On 14/01/2023 16:24, Dan Espen wrote:
> "26C.Z968" <26C.Z968@noaada.net> writes:
>
>> On 1/13/23 10:38 PM, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>>> On 13/01/2023 21:21, Kenny McCormack wrote:
>>>> In article <tpl19c$dad$1@reader2.panix.com>,
>>>> Popping Mad  <rainbow@colition.gov> wrote:
>>>>> On 12/27/22 00:20, 26C.Z969 wrote:
>>>>>> Decided to write my own replacement. It won't
>>>>>>   be freeware ...
>>>>>
>>>>> good luck
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Was it ever established just what OP's complaint against ssh was (is)?
>>>>
>>> I think the problem was that it wasn't 'modern'
>>> Like round wheels, it's simply intolerably old fashioned.
>>
>>
>> Absolutely ! Square wheels are the NEW COOL THING !!!
>> When you bounce you eliminate ground friction and
>> thus cut CO2 emissions :-)
>>
>> The QUESTION was whether SSH was modern enough to cope
>> with modern kinds of THREATS.
>>
>> I still think it ISN'T. SSH is from a kinder-and-gentler
>> era, before mass distributed attacks. Yea, yea ... you
>> can add lots and lots of add-ons and hooks - but that
>> just makes it all the more messy and hard to administer
>> and monitor.
>
> You really should stop criticizing things you apparently don't
> understand. I makes you seem like even more of an idiot.
>
> Or, you can keep throwing out meaningless buzz words like
> "modern threats", and continue proving the above.
>
Its very clear that 26C.Z968 is much more of an ArtStudent™ than an
engineer.
He deals in fuzzy qualitative concepts, the more 'modern' and
'progressive' the better, whilst any real quantitative analysis is hand
waved away.

--
"I guess a rattlesnake ain't risponsible fer bein' a rattlesnake, but ah
puts mah heel on um jess the same if'n I catches him around mah chillun".