On Sep 17, 2021 at 7:58:19 PM MST, "LegionX" wrote
<si3kke$c2f$1@dont-email.me>:

> Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> Wrote in message:
>
>> <https://tinyurl.com/Snitwhopperlie>
>
>> That is a link to a post by Carroll's flood bot.
>
> No, it's not snit.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
So... in Snit's Bitch David Brooks's 'story', that a URL has been published
is "proof" that Panthera Tigris Altaica wrote it now? Get a consumer report
on Snit's Bitch David Brooks and you will learn that he was in the slammer
earlier this year. I do not know what for. The online reports don't go into
that extent of detail and legal lists are private unless subpoenaed.

Hope Snit's Bitch David Brooks likes the tranquility in the packed sewer
of my trash can.

NNTP protocol is only free if your time has no value. Snit's Bitch David
Brooks suffers from neurotic lies so, to him, everything, even giving him
back what he dishes out, are "vilification". Who doesn't know this? By the
way, taking effort possibly building wisdom isn't a waste. Believing you
know more than everyone else and taking it on yourself to 'prove' people
that it's true, as Snit's Bitch David Brooks tries to do? That is a waste.

--
Live on Kickstarter
https://redd.it/6sfkup
https://www.bing.com/search?q=%22FUNCTIONAL%20ILLITERATE%20FRAUD%22
Dustin Cook the functional illiterate fraud
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I thought you said you were technically competent, Gremlin. No technically competent person would be fooled as you were.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Sep 17, 2021 at 7:58:19 PM MST, "LegionX" wrote
<si3kke$c2f$1@dont-email.me>:

> Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> Wrote in message:
>
>> <https://tinyurl.com/Snitwhopperlie>
>
>> That is a link to a post by Carroll's flood bot.
>
> No, it's not snit. It's a short cut url to a thread on usenet seen
> via google groups where two lies you wrote about Gremlin are
> shared in the first post.
>
> 1)The floodbot accusation
>
> 2)The "direct lie" accusation you made when he wrote about you
> helping David with the cell number Gremlin foolishly provided you
> in confidence that you released all over usenet as well as bot
> fed so it's search engine food too.

You used to claim you understood what you read, but here you are, Gremlin,
showing you cannot understand how this has been rehashed many times and
covered, many times.

Why is it you are so incapable of understanding the written word? This is not
a rhetorical question -- you have again shown you do not get what you read.
Why not?

> There's some back and forth between you and Gremlin about what
> you'd written about him. Where you're basically trying to deny
> you did anything wrong - while you give a very good demonstration
> of the severity of your mental disabilities.

See: you can't understand what you read. It is just weird. Then you get mad
when I point out where you show examples of being an functionally illiterate
fraud.

>> Interesting how you got fooled by it.
>
> You aren't making any sense.

If you could understood what you read then the written word would make more
sense to you.

> There's nothing to be fooled by from
> that url.

And yet, Gremlin, you claim to not know it was Carroll's bot who wrote the
post you linked to.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> Wrote in message:

>I thought you said you were technically competent, Gremlin. No technically competent person would be fooled as you were.

You're lying right off in your reply, snit. That's not good. We
aren't Gremlin. So you're lying again. Another easy to quote snit
lie. Dumbshit.

It's very easy to locate the first post in the thread that url
goes to. dishonest dumbshit. You need really dumb readers in
order to pull your bullshit off. How insulting you're being
towards everyone by pretending the url contains nothing but made
up bot junk.
What a dishonest arrogant prick.

Here's the post highlights:
First big lie you wrote about Gremlin:

http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=159159190100
Diesel made it clear he had access not just to the output of the bot
but to the code itself. When called out on this he clarified it was
merely the compiled code he had:

<XnsAB6E44...@ZdS859K14.7p1JRyU90Zyd>
-----
Do you think when you disassemble something that you're
provided the original source code that was
compiled/assembled by the author? You aren't, what you're
given looks nothing like the original source code, but it
still tells you *everything* about the program.
-----

So how did Diesel get a copy of the program, compiled or not? My
guess: he will NEVER say.

***

Heres another lie you wrote about Gremlin:
From: Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com>
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: Re: Ha! Ads be gone!
Date: 18 Aug 2020 17:06:20 GMT
Message-ID: <hq2g4c...@mid.individual.net>

On Aug 18, 2020 at 8:49:01 AM MST, "Gremlin" <nob...@haph.org> wrote:
>> David has asked you to check it against phone book urls he shared
>> with you.

This is a direct lie from you. He did no such thing.

*** end copy

Both came from the first post in the thread. Easy to find, easy to
quote lies - written by you, snit.

--
<https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitwhopperlie>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-teddybear>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitonduck>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitongoogle>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse1>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse2>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse3>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse4>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse5>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse6>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse7>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse8>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse9>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse10>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse11>
Snit is one f*cked up puppy - who steals our hard earned tax
paying dollars from the government by running a long con for
welfare - who can be reached via telephone - text message - or in
person - by using the publically available contact information
below:

Michael (snit) and Anne Glasser (life-like troll lady)
3181 Willow Dr, Prescott, AZ
86301-4855 
1.928.445.3425 or 1-(928)-445-3425
1.928.776.9519 or 1-(928)-776-9519
They are professional Grifters who live on the benefits your hard
earned tax paying dollars provide. Animal abuser = snit pissed on
his own cat!

