Your webpage has a couple big problems.

1) Less important but first chronologically, when I want to log in, on
Chrome or Firefox, it never remembers my userid/email address, even
though I saved it earlier and there is the proper entry in my Passwords.
Walgreens givese me the convenience, each time, of logging in just by
going to walgreens.com. I don't even have to click on Log In or click
again there. -- If you are doing this for my security, it's futile. If
some burglar breaks into my home and wants to access my pharmacy webpage
(like that will ever happen), he can to my Passwords and learn both my
userid and password. So having to click and type and click and click
again is just an inconvenience to me. (It does fill in my password
after I fill in my email.)

2) More important is that once a drug order, like a refill, is placed,
there is no way to see its status. You have no page that displays if
it's ready or in progress or cancelled. Again, Walgreens makes that
easy.

In the first example of this, I looked at the list of prescriptions
that could be refilled and I chose two. Days later at the pharmacy, one
was filled but the other had been cancelled, no prior notice to me (Talk
to you doctor, she said to me.). I had been transferred (without asking
me where I'd prefer to go) from a Walgreens store that closed and
somehow there were two lines for the same drug. One said that 2 refills
were left and the other that 3 refills are left. So after it was
cancelled I used the other line and your webpage again took me to a page
"https://www.riteaid.com/pharmacy/refill-prescriptions" which had the
first line checked (Prescription received). It had 3 more lines that
would track the progress of a prescription but there is NO way to get to
this page again. It has the same url as the list of drugs that can be
refilled. It needs to have a different url and a link from your
dashboard so that people can check on a prescription's progress.

You sent me an email when you got my refiill request, but no email, no
notice of any kind when you cancelled the order, even though
cancellation is unexpected and more important. You should send an email
when you cancel a prescription order. (It probably shouldn't have been
cancelled. I had refills remaining when I was at Walgreens, but
Walgreens has nothing to do with the impossibility of checking an
order's status,. )

3) Finally, I use Firefox (which is better than the competition) and
somehow there you changed what's available for refill and got rid of
both lines about atorvastatin. But when I went to Chrome, the very
same url says on one line that I have 3 refills of atorvastatin
remaining, and 2 refills on the other line. Your webpage should say
the same thing regardless of what browser is used. I don't know how you
managed this unless you keep more than one copy of my records, one for
Firefox and one for Chrome, and you should not do that.

I hope this detailed answer enables your programmers to fix these bugs.
Maybe it will help you understand the problems to see my very page, so
my userid is meirman@erols.com . If you need the password, feel free
to write me., but I figure your programmers have a universal password or
can find mine.

On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 19:48:41 -0500, micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com>
wrote:

>Your webpage has a couple big problems.

Why is a letter to a business being posted on a software user
dicussion group?

In alt.comp.software.firefox, on Tue, 30 Jan 2024 08:24:47 -0800, Nobody
<jock@soccer.com> wrote:

>On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 19:48:41 -0500, micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com>
>wrote:
>
>>Your webpage has a couple big problems.
>
>Why is a letter to a business being posted on a software user
>dicussion group?

It and the two posts just before it and one just after it, were posted
by accident. They were not ready yet, but someone suggested I use a
command that sends messages from the Outbox. I didn't know that in
Agent v.5 it would send every email and every post (that it found
somewhere, Drafts?) that had not yet been sent, but it did.

I went into detail for Rite-Aid, but I had planned before this was
posted here to rewrite it shorter, to emphasize the systems design
failures of rite-aid, and to emphasize paragraph 3, that my list of
yet-to-be-filled prescriptions was so very different betwween Firefox
and Chrome. How could that be?

micky wrote:
> In alt.comp.software.firefox, on Tue, 30 Jan 2024 08:24:47 -0800, Nobody
> <jock@soccer.com> wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 19:48:41 -0500, micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>Your webpage has a couple big problems.
>>
>>Why is a letter to a business being posted on a software user
>>dicussion group?
>
> It and the two posts just before it and one just after it, were posted
> by accident.

Four times posting private mails to a newsgroup in a short time span is not
"by accident".

> They were not ready yet, but someone suggested I use a
> command that sends messages from the Outbox.

"Someone suggested" this for exactly *what*?

> I didn't know that in
> Agent v.5 it would send every email and every post (that it found
> somewhere, Drafts?) that had not yet been sent, but it did.

Go and get to know the functions of your software. Seriously.

In alt.comp.software.firefox, on Wed, 31 Jan 2024 03:22:38 +0100, Frank
Miller <miller@posteo.ee> wrote:

>micky wrote:
>> In alt.comp.software.firefox, on Tue, 30 Jan 2024 08:24:47 -0800, Nobody
>> <jock@soccer.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 19:48:41 -0500, micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>Your webpage has a couple big problems.
>>>
>>>Why is a letter to a business being posted on a software user
>>>dicussion group?
>>
>> It and the two posts just before it and one just after it, were posted
>> by accident.
>
>Four times posting private mails to a newsgroup in a short time span is not
>"by accident".

Yes it was. There were far more than 4 emails and posts that got sent
by one click of the mouse, but it was ONE click of the mouse. I thought
only those emails which I had earlier tried to send but which had failed
(when I was out of the country) would be resent, but instead it sent
them and everything else that I'd even started to write, even though I'd
never tried to send them.

>> They were not ready yet, but someone suggested I use a
>> command that sends messages from the Outbox.
>
>"Someone suggested" this for exactly *what*?

It doesn't matter. You don't care anyhow. You just want to fight.

>> I didn't know that in
>> Agent v.5 it would send every email and every post (that it found
>> somewhere, Drafts?) that had not yet been sent, but it did.
>
>Go and get to know the functions of your software. Seriously.

How do you think one does that? By trying the functions.

On 1/30/2024 10:53 PM, micky wrote:
> In alt.comp.software.firefox, on Wed, 31 Jan 2024 03:22:38 +0100, Frank
> Miller <miller@posteo.ee> wrote:
>
>> micky wrote:
>>> In alt.comp.software.firefox, on Tue, 30 Jan 2024 08:24:47 -0800, Nobody
>>> <jock@soccer.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 19:48:41 -0500, micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Your webpage has a couple big problems.
>>>>
>>>> Why is a letter to a business being posted on a software user
>>>> dicussion group?
>>>
>>> It and the two posts just before it and one just after it, were posted
>>> by accident.
>>
>> Four times posting private mails to a newsgroup in a short time span is not
>> "by accident".
>
> Yes it was. There were far more than 4 emails and posts that got sent
> by one click of the mouse, but it was ONE click of the mouse. I thought
> only those emails which I had earlier tried to send but which had failed
> (when I was out of the country) would be resent, but instead it sent
> them and everything else that I'd even started to write, even though I'd
> never tried to send them.
>
>>> They were not ready yet, but someone suggested I use a
>>> command that sends messages from the Outbox.
>>
>> "Someone suggested" this for exactly *what*?
>
> It doesn't matter. You don't care anyhow. You just want to fight.
>
>>> I didn't know that in
>>> Agent v.5 it would send every email and every post (that it found
>>> somewhere, Drafts?) that had not yet been sent, but it did.
>>
>> Go and get to know the functions of your software. Seriously.
>
> How do you think one does that? By trying the functions.

DO not enter a TO: address until you are ready to send then your problem
will not exist