There used to be a question raised here, in this group "what happens if Turings question can you tell the difference between a male or female communicator cannot be solved"

I have a gene that means I should only be able to have children with another male gene holder, however the results show that;
if he has no gene , there is a 100% chance of a child
if he has 1 gene, there is a 50% chance
if he has both genes, there is 100% chance.

To be a woman I can't communicate with all men

On Friday, December 15, 2023 at 8:36:54 PM UTC, Nicki makethings wrote:
> There used to be a question raised here, in this group "what happens if Turings question can you tell the difference between a male or female communicator cannot be solved"
>
> I have a gene that means I should only be able to have children with another male gene holder, however the results show that;
> if he has no gene , there is a 100% chance of a child
> if he has 1 gene, there is a 50% chance
> if he has both genes, there is 100% chance.
>
> To be a woman I can't communicate with all men
On the social mores side, should I marry by arrangement, (this would cut out many problems associated with social or religious aggression)
Should I be more easy going or 'liberal' about sex and relationships? (this risks many problems of diversity opponents)
Should I have a child and then divorce as soon as I am able to try for another with any suitor?

The women in my family have married before having children, and love knows its damned difficult to separate from a devoted partner.

In Europe the number of this gene is around about 30% & no contraceptive necessary.

interesting dna

Should this mean to say that 30% of EU women are flirts !
Using Google I have only found one man mr stockbauer, who is definitely not a gene match, or if he is was a very strange romance.