On 12/28/23 13:20, Sn!pe wrote:
> Snit <snit@nospam.it> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 25 Dec 2023 01:32:17 +0100 immibis <news@immibis.com> wrote:
>> On Dec 24, 2023, immibis wrote
>> (in article<news:umaiih$2oojb$1@dont-email.me>):
>>
>>> Sn!pe is another user who frequently intends to offend.
>>
>> Sn!pe is a small child - mentally stunted - much like Rod Speed who employs
>> personal attacks to feel better about his own utterly worthless existence.
>>
>
> Hi, Snit, how did you escape my killfile? Are you the ~real~ Snit?
>
> [rhetorical questions, no need to reply; followups to the bit-bucket]
>
If you really didn't care what they had to say, you wouldn't have sent this.

On 12/29/23 05:30, noel wrote:
>
> yes I do, block all posts from you on our news server and if you evade I
> have zero hesitation in blocking all of eternal september, this is not
> the group for your childish hissy fits.
>

The internet will be better off, if the kinds of people who cut
themselves off from the internet just because of one user would actually
do so.

On 12/31/23 06:19, noel wrote:
> I have not blocked them at this point in time because they acknowledged
> and apologised.
>
> However, we block all google usenet, have done for months, so do you
> think I'd have any issue with blocking anyone else?

Google is widely blocked because it *only* contributes spam and
trolling, not because there's at least one troll on it. If there was
only one troll on Google, you'd just block that user.

On 12/28/23 01:01, noel wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Dec 2023 13:18:41 +0100, immibis wrote:
>
>> On 12/25/23 05:31, The Doctor wrote:
>>> In article <20231224204555.2352ef3b@wibble.sysadmininc.com>,
>>> Nigel Reed <sysop@endofthelinebbs.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> What a nugget.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Indeed!
>>>
>>>
>> This exemplifies The Doctor's usual posting style - pure noise.
>
> and your contribution is, what exactly?
> ...more noise..
>
> There is a saying in some parts of the world: POT, KETTLE, BLACK

and your contribution is, what exactly?
....more noise..

There is a saying in some parts of the world: POT, KETTLE, BLACK

On 12/29/23 02:11, Ivo Gandolfo wrote:
> On 22/12/2023 15:16, The Doctor wrote:
>> Looks for peers as always.
>>
>> Check out https://ns2.nk.ca/ for ewb stats.
>> Cotactme for details to peer.
>
>
> https://www.bofh.team/info.txt
>
> Send me your side
>
>
> Sincerely
>

I take this as an indication to blacklist anything that passed through
bofh.team.

On Sun, 31 Dec 2023 19:10:17 +0100, immibis wrote:

> On 12/29/23 05:30, noel wrote:
>>
>> yes I do, block all posts from you on our news server and if you evade
>> I have zero hesitation in blocking all of eternal september, this is
>> not the group for your childish hissy fits.
>>
>>
> The internet will be better off, if the kinds of people who cut
> themselves off from the internet just because of one user would actually
> do so.

the internet would be better off if muppets like you fucked off, looks
like your apology was as I suspected, but gave you the benefit of the
doubt, only sarcasim, consider all your posts no longer readable here, or
at any downstream service I feed, so dont bother replying, but cunts like
you have mental disorders where you cant help yourself, you always feel
the need to beat your fat cellulite chests any chance you get so you
will, pitty you wont score any brownie points because it wont be seen.

On Sun, 31 Dec 2023 19:13:40 +0100, immibis wrote:

> On 12/31/23 06:19, noel wrote:
>> I have not blocked them at this point in time because they acknowledged
>> and apologised.
>>
>> However, we block all google usenet, have done for months, so do you
>> think I'd have any issue with blocking anyone else?
>
> Google is widely blocked because it *only* contributes spam and
> trolling, not because there's at least one troll on it. If there was
> only one troll on Google, you'd just block that user.

currently the support abuse@ holds 37 complaints on E-S within past 7
days, so its not just one dumb cunt like you, theres 46 other wankers,
close enough for me to justify dev nulling E-S if I so choose.
tik tok

On Sun, 31 Dec 2023 19:14:29 +0100, immibis wrote:

> On 12/28/23 01:01, noel wrote:
>> On Mon, 25 Dec 2023 13:18:41 +0100, immibis wrote:
>>
>>> On 12/25/23 05:31, The Doctor wrote:
>>>> In article <20231224204555.2352ef3b@wibble.sysadmininc.com>,
>>>> Nigel Reed <sysop@endofthelinebbs.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> What a nugget.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Indeed!
>>>>
>>>>
>>> This exemplifies The Doctor's usual posting style - pure noise.
>>
>> and your contribution is, what exactly?
>> ...more noise..
>>
>> There is a saying in some parts of the world: POT, KETTLE, BLACK
>
> and your contribution is, what exactly?
> ...more noise..
>
> There is a saying in some parts of the world: POT, KETTLE, BLACK

oh how very clever quoting me back to me ...
v e r y
sssssssllllllllllllllllllooooooooooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
ccllllllllllllllllllllllaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaapppppppppppppppppppppppppppppp

youll have to try do better than that, but as I've now got to last
message in this group, now its time to modify filter.dat happy new year
cockless

immibis <news@immibis.com> wrote:

> I take this as an indication to blacklist anything that passed through
> bofh.team.

