Rocksolid Light

Welcome to RetroBBS

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

I'm not sure whether that's actually useful... -- Larry Wall in <199710011704.KAA21395@wall.org>


computers / alt.folklore.computers / Re: Tubes vs. Integrated circuits

SubjectAuthor
* Tubes vs. Integrated circuitsundefined Hancock-4
+* Re: Tubes vs. Integrated circuitsCharlie Gibbs
|+* Re: Tubes vs. Integrated circuitsRobin Vowels
||+* Re: Tubes vs. Integrated circuitsundefined Hancock-4
|||`* Re: Tubes vs. Integrated circuitsQuadibloc
||| +- Re: Tubes vs. Integrated circuitsRobin Vowels
||| `* Re: Tubes vs. Integrated circuitsundefined Hancock-4
|||  `- Re: Tubes vs. Integrated circuitsRobin Vowels
||+- Re: Tubes vs. Integrated circuitsBob Eager
||`- Re: Tubes vs. Integrated circuitsRobin Vowels
|`* Re: Tubes vs. Integrated circuitsThomas Koenig
| `* Re: Tubes vs. Integrated circuitsAhem A Rivet's Shot
|  +- Re: Tubes vs. Integrated circuitsgareth evans
|  `* Re: Tubes vs. Integrated circuitsDouglas Miller
|   `- Re: Tubes vs. Integrated circuitsScott Lurndal
+- Re: Tubes vs. Integrated circuitsAhem A Rivet's Shot
+* Re: Tubes vs. Integrated circuitsRobin Vowels
|`- Re: Tubes vs. Integrated circuitsundefined Hancock-4
`- Re: Tubes vs. Integrated circuitsDennis Boone

1
Tubes vs. Integrated circuits

<97005cb0-1c1f-4256-baa7-295802a797f1n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.rocksolidbbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=2660&group=alt.folklore.computers#2660

  copy link   Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers
X-Received: by 2002:a37:6884:: with SMTP id d126mr17649610qkc.497.1623699840159; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 12:44:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:1021:: with SMTP id k1mr710477qvr.4.1623699840043; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 12:44:00 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!paganini.bofh.team!news.dns-netz.com!news.freedyn.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed7.news.xs4all.nl!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 12:43:59 -0700 (PDT)
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=8.41.192.198; posting-account=WKyNOQkAAACNglsCZiIox1kdy9R-66KH
NNTP-Posting-Host: 8.41.192.198
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <97005cb0-1c1f-4256-baa7-295802a797f1n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Tubes vs. Integrated circuits
From: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com (undefined Hancock-4)
Injection-Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 19:44:00 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 50
 by: undefined Hancock-4 - Mon, 14 Jun 2021 19:43 UTC

In the early 1960s, Electronics Magazine hosted advertisements for both vacuum tubes and the new integrated circuits.

Vacuum tubes were still very much around. Manufacturers invested in improvements in performance, reliability, and cost. New tubes were developed for hi-fi/stereo, UHF and color television, and military needs.

Integrated circuits, the earliest chips, were just being advertised.

Here are examples of ads both tubes and ICs. The tube ads are interesting as they show the various improvements being made to tubes in the early 1960s.

TI solid circuit--I think this is a pioneer integrated circuit from TI, uses the phrase "integrated circuit bars".
https://worldradiohistory.com/hd2/IDX-Site-Technical/Engineering-General/Archive-Electronics-IDX/IDX/60s/62/Electronics-1962-08-24-OCR-Page-0014.pdf#search=%22solid%20circuit%20semiconductor%22
https://worldradiohistory.com/hd2/IDX-Site-Technical/Engineering-General/Archive-Electronics-IDX/IDX/60s/62/Electronics-1962-08-24-OCR-Page-0015.pdf#search=%22solid%20circuit%20semiconductor%22

Fairchild --building a microcircuit
https://worldradiohistory.com/hd2/IDX-Site-Technical/Engineering-General/Archive-Electronics-IDX/IDX/60s/63/Electronics-1963-03-01-OCR-Page-0074.pdf#search=%22custom%20toggle%20circuit%22
https://worldradiohistory.com/hd2/IDX-Site-Technical/Engineering-General/Archive-Electronics-IDX/IDX/60s/63/Electronics-1963-03-01-OCR-Page-0075.pdf#search=%22custom%20toggle%20circuit%22

Tung Sol Compactron
https://worldradiohistory.com/hd2/IDX-Site-Technical/Engineering-General/Archive-Electronics-IDX/IDX/60s/62/Electronics-1962-08-24-OCR-Page-0009.pdf#search=%22tung%20sol%20compactron%22

Tung Sol computer tube
https://worldradiohistory.com/hd2/IDX-Site-Technical/Engineering-General/Archive-Electronics-IDX/IDX/60s/62/Electronics-1962-07-27-OCR-Page-0009.pdf#search=%22tung-sol%20computer%20tube%22

Hitachi tubes
https://worldradiohistory.com/hd2/IDX-Site-Technical/Engineering-General/Archive-Electronics-IDX/IDX/60s/62/Electronics-1962-09-14-OCR-Page-0081.pdf#search=%22international%20importer%22

RCA Novar hi-fi tubes
https://worldradiohistory.com/hd2/IDX-Site-Technical/Engineering-General/Archive-Electronics-IDX/IDX/60s/62/Electronics-1962-04-13-OCR-Page-0120.pdf#search=%22rca%20t-12%20novar%22

RCA high sensitivity low cost tube
https://worldradiohistory.com/hd2/IDX-Site-Technical/Engineering-General/Archive-Electronics-IDX/IDX/60s/62/Electronics-1962-09-07-OCR-Page-0234.pdf#search=%2250eh5%22

RCA bonded cathode
https://worldradiohistory.com/hd2/IDX-Site-Technical/Engineering-General/Archive-Electronics-IDX/IDX/60s/63/Electronics-1963-11-15-OCR-Page-0108.pdf#search=%22rca%20bonded%20cathode%22

RCA dark heater
https://worldradiohistory.com/hd2/IDX-Site-Technical/Engineering-General/Archive-Electronics-IDX/IDX/60s/61/Electronics-1961-03-03-OCR-Page-0100.pdf#search=%22rca%20dark%20heater%22
https://worldradiohistory.com/hd2/IDX-Site-Technical/Engineering-General/Archive-Electronics-IDX/IDX/60s/61/Electronics-1961-09-01-OCR-Page-0080.pdf#search=%22rca%20dark%20heater%22

Raytheon improved tubes
https://worldradiohistory.com/hd2/IDX-Site-Technical/Engineering-General/Archive-Electronics-IDX/IDX/60s/62/Electronics-1962-09-14-OCR-Page-0017.pdf#search=%22raytheon%20reliable%20receiving%22

