Attention all Gentoo Men!

Gentoo is moving to a new profile, 23.0, and I just switched to it
this morning.

The issue is the 23.0 now makes "-fstack-clash-protection" the default
for GCC as well as "cet" for the entire build/debug chain and GLIBC.

Why the change?

Those fucking bastards want to make Gentoo more compatible with the
mainstream distros. All the common junk distros have already incorporated
this security garbage.

Listen, motherfuckers. We are MEN. REAL FUCKING MEN. We don't need
no distro nanny making things "secure" for us. We make our own fucking
decisions. Got that, cocksuckers?

But fuck the profile. Just edit your "package.use.force" to override
those ridiculous default settings:

sys-devel/gcc -cet -default-stack-clash-protection -default-znow -hardened -libssp nopie nossp -pie -sanitize -ssp vanilla -vtv
sys-devel/binutils -cet -hardened vanilla
sys-libs/binutils-libs -cet
dev-build/libtool vanilla
dev-debug/gdb -cet vanilla

Don't forget to force the "vanilla" option. It will eliminate any
patching that may contain further bullshit.

Security? Fuck you! Not on my machines. NEVER on my machines.

All Hail Gentoo!

The only distro for REAL MEN.

Le 27-04-2024, Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> a écrit :
>
> Security? Fuck you! Not on my machines. NEVER on my machines.

Why were you so concerned with the xz bug (which you believed was a xv
bug by the way)? Are you concerned by the security only when you believe
you can handle it?

> The only distro for REAL MEN.

Yes, everyone know it's not for you. No need to repeat it.

--
Si vous avez du temps à perdre :
https://scarpet42.gitlab.io

On 4/27/24 07:57, Farley Flud wrote:
> Attention all Gentoo Men!

My dick may one day become a Gentoo dick. But only my dick, not me.

On 27 Apr 2024 16:16:21 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:

>
> Why were you so concerned with the xz bug (which you believed was a xv
> bug by the way)?

The xz backdoor is a fascinating example of both bash scripting and
C programming as well as a great insight into the ELF linking process.

I learned a lot by studying the analysis.

But YOU are not a programmer and YOU can't gain anything from
this fantastic, though nefarious, example.

YOU can only allow a distro to take you by the hand.

Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!

Le 27-04-2024, Diego Garcia <dg@chaos.rocks> a écrit :
> On 27 Apr 2024 16:16:21 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
>
>>
>> Why were you so concerned with the xz bug (which you believed was a xv
>> bug by the way)?
>
> The xz backdoor is a fascinating example of both bash scripting and
> C programming as well as a great insight into the ELF linking process.

That's only half of the story. Technically speaking it's an interesting
backdoor. It's as interesting socially speaking than technically
speaking.

> I learned a lot by studying the analysis.

Yes, I saw that. Like how you tried to analyse the compile code to try
to understand how it works when the source code is available. That was a
good one, yes. Really funny to read. And to see how you stopped halfway
because it was too difficult for you was funny too: "I'm the best
programmer in the all world but can't go further in the analyse because
I know nothing about network and it's difficult to understand how ssh
works without basic network knowledge. I'm surprise to discover that sso
is related to network somewhere. Who could have guessed?" Yes, I read
this message and it gave me a really good laugh. Thanks for that.

> But YOU are not a programmer

Neither are you. And it doesn't require a great deal of knowledge to
know more than you about programming.

> and YOU can't gain anything from this fantastic, though nefarious,
> example.

Once again, unlike you who is proud to show your lack of technically
abilities, you know nothing about what I can do and what I can't do.

> YOU can only allow a distro to take you by the hand.

Like, you. But unlike you, I can use my distro to use my computer as I
want. You manage to have a computer who can't do anything except failing
miserably in trying to compile your kernel.

--
Si vous avez du temps à perdre :
https://scarpet42.gitlab.io

On 27 Apr 2024 19:25:50 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:

>
> Like, you. But unlike you, I can use my distro to use my computer as I
> want. You manage to have a computer who can't do anything except failing
> miserably in trying to compile your kernel.
>

Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!

You can only use your computer the way that your distro wants.

Without your distro you would not be using GNU/Linux -- and
you know it.