On Sep 17, 2021 at 9:08:25 PM MST, "LegionX" wrote
<si3onr$rd5$1@dont-email.me>:

> Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> Wrote in message:
>
>> I thought you said you were technically competent, Gremlin. No technically
>> competent person would be fooled as you were.
>
> You're lying right off in your reply, snit.

You are so deeply incompetent you pointed to this post and could not tell it
was Carroll's bot:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.computer.workshop/c/AVU7J_lMYmU/m/JKGg1FxOAQAJ
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So... in Snit's Bitch David Brooks's 'story', that a URL has been published
is "proof" that Panthera Tigris Altaica wrote it now? Get a consumer report
on Snit's Bitch David Brooks and you will learn that he was in the slammer
earlier this year. I do not know what for. The online reports don't go into
that extent of detail and legal lists are private unless subpoenaed.

Hope Snit's Bitch David Brooks likes the tranquility in the packed sewer
of my trash can.

NNTP protocol is only free if your time has no value. Snit's Bitch David
Brooks suffers from neurotic lies so, to him, everything, even giving him
back what he dishes out, are "vilification". Who doesn't know this? By the
way, taking effort possibly building wisdom isn't a waste. Believing you
know more than everyone else and taking it on yourself to 'prove' people
that it's true, as Snit's Bitch David Brooks tries to do? That is a waste.

--
Live on Kickstarter
https://redd.it/6sfkup
https://www.bing.com/search?q=%22FUNCTIONAL%20ILLITERATE%20FRAUD%22
Dustin Cook the functional illiterate fraud
----------------------------------------------------------------------

That is deeply incompetent of you. Seriously, you mock others but that is just
insanely incompetent in basic tech. You claim you can make a better IRC chat
bot than I can, but Carroll's flood bot which does not even reply showing it
gets basic context baffles you. You are simply lost when it comes to many
areas of tech.

Hell, with databases you could not understand how some showed your actual city
and some showed Johnson City. You could not figure out how I was not
controlling them ALL. Yes... ALL. When I noted data they had you blamed me.

You might -- MIGHT -- know some about electronics, Gremlin, but overall when
it comes to tech you have MANY areas you are just lost.

You are are a pathetic follower who cries about how you are better than those
you know are better than you.

How pathetic of you.

Gremlin Dustin Cook:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=gremlin+dustin+cook>
<https://www.bing.com/search?q=gremlin+dustin+cook>
<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=gremlin+dustin+cook>

LegionX Dustin Cook:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=legionx+dustin+cook>
<https://www.bing.com/search?q=legionx+dustin+cook>
<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=legionx+dustin+cook>

HHI Dustin Cook:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=HHI+dustin+cook>
<https://www.bing.com/search?q=HHI+dustin+cook>
<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=HHI+dustin+cook>

Imaginary Friend Dustin Cook:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=imaginary+friend+dustin+cook>
<https://www.bing.com/search?q=imaginary+friend+dustin+cook>
<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=imaginary+friend+dustin+cook>

Functionally Illiterate Fraud:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=functionally+illiterate+fraud>
<https://www.bing.com/search?q=functionally+illiterate+fraud>
<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=functionally+illiterate+fraud>

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On 2021-09-18, LegionX <MichaelAndAnneGlasser@griftersconjobsllc.com> wrote:
> Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> Wrote in message:
>
>> <https://tinyurl.com/Snitwhopperlie>
>
>>That is a link to a post by Carroll's flood bot.
>
> No, it's not snit. It's a short cut url to a thread on usenet seen
> via google groups where two lies you wrote about Gremlin are
> shared in the first post.

Exactly.

You have just demonstrated a classic technique that snit uses to put
forth his lies.
He just makes up a claim and then uses it to attempt to rewrite history
by pointing back to the erroneous claim multiple times.