GE five star tubes
https://worldradiohistory.com/hd2/IDX-Site-Technical/Engineering-General/Archive-Electronics-IDX/IDX/60s/61/Electronics-1961-07-07-OCR-Page-0067.pdf#search=%22highest%20reliability%22

Sylvania computer tubes
https://worldradiohistory.com/hd2/IDX-Site-Technical/Engineering-General/Archive-Electronics-IDX/IDX/60s/63/Electronics-1963-12-20-OCR-Page-0017.pdf#search=%22sylvania%20computer%20tube%22

https://worldradiohistory.com/hd2/IDX-Site-Technical/Engineering-General/Archive-Electronics-IDX/IDX/60s/60/Electronics-1960-11-25-OCR-Page-0019.pdf#search=%22sylvania%20tube%20news%20computer%22

Amperex premium
https://worldradiohistory.com/hd2/IDX-Site-Technical/Engineering-General/Archive-Electronics-IDX/IDX/60s/60/Electronics-1960-09-23-OCR-Page-0029.pdf#search=%22computer%20pentode%22

Re: Tubes vs. Integrated circuits

<sa8hat06v6@news3.newsguy.com>

  copy mid

https://www.rocksolidbbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=2662&group=alt.folklore.computers#2662

  copy link   Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!news.uzoreto.com!news-out.netnews.com!news.alt.net!fdc2.netnews.com!peer02.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!spln!extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!news3
From: cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid (Charlie Gibbs)
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers
Subject: Re: Tubes vs. Integrated circuits
Date: 14 Jun 2021 21:22:37 GMT
Organization: NewsGuy - Unlimited Usenet $23.95
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <sa8hat06v6@news3.newsguy.com>
References: <97005cb0-1c1f-4256-baa7-295802a797f1n@googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: p915d66cbbef9e4cfe512d5cb372d5c159814b285f8057c18.newsdawg.com
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
X-Received-Bytes: 1877
 by: Charlie Gibbs - Mon, 14 Jun 2021 21:22 UTC

On 2021-06-14, undefined Hancock-4 <hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com> wrote:

> In the early 1960s, Electronics Magazine hosted advertisements for
> both vacuum tubes and the new integrated circuits.
>
> Vacuum tubes were still very much around. Manufacturers invested
> in improvements in performance, reliability, and cost. New tubes
> were developed for hi-fi/stereo, UHF and color television, and
> military needs.
>
> Integrated circuits, the earliest chips, were just being advertised.

<snip>

I remember that when transistor radios first came out, a big selling
point was that when you turned them on, they started playing instantly;
you didn't have to wait for the tubes to warm up. TVs still needed
some tubes, but developed "instant-on" circuits that kept a low
voltage on the heaters so that they'd come up quickly.

Nowadays, with nary a tube in sight, it takes just as long for
a TV to become ready. I tell people that it's warming up (and
usually get a blank stare in response).

--
/~\ Charlie Gibbs | They don't understand Microsoft
\ / <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> | has stolen their car and parked
X I'm really at ac.dekanfrus | a taxi in their driveway.
/ \ if you read it the right way. | -- Mayayana

Re: Tubes vs. Integrated circuits

<20210614225348.49a82619362986235658e054@eircom.net>

  copy mid

https://www.rocksolidbbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=2663&group=alt.folklore.computers#2663

  copy link   Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: steveo@eircom.net (Ahem A Rivet's Shot)
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers
Subject: Re: Tubes vs. Integrated circuits
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 22:53:48 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <20210614225348.49a82619362986235658e054@eircom.net>
References: <97005cb0-1c1f-4256-baa7-295802a797f1n@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="2a96f93bf554d1f74c4b86f9354bb49f";
logging-data="23528"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+tzuTOQrFRnKmD0Y4trD8p0RoG4n97YbE="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:N65BaqzfrK/uMlYFK5cnN/PeABI=
X-Newsreader: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; amd64-portbld-freebsd12.1)
X-Clacks-Overhead: "GNU Terry Pratchett"
 by: Ahem A Rivet's - Mon, 14 Jun 2021 21:53 UTC

On Mon, 14 Jun 2021 12:43:59 -0700 (PDT)
undefined Hancock-4 <hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com> wrote:

> Tung Sol computer tube

Tung Sol valves are still made, there's a matched pair of their
EL34s in my Marshall head.

--
Steve O'Hara-Smith | Directable Mirror Arrays
C:\>WIN | A better way to focus the sun
The computer obeys and wins. | licences available see
You lose and Bill collects. | http://www.sohara.org/

Re: Tubes vs. Integrated circuits

<bc42cf32-ff0f-45b1-af4f-9bddb82e749fn@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.rocksolidbbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=2665&group=alt.folklore.computers#2665

  copy link   Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers
X-Received: by 2002:a37:c447:: with SMTP id h7mr19331167qkm.63.1623730377370;
Mon, 14 Jun 2021 21:12:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:ae9:f812:: with SMTP id x18mr19747263qkh.11.1623730377235;
Mon, 14 Jun 2021 21:12:57 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 21:12:57 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <97005cb0-1c1f-4256-baa7-295802a797f1n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=202.67.103.232; posting-account=S_MdrwoAAAD7T2pxG2e393dk6y0tc0Le
NNTP-Posting-Host: 202.67.103.232
References: <97005cb0-1c1f-4256-baa7-295802a797f1n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <bc42cf32-ff0f-45b1-af4f-9bddb82e749fn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Tubes vs. Integrated circuits
From: robin.vowels@gmail.com (Robin Vowels)
Injection-Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 04:12:57 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
 by: Robin Vowels - Tue, 15 Jun 2021 04:12 UTC