Without your distro you would be using Microslop Winblows or
Apphole -- and you know it.

Your distro -- and only your distro -- allows you to exploit
open source software.

If you had to "do it yourself," you would be dead in the water --
and you know it.

On Apr 27, 2024 at 3:25:50 PM EDT, "Stéphane CARPENTIER" <sc@fiat-linux.fr>
wrote:

>> But YOU are not a programmer
>
> Neither are you. And it doesn't require a great deal of knowledge to
> know more than you about programming.

Anyone who has written a Tic-Tac-Toe program knows more about programming than
Farley Fucktard/Diego Dipshit/whatever name he is calling himself today.

Remember, he is the doofus who proclaims that "All programming is math" (It
will certainly look that way if the only "programming" you do is to solve
trivial math problems which BTW have already been solved), that a .csv file is
a "database" (Um, no. You import the .csv file INTO a database) and that one
needs to "write a computer program" to determine the field widths in a .csv
file (clueless kiddie, learn some SQL).

Le 27-04-2024, Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> a écrit :
> On 27 Apr 2024 19:25:50 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
>
>>
>> Like, you. But unlike you, I can use my distro to use my computer as I
>> want. You manage to have a computer who can't do anything except failing
>> miserably in trying to compile your kernel.
>>
>
> Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!
>
> You can only use your computer the way that your distro wants.

Nope. My distro wants nothing. My distro tell me what can be installed
and I chose what I want to install. From the boot (LILO, GRUB or from
UEFI) to the choice of Window Manager. The core programs installed by
default are only there to let me install everything else.

You can't understand that because you never managed to pass the
installation of the core programs of Gentoo. You are the only one in the
world who never managed to complete the installation of his distro. And
now installing Linux, with a distro considered difficult by some, is way
easier than installing slackware thirty years ago.

> Without your distro you would not be using GNU/Linux -- and
> you know it.

Of course. Nobody would use Linux without a distro. That's the purpose
of a distro.

The LFS user aren't using it, they spend all their time to install
things and upgrade it. There is nothing wrong with that. It's a pretty
good way to learn, but one need a lot of time for that.

> Without your distro you would be using Microslop Winblows or
> Apphole -- and you know it.

Nope. Wrong. Again. I would look at something like openBSD or FreeBSD.

> Your distro -- and only your distro -- allows you to exploit
> open source software.

Yes, like everyone else in the world. Except you who can't exploit open
source software even with the help of your distro.

> If you had to "do it yourself," you would be dead in the water --
> and you know it.

Nope. Wrong. Once again. If I really had time to loose, I could do far
more without a distro than you with your distro. But unlike you, my time
is precious and it's worthless to just prove you wrong.

--
Si vous avez du temps à perdre :
https://scarpet42.gitlab.io

On 4/28/2024 10:13 AM, Tyrone wrote:
> On Apr 27, 2024 at 3:25:50 PM EDT, "Stéphane CARPENTIER" <sc@fiat-linux.fr>
> wrote:
>
>>> But YOU are not a programmer
>>
>> Neither are you. And it doesn't require a great deal of knowledge to
>> know more than you about programming.
>
> Anyone who has written a Tic-Tac-Toe program knows more about programming than
> Farley Fucktard/Diego Dipshit/whatever name he is calling himself today.
>
> Remember, he is the doofus who proclaims that "All programming is math" (It
> will certainly look that way if the only "programming" you do is to solve
> trivial math problems which BTW have already been solved), that a .csv file is
> a "database" (Um, no. You import the .csv file INTO a database)

Feeb often expands or contracts the meaning of a word or idea to support
what he's arguing that day.

On day 1 a .csv file IS a database.
On day 2 a .csv file IS NOT a database.

On day 1 there is no such thing as a text file.
On day 2 there is such a thing as a text file.

On day 1 AutoCAD is 'fantastic'.
On day 2 AutoCAD is 'overblown junk'.

On day 1 'software never expires'.
On day 2 'whine whine whine that DFS is using Office 2003'

That's how the confused fraud works.

> and that one needs to "write a computer program" to determine the
> field widths in a .csv file (clueless kiddie, learn some SQL).

