted: alt.os.linux.mint,alt.os.linux.ubuntu

"This week we begin with a side-by-side look at Linux Mint's Debian
Edition running the Cinnamon desktop along with Ubuntu Cinnamon."

"(...) I'm all in favour of hobby projects, building something for the
educational aspect, and producing similar projects with different
philosophies. In this specific case though, I do find myself wondering
what the motivation is for creating and maintaining Ubuntu Cinnamon as
an official flavour of Ubuntu. Linux Mint is basically Ubuntu (or
Debian, depending on the edition) with the Cinnamon desktop, some
custom utilities, and some added polish. Mint has been a user
friendly, capable member of the Debian/Ubuntu family for over a decade
and a go-to distribution for people who want a beginner friendly
experience.(...)
Linux Mint 6 'Debian Edition' is another solid release from the Mint
project with a lot of polish and friendly touches put into it. Ubuntu
Cinnamon 23.10 offers the usual, friendly Ubuntu base, but (apart from
looking nice) doesn't manage to offer a particularly good experience
with the Cinnamon desktop."
More:
http://distrowatch.org/weekly.php?issue=20231023#ubuntucinnamon

Well, I suppose that settles it then.

Yrrah

Re: Ubuntu Cinnamon vs Linux Mint Debian Edition

<kpnmt4Fg6asU1@mid.individual.net>

  copy mid

https://www.rocksolidbbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=3569&group=alt.os.linux.ubuntu#3569

  copy link   Newsgroups: alt.os.linux.mint alt.os.linux.ubuntu
Path: i2pn2.org!rocksolid2!news.neodome.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: MikeE@ster.invalid (Mike Easter)
Newsgroups: alt.os.linux.mint,alt.os.linux.ubuntu
Subject: Re: Ubuntu Cinnamon vs Linux Mint Debian Edition
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 09:56:02 -0700
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <kpnmt4Fg6asU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <bkncji5dctu4qmadr7jdis1a6h0d3d2j78@net.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net HXX2uwQnnRt/fVC11agHNA+l9iXQ+h8HlAMDUEKpKmHxURbiad
Cancel-Lock: sha1:firIAvGAQbQ6Ilo3Us/wjnyZGm8= sha256:gKvJgRKYk5DLtf74MHr8oNk0Wl2KfnLyaHkVBI6x7ms=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/68.10.0
In-Reply-To: <bkncji5dctu4qmadr7jdis1a6h0d3d2j78@net.com>
Content-Language: en-US
 by: Mike Easter - Mon, 23 Oct 2023 16:56 UTC

Yrrah wrote:
> x-posted: alt.os.linux.mint,alt.os.linux.ubuntu
>
> "This week we begin with a side-by-side look at Linux Mint's Debian
> Edition running the Cinnamon desktop along with Ubuntu Cinnamon."
>
Transparency: I'm a big fan of LM and its extras, I'm not a fan of some
of Ub's decisions such as Snap and particularly not its flagship Gnome,
so I would be somewhat biased in my view of his comparison, but some of
the result was 'predictable'.

LMDE is based on Deb *stable*. Ub is based on Deb *testing* plus
tweaked into Ub repo/s. Doh. I wonder which is going to be more
stable. kernel 6.5 vs 6.1

LM incl DE is all about making its desktops 'similarly' polished based
on the fact that they have dropped anything that isn't based on gtk's
toolkits and that LM Cinnamon 'polish' of the flagship LM Cinnamon is
'transferred' to the LMDE which has /only/ the Cinn DE.

So, in a sense, in a half-hearted 'defense' of the Ub Cinn 'team', it
isn't' /exactly/ a fair comparison and we could predict that they would
come up short.

I also find that 'bloat' in the Ub release 'unnecessary' and unwanted:
LMDE 2.5G UbCinn 5.9G.

--
Mike Easter

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.8
clearnet tor