---snip--

> Functionally Illiterate Fraud: <https://www
> .google.com/search?q=functionally+illiterate+fraud>
> <https://www.bing.com/search?q=functionally+illiterate+fraud>
> <https://duckduckgo.com/?q=functionally+illiterate+fraud>
>
> Lol snit. Explain how the contents of these links can exist then:
> https://streamable.com/vyh8r6
>
> Https://tinyurl.com/gremlinslab
>
> We've got more but we are confident that these put your accusation
> that you made up to describe Gremlin right where they belong. In
> the trash. :)
>
> You didn't forget that you're the original source for the contents
> of the urls you have been sharing are you? Why don't you disclose
> that fact when you share them? Lol
>
> The urls we share about you do not have content created by any of
> us. Some of their content predates our knowledge of your
> existance by over a decade snit.
>
> How do you explain the difference between the urls? :)
>
>>Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity.
>
> Snit everyone can see how insecure and fragile you are. When
> Gremlin was posting here he had no trouble taking you to school
> on any tech subject you tried to participate in. It was obvious
> to *everyone* that you weren't a peer. You are decades behind his
> knowledge levels. And this is why you created the functionally
> illiterate fraud label and variants such as functonally
> illiterate jealous of you fraud. Gremlin has never been anything
> of the kind.
>
> You did the same thing to Steve Carroll. You lied about him being
> a narcissistic bigot. Repeatedly. So that you could get that
> seeded into search engines.
>
>
>>They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
>
> Exactly. That's why you write what you do to us as you avoid
> answering the majority of our questions. You've lied about us.
> You've created a label for us for the purposes of gaming search
> engines again. You continue to falsely claim we're socking.
> You're the one who continues to avoid addressing the fact we
> busted you socking up as Sigmond. Not the other way around,
> dumbass.
>
>
>>They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
>
> Yes and you're doing that because it's all you've got.

Well stated.

His floodbot seeding seems to be having the opposite effect from what
snit inteneded and his attempts at scrubbing his reputation from the
net isn't working either.

DuckDuckGo search of snit Michael Glasser and the first hit is:

"Snit Michael Glasser -- Psychopath"

<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=snit+michael+glasser&va=b&t=hc&atb=v282-1&ia=
web>

Snit fails once again.

--
pothead
Tommy Chong For President 2024
Lifetime Member of "The Prescott Parasite Eradication Team"
Ask snit how he pissed on his cat.
All about snit read below. Links courtesy of Ron:
https://web.archive.org/web/20181028000459/http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529043314/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529062255/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html

On Sep 18, 2021 at 4:55:46 AM MST, "pothead" wrote
<slrnskbku2.5ic.pothead@localhost.localdomain>:

> On 2021-09-18, LegionX <MichaelAndAnneGlasser@griftersconjobsllc.com> wrote:
>> Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> Wrote in message:
>>
>>> <https://tinyurl.com/Snitwhopperlie>
>>
>>> That is a link to a post by Carroll's flood bot.
>>
>> No, it's not snit. It's a short cut url to a thread on usenet seen
>> via google groups where two lies you wrote about Gremlin are
>> shared in the first post.
>
> Exactly.
>
> You have just demonstrated a classic technique that snit uses to put
> forth his lies.
> He just makes up a claim and then uses it to attempt to rewrite history
> by pointing back to the erroneous claim multiple times.
>
> ---snip--
>
>
>> Functionally Illiterate Fraud:
>> <https://www.google.com/search?q=functionally+illiterate+fraud>
>> <https://www.bing.com/search?q=functionally+illiterate+fraud>
>> <https://duckduckgo.com/?q=functionally+illiterate+fraud>
>>
>> Lol snit. Explain how the contents of these links can exist then:
>> https://streamable.com/vyh8r6
>>
>> Https://tinyurl.com/gremlinslab
>>
>> We've got more but we are confident that these put your accusation
>> that you made up to describe Gremlin right where they belong. In
>> the trash. :)
>>
>> You didn't forget that you're the original source for the contents
>> of the urls you have been sharing are you? Why don't you disclose
>> that fact when you share them? Lol
>>
>> The urls we share about you do not have content created by any of
>> us. Some of their content predates our knowledge of your
>> existance by over a decade snit.
>>
>> How do you explain the difference between the urls? :)
>>
>>> Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity.
>>
>> Snit everyone can see how insecure and fragile you are. When
>> Gremlin was posting here he had no trouble taking you to school
>> on any tech subject you tried to participate in. It was obvious
>> to *everyone* that you weren't a peer. You are decades behind his
>> knowledge levels. And this is why you created the functionally
>> illiterate fraud label and variants such as functonally
>> illiterate jealous of you fraud. Gremlin has never been anything
>> of the kind.
>>
>> You did the same thing to Steve Carroll. You lied about him being
>> a narcissistic bigot. Repeatedly. So that you could get that
>> seeded into search engines.
>>
>>
>>> They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
>>> somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
>>
>> Exactly. That's why you write what you do to us as you avoid
>> answering the majority of our questions. You've lied about us.
>> You've created a label for us for the purposes of gaming search
>> engines again. You continue to falsely claim we're socking.
>> You're the one who continues to avoid addressing the fact we
>> busted you socking up as Sigmond. Not the other way around,
>> dumbass.
>>
>>
>>> They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
>>
>> Yes and you're doing that because it's all you've got.
>
> Well stated.
>
> His floodbot seeding seems to be having the opposite effect from what
> snit inteneded and his attempts at scrubbing his reputation from the
> net isn't working either.
>
> DuckDuckGo search of snit Michael Glasser and the first hit is:
>
> "Snit Michael Glasser -- Psychopath"
>
> <https://duckduckgo.com/?q=snit+michael+glasser&va=b&t=hc&atb=v282-1&ia=web>
>
> Snit fails once again.

Notice again you failed -- predictably -- to show any quotes to back your
attacks.

Why do you think your failure is so predictable?

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.