You don't need to, but you can.

https://imgur.com/a/pLqp6So

Writing that C program was exponentially more difficult than importing
..csv files into a dbms and using SQL. But now it runs instantaneously
with almost no work on my part.

Anyway, I just now figured out something cool in SQLite:

Run this query (replace tblname with the actual table name)

SELECT "SELECT '" || name || "' AS Column, MAX(LENGTH(" || name || "))
AS MAXLEN FROM tblname UNION ALL " FROM PRAGMA_TABLE_INFO('tblname');

It will return a row for each column in the table.

Paste all the results into a SQL editor window, delete the final 'UNION
ALL', terminate the SQL and run it and you get the max width of the data
in each column. I did it for a table named 'XOVER'.

SELECT 'SERVERID' AS Column, MAX(LENGTH(SERVERID)) AS MAXLEN FROM XOVER
UNION ALL
SELECT 'GROUPID' AS Column, MAX(LENGTH(GROUPID)) AS MAXLEN FROM XOVER
UNION ALL
SELECT 'NEWARTICLEID' AS Column, MAX(LENGTH(NEWARTICLEID)) AS MAXLEN
FROM XOVER UNION ALL
SELECT 'MESSAGEID' AS Column, MAX(LENGTH(MESSAGEID)) AS MAXLEN FROM
XOVER UNION ALL
SELECT 'XOVER' AS Column, MAX(LENGTH(XOVER)) AS MAXLEN FROM XOVER UNION ALL
SELECT 'POSTER' AS Column, MAX(LENGTH(POSTER)) AS MAXLEN FROM XOVER
UNION ALL
SELECT 'SUBJECT' AS Column, MAX(LENGTH(SUBJECT)) AS MAXLEN FROM XOVER
UNION ALL
SELECT 'UTCDATETIME' AS Column, MAX(LENGTH(UTCDATETIME)) AS MAXLEN FROM
XOVER;

results
SERVERID 1
GROUPID 2
NEWARTICLEID 7
MESSAGEID 212
XOVER 3536
POSTER 208
SUBJECT 1250
UTCDATETIME 19

sweet! That will definitely come in handy sometime.

Note: 'UNION ALL' maintains the order of the columns in the schema,
while 'UNION' outputs them in alpha order.

This will go in my book:
'Tips, Tricks, Traps, Travails and Techniques for SQLite'.

I'm sure you can do similar or better in
Oracle/SQLServer/Postgres/MariaDB with SQL.

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/20463365/looping-through-column-names-with-dynamic-sql

On 4/27/2024 6:01 PM, Lego-Man Larry wrote:
> On 27 Apr 2024 19:25:50 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
>
>>
>> Like, you. But unlike you, I can use my distro to use my computer as I
>> want. You manage to have a computer who can't do anything except failing
>> miserably in trying to compile your kernel.
>>
>
> Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!
>
> You can only use your computer the way that your distro wants.
>
> Without your distro you would not be using GNU/Linux -- and
> you know it.

Without Mom, you'd be on the street -- and you know it.

> Without your distro you would be using Microslop Winblows or
> Apphole -- and you know it.
>
> Your distro -- and only your distro -- allows you to exploit
> open source software.

Without 'REAL PROGRAMMERS' you wouldn't be using a computer at all.

> If you had to "do it yourself," you would be dead in the water --
> and you know it.

So would you, since NOTHING you do is DIY. It's just configuring lego
blocks built by others.

In fact, I'd bet 1,000,000 to 1 your little 'boot script' is
plagiarized. You better hope I don't find it online, bozo.

On 28 Apr 2024 17:45:50 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:

>
> Of course. Nobody would use Linux without a distro. That's the purpose
> of a distro.
>

Wrong again.

I use NO distro. My GNU/Linux system is totally of my own creation.

Basically, my system is based on LFS boot scripts (no systemd) and
using Gentoo Portage as a package manager.

Gentoo Portage can be used independently of a Gentoo distro.

So you are TOTALLY WRONG.

I make my own unique GNU/Linux system and I rely upon NO distro.

Could you ever do the same?

Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!

YOU could not, and YOU know it. YOU are a distro lackey in the
truest sense.

Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!