On Tuesday, June 15, 2021 at 5:44:00 AM UTC+10, undefined Hancock-4 wrote:
> In the early 1960s, Electronics Magazine hosted advertisements for both vacuum tubes and the new integrated circuits.
>
> Vacuum tubes were still very much around. Manufacturers invested in improvements in performance, reliability, and cost. New tubes were developed for hi-fi/stereo, UHF and color television, and military needs.
>
> Integrated circuits, the earliest chips, were just being advertised.
>
> Here are examples of ads both tubes and ICs. The tube ads are interesting as they show the various improvements being made to tubes in the early 1960s.
>
> TI solid circuit--I think this is a pioneer integrated circuit from TI, uses the phrase "integrated circuit bars".
> https://worldradiohistory.com/hd2/IDX-Site-Technical/Engineering-General/Archive-Electronics-IDX/IDX/60s/62/Electronics-1962-08-24-OCR-Page-0014.pdf#search=%22solid%20circuit%20semiconductor%22
> https://worldradiohistory.com/hd2/IDX-Site-Technical/Engineering-General/Archive-Electronics-IDX/IDX/60s/62/Electronics-1962-08-24-OCR-Page-0015.pdf#search=%22solid%20circuit%20semiconductor%22
>
> Fairchild --building a microcircuit
> https://worldradiohistory.com/hd2/IDX-Site-Technical/Engineering-General/Archive-Electronics-IDX/IDX/60s/63/Electronics-1963-03-01-OCR-Page-0074.pdf#search=%22custom%20toggle%20circuit%22
> https://worldradiohistory.com/hd2/IDX-Site-Technical/Engineering-General/Archive-Electronics-IDX/IDX/60s/63/Electronics-1963-03-01-OCR-Page-0075.pdf#search=%22custom%20toggle%20circuit%22
>
> Tung Sol Compactron
> https://worldradiohistory.com/hd2/IDX-Site-Technical/Engineering-General/Archive-Electronics-IDX/IDX/60s/62/Electronics-1962-08-24-OCR-Page-0009.pdf#search=%22tung%20sol%20compactron%22
>
> Tung Sol computer tube
> https://worldradiohistory.com/hd2/IDX-Site-Technical/Engineering-General/Archive-Electronics-IDX/IDX/60s/62/Electronics-1962-07-27-OCR-Page-0009.pdf#search=%22tung-sol%20computer%20tube%22
>
> Hitachi tubes
> https://worldradiohistory.com/hd2/IDX-Site-Technical/Engineering-General/Archive-Electronics-IDX/IDX/60s/62/Electronics-1962-09-14-OCR-Page-0081.pdf#search=%22international%20importer%22
..
High quality tubes for computer use were developed long before this.
For example, E92CC and E90CC were premium tubes from Mullard, with long life and
slow degradation of performance during their life, compared to the radio tubes ECC92 and ECC90,
respectively. These were in use in computers in the 1950s.
..
Tubes having multiple elements were developed in Germany in the 1920s.
Others were developed in the 1930s, including the 19, or 1J6, the 1D8-GT,
the 3A8-GT, and the 6J6 (already mentioned, possibly developed in the 1940s).

> RCA Novar hi-fi tubes
> https://worldradiohistory.com/hd2/IDX-Site-Technical/Engineering-General/Archive-Electronics-IDX/IDX/60s/62/Electronics-1962-04-13-OCR-Page-0120.pdf#search=%22rca%20t-12%20novar%22
>
> RCA high sensitivity low cost tube
> https://worldradiohistory.com/hd2/IDX-Site-Technical/Engineering-General/Archive-Electronics-IDX/IDX/60s/62/Electronics-1962-09-07-OCR-Page-0234.pdf#search=%2250eh5%22
>
> RCA bonded cathode
> https://worldradiohistory.com/hd2/IDX-Site-Technical/Engineering-General/Archive-Electronics-IDX/IDX/60s/63/Electronics-1963-11-15-OCR-Page-0108.pdf#search=%22rca%20bonded%20cathode%22
>
> RCA dark heater
> https://worldradiohistory.com/hd2/IDX-Site-Technical/Engineering-General/Archive-Electronics-IDX/IDX/60s/61/Electronics-1961-03-03-OCR-Page-0100.pdf#search=%22rca%20dark%20heater%22
> https://worldradiohistory.com/hd2/IDX-Site-Technical/Engineering-General/Archive-Electronics-IDX/IDX/60s/61/Electronics-1961-09-01-OCR-Page-0080.pdf#search=%22rca%20dark%20heater%22
>
> Raytheon improved tubes
> https://worldradiohistory.com/hd2/IDX-Site-Technical/Engineering-General/Archive-Electronics-IDX/IDX/60s/62/Electronics-1962-09-14-OCR-Page-0017.pdf#search=%22raytheon%20reliable%20receiving%22
>
> GE five star tubes
> https://worldradiohistory.com/hd2/IDX-Site-Technical/Engineering-General/Archive-Electronics-IDX/IDX/60s/61/Electronics-1961-07-07-OCR-Page-0067.pdf#search=%22highest%20reliability%22
>
> Sylvania computer tubes
> https://worldradiohistory.com/hd2/IDX-Site-Technical/Engineering-General/Archive-Electronics-IDX/IDX/60s/63/Electronics-1963-12-20-OCR-Page-0017.pdf#search=%22sylvania%20computer%20tube%22
>
> https://worldradiohistory.com/hd2/IDX-Site-Technical/Engineering-General/Archive-Electronics-IDX/IDX/60s/60/Electronics-1960-11-25-OCR-Page-0019.pdf#search=%22sylvania%20tube%20news%20computer%22
>
> Amperex premium
> https://worldradiohistory.com/hd2/IDX-Site-Technical/Engineering-General/Archive-Electronics-IDX/IDX/60s/60/Electronics-1960-09-23-OCR-Page-0029.pdf#search=%22computer%20pentode%22

Re: Tubes vs. Integrated circuits

<1acc1ef6-26a6-4d83-a9d9-bcb132bb8c8en@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.rocksolidbbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=2668&group=alt.folklore.computers#2668

  copy link   Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:91c:: with SMTP id v28mr1565877qkv.249.1623734756643;
Mon, 14 Jun 2021 22:25:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:12e5:: with SMTP id f5mr1378109qkl.406.1623734756467;
Mon, 14 Jun 2021 22:25:56 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 22:25:56 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <sa8hat06v6@news3.newsguy.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=202.67.103.232; posting-account=S_MdrwoAAAD7T2pxG2e393dk6y0tc0Le
NNTP-Posting-Host: 202.67.103.232
References: <97005cb0-1c1f-4256-baa7-295802a797f1n@googlegroups.com> <sa8hat06v6@news3.newsguy.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <1acc1ef6-26a6-4d83-a9d9-bcb132bb8c8en@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Tubes vs. Integrated circuits
From: robin.vowels@gmail.com (Robin Vowels)
Injection-Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 05:25:56 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
 by: Robin Vowels - Tue, 15 Jun 2021 05:25 UTC

On Tuesday, June 15, 2021 at 7:23:30 AM UTC+10, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
> On 2021-06-14, undefined Hancock-4 <hanc...@bbs.cpcn.com> wrote:
>
> > In the early 1960s, Electronics Magazine hosted advertisements for
> > both vacuum tubes and the new integrated circuits.
> >
> > Vacuum tubes were still very much around. Manufacturers invested
> > in improvements in performance, reliability, and cost. New tubes
> > were developed for hi-fi/stereo, UHF and color television, and
> > military needs.
> >
> > Integrated circuits, the earliest chips, were just being advertised.
> <snip>
>
> I remember that when transistor radios first came out, a big selling
> point was that when you turned them on, they started playing instantly;
> you didn't have to wait for the tubes to warm up.
..
Valves operating from batteries featured instant warm-up
(the 0.5ma series such as 1R5, 3V4, 1S4, and so on). These
were mainly used in portable radios.
..
Tubes for TV in the 1950s had controlled heater warm-up time
of 11 seconds. Earlier tubes took about 20-30 seconds.
..
> TVs still needed
> some tubes, but developed "instant-on" circuits that kept a low
> voltage on the heaters so that they'd come up quickly.
>
> Nowadays, with nary a tube in sight, it takes just as long for
> a TV to become ready.
..
Takes just as long as a tube TV (around 10 seconds) because
that's how long the computer takes to "get going".
..
The 6J6 that I mentioned in previous post was available
by 1945 (may have been available in 1942).
..
> I tell people that it's warming up (and
> usually get a blank stare in response).