Wouldn't it be better to just blacklist nk.ca if you wish so?

noel <deletethis@invalid.lan> wrote:

> On Sun, 31 Dec 2023 19:10:17 +0100, immibis wrote:
>
> > On 12/29/23 05:30, noel wrote:
> >>
> >> yes I do, block all posts from you on our news server and if you evade
> >> I have zero hesitation in blocking all of eternal september, this is
> >> not the group for your childish hissy fits.
> >>
> >
> > The internet will be better off, if the kinds of people who cut
> > themselves off from the internet just because of one user would actually
> > do so.
> >
>
> the internet would be better off if muppets like you fucked off, looks
> like your apology was as I suspected, but gave you the benefit of the
> doubt, only sarcasim, consider all your posts no longer readable here, or
> at any downstream service I feed, so dont bother replying, but cunts like
> you have mental disorders where you cant help yourself, you always feel
> the need to beat your fat cellulite chests any chance you get so you
> will, pitty you wont score any brownie points because it wont be seen.
>

immibis and I are ~not~ the same person; I had not met him before our
recent encounter here in the news hierarchy groups. I am here ~only~
in my primary persona, namely Sn!pe. This article is my first in this
group since my well-meaning, grovelling, apology three days ago in:
Message-ID: <1qmhz5a.1om1ays1p23q5cN%snipeco.2@gmail.com>

Your bullying bluster says a great deal about you, noel. I will make no
further comment. Of course you won't read this; now kill-file me and be
done with it. I will do likewise.

--
^Ï^. Sn!pe, PA, FIBS - Professional Crastinator

My pet rock Gordon just is.

Sn!pe <snipeco.2@gmail.com> wrote:

> noel <deletethis@invalid.lan> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 31 Dec 2023 19:10:17 +0100, immibis wrote:
> >
> > > On 12/29/23 05:30, noel wrote:
> > >>
> > >> yes I do, block all posts from you on our news server and if you evade
> > >> I have zero hesitation in blocking all of eternal september, this is
> > >> not the group for your childish hissy fits.
> > >>
> > >
> > > The internet will be better off, if the kinds of people who cut
> > > themselves off from the internet just because of one user would actually
> > > do so.
> > >
> >
> > the internet would be better off if muppets like you fucked off, looks
> > like your apology was as I suspected, but gave you the benefit of the
> > doubt, only sarcasim, consider all your posts no longer readable here, or
> > at any downstream service I feed, so dont bother replying, but cunts like
> > you have mental disorders where you cant help yourself, you always feel
> > the need to beat your fat cellulite chests any chance you get so you
> > will, pitty you wont score any brownie points because it wont be seen.
> >
>
> immibis and I are ~not~ the same person; I had not met him before our
> recent encounter here in the news hierarchy groups. I am here ~only~
> in my primary persona, namely Sn!pe. This article is my first in this
> group since my well-meaning, grovelling, apology three days ago in:
> Message-ID: <1qmhz5a.1om1ays1p23q5cN%snipeco.2@gmail.com>
>
> Your bullying bluster says a great deal about you, noel. I will make no
> further comment. Of course you won't read this; now kill-file me and be
> done with it. I will do likewise.
>

Hello, everybody, this is me, Sn!pe, in my secondary persona.
I use this persona to poke fun at people who deserve it. This is
only a flying visit, I don't expect to be back here any time soon.

I usually sign off with a rude noise but I'll forego that this time;
I wouldn't want to offend anybody. Bye now! [cheery wave]

--
\|/
(((Ï))) - Mr Ön!on
When we shake the ketchup bottle
At first none comes and then a lot'll.

On 01/01/2024 14:51, Adam W. wrote:
> immibis <news@immibis.com> wrote:
>
>> I take this as an indication to blacklist anything that passed through
>> bofh.team.
>
> Wouldn't it be better to just blacklist nk.ca if you wish so?

The biggest problem is that this genie didn't understand that I'm not
the only upstream one, so even if he filtered me he would still receive
the things, as they would probably pass through other peers closer to him xD

Sincerely

--
Ivo Gandolfo

noel <deletethis@invalid.lan> wrote:
>On Sun, 31 Dec 2023 19:13:40 +0100, immibis wrote:
>>On 12/31/23 06:19, noel wrote:

>>>I have not blocked them at this point in time because they acknowledged
>>>and apologised.