Le 28-04-2024, Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> a écrit :
> On 28 Apr 2024 17:45:50 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
>
>>
>> Of course. Nobody would use Linux without a distro. That's the purpose
>> of a distro.
>>
>
> Wrong again.

You don't understand what you fail to do. It doesn't prove me wrong.

> I use NO distro.

You use Gentoo (or you fail to). It's a distro, like it or not.

> My GNU/Linux system is totally of my own creation.

Yes of course: it does nothing. No Gentoo maintainer would admit
providing you the failure installed on your system.

Last time you wanted to read a pdf document, you asked here for some
help because:
- it's to difficult to installed LaTeX on your miserable system.
- you where unable to find the pdf file provided.
With one request, you provided two way to prove your inability to use
your computer.

There is nothing to be proud with your useless computer.

> Basically, my system is based on LFS boot scripts (no systemd) and
> using Gentoo Portage as a package manager.

That's it: a Gentoo distro. Like it or not. You can change the name to
imagine

> Gentoo Portage can be used independently of a Gentoo distro.

Yes, of course. Anyone but you can install any package manager on any
distro.

> So you are TOTALLY WRONG.

Nope. It would request you to be able to create your own distro but you
proved so many times you don't have the skill to do it.

> I make my own unique GNU/Linux system and I rely upon NO distro.

You did it in your dreams, but it's not enough.

> Could you ever do the same?

Why would I want to create a useless computer like yours? I need my
computer to use it. Not to laugh at a black screen like a moron.

--
Si vous avez du temps à perdre :
https://scarpet42.gitlab.io

On 28 Apr 2024 18:28:38 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:

>
> Last time you wanted to read a pdf document, you asked here for some
> help because:
> - it's to difficult to installed LaTeX on your miserable system.
> - you where unable to find the pdf file provided.
> With one request, you provided two way to prove your inability to use
> your computer.
>

Nope. The web site was broken. It did not offer a PDF product.

But now it is fixed:

https://gitlab.com/x86-psABIs/x86-64-ABI

A PDF product is now available for download as it always should
have been.

Conclusion:

There is nothing wrong with my machine. The problem is your
limited intelligence.

Le 28-04-2024, Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> a écrit :
> On 28 Apr 2024 18:28:38 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
>
>>
>> Last time you wanted to read a pdf document, you asked here for some
>> help because:
>> - it's to difficult to installed LaTeX on your miserable system.
>> - you where unable to find the pdf file provided.
>> With one request, you provided two way to prove your inability to use
>> your computer.
>
> Nope.

Yes. You lack of honor don't change the past.

> The web site was broken.

No, I wouldn't have been able to help you if it was the case.

> It did not offer a PDF product.

It did, I told you how to find it.

> But now it is fixed:
>
> https://gitlab.com/x86-psABIs/x86-64-ABI

It has never been broken. You are the broken one.

> A PDF product is now available for download as it always should
> have been.

It has been, I show you how to find it.

> Conclusion:

You are a real peace of shit, I'm not that surprised you go so well with
you pet dog the terrorist. That's the only conclusion I can get from
your message.

> There is nothing wrong with my machine.

Something was wrong with you. It's still wrong with you. You asked for
help. I provided it to you and now you claim that never happened. Unlike
DFS, I don't keep the history of every message, but I know I'm right and
you are a miserable dog's shit.

> The problem is your limited intelligence.

Agreed. I helped you when you needed it and I didn't imagined you would
react like that about it. I wasn't smart in helping you. It won't happen
again.

--
Si vous avez du temps à perdre :
https://scarpet42.gitlab.io

On 30 Apr 2024 19:21:55 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:

>
> Agreed. I helped you when you needed it and I didn't imagined you would
> react like that about it. I wasn't smart in helping you. It won't happen
> again.
>

Keep quiet, you petulant baby.

I was grateful for your assistance in the past, but that does not change
the fact that the web site was broken. It should have provided a link
to a PDF.

I am also grateful for your help in understanding Wayland, which I plan
on implementing in the near future.

But beyond those two instances, you are an idiot.

Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> wrote:
>On 30 Apr 2024 19:21:55 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
>
>> Agreed. I helped you when you needed it and I didn't imagined you would
>> react like that about it. I wasn't smart in helping you. It won't happen
>> again.
>
>Keep quiet, you petulant baby.
>
>I was grateful for your assistance in the past, but that does not change
>the fact that the web site was broken. It should have provided a link
>to a PDF.
>
>I am also grateful for your help in understanding Wayland, which I plan
>on implementing in the near future.
>
>But beyond those two instances, you are an idiot.

There we have it. Russell himself shows his own failing, damaged
brain. He feels called to give credit even as he's being a dickface.
Get over yourself, bub, do some real drugs.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

Le 30-04-2024, Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> a écrit :
> On 30 Apr 2024 19:21:55 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
>
>>
>> Agreed. I helped you when you needed it and I didn't imagined you would
>> react like that about it. I wasn't smart in helping you. It won't happen
>> again.
>
> Keep quiet, you petulant baby.

I do what I want. You can't change that.

> I was grateful for your assistance in the past, but that does not change
> the fact that the web site was broken. It should have provided a link
> to a PDF.

It wasn't broken, I wouldn't have been able to help if it was. It was
your ability to find it which was broken.

> But beyond those two instances, you are an idiot.

I know I'm an idiot. That's not the point of my previous answer to your
crap.

--
Si vous avez du temps à perdre :
https://scarpet42.gitlab.io

On 4/27/2024 2:22 PM, Larry 'Backdoor Slayer' Pietraskiewicz wrote:

> On 27 Apr 2024 16:16:21 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
>
>>
>> Why were you so concerned with the xz bug (which you believed was a xv
>> bug by the way)?
>
> The xz backdoor is a fascinating example of both bash scripting and
> C programming as well as a great insight into the ELF linking process.
>
> I learned a lot by studying the analysis.

Another vague bullshit claim by the deluded "computing virtuoso".

If you were 1/10th the 'computer scientist' and technologist you claim
to be, you could've done the full xz backdoor investigation and analysis
yourself. But you were lost and confused, as usual, so you had to sit
around and wait for 'REAL MEN' to explain it in detail and publish their
analysis.

> But YOU are not a programmer and YOU can't gain anything from this
> fantastic, though nefarious, example.

You ARE a computer programmer, but only in the most generous, Girl Scout
definition of the word.

Here you go, 'magnificent programmer': make a C version of my 25-line
Python quickie:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
#Heap's algorithm for recursion/permutation
import sys
def permute(k, a):
global b
if k == 1:
b.append(list(a))
else:
permute(k-1, a)
for i in range(k-1):
if k % 2 == 0:
a[i], a[k-1] = a[k-1], a[i]
else:
a[0], a[k-1] = a[k-1], a[0]
permute(k-1, a)
a,b = [],[]
for i in range(1,len(sys.argv)):
a.append(sys.argv[i])
permute(len(a),a)
e = sorted(b)[0][0]
for i, itm in enumerate(sorted(b)):
if len(b) > 2:
if itm[0] != e:
e = itm[0]
print()
print("%2d." % (i+1),end = ' ')
print(*itm)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

$ python permute_Heap.py Feeb loves his GrandAm
1. Feeb GrandAm his loves
2. Feeb GrandAm loves his
3. Feeb his GrandAm loves
4. Feeb his loves GrandAm
5. Feeb loves GrandAm his
6. Feeb loves his GrandAm

7. GrandAm Feeb his loves
8. GrandAm Feeb loves his
9. GrandAm his Feeb loves
10. GrandAm his loves Feeb
11. GrandAm loves Feeb his
12. GrandAm loves his Feeb

13. his Feeb GrandAm loves
14. his Feeb loves GrandAm
15. his GrandAm Feeb loves
16. his GrandAm loves Feeb
17. his loves Feeb GrandAm
18. his loves GrandAm Feeb

19. loves Feeb GrandAm his
20. loves Feeb his GrandAm
21. loves GrandAm Feeb his
22. loves GrandAm his Feeb
23. loves his Feeb GrandAm
24. loves his GrandAm Feeb

> YOU can only allow a distro to take you by the hand.
>
> Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!

YOU needed a "bitch" to help you write a little LibreOffice Basic code.

Thanks for admitting it, by the way. Usually you just lie your ass off
about how great you are. But occasionally you tell the truth about your
lowly programming skillz.