Re: Tubes vs. Integrated circuits

<VdWdnSq26PGUoFX9nZ2dnUU7-X_NnZ2d@giganews.com>

  copy mid

https://www.rocksolidbbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=2669&group=alt.folklore.computers#2669

  copy link   Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!feeder1.feed.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!tr1.eu1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 00:39:21 -0500
Sender: Dennis Boone <drb@yagi.h-net.org>
From: drb@ihatespam.msu.edu (Dennis Boone)
Subject: Re: Tubes vs. Integrated circuits
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers
References: <97005cb0-1c1f-4256-baa7-295802a797f1n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: tin/2.4.5-20201224 ("Glen Albyn") (FreeBSD/12.2-RELEASE-p4 (amd64))
Message-ID: <VdWdnSq26PGUoFX9nZ2dnUU7-X_NnZ2d@giganews.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 00:39:21 -0500
Lines: 12
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-PD4NE94aMoNTc1s2Aispj80cosp3v3A118AVhYTTg8yS3PUo+z4jz2w4WFt7hsSC1QsjCtKCSd/7QHJ!tsg842BpyFJqbthaJsKalnhYFP789Dd6cLhJiXcD+dzeGBqHbuYpUaFVOQd22PWHORgJoPY=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 1511
 by: Dennis Boone - Tue, 15 Jun 2021 05:39 UTC

> Vacuum tubes were still very much around.

Vacuum tubes still _are_ around. In the US, the tv and radio broadcast
transmitters are migrating to solid state (GatesAir has an 80kW UHF
digital television transmitter, for example), but there are still plenty
of systems out there using tubes bigger than your head to generate tens
of thousands of watts.

I think Svetlana is still producing smaller stuff for audio and ham type
applications, too.

De

Re: Tubes vs. Integrated circuits

<sa9tb3$ujn$1@newsreader4.netcologne.de>

  copy mid

https://www.rocksolidbbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=2675&group=alt.folklore.computers#2675

  copy link   Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!paganini.bofh.team!news.dns-netz.com!news.freedyn.net!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!.POSTED.2001-4dd6-26b3-0-7285-c2ff-fe6c-992d.ipv6dyn.netcologne.de!not-for-mail
From: tkoenig@netcologne.de (Thomas Koenig)
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers
Subject: Re: Tubes vs. Integrated circuits
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 09:53:39 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: news.netcologne.de
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <sa9tb3$ujn$1@newsreader4.netcologne.de>
References: <97005cb0-1c1f-4256-baa7-295802a797f1n@googlegroups.com>
<sa8hat06v6@news3.newsguy.com>
Injection-Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 09:53:39 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: newsreader4.netcologne.de; posting-host="2001-4dd6-26b3-0-7285-c2ff-fe6c-992d.ipv6dyn.netcologne.de:2001:4dd6:26b3:0:7285:c2ff:fe6c:992d";
logging-data="31351"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@netcologne.de"
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
 by: Thomas Koenig - Tue, 15 Jun 2021 09:53 UTC

Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> schrieb:
> On 2021-06-14, undefined Hancock-4 <hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com> wrote:
>
>> In the early 1960s, Electronics Magazine hosted advertisements for
>> both vacuum tubes and the new integrated circuits.
>>
>> Vacuum tubes were still very much around. Manufacturers invested
>> in improvements in performance, reliability, and cost. New tubes
>> were developed for hi-fi/stereo, UHF and color television, and
>> military needs.
>>
>> Integrated circuits, the earliest chips, were just being advertised.
>
><snip>
>
> I remember that when transistor radios first came out, a big selling
> point was that when you turned them on, they started playing instantly;
> you didn't have to wait for the tubes to warm up. TVs still needed
> some tubes, but developed "instant-on" circuits that kept a low
> voltage on the heaters so that they'd come up quickly.

Transistor radios effectively killed of a promising market
for Stirling motors. They could simply run on batteries...

Re: Tubes vs. Integrated circuits

<20210615131116.9030056db183570c89052958@eircom.net>

  copy mid

https://www.rocksolidbbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=2676&group=alt.folklore.computers#2676

  copy link   Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: steveo@eircom.net (Ahem A Rivet's Shot)
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers
Subject: Re: Tubes vs. Integrated circuits
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 13:11:16 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <20210615131116.9030056db183570c89052958@eircom.net>
References: <97005cb0-1c1f-4256-baa7-295802a797f1n@googlegroups.com>
<sa8hat06v6@news3.newsguy.com>
<sa9tb3$ujn$1@newsreader4.netcologne.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="2a96f93bf554d1f74c4b86f9354bb49f";
logging-data="7697"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/KRgZA6wLLFJOvefsaswzExzo5pIvjCS4="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:o4yLBX7psONI7K0fLwVCUEfd+Us=
X-Newsreader: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; amd64-portbld-freebsd12.1)
X-Clacks-Overhead: "GNU Terry Pratchett"
 by: Ahem A Rivet's - Tue, 15 Jun 2021 12:11 UTC

On Tue, 15 Jun 2021 09:53:39 -0000 (UTC)
Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> wrote:

> Transistor radios effectively killed of a promising market
> for Stirling motors. They could simply run on batteries...

I recall a battery valve radio, with two batteries a 6V one for the
heaters and a 90V one for the HT - testing the 90V one by tongue was
inadvisable.