>>>However, we block all google usenet, have done for months, so do you
>>>think I'd have any issue with blocking anyone else?

>>Google is widely blocked because it *only* contributes spam and
>>trolling, not because there's at least one troll on it. If there was
>>only one troll on Google, you'd just block that user.

>currently the support abuse@ holds 37 complaints on E-S within past 7
>days, so its not just one dumb cunt like you, theres 46 other wankers,
>close enough for me to justify dev nulling E-S if I so choose.
>tik tok

Stop crying. Stop whining. Just fuck off already. If you block all
articles originating at news.eternal-september.org and that ends all of
your drama queen antics, then Usenet will be better off for it.

But you'll never do it because you are here only to cry, whine, and
complain.

Your behavior is utterly immature.

On 1/1/24 10:29, noel wrote:
> On Sun, 31 Dec 2023 19:13:40 +0100, immibis wrote:
>
>> On 12/31/23 06:19, noel wrote:
>>> I have not blocked them at this point in time because they acknowledged
>>> and apologised.
>>>
>>> However, we block all google usenet, have done for months, so do you
>>> think I'd have any issue with blocking anyone else?
>>
>> Google is widely blocked because it *only* contributes spam and
>> trolling, not because there's at least one troll on it. If there was
>> only one troll on Google, you'd just block that user.
>
> currently the support abuse@ holds 37 complaints on E-S within past 7
> days, so its not just one dumb cunt like you, theres 46 other wankers,
> close enough for me to justify dev nulling E-S if I so choose.
> tik tok

Tick Tock indeed. You know, that saying came from clocks before it came
from zoomer social media apps.

I recommend you hurry up and block it ASAP so you'll have to stop
responding to us "dumb cunts". The network will be better for it.

On 1/1/24 18:47, Ivo Gandolfo wrote:
> On 01/01/2024 14:51, Adam W. wrote:
>> immibis <news@immibis.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I take this as an indication to blacklist anything that passed through
>>> bofh.team.
>>
>> Wouldn't it be better to just blacklist nk.ca if you wish so?
>
> The biggest problem is that this genie didn't understand that I'm not
> the only upstream one, so even if he filtered me he would still receive
> the things, as they would probably pass through other peers closer to
> him xD
>
>
> Sincerely
>

It's one heuristic of many. "Hi, I'm a troll, please peer with me so I
can't get blocked as easily." "Yes, sounds like a good idea, please peer
with me." - why should I trust your peering decisions?

On Mon, 01 Jan 2024 18:19:09 +0000, Adam H. Kerman wrote:

> noel <deletethis@invalid.lan> wrote:
>>On Sun, 31 Dec 2023 19:13:40 +0100, immibis wrote:
>>>On 12/31/23 06:19, noel wrote:
>
>>>>I have not blocked them at this point in time because they
>>>>acknowledged and apologised.
>
>>>>However, we block all google usenet, have done for months, so do you
>>>>think I'd have any issue with blocking anyone else?
>
>>>Google is widely blocked because it *only* contributes spam and
>>>trolling, not because there's at least one troll on it. If there was
>>>only one troll on Google, you'd just block that user.
>
>>currently the support abuse@ holds 37 complaints on E-S within past 7
>>days, so its not just one dumb cunt like you, theres 46 other wankers,
>>close enough for me to justify dev nulling E-S if I so choose.
>>tik tok
>
> Stop crying. Stop whining. Just fuck off already. If you block all
> articles originating at news.eternal-september.org and that ends all of
> your drama queen antics, then Usenet will be better off for it.

you still telling people i'm seamus adam, lol how fucking clueless you
are.

I make NO apologies for taking action that protects the masses, tough
shit about collateral damage, I dont care, I dont block nntp ports if my
users want to use someonewhere else, they are welcome to.

>
> But you'll never do it because you are here only to cry, whine, and
> complain.
>

oh your hilarious... what have you been doing retard...

> Your behavior is utterly immature.

haha this from the cocksucking loser who used to enter into newsgroups
abuse everyone then never appearing again, your history dates back to
2001 here dickless, what a clueless coward you are.

On Mon, 01 Jan 2024 18:47:02 +0100, Ivo Gandolfo wrote:

> On 01/01/2024 14:51, Adam W. wrote:
>> immibis <news@immibis.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I take this as an indication to blacklist anything that passed through
>>> bofh.team.
>>
>> Wouldn't it be better to just blacklist nk.ca if you wish so?
>
> The biggest problem is that this genie didn't understand that I'm not
> the only upstream one, so even if he filtered me he would still receive
> the things, as they would probably pass through other peers closer to
> him xD
>
>
> Sincerely

Would you expect anything different from someone who uses SHA1 DNSSEC
records :)

not even sure why that genius is in this group they dont run a news
server, so peering discussions are irrelevant to them

On Mon, 01 Jan 2024 17:10:40 +0000, Sn!pe wrote:

> immibis and I are ~not~ the same person; I had not met him before our

My bad, no idea why I confused you for that wanker, please accept my
sincere apologies.

