On 3/5/2024 10:54 AM, Nuxxie wrote:
> On Tue, 05 Mar 2024 09:25:03 -0500, DFS wrote:

>> //---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> //convert from base 10 to base N
>> //---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> [snip horrendous junk]
>>
>
> Your shit code will bomb on inputs like:
>
> 45645178781578787818771656462681881516816868156568165641579796464651664155461246461654646

heh! You really are just a fool.

> A REAL PROGRAMMER will have no difficulty in doing this job:

That's definitely not you.

> Convert any base up to base-62 to any other base (up to base-62)
> with any precision, e.g. 10000 digit input.
>
> A dumb-fuck code monkey like you could never do it.

Over the years, you've proven yourself to be less than a "code monkey".

Now SandFreak comes along using the same term, and he's a shit
programmer too. What are the odds?

> But why base 62? Because to express a base 62 number we need
> all 10 digits (0-9) plus lower case (a-z) and upper case (A-Z):
>
> 10 + 26 + 26 = 62
>
> UVW345Hiap98zdDeq34Z is base 62.

I was gonna deal with just bases 2-16, but now that you mention it:

~$ ./base UVW345Hiap98zdDeq34Z 62 10
1. 35 * 62^ 0 = 35
2. 4 * 62^ 1 = 248
3. 3 * 62^ 2 = 11532
4. 26 * 62^ 3 = 6196528
5. 14 * 62^ 4 = 206868704
6. 13 * 62^ 5 = 11909726816
7. 13 * 62^ 6 = 738403062592
8. 35 * 62^ 7 = 123256511217280
9. 8 * 62^ 8 = 1746720844679168
10. 9 * 62^ 9 = 121833778916371968
11. 25 * 62^10 = 20982484146708504576
12. 10 * 62^11 = 520365606838370959360
13. 18 * 62^12 = 58072801723162199851008
14. 17 * 62^13 = 3400485167567386739474432
15. 5 * 62^14 = 62008847173287641996066816
16. 4 * 62^15 = 3075638819795066520736890880
17. 3 * 62^16 = 143017205120470598162067750912
18. 32 * 62^17 = 94582044986337894547347006816256
19. 31 * 62^18 = 5680834076991919978149414132776960
20. 30 * 62^19 = 340850044619515217135708921676169216

UVW345Hiap98zdDeq34Z (base 62) =
346625606899805372193646708944535552 (base 10)

Look right?

I can't speak to the correctness of the products of the exponents.
They're floats, FWIW.

(I increased 2 limits, and added the line counter. That's it.)

Le 05-03-2024, Nuxxie <nuxxie@linux.rocks> a écrit :
>> > Computer science is mathematics and NOT coding.
> Right on! I could not have said it better myself.

It looks like you have memory issues.

--
Si vous avez du temps à perdre :
https://scarpet42.gitlab.io