--
Steve O'Hara-Smith | Directable Mirror Arrays
C:\>WIN | A better way to focus the sun
The computer obeys and wins. | licences available see
You lose and Bill collects. | http://www.sohara.org/

Re: Tubes vs. Integrated circuits

<saac00$dml$1@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://www.rocksolidbbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=2677&group=alt.folklore.computers#2677

  copy link   Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: headstone255@yahoo.com (gareth evans)
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers
Subject: Re: Tubes vs. Integrated circuits
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 15:03:42 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <saac00$dml$1@dont-email.me>
References: <97005cb0-1c1f-4256-baa7-295802a797f1n@googlegroups.com>
<sa8hat06v6@news3.newsguy.com> <sa9tb3$ujn$1@newsreader4.netcologne.de>
<20210615131116.9030056db183570c89052958@eircom.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 14:03:44 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="1419549ecf37d44b6bff3109d752b3ae";
logging-data="14037"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+1cJzYlahPDeNGOftYaQVN"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/45.8.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:1NRW7w9xg5QrkxLSCRKkcnLq9ZM=
In-Reply-To: <20210615131116.9030056db183570c89052958@eircom.net>
 by: gareth evans - Tue, 15 Jun 2021 14:03 UTC

On 15/06/2021 13:11, Ahem A Rivet's Shot wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jun 2021 09:53:39 -0000 (UTC)
> Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> wrote:
>
>> Transistor radios effectively killed of a promising market
>> for Stirling motors. They could simply run on batteries...
>
> I recall a battery valve radio, with two batteries a 6V one for the
> heaters and a 90V one for the HT - testing the 90V one by tongue was
> inadvisable.
>

A recent Repair Shop episode had 10-off PP3 batteries wire in series
to create the 90V for an old repair

Re: Tubes vs. Integrated circuits

<bf2d31e1-43c4-4848-9f9d-29e05ce3cbb9n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.rocksolidbbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=2678&group=alt.folklore.computers#2678

  copy link   Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5710:: with SMTP id 16mr515090qtw.165.1623775719528;
Tue, 15 Jun 2021 09:48:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a0c:cd87:: with SMTP id v7mr6354007qvm.42.1623775719380;
Tue, 15 Jun 2021 09:48:39 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!news.uzoreto.com!news-out.netnews.com!news.alt.net!fdc3.netnews.com!peer01.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 09:48:39 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20210615131116.9030056db183570c89052958@eircom.net>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=96.42.194.246; posting-account=5XW4vgoAAADMD8xScYja8bdzAXoYQrTS
NNTP-Posting-Host: 96.42.194.246
References: <97005cb0-1c1f-4256-baa7-295802a797f1n@googlegroups.com>
<sa8hat06v6@news3.newsguy.com> <sa9tb3$ujn$1@newsreader4.netcologne.de> <20210615131116.9030056db183570c89052958@eircom.net>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <bf2d31e1-43c4-4848-9f9d-29e05ce3cbb9n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Tubes vs. Integrated circuits
From: durgadas311@gmail.com (Douglas Miller)
Injection-Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 16:48:39 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 2220
 by: Douglas Miller - Tue, 15 Jun 2021 16:48 UTC

On Tuesday, June 15, 2021 at 7:30:02 AM UTC-5, Ahem A Rivet's Shot wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jun 2021 09:53:39 -0000 (UTC)
> Thomas Koenig <tko...@netcologne.de> wrote:
>
> > Transistor radios effectively killed of a promising market
> > for Stirling motors. They could simply run on batteries...
> I recall a battery valve radio, with two batteries a 6V one for the
> heaters and a 90V one for the HT - testing the 90V one by tongue was
> inadvisable.
>...

I acquired a "farm radio" awhile ago, vacuum tubes and batteries (something like 6V and 90V). Even had an odd "cell" that was used to force a voltage drop (replaced by modern "coin cell" battery). They were apparently fairly common in this part of the country, as many farms did not have electricity until the latter half of the 20th century. I'm not sure if transistor radios butted up against that market, but it would have been close.

Re: Tubes vs. Integrated circuits

<1o5yI.24844$341.16106@fx42.iad>

  copy mid

https://www.rocksolidbbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=2679&group=alt.folklore.computers#2679

  copy link   Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!4.us.feeder.erje.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!feeder1.feed.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!peer02.ams4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx42.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
X-newsreader: xrn 9.03-beta-14-64bit
Sender: scott@dragon.sl.home (Scott Lurndal)
From: scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal)
Reply-To: slp53@pacbell.net
Subject: Re: Tubes vs. Integrated circuits
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers
References: <97005cb0-1c1f-4256-baa7-295802a797f1n@googlegroups.com> <sa8hat06v6@news3.newsguy.com> <sa9tb3$ujn$1@newsreader4.netcologne.de> <20210615131116.9030056db183570c89052958@eircom.net> <bf2d31e1-43c4-4848-9f9d-29e05ce3cbb9n@googlegroups.com>
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <1o5yI.24844$341.16106@fx42.iad>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@usenetserver.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 17:25:17 UTC
Organization: UsenetServer - www.usenetserver.com
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 17:25:17 GMT
X-Received-Bytes: 2030
 by: Scott Lurndal - Tue, 15 Jun 2021 17:25 UTC

Douglas Miller <durgadas311@gmail.com> writes:
>On Tuesday, June 15, 2021 at 7:30:02 AM UTC-5, Ahem A Rivet's Shot wrote:
>> On Tue, 15 Jun 2021 09:53:39 -0000 (UTC)=20
>> Thomas Koenig <tko...@netcologne.de> wrote:=20
>>=20
>> > Transistor radios effectively killed of a promising market=20
>> > for Stirling motors. They could simply run on batteries...
>> I recall a battery valve radio, with two batteries a 6V one for the=20
>> heaters and a 90V one for the HT - testing the 90V one by tongue was=20
>> inadvisable.
>>...
>
>I acquired a "farm radio" awhile ago, vacuum tubes and batteries (something=
> like 6V and 90V). Even had an odd "cell" that was used to force a voltage =
>drop (replaced by modern "coin cell" battery). They were apparently fairly =
>common in this part of the country, as many farms did not have electricity =
>until the latter half of the 20th century. I'm not sure if transistor radio=
>s butted up against that market, but it would have been close.

A Stewart Warner model 303, by any chance?

I've got the one from my Grandparents attic in Wisconsin.

Requires an "A" battery and two "B" (45v) batteries.

Re: Tubes vs. Integrated circuits

<663f019a-db0e-4e40-b900-3834bd727e1fn@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.rocksolidbbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=2680&group=alt.folklore.computers#2680

  copy link   Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:15d3:: with SMTP id o19mr1272904qkm.481.1623786661716; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 12:51:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:d4e:: with SMTP id o14mr1387289qkl.402.1623786661576; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 12:51:01 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news.uzoreto.com!tr3.eu1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 12:51:01 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <bc42cf32-ff0f-45b1-af4f-9bddb82e749fn@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=8.41.192.198; posting-account=WKyNOQkAAACNglsCZiIox1kdy9R-66KH
NNTP-Posting-Host: 8.41.192.198
References: <97005cb0-1c1f-4256-baa7-295802a797f1n@googlegroups.com> <bc42cf32-ff0f-45b1-af4f-9bddb82e749fn@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <663f019a-db0e-4e40-b900-3834bd727e1fn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Tubes vs. Integrated circuits
From: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com (undefined Hancock-4)
Injection-Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 19:51:01 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 60
 by: undefined Hancock-4 - Tue, 15 Jun 2021 19:51 UTC

On Tuesday, June 15, 2021 at 12:12:58 AM UTC-4, Robin Vowels wrote:

> High quality tubes for computer use were developed long before this.
> For example, E92CC and E90CC were premium tubes from Mullard, with long life and
> slow degradation of performance during their life, compared to the radio tubes ECC92 and ECC90,
> respectively. These were in use in computers in the 1950s.
> .
> Tubes having multiple elements were developed in Germany in the 1920s.
> Others were developed in the 1930s, including the 19, or 1J6, the 1D8-GT,
> the 3A8-GT, and the 6J6 (already mentioned, possibly developed in the 1940s).