> Your bullying bluster says a great deal about you, noel. I will make no

I have never walked on cotton wool.

> Of course you won't read this

yes I did :)

> now kill-file me and be done with it. I will do likewise.

Nope I dont use kill files, if someone is worth removing to me they are
worth removing for everyone courtesy of dnews filter rules.

The best thing about usenet is, no one forces anyone to read anything.

[nothing snipped]

noel <deletethis@invalid.lan> wrote:

> On Mon, 01 Jan 2024 17:10:40 +0000, Sn!pe wrote:
>
> > immibis and I are ~not~ the same person; I had not met him before our
>
> My bad, no idea why I confused you for that wanker, please accept my
> sincere apologies.
>

Apology accepted, thank you.

>
> > Your bullying bluster says a great deal about you, noel. I will make no
>
> I have never walked on cotton wool.
>
> > Of course you won't read this
>
> yes I did :)
>
> > now kill-file me and be done with it. I will do likewise.
>
> Nope I dont use kill files, if someone is worth removing to me they are
> worth removing for everyone courtesy of dnews filter rules.
>
> The best thing about usenet is, no one forces anyone to read anything.
>

Quite so.

--
^Ï^. Sn!pe, PA, FIBS - Professional Crastinator

My pet rock Gordon just is.

noel <deletethis@invalid.lan> wrote:
>On Mon, 01 Jan 2024 18:19:09 +0000, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>>noel <deletethis@invalid.lan> wrote:
>>>On Sun, 31 Dec 2023 19:13:40 +0100, immibis wrote:
>>>>On 12/31/23 06:19, noel wrote:

>>>>>I have not blocked them at this point in time because they
>>>>>acknowledged and apologised.

>>>>>However, we block all google usenet, have done for months, so do you
>>>>>think I'd have any issue with blocking anyone else?

>>>>Google is widely blocked because it *only* contributes spam and
>>>>trolling, not because there's at least one troll on it. If there was
>>>>only one troll on Google, you'd just block that user.

>>>currently the support abuse@ holds 37 complaints on E-S within past 7
>>>days, so its not just one dumb cunt like you, theres 46 other wankers,
>>>close enough for me to justify dev nulling E-S if I so choose.
>>>tik tok

>>Stop crying. Stop whining. Just fuck off already. If you block all
>>articles originating at news.eternal-september.org and that ends all of
>>your drama queen antics, then Usenet will be better off for it.

>you still telling people i'm seamus adam, lol how fucking clueless you
>are.

>I make NO apologies for taking action that protects the masses, tough
>shit about collateral damage, I dont care, I dont block nntp ports if my
>users want to use someonewhere else, they are welcome to.

Ah. Your crying and whining is getting louder and louder and louder. The
masses you are protecting are sockpuppets yet to be created?
>>But you'll never do it because you are here only to cry, whine, and
>>complain.

>oh your hilarious... what have you been doing retard...

>>Your behavior is utterly immature.

>haha this from the cocksucking loser who used to enter into newsgroups
>abuse everyone then never appearing again, your history dates back to
>2001 here dickless, what a clueless coward you are.

I'm so confused as to how you read my article considering that you are
blocking everything from news.eternal-september.org.

On Wed, 03 Jan 2024 01:34:52 +0000, Adam H. Kerman wrote:

>
>>you still telling people i'm seamus adam, lol how fucking clueless you
>>are.
>
>>I make NO apologies for taking action that protects the masses, tough
>>shit about collateral damage, I dont care, I dont block nntp ports if my
>>users want to use someonewhere else, they are welcome to.
>
> Ah. Your crying and whining is getting louder and louder and louder. The
> masses you are protecting are sockpuppets yet to be created?

the only one crying is you. my care factor doesnt exist.

>>>But you'll never do it because you are here only to cry, whine, and
>>>complain.
>
>>oh your hilarious... what have you been doing retard...
>
>>>Your behavior is utterly immature.
>
>>haha this from the cocksucking loser who used to enter into newsgroups
>>abuse everyone then never appearing again, your history dates back to
>>2001 here dickless, what a clueless coward you are.
>
> I'm so confused as to how you read my article considering that you are
> blocking everything from news.eternal-september.org.

you still havent learned how to read yet adam, such a shame for an old
cunt like you, put your coke bottle glasses on and youll see I said " if
evaded " imbiscile bus hasnt evaded yet, if it has, its failed dismally
so ES is not filtered, but you knew that, your just adam being adam, a
useless cockless troll, because nobody like you.