Message-ID:

Scientists are people who build the Brooklyn Bridge and then buy it. -- William Buckley

computers / news.software.nntp / Re: QUIC and NNTPS

Re: QUIC and NNTPS

<ts0k3f$2o3f$1@news.cyber23.de>

https://www.rocksolidbbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=1426&group=news.software.nntp#1426

copy link Newsgroups: news.software.nntp

Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news.cyber23.de!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: franky@xxx.yyy (Frank)
Newsgroups: news.software.nntp
Subject: Re: QUIC and NNTPS
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2023 16:54:16 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: Cyber23 news
Message-ID: <ts0k3f$2o3f$1@news.cyber23.de>
Injection-Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2023 16:54:16 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: news.cyber23.de;
logging-data="90223"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@cyber23.de"

by: Frank - Wed, 8 Feb 2023 16:54 UTC

On 2023-02-08, The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:

> Is this possible?

What do you expect from it?

Sure, it is technically possible, if someone defines a protocol for
NNTP-over-QUIC and implements it.

I do not see how a few milliseconds make a difference for Usenet
propagation.

Re: QUIC and NNTPS

<ts1aog$23a4$3@gallifrey.nk.ca>

copy mid

https://www.rocksolidbbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=1427&group=news.software.nntp#1427

copy link Newsgroups: news.software.nntp

Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!.POSTED.doctor.nl2k.ab.ca!not-for-mail
From: doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor)
Newsgroups: news.software.nntp
Subject: Re: QUIC and NNTPS
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2023 23:20:48 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: NetKnow News
Message-ID: <ts1aog$23a4$3@gallifrey.nk.ca>
References: <ts0k3f$2o3f$1@news.cyber23.de>
Injection-Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2023 23:20:48 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: gallifrey.nk.ca; posting-host="doctor.nl2k.ab.ca:204.209.81.1";
logging-data="68932"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@gallifrey.nk.ca"
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
Originator: doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor)

by: The Doctor - Wed, 8 Feb 2023 23:20 UTC

In article <ts0k3f$2o3f$1@news.cyber23.de>, Frank <franky@xxx.yyy> wrote:
>On 2023-02-08, The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>
>> Is this possible?
>
>What do you expect from it?
>
>Sure, it is technically possible, if someone defines a protocol for
>NNTP-over-QUIC and implements it.
>
>I do not see how a few milliseconds make a difference for Usenet
>propagation.

IF using port 56X you could speed up NNTP over TLS.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b
Sometimes what's billed as light is the darkness. -unknown Beware https://mindspring.com

Re: QUIC and NNTPS

<ts22a4$e67$1@tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net>

copy mid

https://www.rocksolidbbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=1428&group=news.software.nntp#1428

copy link Newsgroups: news.software.nntp

Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!tncsrv06.tnetconsulting.net!tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net!.POSTED.alpha.home.tnetconsulting.net!not-for-mail
From: gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net (Grant Taylor)
Newsgroups: news.software.nntp
Subject: Re: QUIC and NNTPS
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2023 23:00:53 -0700
Organization: TNet Consulting
Message-ID: <ts22a4$e67$1@tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net>
References: <ts0k3f$2o3f$1@news.cyber23.de> <ts1aog$23a4$3@gallifrey.nk.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2023 06:02:44 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net; posting-host="alpha.home.tnetconsulting.net:198.18.18.251";
logging-data="14535"; mail-complaints-to="newsmaster@tnetconsulting.net"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/78.13.0
In-Reply-To: <ts1aog$23a4$3@gallifrey.nk.ca>
Content-Language: en-US

by: Grant Taylor - Thu, 9 Feb 2023 06:00 UTC

On 2/8/23 4:20 PM, The Doctor wrote:
> IF using port 56X you could speed up NNTP over TLS.

How large of an increase in speed are you hoping to see?

I doubt that it would be worth the effort.

I think that yet another news (transport) protocol is ... questionable
at best. Especially when it's still NNTP, just a different transport
therefor.

--
Grant. . . .
unix || die

Subject	Author
Re: QUIC and NNTPS	Frank
Re: QUIC and NNTPS	The Doctor
Re: QUIC and NNTPS	Grant Taylor