The point was to show that tube makers were still improving their products even after integrated circuits came out. RCA and others would run ads for tubes for years to come.

In the early 1950s, IBM had trouble getting acceptable tubes for its computers. Apparently so did the rest of the industrial world. In the late 1950s tube makers advertised premium grade tubes.

Some ads for premium tubes;

Tungsol
https://worldradiohistory.com/hd2/IDX-Site-Technical/Engineering-General/Archive-Electronics-IDX/IDX/50s/51/Electronics-1951-03-OCR-Page-0029.pdf#search=%22tung%20sol%20electron%20tubes%22
https://worldradiohistory.com/hd2/IDX-Site-Technical/Engineering-General/Archive-Electronics-IDX/IDX/50s/51/Electronics-1951-03-OCR-Page-0030.pdf#search=%22tung%20sol%20electron%20tubes%22

Sylvania computer tube 1958
https://worldradiohistory.com/hd2/IDX-Site-Technical/Engineering-General/Archive-Electronics-IDX/IDX/50s/57/Electronics-1957-08-OCR-Page-0105.pdf#search=%22computer%20%20tube%22

GE cmputer tube 1957
https://worldradiohistory.com/hd2/IDX-Site-Technical/Engineering-General/Archive-Electronics-IDX/IDX/50s/57/Electronics-1957-04-OCR-Page-0053.pdf#search=%22computer%20%20tube%22

RCA preferred
https://worldradiohistory.com/hd2/IDX-Site-Technical/Engineering-General/Archive-Electronics-IDX/IDX/50s/58/Electronics-1958-08-15-OCR-Page-0172.pdf#search=%22improved%20cathode%22

Speaking of Mullard, here are some ads from them:
Mullard Tubes

seven tubes for stereo
https://worldradiohistory.com/hd2/IDX-Site-Technical/Engineering-General/Archive-Electronics-IDX/IDX/50s/59/Electronics-1959-10-23-OCR-Page-0059.pdf#search=%22type%2045%22

low noise pentode
https://worldradiohistory.com/hd2/IDX-Site-Technical/Engineering-General/Archive-Electronics-IDX/IDX/60s/60/Electronics-1960-10-21-OCR-Page-0111.pdf#search=%22mullard%22

high gain double triode
https://worldradiohistory.com/hd2/IDX-Site-Technical/Engineering-General/Archive-Electronics-IDX/IDX/60s/60/Electronics-1960-11-25-OCR-Page-0073.pdf#search=%22mullard%22

high slope pentode
https://worldradiohistory.com/hd2/IDX-Site-Technical/Engineering-General/Archive-Electronics-IDX/IDX/60s/61/Electronics-1961-09-15-OCR-Page-0073.pdf#search=%22mullard%22

vairable mu pentode
https://worldradiohistory.com/hd2/IDX-Site-Technical/Engineering-General/Archive-Electronics-IDX/IDX/60s/62/Electronics-1962-01-26-OCR-Page-0020.pdf#search=%22mullard%22

VHF triode
https://worldradiohistory.com/hd2/IDX-Site-Technical/Engineering-General/Archive-Electronics-IDX/IDX/60s/63/Electronics-1963-01-25-OCR-Page-0101.pdf#search=%22mullard%22

high gain i.f. pentode
https://worldradiohistory.com/hd2/IDX-Site-Technical/Engineering-General/Archive-Electronics-IDX/IDX/60s/63/Electronics-1963-03-22-OCR-Page-0097.pdf#search=%22mullard%22

audio amp
https://worldradiohistory.com/hd2/IDX-Site-Technical/Engineering-General/Archive-Electronics-IDX/IDX/50s/56/Electronics-1956-02-OCR-Page-0116.pdf#search=%22mullard%20high%20fidelity%22

hi-fi pentode
https://worldradiohistory.com/hd2/IDX-Site-Technical/Engineering-General/Archive-Electronics-IDX/IDX/50s/59/Electronics-1959-04-10-OCR-Page-0008.pdf#search=%22mullard%20high%20fidelity%22

Re: Tubes vs. Integrated circuits

<d514d3c3-4dd4-4b39-8321-45475dc01885n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.rocksolidbbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=2682&group=alt.folklore.computers#2682

  copy link   Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers
X-Received: by 2002:a37:a38d:: with SMTP id m135mr1384797qke.36.1623786742225;
Tue, 15 Jun 2021 12:52:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:44c4:: with SMTP id b4mr1285153qto.181.1623786742105;
Tue, 15 Jun 2021 12:52:22 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!paganini.bofh.team!news.dns-netz.com!news.freedyn.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed8.news.xs4all.nl!news.uzoreto.com!news-out.netnews.com!news.alt.net!fdc2.netnews.com!peer03.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 12:52:21 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1acc1ef6-26a6-4d83-a9d9-bcb132bb8c8en@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=8.41.192.198; posting-account=WKyNOQkAAACNglsCZiIox1kdy9R-66KH
NNTP-Posting-Host: 8.41.192.198
References: <97005cb0-1c1f-4256-baa7-295802a797f1n@googlegroups.com>
<sa8hat06v6@news3.newsguy.com> <1acc1ef6-26a6-4d83-a9d9-bcb132bb8c8en@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <d514d3c3-4dd4-4b39-8321-45475dc01885n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Tubes vs. Integrated circuits
From: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com (undefined Hancock-4)
Injection-Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 19:52:22 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Bytes: 1491
 by: undefined Hancock-4 - Tue, 15 Jun 2021 19:52 UTC

On Tuesday, June 15, 2021 at 1:25:57 AM UTC-4, Robin Vowels wrote:

> The 6J6 that I mentioned in previous post was available
> by 1945 (may have been available in 1942).

I believe IBM mentioned that particular tube as especially troublesome (write up in bitsavers).

