Rocksolid Light

Welcome to RetroBBS

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

Alexander Graham Bell is alive and well in New York, and still waiting for a dial tone.


devel / comp.os.msdos.misc / Re: Alternative to uart 16550

SubjectAuthor
* Alternative to uart 16550True Concepts
`- Re: Alternative to uart 16550Evgeniy

1
Alternative to uart 16550

<0820d624-0ab1-4e54-bebd-ca3b18dbf358n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.rocksolidbbs.com/devel/article-flat.php?id=24&group=comp.os.msdos.misc#24

  copy link   Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc
X-Received: by 2002:a37:9d90:: with SMTP id g138mr11516193qke.212.1624696004956;
Sat, 26 Jun 2021 01:26:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:17d5:: with SMTP id p21mr13472430ota.104.1624696004711;
Sat, 26 Jun 2021 01:26:44 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2021 01:26:44 -0700 (PDT)
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=119.160.117.156; posting-account=ONKT9goAAAA7wVqTsLnHbF2___XXfvc7
NNTP-Posting-Host: 119.160.117.156
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <0820d624-0ab1-4e54-bebd-ca3b18dbf358n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Alternative to uart 16550
From: abuzarprinx55@gmail.com (True Concepts)
Injection-Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2021 08:26:44 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
 by: True Concepts - Sat, 26 Jun 2021 08:26 UTC

I am working on a project in which I have to use uart 16550 but its not available in proteous so anyone can tell me what its alternative is?

Re: Alternative to uart 16550

<sb77ur$rmq$1@gioia.aioe.org>

  copy mid

https://www.rocksolidbbs.com/devel/article-flat.php?id=25&group=comp.os.msdos.misc#25

  copy link   Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!rAlbPkvfGqHhuXaE/6ssnA.user.gioia.aioe.org.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: forgetthismailbox@gmail.com (Evgeniy)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc
Subject: Re: Alternative to uart 16550
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2021 15:52:42 +0300
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <sb77ur$rmq$1@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <0820d624-0ab1-4e54-bebd-ca3b18dbf358n@googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: rAlbPkvfGqHhuXaE/6ssnA.user.gioia.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
 by: Evgeniy - Sat, 26 Jun 2021 12:52 UTC

Hello, True!

On Sat, 26 Jun 2021 01:26:44 -0700 (PDT)
True Concepts <abuzarprinx55@gmail.com> wrote:

> I am working on a project in which I have to use uart 16550 but its not available in proteous so anyone can tell me what its alternative is?

It depends on what do you exactly want: just any UART (may be with buffering) or UART 16550 I/O port compatible UART. I do not work with Proteus and do not know what models are supported, but may be some of listed models persists. If you need some way compatible UART you can use 16450 or classical 8250 (16550 is some way updated historical 8250). If you do not need 16550 compatibility, may be you can use MC2681/SCC2681 (easy to work with them).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/8250_UART
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_asynchronous_receiver-transmitter#UART_models

------
With Best Regards,
Evgeniy

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.81
clearnet tor