Re: Tubes vs. Integrated circuits

<iitl6qFbau0U1@mid.individual.net>

  copy mid

https://www.rocksolidbbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=2687&group=alt.folklore.computers#2687

  copy link   Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!lilly.ping.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: news0009@eager.cx (Bob Eager)
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers
Subject: Re: Tubes vs. Integrated circuits
Date: 16 Jun 2021 06:48:58 GMT
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <iitl6qFbau0U1@mid.individual.net>
References: <97005cb0-1c1f-4256-baa7-295802a797f1n@googlegroups.com>
<sa8hat06v6@news3.newsguy.com>
<1acc1ef6-26a6-4d83-a9d9-bcb132bb8c8en@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net 5jQ7Lx9AXKSLiZA8bkVwHQS3p9d09cF67q5wU71Yh8E5fzj+Eu
Cancel-Lock: sha1:eG9BRtcv5K0aHVS9VdfLyP+ejwU=
User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a
git.gnome.org/pan2)
 by: Bob Eager - Wed, 16 Jun 2021 06:48 UTC

On Mon, 14 Jun 2021 22:25:56 -0700, Robin Vowels wrote:

> Valves operating from batteries featured instant warm-up (the 0.5ma
> series such as 1R5, 3V4, 1S4, and so on). These were mainly used in
> portable radios.

The first radio I built used valves with a 1.4v filament, quick warm-up,
and 90v anode voltage. They were designed for battery use, of course, but
I used a transformer (lots of exposed main terminals...)

Valves were (British designation) DF96, DAF96, DK96, DL96. B7G base.

--
Using UNIX since v6 (1975)...

Use the BIG mirror service in the UK:
http://www.mirrorservice.org

Re: Tubes vs. Integrated circuits

<29e94a59-343f-4376-a3bd-143b6c0cfa82n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.rocksolidbbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=2711&group=alt.folklore.computers#2711

  copy link   Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:162a:: with SMTP id e10mr3629640qvw.49.1623900595082;
Wed, 16 Jun 2021 20:29:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:5fb:: with SMTP id z27mr1696969qkg.262.1623900594944;
Wed, 16 Jun 2021 20:29:54 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 20:29:54 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1acc1ef6-26a6-4d83-a9d9-bcb132bb8c8en@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=202.67.103.232; posting-account=S_MdrwoAAAD7T2pxG2e393dk6y0tc0Le
NNTP-Posting-Host: 202.67.103.232
References: <97005cb0-1c1f-4256-baa7-295802a797f1n@googlegroups.com>
<sa8hat06v6@news3.newsguy.com> <1acc1ef6-26a6-4d83-a9d9-bcb132bb8c8en@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <29e94a59-343f-4376-a3bd-143b6c0cfa82n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Tubes vs. Integrated circuits
From: robin.vowels@gmail.com (Robin Vowels)
Injection-Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 03:29:55 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
 by: Robin Vowels - Thu, 17 Jun 2021 03:29 UTC

On Tuesday, June 15, 2021 at 3:25:57 PM UTC+10, Robin Vowels wrote:
..
> Valves operating from batteries featured instant warm-up
> (the 0.5ma series such as 1R5, 3V4, 1S4, and so on). These
> were mainly used in portable radios.
..
Sorry, I made a typo as to filament current. It was 50 ma
for that series.

Re: Tubes vs. Integrated circuits

<fdb22224-b445-4c82-8cd6-e10721b08f4dn@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.rocksolidbbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=2714&group=alt.folklore.computers#2714

  copy link   Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:4e86:: with SMTP id 6mr3717245qtp.196.1623912909717;
Wed, 16 Jun 2021 23:55:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a37:6684:: with SMTP id a126mr2241193qkc.61.1623912909582;
Wed, 16 Jun 2021 23:55:09 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.goja.nl.eu.org!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 23:55:09 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <d514d3c3-4dd4-4b39-8321-45475dc01885n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2001:56a:f8e3:d700:b1b5:d542:9bdb:7c83;
posting-account=1nOeKQkAAABD2jxp4Pzmx9Hx5g9miO8y
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:56a:f8e3:d700:b1b5:d542:9bdb:7c83
References: <97005cb0-1c1f-4256-baa7-295802a797f1n@googlegroups.com>
<sa8hat06v6@news3.newsguy.com> <1acc1ef6-26a6-4d83-a9d9-bcb132bb8c8en@googlegroups.com>
<d514d3c3-4dd4-4b39-8321-45475dc01885n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <fdb22224-b445-4c82-8cd6-e10721b08f4dn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Tubes vs. Integrated circuits
From: jsavard@ecn.ab.ca (Quadibloc)
Injection-Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 06:55:09 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
 by: Quadibloc - Thu, 17 Jun 2021 06:55 UTC

On Tuesday, June 15, 2021 at 1:52:23 PM UTC-6, undefined Hancock-4 wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 15, 2021 at 1:25:57 AM UTC-4, Robin Vowels wrote:

> > The 6J6 that I mentioned in previous post was available
> > by 1945 (may have been available in 1942).

> I believe IBM mentioned that particular tube as especially troublesome (write up in bitsavers).

I couldn't find anything relevant at Bitsavers, but Ed Thelen's Nike Missile Web Site quotes
the book "IBM's Early Computers" from MIT Press about it:

http://ed-thelen.org/comp-hist/IBM-604.html

John Savard

Re: Tubes vs. Integrated circuits

<bb53e374-b0a2-4cf5-a09c-1bbeb98dc290n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.rocksolidbbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=2715&group=alt.folklore.computers#2715

  copy link   Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:240b:: with SMTP id fv11mr5934544qvb.23.1623936347299;
Thu, 17 Jun 2021 06:25:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5d4c:: with SMTP id g12mr5101296qtx.363.1623936347008;
Thu, 17 Jun 2021 06:25:47 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 06:25:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <fdb22224-b445-4c82-8cd6-e10721b08f4dn@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=202.67.103.232; posting-account=S_MdrwoAAAD7T2pxG2e393dk6y0tc0Le
NNTP-Posting-Host: 202.67.103.232
References: <97005cb0-1c1f-4256-baa7-295802a797f1n@googlegroups.com>
<sa8hat06v6@news3.newsguy.com> <1acc1ef6-26a6-4d83-a9d9-bcb132bb8c8en@googlegroups.com>
<d514d3c3-4dd4-4b39-8321-45475dc01885n@googlegroups.com> <fdb22224-b445-4c82-8cd6-e10721b08f4dn@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <bb53e374-b0a2-4cf5-a09c-1bbeb98dc290n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Tubes vs. Integrated circuits
From: robin.vowels@gmail.com (Robin Vowels)
Injection-Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 13:25:47 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
 by: Robin Vowels - Thu, 17 Jun 2021 13:25 UTC

On Thursday, June 17, 2021 at 4:55:10 PM UTC+10, Quadibloc wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 15, 2021 at 1:52:23 PM UTC-6, undefined Hancock-4 wrote:
> > On Tuesday, June 15, 2021 at 1:25:57 AM UTC-4, Robin Vowels wrote:
>
> > > The 6J6 that I mentioned in previous post was available
> > > by 1945 (may have been available in 1942).
>
> > I believe IBM mentioned that particular tube as especially troublesome (write up in bitsavers).
> I couldn't find anything relevant at Bitsavers, but Ed Thelen's Nike Missile Web Site quotes
> the book "IBM's Early Computers" from MIT Press about it:
>
> http://ed-thelen.org/comp-hist/IBM-604.html
..
Interesting.
The 6J6 was used extensively in the English Electric DEUCE, a very reliable
machine.

Re: Tubes vs. Integrated circuits

<1bec143c-db04-4e9c-9c06-da0a846da8d9n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.rocksolidbbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=2756&group=alt.folklore.computers#2756

  copy link   Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers
X-Received: by 2002:ad4:5444:: with SMTP id h4mr17769025qvt.14.1624737487422; Sat, 26 Jun 2021 12:58:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5789:: with SMTP id v9mr14971619qta.294.1624737487296; Sat, 26 Jun 2021 12:58:07 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!paganini.bofh.team!news.dns-netz.com!news.freedyn.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed9.news.xs4all.nl!tr3.eu1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2021 12:58:07 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <fdb22224-b445-4c82-8cd6-e10721b08f4dn@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=8.41.192.198; posting-account=WKyNOQkAAACNglsCZiIox1kdy9R-66KH
NNTP-Posting-Host: 8.41.192.198
References: <97005cb0-1c1f-4256-baa7-295802a797f1n@googlegroups.com> <sa8hat06v6@news3.newsguy.com> <1acc1ef6-26a6-4d83-a9d9-bcb132bb8c8en@googlegroups.com> <d514d3c3-4dd4-4b39-8321-45475dc01885n@googlegroups.com> <fdb22224-b445-4c82-8cd6-e10721b08f4dn@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <1bec143c-db04-4e9c-9c06-da0a846da8d9n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Tubes vs. Integrated circuits
From: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com (undefined Hancock-4)
Injection-Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2021 19:58:07 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 33
 by: undefined Hancock-4 - Sat, 26 Jun 2021 19:58 UTC

On Thursday, June 17, 2021 at 2:55:10 AM UTC-4, Quadibloc wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 15, 2021 at 1:52:23 PM UTC-6, undefined Hancock-4 wrote:
> > On Tuesday, June 15, 2021 at 1:25:57 AM UTC-4, Robin Vowels wrote:
>
> > > The 6J6 that I mentioned in previous post was available
> > > by 1945 (may have been available in 1942).
>
> > I believe IBM mentioned that particular tube as especially troublesome (write up in bitsavers).
> I couldn't find anything relevant at Bitsavers, but Ed Thelen's Nike Missile Web Site quotes
> the book "IBM's Early Computers" from MIT Press about it:
>
> http://ed-thelen.org/comp-hist/IBM-604.html

One of the early computer symposiums, listed in the IBM section, talks about machine reliability. All the pioneers had lots of problems. The early circuits were unreliable. Anyway, the IBM rep said the 6J6, used in their 604 calculator, was particularly troublesome.

On a related note, the Williams CRT, used for memory in the earliest IBM computers, was very unreliable. They converted to core as soon as that was perfected (which took some doing as well).

I think the Whirlwind writeups also discussed circuitry issues.

The IBM history discusses this in detail, both the electronic and physical characteristics of audio tubes that needed to be improved for digital service.

In the late 1950s various computer mfrs introduced computer grade tubes, as well as tubes for other tough applications.

Re: Tubes vs. Integrated circuits

<f77fd0f4-22b3-49c1-8665-d3e864fd3858n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.rocksolidbbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=2762&group=alt.folklore.computers#2762

  copy link   Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:a47:: with SMTP id j7mr7682790qka.370.1624754977798;
Sat, 26 Jun 2021 17:49:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:6781:: with SMTP id b1mr15649915qtp.259.1624754977639;
Sat, 26 Jun 2021 17:49:37 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2021 17:49:37 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1bec143c-db04-4e9c-9c06-da0a846da8d9n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=202.67.103.232; posting-account=S_MdrwoAAAD7T2pxG2e393dk6y0tc0Le
NNTP-Posting-Host: 202.67.103.232
References: <97005cb0-1c1f-4256-baa7-295802a797f1n@googlegroups.com>
<sa8hat06v6@news3.newsguy.com> <1acc1ef6-26a6-4d83-a9d9-bcb132bb8c8en@googlegroups.com>
<d514d3c3-4dd4-4b39-8321-45475dc01885n@googlegroups.com> <fdb22224-b445-4c82-8cd6-e10721b08f4dn@googlegroups.com>
<1bec143c-db04-4e9c-9c06-da0a846da8d9n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <f77fd0f4-22b3-49c1-8665-d3e864fd3858n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Tubes vs. Integrated circuits
From: robin.vowels@gmail.com (Robin Vowels)
Injection-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2021 00:49:37 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 by: Robin Vowels - Sun, 27 Jun 2021 00:49 UTC

On Sunday, June 27, 2021 at 5:58:08 AM UTC+10, undefined Hancock-4 wrote:
> On Thursday, June 17, 2021 at 2:55:10 AM UTC-4, Quadibloc wrote:
> > On Tuesday, June 15, 2021 at 1:52:23 PM UTC-6, undefined Hancock-4 wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, June 15, 2021 at 1:25:57 AM UTC-4, Robin Vowels wrote:
> >
> > > > The 6J6 that I mentioned in previous post was available
> > > > by 1945 (may have been available in 1942).
> >
> > > I believe IBM mentioned that particular tube as especially troublesome (write up in bitsavers).
> > I couldn't find anything relevant at Bitsavers, but Ed Thelen's Nike Missile Web Site quotes
> > the book "IBM's Early Computers" from MIT Press about it:
> >
> > http://ed-thelen.org/comp-hist/IBM-604.html
> One of the early computer symposiums, listed in the IBM section, talks about machine reliability. All the pioneers had lots of problems. The early circuits were unreliable. Anyway, the IBM rep said the 6J6, used in their 604 calculator, was particularly troublesome.
>
> On a related note, the Williams CRT, used for memory in the earliest IBM computers, was very unreliable. They converted to core as soon as that was perfected (which took some doing as well).
>
> I think the Whirlwind writeups also discussed circuitry issues.
>
> The IBM history discusses this in detail, both the electronic and physical characteristics of audio tubes that needed to be improved for digital service.
>
> In the late 1950s various computer mfrs introduced computer grade tubes, as well as tubes for other tough applications.
..
Mullard introduced the E90CC in 1955. Good for 10,000 hours.
..
As for the 6J6, it was used in the very reliable DEUCE in large quantities from 1955.


computers / alt.folklore.computers / Re: Tubes vs. Integrated circuits

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.81
clearnet tor